Loading…
Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination
This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-varia...
Saved in:
Published in: | Contemporary educational psychology 2008-10, Vol.33 (4), p.915-931 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53 |
container_end_page | 931 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 915 |
container_title | Contemporary educational psychology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Klassen, Robert M. Krawchuk, Lindsey L. Rajani, Sukaina |
description | This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_235931853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ813136</ericid><els_id>S0361476X07000264</els_id><sourcerecordid>1574871331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE-L1EAQxRtRcFz9BiJB8Jix_3fiyWVZ3ZUBLwremrJSPdNDNhm7k13n29thxj14EQoa-v3q1eMx9kbwteDCvt-vkbpDPuJuLTl362W4eMJWgre8lqrRT9mKKytq7eyP5-xFzvsCCN2qFft9idDRXcTqkEZMkKc4wBTHoRpDNQ8dpW2CboaJ8odqMz5UmfpQUwgRAY_VNJ4-Em3nvkDFhbqIU652cbujVPV0T31ezP7xf8meBegzvTq_F-z7p-tvVzf15uvn26vLTY2G66nupAHZatsYCUFyyY1AsMZB6wTK4EigAmm1JOkASi5pdMHlT63JWTDqgr09-Zb7v2bKk9-PcxrKSS-VaZVojCqQPUGYxpwTBX9I8Q7S0Qvul5L93v8t2S8l-2W4KIvvzu6QEfqQYMCYH7cld41zzZLi9YmjFPFRvv7SCCWULfLHs1yauI-UfMZIQzkZE-HkuzH-L8kf5iqhMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235931853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Klassen, Robert M. ; Krawchuk, Lindsey L. ; Rajani, Sukaina</creator><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Robert M. ; Krawchuk, Lindsey L. ; Rajani, Sukaina</creatorcontrib><description>This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-476X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2384</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Anxiety ; Biological and medical sciences ; College students ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grade Point Average ; Motivation ; Prediction ; Procrastination ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure ; Self Efficacy ; Self Esteem ; Self Management ; Self-regulation ; Study Habits ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduates</subject><ispartof>Contemporary educational psychology, 2008-10, Vol.33 (4), p.915-931</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ813136$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20787785$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawchuk, Lindsey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajani, Sukaina</creatorcontrib><title>Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination</title><title>Contemporary educational psychology</title><description>This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grade Point Average</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Procrastination</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Self Esteem</subject><subject>Self Management</subject><subject>Self-regulation</subject><subject>Study Habits</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduates</subject><issn>0361-476X</issn><issn>1090-2384</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE-L1EAQxRtRcFz9BiJB8Jix_3fiyWVZ3ZUBLwremrJSPdNDNhm7k13n29thxj14EQoa-v3q1eMx9kbwteDCvt-vkbpDPuJuLTl362W4eMJWgre8lqrRT9mKKytq7eyP5-xFzvsCCN2qFft9idDRXcTqkEZMkKc4wBTHoRpDNQ8dpW2CboaJ8odqMz5UmfpQUwgRAY_VNJ4-Em3nvkDFhbqIU652cbujVPV0T31ezP7xf8meBegzvTq_F-z7p-tvVzf15uvn26vLTY2G66nupAHZatsYCUFyyY1AsMZB6wTK4EigAmm1JOkASi5pdMHlT63JWTDqgr09-Zb7v2bKk9-PcxrKSS-VaZVojCqQPUGYxpwTBX9I8Q7S0Qvul5L93v8t2S8l-2W4KIvvzu6QEfqQYMCYH7cld41zzZLi9YmjFPFRvv7SCCWULfLHs1yauI-UfMZIQzkZE-HkuzH-L8kf5iqhMg</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Klassen, Robert M.</creator><creator>Krawchuk, Lindsey L.</creator><creator>Rajani, Sukaina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination</title><author>Klassen, Robert M. ; Krawchuk, Lindsey L. ; Rajani, Sukaina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grade Point Average</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Procrastination</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Self Esteem</topic><topic>Self Management</topic><topic>Self-regulation</topic><topic>Study Habits</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawchuk, Lindsey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajani, Sukaina</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klassen, Robert M.</au><au>Krawchuk, Lindsey L.</au><au>Rajani, Sukaina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ813136</ericid><atitle>Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary educational psychology</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>915</spage><epage>931</epage><pages>915-931</pages><issn>0361-476X</issn><eissn>1090-2384</eissn><abstract>This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-476X |
ispartof | Contemporary educational psychology, 2008-10, Vol.33 (4), p.915-931 |
issn | 0361-476X 1090-2384 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_235931853 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals; ERIC |
subjects | Academic Achievement Anxiety Biological and medical sciences College students Educational psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grade Point Average Motivation Prediction Procrastination Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure Self Efficacy Self Esteem Self Management Self-regulation Study Habits Undergraduate Students Undergraduates |
title | Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Academic%20procrastination%20of%20undergraduates:%20Low%20self-efficacy%20to%20self-regulate%20predicts%20higher%20levels%20of%20procrastination&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Klassen,%20Robert%20M.&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=915&rft.epage=931&rft.pages=915-931&rft.issn=0361-476X&rft.eissn=1090-2384&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1574871331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235931853&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ813136&rfr_iscdi=true |