Loading…
Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities
Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively do...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of ecology 2020-03, Vol.108 (2), p.449-459 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23 |
container_end_page | 459 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | The Journal of ecology |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew Wandrag, Elizabeth M. Catford, Jane A. Gruber, Bernd Driscoll, Don Duncan, Richard P. Buckley, Yvonne |
description | Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts.
Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance.
We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing.
Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.
We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to man |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2745.13280 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2358410812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2358410812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXgOe085-Jak3KbVaKl7qednsTmRLvswmld78Cf5Gf4mJEa_OZWB4npnhJeSawoz2Nac8kiGLhZxRzhI4IZO_ySmZADAWgojjc3Lh_R4AoljChOyeUPuuceVrYKqixta17oCBK2pt2ttgU7my_fr49DUahz4oKot5PtBVFrjyoC3aoM512Q560ZW9jv6SnGU693j126fk5X61Wz6E2-f14_JuGxouIwhFZGkKQGOj0TAEybhMOad0QWOBkU2NoHwRUZto1En_cSZNanSWWiETmTI-JTfj3rqp3jr0rdpXXVP2J1W_KhEUEjpQ85EyTeV9g5mqG1fo5qgoqCE6NQSlhqDUT3S9IUfj3eV4_A9Xm9Vy9L4B7QhxeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2358410812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew ; Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Catford, Jane A. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Driscoll, Don ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Buckley, Yvonne</creator><contributor>Buckley, Yvonne</contributor><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew ; Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Catford, Jane A. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Driscoll, Don ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Buckley, Yvonne ; Buckley, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><description>Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts.
Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance.
We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing.
Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.
We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Avena fatua ; Biomass ; Bromus diandrus ; Community composition ; Competition ; Competitors ; Composition ; Distribution ; Dominant species ; Environmental changes ; Fertility ; Geographical distribution ; grasslands ; Grazing ; impact ; Indigenous plants ; Indigenous species ; Information management ; Invasive species ; joint‐species distribution model (JSDM) ; light competition ; Modelling ; Native organisms ; Native species ; nutrient addition ; Plant communities ; Plant populations ; Population decline ; Removal ; tobit regression ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2020-03, Vol.108 (2), p.449-459</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Journal of Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Ecology © 2020 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2071-6279 ; 0000-0003-0078-8179 ; 0000-0003-0582-5960 ; 0000-0002-1560-5235 ; 0000-0001-8140-539X ; 0000-0003-2295-449X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Buckley, Yvonne</contributor><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catford, Jane A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruber, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts.
Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance.
We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing.
Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.
We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.</description><subject>Avena fatua</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bromus diandrus</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitors</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>impact</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>joint‐species distribution model (JSDM)</subject><subject>light competition</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Native organisms</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>nutrient addition</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>tobit regression</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXgOe085-Jak3KbVaKl7qednsTmRLvswmld78Cf5Gf4mJEa_OZWB4npnhJeSawoz2Nac8kiGLhZxRzhI4IZO_ySmZADAWgojjc3Lh_R4AoljChOyeUPuuceVrYKqixta17oCBK2pt2ttgU7my_fr49DUahz4oKot5PtBVFrjyoC3aoM512Q560ZW9jv6SnGU693j126fk5X61Wz6E2-f14_JuGxouIwhFZGkKQGOj0TAEybhMOad0QWOBkU2NoHwRUZto1En_cSZNanSWWiETmTI-JTfj3rqp3jr0rdpXXVP2J1W_KhEUEjpQ85EyTeV9g5mqG1fo5qgoqCE6NQSlhqDUT3S9IUfj3eV4_A9Xm9Vy9L4B7QhxeA</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew</creator><creator>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creator><creator>Catford, Jane A.</creator><creator>Gruber, Bernd</creator><creator>Driscoll, Don</creator><creator>Duncan, Richard P.</creator><creator>Buckley, Yvonne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-6279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0078-8179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-5960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-5235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-539X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-449X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities</title><author>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew ; Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Catford, Jane A. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Driscoll, Don ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Buckley, Yvonne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Avena fatua</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bromus diandrus</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitors</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>impact</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>joint‐species distribution model (JSDM)</topic><topic>light competition</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Native organisms</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>nutrient addition</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>tobit regression</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catford, Jane A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruber, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew</au><au>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</au><au>Catford, Jane A.</au><au>Gruber, Bernd</au><au>Driscoll, Don</au><au>Duncan, Richard P.</au><au>Buckley, Yvonne</au><au>Buckley, Yvonne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>449-459</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><abstract>Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts.
Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance.
We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing.
Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.
We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.13280</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-6279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0078-8179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-5960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-5235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-539X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-449X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0477 |
ispartof | The Journal of ecology, 2020-03, Vol.108 (2), p.449-459 |
issn | 0022-0477 1365-2745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2358410812 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Avena fatua Biomass Bromus diandrus Community composition Competition Competitors Composition Distribution Dominant species Environmental changes Fertility Geographical distribution grasslands Grazing impact Indigenous plants Indigenous species Information management Invasive species joint‐species distribution model (JSDM) light competition Modelling Native organisms Native species nutrient addition Plant communities Plant populations Population decline Removal tobit regression Woodlands |
title | Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T01%3A30%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20competitive%20impact:%20Joint%E2%80%90species%20modelling%20of%20invaded%20plant%20communities&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Reilly%E2%80%90Nugent,%20Andrew&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=449-459&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.13280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2358410812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2358410812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |