Loading…
Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016
The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judi...
Saved in:
Published in: | International transactions in operational research 2020-07, Vol.27 (4), p.2002-2020 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673 |
container_end_page | 2020 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2002 |
container_title | International transactions in operational research |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Blank, Jos L. T. Heezik, Alex A.S. |
description | The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judiciary and to improve productivity. One of the central questions hereby is whether these measures have actually contributed to a more productive sector. This paper focuses on the development of productivity in the judiciary and how policy measures have affected productivity. In this empirical analysis, we apply a cost function model to time series data of the Dutch judiciary between 1980 and 2016. The results show a dramatic decline of productivity over the entire period (−50%), in spite of various policy measures. The year 2001 can be regarded as a turning point, as since then productivity has remained more or less stable. It seems that this is largely due to the establishment of the Council for the Judiciary and the associated increase in (financial and operational) autonomy for the judiciary. Another striking result is that technical change is biased toward using more personnel through time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/itor.12716 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2354604337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2354604337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QtGYoeUYufhNOxQeUqVilBZR449oa7SuNgOVb6HH8VtWLFgNp7FuXdmfAm5ZHTCQt1ob-yExTnjR2TE0jyLkqLIjsmIFryIOGX8lJw5t6aUsozlI_L9ahote7BYG7txIFoFW2tUJ73-0r4HuRLtB4Juwa8Q1p3SUgvbg-udx80tCJDGeai7NihMC2Ib5EKu9k2jUYE34PUGwaHV6MDUB6P7zgfmrx1U6HeILbBiSg-7xGHlc3JSi8bhxe87Ju-PD8vZczRfPL3M7uaRTJKcR2mV0LyQtErTJMaET2VeFYiCxSqTlUjjWta0FnmMGVMCU1Vwzriqg6pCxfNkTK4G33DBZ4fOl2vT2TaMLOMkSzlNw5xAXQ-UtMa58G_l1upNuKFktNyHUO5DKA8hBJgN8E432P9Dli_Lxdug-QH5x4xS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354604337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Blank, Jos L. T. ; Heezik, Alex A.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blank, Jos L. T. ; Heezik, Alex A.S.</creatorcontrib><description>The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judiciary and to improve productivity. One of the central questions hereby is whether these measures have actually contributed to a more productive sector. This paper focuses on the development of productivity in the judiciary and how policy measures have affected productivity. In this empirical analysis, we apply a cost function model to time series data of the Dutch judiciary between 1980 and 2016. The results show a dramatic decline of productivity over the entire period (−50%), in spite of various policy measures. The year 2001 can be regarded as a turning point, as since then productivity has remained more or less stable. It seems that this is largely due to the establishment of the Council for the Judiciary and the associated increase in (financial and operational) autonomy for the judiciary. Another striking result is that technical change is biased toward using more personnel through time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-6016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/itor.12716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cost analysis ; Cost function ; cost model ; Empirical analysis ; judiciary ; Operations research ; policy reforms ; Productivity ; productivity change ; Time series</subject><ispartof>International transactions in operational research, 2020-07, Vol.27 (4), p.2002-2020</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Operational Research Societies</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0173-4239 ; 0000-0003-1387-0307</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blank, Jos L. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heezik, Alex A.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016</title><title>International transactions in operational research</title><description>The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judiciary and to improve productivity. One of the central questions hereby is whether these measures have actually contributed to a more productive sector. This paper focuses on the development of productivity in the judiciary and how policy measures have affected productivity. In this empirical analysis, we apply a cost function model to time series data of the Dutch judiciary between 1980 and 2016. The results show a dramatic decline of productivity over the entire period (−50%), in spite of various policy measures. The year 2001 can be regarded as a turning point, as since then productivity has remained more or less stable. It seems that this is largely due to the establishment of the Council for the Judiciary and the associated increase in (financial and operational) autonomy for the judiciary. Another striking result is that technical change is biased toward using more personnel through time.</description><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost function</subject><subject>cost model</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>judiciary</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>policy reforms</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>productivity change</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0969-6016</issn><issn>1475-3995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EEqWw4QtGYoeUYufhNOxQeUqVilBZR449oa7SuNgOVb6HH8VtWLFgNp7FuXdmfAm5ZHTCQt1ob-yExTnjR2TE0jyLkqLIjsmIFryIOGX8lJw5t6aUsozlI_L9ahote7BYG7txIFoFW2tUJ73-0r4HuRLtB4Juwa8Q1p3SUgvbg-udx80tCJDGeai7NihMC2Ib5EKu9k2jUYE34PUGwaHV6MDUB6P7zgfmrx1U6HeILbBiSg-7xGHlc3JSi8bhxe87Ju-PD8vZczRfPL3M7uaRTJKcR2mV0LyQtErTJMaET2VeFYiCxSqTlUjjWta0FnmMGVMCU1Vwzriqg6pCxfNkTK4G33DBZ4fOl2vT2TaMLOMkSzlNw5xAXQ-UtMa58G_l1upNuKFktNyHUO5DKA8hBJgN8E432P9Dli_Lxdug-QH5x4xS</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Blank, Jos L. T.</creator><creator>Heezik, Alex A.S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0173-4239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-0307</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016</title><author>Blank, Jos L. T. ; Heezik, Alex A.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost function</topic><topic>cost model</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>judiciary</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>policy reforms</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>productivity change</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blank, Jos L. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heezik, Alex A.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International transactions in operational research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blank, Jos L. T.</au><au>Heezik, Alex A.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016</atitle><jtitle>International transactions in operational research</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2002</spage><epage>2020</epage><pages>2002-2020</pages><issn>0969-6016</issn><eissn>1475-3995</eissn><abstract>The judiciary is constantly undergoing change in order to respond to a wide range of social developments that have brought the sector under increasing pressure. In order to deal with the constant call for enhancing budgets, different policy measures have been taken to downsize the appeal to the judiciary and to improve productivity. One of the central questions hereby is whether these measures have actually contributed to a more productive sector. This paper focuses on the development of productivity in the judiciary and how policy measures have affected productivity. In this empirical analysis, we apply a cost function model to time series data of the Dutch judiciary between 1980 and 2016. The results show a dramatic decline of productivity over the entire period (−50%), in spite of various policy measures. The year 2001 can be regarded as a turning point, as since then productivity has remained more or less stable. It seems that this is largely due to the establishment of the Council for the Judiciary and the associated increase in (financial and operational) autonomy for the judiciary. Another striking result is that technical change is biased toward using more personnel through time.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/itor.12716</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0173-4239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-0307</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-6016 |
ispartof | International transactions in operational research, 2020-07, Vol.27 (4), p.2002-2020 |
issn | 0969-6016 1475-3995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2354604337 |
source | Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley |
subjects | Cost analysis Cost function cost model Empirical analysis judiciary Operations research policy reforms Productivity productivity change Time series |
title | Policy reforms and productivity change in the judiciary system: a cost function approach applied to time series of the Dutch judiciary system between 1980 and 2016 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A03%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20reforms%20and%20productivity%20change%20in%20the%20judiciary%20system:%20a%20cost%20function%20approach%20applied%20to%20time%20series%20of%20the%20Dutch%20judiciary%20system%20between%201980%20and%202016&rft.jtitle=International%20transactions%20in%20operational%20research&rft.au=Blank,%20Jos%20L.%20T.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2002&rft.epage=2020&rft.pages=2002-2020&rft.issn=0969-6016&rft.eissn=1475-3995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/itor.12716&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2354604337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-4b3079c0b4432e368c7b9eea12d5cba42fcf0fa72e51dae4d96616df307bed673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354604337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |