Loading…
Spatiotemporal Variability of Modeled Watershed Scale Surface‐Depression Storage and Runoff for the Conterminous United States
This study explores the viability of using simulated monthly runoff as a proxy for landscape‐scale surface‐depression storage processes simulated by the United States Geological Survey’s National Hydrologic Model (NHM) infrastructure across the conterminous United States (CONUS). Two different tempo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2020-02, Vol.56 (1), p.16-29 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-19e99d8d13e323779241cb2cd5ac8147dd3cb51621cabfa93cfc7746620fcd413 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-19e99d8d13e323779241cb2cd5ac8147dd3cb51621cabfa93cfc7746620fcd413 |
container_end_page | 29 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Journal of the American Water Resources Association |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Driscoll, Jessica M. Hay, Lauren E. Vanderhoof, Melanie K. Viger, Roland J. |
description | This study explores the viability of using simulated monthly runoff as a proxy for landscape‐scale surface‐depression storage processes simulated by the United States Geological Survey’s National Hydrologic Model (NHM) infrastructure across the conterminous United States (CONUS). Two different temporal resolution model codes (daily and monthly) were run in the NHM with the same spatial discretization. Simulated values of daily surface‐depression storage (treated as a decimal fraction of maximum volume) as computed by the daily Precipitation‐Runoff Modeling System (NHM‐PRMS) and normalized runoff (0 to 1) as computed by the Monthly Water Balance Model (NHM‐MWBM) were aggregated to monthly and annual values for each hydrologic response unit (HRU) in the CONUS geospatial fabric (HRU; n = 109,951) and analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation test. Correlations between simulated runoff and surface‐depression storage aggregated to monthly and annual values were compared to identify where which time scale had relatively higher correlation values across the CONUS. Results show Spearman’s rank values >0.75 (highly correlated) for the monthly time scale in 28,279 HRUs (53.35%) compared to the annual time scale in 41,655 HRUs (78.58%). The geographic distribution of HRUs with highly correlated monthly values show areas where surface‐depression storage features are known to be common (e.g., Prairie Pothole Region, Florida).
Research Impact Statement: Correlation between simulated runoff and surface depression storage using continental‐extent models to improve understanding and representation of surface‐depression storage processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1752-1688.12826 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2354091235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354091235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-19e99d8d13e323779241cb2cd5ac8147dd3cb51621cabfa93cfc7746620fcd413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRSMEEqWwZmuJdWhs57msyltFSA2l7CzHD-oqjYPtCHXXT-Ab-RIcgtgymzsa3XtGukFwDqNL6GcCswSFMM3zS4hylB4Eo7_Lod-jAodxFr8eByfWbqIIJjDHo2BfttQp7cS21YbW4IUaRStVK7cDWoJHzUUtOFhRJ4xd-61ktBag7IykTHztP69Ea4S1SjegdB7xJgBtOFh0jZYSSG2AWwsw040HbFWjOwuWjXI9yXmoPQ2OJK2tOPvVcbC8uX6e3YXzp9v72XQeMpxkaQgLURQ85xALjHCWFSiGrEKMJ5TlMM44x6xKYIogo5WkBWaSZVmcpiiSjMcQj4OLgdsa_d4J68hGd6bxLwnCSRwV0It3TQYXM9paIyRpjdpSsyMwIn3NpC-V9KWSn5p9Ih0SH6oWu__s5GG6WgzBb1S1gks</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354091235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatiotemporal Variability of Modeled Watershed Scale Surface‐Depression Storage and Runoff for the Conterminous United States</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Driscoll, Jessica M. ; Hay, Lauren E. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Viger, Roland J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Jessica M. ; Hay, Lauren E. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Viger, Roland J.</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores the viability of using simulated monthly runoff as a proxy for landscape‐scale surface‐depression storage processes simulated by the United States Geological Survey’s National Hydrologic Model (NHM) infrastructure across the conterminous United States (CONUS). Two different temporal resolution model codes (daily and monthly) were run in the NHM with the same spatial discretization. Simulated values of daily surface‐depression storage (treated as a decimal fraction of maximum volume) as computed by the daily Precipitation‐Runoff Modeling System (NHM‐PRMS) and normalized runoff (0 to 1) as computed by the Monthly Water Balance Model (NHM‐MWBM) were aggregated to monthly and annual values for each hydrologic response unit (HRU) in the CONUS geospatial fabric (HRU; n = 109,951) and analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation test. Correlations between simulated runoff and surface‐depression storage aggregated to monthly and annual values were compared to identify where which time scale had relatively higher correlation values across the CONUS. Results show Spearman’s rank values >0.75 (highly correlated) for the monthly time scale in 28,279 HRUs (53.35%) compared to the annual time scale in 41,655 HRUs (78.58%). The geographic distribution of HRUs with highly correlated monthly values show areas where surface‐depression storage features are known to be common (e.g., Prairie Pothole Region, Florida).
Research Impact Statement: Correlation between simulated runoff and surface depression storage using continental‐extent models to improve understanding and representation of surface‐depression storage processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-474X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-1688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Middleburg: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Annual ; Annual runoff ; Computation ; Computer simulation ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; Daily ; Depression storage ; Geographical distribution ; Geologic depressions ; Geological surveys ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; modeling ; Monthly ; MWBM ; Potholes ; PRMS ; Runoff ; Surface runoff ; surface‐depression storage ; Surveying ; Temporal resolution ; Time ; Viability ; Water balance ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2020-02, Vol.56 (1), p.16-29</ispartof><rights>Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2020 American Water Resources Association</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-19e99d8d13e323779241cb2cd5ac8147dd3cb51621cabfa93cfc7746620fcd413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-19e99d8d13e323779241cb2cd5ac8147dd3cb51621cabfa93cfc7746620fcd413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0101-5533 ; 0000-0003-2520-714X ; 0000-0003-3097-9603 ; 0000-0003-3763-4595</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viger, Roland J.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatiotemporal Variability of Modeled Watershed Scale Surface‐Depression Storage and Runoff for the Conterminous United States</title><title>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</title><description>This study explores the viability of using simulated monthly runoff as a proxy for landscape‐scale surface‐depression storage processes simulated by the United States Geological Survey’s National Hydrologic Model (NHM) infrastructure across the conterminous United States (CONUS). Two different temporal resolution model codes (daily and monthly) were run in the NHM with the same spatial discretization. Simulated values of daily surface‐depression storage (treated as a decimal fraction of maximum volume) as computed by the daily Precipitation‐Runoff Modeling System (NHM‐PRMS) and normalized runoff (0 to 1) as computed by the Monthly Water Balance Model (NHM‐MWBM) were aggregated to monthly and annual values for each hydrologic response unit (HRU) in the CONUS geospatial fabric (HRU; n = 109,951) and analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation test. Correlations between simulated runoff and surface‐depression storage aggregated to monthly and annual values were compared to identify where which time scale had relatively higher correlation values across the CONUS. Results show Spearman’s rank values >0.75 (highly correlated) for the monthly time scale in 28,279 HRUs (53.35%) compared to the annual time scale in 41,655 HRUs (78.58%). The geographic distribution of HRUs with highly correlated monthly values show areas where surface‐depression storage features are known to be common (e.g., Prairie Pothole Region, Florida).
Research Impact Statement: Correlation between simulated runoff and surface depression storage using continental‐extent models to improve understanding and representation of surface‐depression storage processes.</description><subject>Annual</subject><subject>Annual runoff</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Daily</subject><subject>Depression storage</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Geologic depressions</subject><subject>Geological surveys</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Monthly</subject><subject>MWBM</subject><subject>Potholes</subject><subject>PRMS</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Surface runoff</subject><subject>surface‐depression storage</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Temporal resolution</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Viability</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1093-474X</issn><issn>1752-1688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRSMEEqWwZmuJdWhs57msyltFSA2l7CzHD-oqjYPtCHXXT-Ab-RIcgtgymzsa3XtGukFwDqNL6GcCswSFMM3zS4hylB4Eo7_Lod-jAodxFr8eByfWbqIIJjDHo2BfttQp7cS21YbW4IUaRStVK7cDWoJHzUUtOFhRJ4xd-61ktBag7IykTHztP69Ea4S1SjegdB7xJgBtOFh0jZYSSG2AWwsw040HbFWjOwuWjXI9yXmoPQ2OJK2tOPvVcbC8uX6e3YXzp9v72XQeMpxkaQgLURQ85xALjHCWFSiGrEKMJ5TlMM44x6xKYIogo5WkBWaSZVmcpiiSjMcQj4OLgdsa_d4J68hGd6bxLwnCSRwV0It3TQYXM9paIyRpjdpSsyMwIn3NpC-V9KWSn5p9Ih0SH6oWu__s5GG6WgzBb1S1gks</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Driscoll, Jessica M.</creator><creator>Hay, Lauren E.</creator><creator>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creator><creator>Viger, Roland J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-5533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-714X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-9603</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-4595</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Spatiotemporal Variability of Modeled Watershed Scale Surface‐Depression Storage and Runoff for the Conterminous United States</title><author>Driscoll, Jessica M. ; Hay, Lauren E. ; Vanderhoof, Melanie K. ; Viger, Roland J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-19e99d8d13e323779241cb2cd5ac8147dd3cb51621cabfa93cfc7746620fcd413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Annual</topic><topic>Annual runoff</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Daily</topic><topic>Depression storage</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Geologic depressions</topic><topic>Geological surveys</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Monthly</topic><topic>MWBM</topic><topic>Potholes</topic><topic>PRMS</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Surface runoff</topic><topic>surface‐depression storage</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Temporal resolution</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Viability</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hay, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viger, Roland J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Driscoll, Jessica M.</au><au>Hay, Lauren E.</au><au>Vanderhoof, Melanie K.</au><au>Viger, Roland J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatiotemporal Variability of Modeled Watershed Scale Surface‐Depression Storage and Runoff for the Conterminous United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Water Resources Association</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>16-29</pages><issn>1093-474X</issn><eissn>1752-1688</eissn><abstract>This study explores the viability of using simulated monthly runoff as a proxy for landscape‐scale surface‐depression storage processes simulated by the United States Geological Survey’s National Hydrologic Model (NHM) infrastructure across the conterminous United States (CONUS). Two different temporal resolution model codes (daily and monthly) were run in the NHM with the same spatial discretization. Simulated values of daily surface‐depression storage (treated as a decimal fraction of maximum volume) as computed by the daily Precipitation‐Runoff Modeling System (NHM‐PRMS) and normalized runoff (0 to 1) as computed by the Monthly Water Balance Model (NHM‐MWBM) were aggregated to monthly and annual values for each hydrologic response unit (HRU) in the CONUS geospatial fabric (HRU; n = 109,951) and analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation test. Correlations between simulated runoff and surface‐depression storage aggregated to monthly and annual values were compared to identify where which time scale had relatively higher correlation values across the CONUS. Results show Spearman’s rank values >0.75 (highly correlated) for the monthly time scale in 28,279 HRUs (53.35%) compared to the annual time scale in 41,655 HRUs (78.58%). The geographic distribution of HRUs with highly correlated monthly values show areas where surface‐depression storage features are known to be common (e.g., Prairie Pothole Region, Florida).
Research Impact Statement: Correlation between simulated runoff and surface depression storage using continental‐extent models to improve understanding and representation of surface‐depression storage processes.</abstract><cop>Middleburg</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1752-1688.12826</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0101-5533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-714X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-9603</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-4595</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1093-474X |
ispartof | Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2020-02, Vol.56 (1), p.16-29 |
issn | 1093-474X 1752-1688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2354091235 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Annual Annual runoff Computation Computer simulation Correlation Correlation analysis Daily Depression storage Geographical distribution Geologic depressions Geological surveys Hydrologic models Hydrology modeling Monthly MWBM Potholes PRMS Runoff Surface runoff surface‐depression storage Surveying Temporal resolution Time Viability Water balance Watersheds |
title | Spatiotemporal Variability of Modeled Watershed Scale Surface‐Depression Storage and Runoff for the Conterminous United States |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A07%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatiotemporal%20Variability%20of%20Modeled%20Watershed%20Scale%20Surface%E2%80%90Depression%20Storage%20and%20Runoff%20for%20the%20Conterminous%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Water%20Resources%20Association&rft.au=Driscoll,%20Jessica%20M.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=16-29&rft.issn=1093-474X&rft.eissn=1752-1688&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1752-1688.12826&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354091235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-19e99d8d13e323779241cb2cd5ac8147dd3cb51621cabfa93cfc7746620fcd413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354091235&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |