Loading…

Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities

Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively do...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of ecology 2020-03, Vol.108 (2), p.449-459
Main Authors: O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew, Wandrag, Elizabeth M., Catford, Jane A., Gruber, Bernd, Driscoll, Don, Duncan, Richard P., Buckley, Yvonne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23
container_end_page 459
container_issue 2
container_start_page 449
container_title The Journal of ecology
container_volume 108
creator O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew
Wandrag, Elizabeth M.
Catford, Jane A.
Gruber, Bernd
Driscoll, Don
Duncan, Richard P.
Buckley, Yvonne
description Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to man
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2745.13280
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2358410812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2358410812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXgOe085-Jak3KbVaKl7qednsTmRLvswmld78Cf5Gf4mJEa_OZWB4npnhJeSawoz2Nac8kiGLhZxRzhI4IZO_ySmZADAWgojjc3Lh_R4AoljChOyeUPuuceVrYKqixta17oCBK2pt2ttgU7my_fr49DUahz4oKot5PtBVFrjyoC3aoM512Q560ZW9jv6SnGU693j126fk5X61Wz6E2-f14_JuGxouIwhFZGkKQGOj0TAEybhMOad0QWOBkU2NoHwRUZto1En_cSZNanSWWiETmTI-JTfj3rqp3jr0rdpXXVP2J1W_KhEUEjpQ85EyTeV9g5mqG1fo5qgoqCE6NQSlhqDUT3S9IUfj3eV4_A9Xm9Vy9L4B7QhxeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2358410812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew ; Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Catford, Jane A. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Driscoll, Don ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Buckley, Yvonne</creator><contributor>Buckley, Yvonne</contributor><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew ; Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Catford, Jane A. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Driscoll, Don ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Buckley, Yvonne ; Buckley, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><description>Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Avena fatua ; Biomass ; Bromus diandrus ; Community composition ; Competition ; Competitors ; Composition ; Distribution ; Dominant species ; Environmental changes ; Fertility ; Geographical distribution ; grasslands ; Grazing ; impact ; Indigenous plants ; Indigenous species ; Information management ; Invasive species ; joint‐species distribution model (JSDM) ; light competition ; Modelling ; Native organisms ; Native species ; nutrient addition ; Plant communities ; Plant populations ; Population decline ; Removal ; tobit regression ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2020-03, Vol.108 (2), p.449-459</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Journal of Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Journal of Ecology © 2020 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2071-6279 ; 0000-0003-0078-8179 ; 0000-0003-0582-5960 ; 0000-0002-1560-5235 ; 0000-0001-8140-539X ; 0000-0003-2295-449X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Buckley, Yvonne</contributor><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catford, Jane A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruber, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.</description><subject>Avena fatua</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bromus diandrus</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitors</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>impact</subject><subject>Indigenous plants</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>joint‐species distribution model (JSDM)</subject><subject>light competition</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Native organisms</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>nutrient addition</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>tobit regression</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbPXgOe085-Jak3KbVaKl7qednsTmRLvswmld78Cf5Gf4mJEa_OZWB4npnhJeSawoz2Nac8kiGLhZxRzhI4IZO_ySmZADAWgojjc3Lh_R4AoljChOyeUPuuceVrYKqixta17oCBK2pt2ttgU7my_fr49DUahz4oKot5PtBVFrjyoC3aoM512Q560ZW9jv6SnGU693j126fk5X61Wz6E2-f14_JuGxouIwhFZGkKQGOj0TAEybhMOad0QWOBkU2NoHwRUZto1En_cSZNanSWWiETmTI-JTfj3rqp3jr0rdpXXVP2J1W_KhEUEjpQ85EyTeV9g5mqG1fo5qgoqCE6NQSlhqDUT3S9IUfj3eV4_A9Xm9Vy9L4B7QhxeA</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew</creator><creator>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creator><creator>Catford, Jane A.</creator><creator>Gruber, Bernd</creator><creator>Driscoll, Don</creator><creator>Duncan, Richard P.</creator><creator>Buckley, Yvonne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-6279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0078-8179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-5960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-5235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-539X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-449X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities</title><author>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew ; Wandrag, Elizabeth M. ; Catford, Jane A. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Driscoll, Don ; Duncan, Richard P. ; Buckley, Yvonne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Avena fatua</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bromus diandrus</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitors</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>impact</topic><topic>Indigenous plants</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>joint‐species distribution model (JSDM)</topic><topic>light competition</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Native organisms</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>nutrient addition</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>tobit regression</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catford, Jane A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruber, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Reilly‐Nugent, Andrew</au><au>Wandrag, Elizabeth M.</au><au>Catford, Jane A.</au><au>Gruber, Bernd</au><au>Driscoll, Don</au><au>Duncan, Richard P.</au><au>Buckley, Yvonne</au><au>Buckley, Yvonne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>449-459</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><abstract>Non‐native species can dominate plant communities by competitively displacing native species, or because environmental change creates conditions favourable to non‐native species but unfavourable to native species. We need to disentangle these mechanisms so that management can target competitively dominant species and reduce their impacts. Joint‐species distribution models (JSDMs) can potentially quantify competitive impacts by simultaneously modelling how species respond to environmental variation and to changes in community composition. We describe a JSDM to model variation in plant cover and show how this can be applied to compositional data to detect dominant competitors that cause other species to decline in abundance. We applied the model to an experiment in an invaded grassy‐woodland community in Australia where we manipulated biomass removal (through slashing and fencing to prevent grazing by kangaroos) along a fertility gradient. Non‐native species dominated plant cover at high fertility sites in the absence of biomass removal. Results from the JSDM identified three of the 72 non‐native plant species (Bromus diandrus, Acetosella vulgaris and especially Avena fatua) as having a strong competitive impact on the community, driving changes in composition and reducing the cover of both native and non‐native species, particularly in the absence of grazing. The dominant non‐native grasses Bromus diandrus and Avena fatua were among the tallest species in the community and had the greatest impact on shorter‐statured species, most likely through competition for light under conditions of high fertility and low grazing. Synthesis. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application. We demonstrate a method to measure competitive impact using a joint‐species distribution model, which allowed us to identify the species driving compositional change through competitive displacement, and where on the landscape competitive impacts were greatest. This information is central to managing plant invasions: by targeting dominant non‐native species with large competitive impacts, management can reduce impacts where they are greatest. We provide details of the modelling procedure and reproducible code to encourage further application.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.13280</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-6279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0078-8179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-5960</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-5235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-539X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-449X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0477
ispartof The Journal of ecology, 2020-03, Vol.108 (2), p.449-459
issn 0022-0477
1365-2745
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2358410812
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Avena fatua
Biomass
Bromus diandrus
Community composition
Competition
Competitors
Composition
Distribution
Dominant species
Environmental changes
Fertility
Geographical distribution
grasslands
Grazing
impact
Indigenous plants
Indigenous species
Information management
Invasive species
joint‐species distribution model (JSDM)
light competition
Modelling
Native organisms
Native species
nutrient addition
Plant communities
Plant populations
Population decline
Removal
tobit regression
Woodlands
title Measuring competitive impact: Joint‐species modelling of invaded plant communities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T01%3A30%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20competitive%20impact:%20Joint%E2%80%90species%20modelling%20of%20invaded%20plant%20communities&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Reilly%E2%80%90Nugent,%20Andrew&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=449-459&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.13280&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2358410812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-46d1b0017caec2e05235b33119174e6dbc413961d8aea8006f5cbcafbd4585b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2358410812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true