Loading…

Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016

The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International transactions in operational research 2020-07, Vol.27 (4), p.2002-2020
Main Authors: Blank, Jos L. T., Heezik, Alex A.S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673
container_end_page 2020
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2002
container_title International transactions in operational research
container_volume 27
creator Blank, Jos L. T.
Heezik, Alex A.S.
description The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judiciary and to improve productivity. One of the central questions hereby is whether these measures have actually contributed to a more productive sector. This paper focuses on the development of productivity in the judiciary and how policy measures have affected productivity. In this empirical analysis, we apply a cost function model to time series data of the Dutch judiciary between 1980 and 2016. The results show a dramatic decline of productivity over the entire period (−50%), in spite of various policy measures. The year 2001 can be regarded as a turning point, as since then productivity has remained more or less stable. It seems that this is largely due to the establishment of the Council for the Judiciary and the associated increase in (financial and operational) autonomy for the judiciary. Another striking result is that technical change is biased toward using more personnel through time.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/itor.12716
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2354604337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354604337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QtGYoeUYufhNOxQeUqVilBZR449oa7SuNgOVb6HH8VtWLFgNp7FuXdmfAm5ZHTCQt1ob-yExTnjR2TE0jyLkqLIjsmIFryIOGX8lJw5t6aUsozlI_L9ahote7BYG7txIFoFW2tUJ73-0r4HuRLtB4Juwa8Q1p3SUgvbg-udx80tCJDGeai7NihMC2Ib5EKu9k2jUYE34PUGwaHV6MDUB6P7zgfmrx1U6HeILbBiSg-7xGHlc3JSi8bhxe87Ju-PD8vZczRfPL3M7uaRTJKcR2mV0LyQtErTJMaET2VeFYiCxSqTlUjjWta0FnmMGVMCU1Vwzriqg6pCxfNkTK4G33DBZ4fOl2vT2TaMLOMkSzlNw5xAXQ-UtMa58G_l1upNuKFktNyHUO5DKA8hBJgN8E432P9Dli_Lxdug-QH5x4xS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354604337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Blank, Jos L. T. ; Heezik, Alex A.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blank, Jos L. T. ; Heezik, Alex A.S.</creatorcontrib><description>The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judiciary and to improve productivity. One of the central questions hereby is whether these measures have actually contributed to a more productive sector. This paper focuses on the development of productivity in the judiciary and how policy measures have affected productivity. In this empirical analysis, we apply a cost function model to time series data of the Dutch judiciary between 1980 and 2016. The results show a dramatic decline of productivity over the entire period (−50%), in spite of various policy measures. The year 2001 can be regarded as a turning point, as since then productivity has remained more or less stable. It seems that this is largely due to the establishment of the Council for the Judiciary and the associated increase in (financial and operational) autonomy for the judiciary. Another striking result is that technical change is biased toward using more personnel through time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-6016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/itor.12716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cost analysis ; Cost function ; cost model ; Empirical analysis ; judiciary ; Operations research ; policy reforms ; Productivity ; productivity change ; Time series</subject><ispartof>International transactions in operational research, 2020-07, Vol.27 (4), p.2002-2020</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Operational Research Societies</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0173-4239 ; 0000-0003-1387-0307</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blank, Jos L. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heezik, Alex A.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016</title><title>International transactions in operational research</title><description>The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judiciary and to improve productivity. One of the central questions hereby is whether these measures have actually contributed to a more productive sector. This paper focuses on the development of productivity in the judiciary and how policy measures have affected productivity. In this empirical analysis, we apply a cost function model to time series data of the Dutch judiciary between 1980 and 2016. The results show a dramatic decline of productivity over the entire period (−50%), in spite of various policy measures. The year 2001 can be regarded as a turning point, as since then productivity has remained more or less stable. It seems that this is largely due to the establishment of the Council for the Judiciary and the associated increase in (financial and operational) autonomy for the judiciary. Another striking result is that technical change is biased toward using more personnel through time.</description><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost function</subject><subject>cost model</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>judiciary</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>policy reforms</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>productivity change</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0969-6016</issn><issn>1475-3995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QtGYoeUYufhNOxQeUqVilBZR449oa7SuNgOVb6HH8VtWLFgNp7FuXdmfAm5ZHTCQt1ob-yExTnjR2TE0jyLkqLIjsmIFryIOGX8lJw5t6aUsozlI_L9ahote7BYG7txIFoFW2tUJ73-0r4HuRLtB4Juwa8Q1p3SUgvbg-udx80tCJDGeai7NihMC2Ib5EKu9k2jUYE34PUGwaHV6MDUB6P7zgfmrx1U6HeILbBiSg-7xGHlc3JSi8bhxe87Ju-PD8vZczRfPL3M7uaRTJKcR2mV0LyQtErTJMaET2VeFYiCxSqTlUjjWta0FnmMGVMCU1Vwzriqg6pCxfNkTK4G33DBZ4fOl2vT2TaMLOMkSzlNw5xAXQ-UtMa58G_l1upNuKFktNyHUO5DKA8hBJgN8E432P9Dli_Lxdug-QH5x4xS</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Blank, Jos L. T.</creator><creator>Heezik, Alex A.S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0173-4239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-0307</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016</title><author>Blank, Jos L. T. ; Heezik, Alex A.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost function</topic><topic>cost model</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>judiciary</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>policy reforms</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>productivity change</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blank, Jos L. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heezik, Alex A.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International transactions in operational research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blank, Jos L. T.</au><au>Heezik, Alex A.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016</atitle><jtitle>International transactions in operational research</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2002</spage><epage>2020</epage><pages>2002-2020</pages><issn>0969-6016</issn><eissn>1475-3995</eissn><abstract>The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judiciary and to improve productivity. One of the central questions hereby is whether these measures have actually contributed to a more productive sector. This paper focuses on the development of productivity in the judiciary and how policy measures have affected productivity. In this empirical analysis, we apply a cost function model to time series data of the Dutch judiciary between 1980 and 2016. The results show a dramatic decline of productivity over the entire period (−50%), in spite of various policy measures. The year 2001 can be regarded as a turning point, as since then productivity has remained more or less stable. It seems that this is largely due to the establishment of the Council for the Judiciary and the associated increase in (financial and operational) autonomy for the judiciary. Another striking result is that technical change is biased toward using more personnel through time.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/itor.12716</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0173-4239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-0307</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-6016
ispartof International transactions in operational research, 2020-07, Vol.27 (4), p.2002-2020
issn 0969-6016
1475-3995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2354604337
source Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley
subjects Cost analysis
Cost function
cost model
Empirical analysis
judiciary
Operations research
policy reforms
Productivity
productivity change
Time series
title Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A03%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20reforms%20and%20productivity%20change%20in%20the%20judiciary%20system:%20a%20cost%20function%20approach%20applied%20to%20time%20series%20of%20the%20Dutch%20judiciary%20system%20between%201980%20and%202016&rft.jtitle=International%20transactions%20in%20operational%20research&rft.au=Blank,%20Jos%20L.%20T.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2002&rft.epage=2020&rft.pages=2002-2020&rft.issn=0969-6016&rft.eissn=1475-3995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/itor.12716&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354604337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354604337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true