Loading…

Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination

This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-varia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contemporary educational psychology 2008-10, Vol.33 (4), p.915-931
Main Authors: Klassen, Robert M., Krawchuk, Lindsey L., Rajani, Sukaina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53
container_end_page 931
container_issue 4
container_start_page 915
container_title Contemporary educational psychology
container_volume 33
creator Klassen, Robert M.
Krawchuk, Lindsey L.
Rajani, Sukaina
description This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_235931853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ813136</ericid><els_id>S0361476X07000264</els_id><sourcerecordid>1574871331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE-L1EAQxRtRcFz9BiJB8Jix_3fiyWVZ3ZUBLwremrJSPdNDNhm7k13n29thxj14EQoa-v3q1eMx9kbwteDCvt-vkbpDPuJuLTl362W4eMJWgre8lqrRT9mKKytq7eyP5-xFzvsCCN2qFft9idDRXcTqkEZMkKc4wBTHoRpDNQ8dpW2CboaJ8odqMz5UmfpQUwgRAY_VNJ4-Em3nvkDFhbqIU652cbujVPV0T31ezP7xf8meBegzvTq_F-z7p-tvVzf15uvn26vLTY2G66nupAHZatsYCUFyyY1AsMZB6wTK4EigAmm1JOkASi5pdMHlT63JWTDqgr09-Zb7v2bKk9-PcxrKSS-VaZVojCqQPUGYxpwTBX9I8Q7S0Qvul5L93v8t2S8l-2W4KIvvzu6QEfqQYMCYH7cld41zzZLi9YmjFPFRvv7SCCWULfLHs1yauI-UfMZIQzkZE-HkuzH-L8kf5iqhMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235931853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Klassen, Robert M. ; Krawchuk, Lindsey L. ; Rajani, Sukaina</creator><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Robert M. ; Krawchuk, Lindsey L. ; Rajani, Sukaina</creatorcontrib><description>This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-476X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2384</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Anxiety ; Biological and medical sciences ; College students ; Educational psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grade Point Average ; Motivation ; Prediction ; Procrastination ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure ; Self Efficacy ; Self Esteem ; Self Management ; Self-regulation ; Study Habits ; Undergraduate Students ; Undergraduates</subject><ispartof>Contemporary educational psychology, 2008-10, Vol.33 (4), p.915-931</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ813136$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20787785$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawchuk, Lindsey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajani, Sukaina</creatorcontrib><title>Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination</title><title>Contemporary educational psychology</title><description>This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grade Point Average</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Procrastination</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Self Esteem</subject><subject>Self Management</subject><subject>Self-regulation</subject><subject>Study Habits</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Undergraduates</subject><issn>0361-476X</issn><issn>1090-2384</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE-L1EAQxRtRcFz9BiJB8Jix_3fiyWVZ3ZUBLwremrJSPdNDNhm7k13n29thxj14EQoa-v3q1eMx9kbwteDCvt-vkbpDPuJuLTl362W4eMJWgre8lqrRT9mKKytq7eyP5-xFzvsCCN2qFft9idDRXcTqkEZMkKc4wBTHoRpDNQ8dpW2CboaJ8odqMz5UmfpQUwgRAY_VNJ4-Em3nvkDFhbqIU652cbujVPV0T31ezP7xf8meBegzvTq_F-z7p-tvVzf15uvn26vLTY2G66nupAHZatsYCUFyyY1AsMZB6wTK4EigAmm1JOkASi5pdMHlT63JWTDqgr09-Zb7v2bKk9-PcxrKSS-VaZVojCqQPUGYxpwTBX9I8Q7S0Qvul5L93v8t2S8l-2W4KIvvzu6QEfqQYMCYH7cld41zzZLi9YmjFPFRvv7SCCWULfLHs1yauI-UfMZIQzkZE-HkuzH-L8kf5iqhMg</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Klassen, Robert M.</creator><creator>Krawchuk, Lindsey L.</creator><creator>Rajani, Sukaina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination</title><author>Klassen, Robert M. ; Krawchuk, Lindsey L. ; Rajani, Sukaina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grade Point Average</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Procrastination</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Self Esteem</topic><topic>Self Management</topic><topic>Self-regulation</topic><topic>Study Habits</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Undergraduates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawchuk, Lindsey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajani, Sukaina</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klassen, Robert M.</au><au>Krawchuk, Lindsey L.</au><au>Rajani, Sukaina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ813136</ericid><atitle>Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary educational psychology</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>915</spage><epage>931</epage><pages>915-931</pages><issn>0361-476X</issn><eissn>1090-2384</eissn><abstract>This article reports two studies exploring the academic procrastination of 456 undergraduates. Study 1 explores the relationships among academic procrastination, self-regulation, academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-efficacy for self-regulation. Results reveal that although other self-variables are related to procrastination, self-efficacy for self-regulation is most predictive of procrastination tendencies. Study 2 examines academic and motivation characteristics of “negative procrastinators,” the undergraduates who are most adversely influenced by procrastination. The 25% of 195 participants in Study 2 who were classified as negative procrastinators had significantly lower GPAs, higher levels of daily and task procrastination, lower predicted and actual class grades, and lower self-efficacy for self-regulation. After controlling for GPA, daily procrastination and self-efficacy for self-regulation significantly predicted the negative impact of procrastination. The article concludes with a discussion of the importance that self-efficacy for self-regulation holds for procrastination research, and with suggestions for practitioners who work with students who are adversely affected by procrastination.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-476X
ispartof Contemporary educational psychology, 2008-10, Vol.33 (4), p.915-931
issn 0361-476X
1090-2384
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_235931853
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals; ERIC
subjects Academic Achievement
Anxiety
Biological and medical sciences
College students
Educational psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grade Point Average
Motivation
Prediction
Procrastination
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure
Self Efficacy
Self Esteem
Self Management
Self-regulation
Study Habits
Undergraduate Students
Undergraduates
title Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Academic%20procrastination%20of%20undergraduates:%20Low%20self-efficacy%20to%20self-regulate%20predicts%20higher%20levels%20of%20procrastination&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Klassen,%20Robert%20M.&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=915&rft.epage=931&rft.pages=915-931&rft.issn=0361-476X&rft.eissn=1090-2384&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1574871331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-d25a2946852af202051ca657a971c2f7e1c3a2642e27aaeff2549462b44e76a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235931853&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ813136&rfr_iscdi=true