Evaluation of instant light‐response curves of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters obtained with a portable chlorophyll fluorometer on site in the field

• Published in: Plant, cell and environment cell and environment, 2000-12, Vol.23 (12), p.1397-1405
• Main Authors: Rascher, U., Liebig, M., Lüttge, U.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; cardinal points; chlorophyll a fluorescence; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; light reaction; Metabolism; photosynthesis; Photosynthesis, respiration. Anabolism, catabolism; photosystem II; Plant physiology and development; pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer (Mini‐PAM); quantum yield; steady state
• ISSN: 0140-7791; 1365-3040
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00650.x

ABSTRACT Miniaturized pulse‐amplitude modulated photosynthesis yield analysers are primarily designed for measuring effective quantum yield (ΔF/Fm′) of photosystem II under momentary ambient light conditions in the field. Although this provides important ecophysiological information, it is often necessary to learn more about the potential intrinsic capacities of leaves by measuring light‐response curves. Thus, instruments provide light‐curve programmes, where light intensities are increased in short intervals and instant light‐response curves are recorded within a few minutes. This method can be criticized because photosynthesis will most likely not be in steady state. This technical report shows that with the appropriate precautions instant light curves can nevertheless provide reliable information about cardinal points of photosynthesis. First, the geometry of the light source of the instrument in relation to the quantum sensor must be considered and quantum sensor readings must be corrected. Second, the measurements of the light‐response curves must be compared with readings of effective quantum yield of photosystem II under ambient light conditions where photosynthesis is in steady state. This may show that in the critical range of the light curves either both measurements perfectly coincide or are offset against each other by a constant value (examples are given here). In the first case results of light curves can be taken at face values, and in the second case a simple correction can be applied. With these precautions and careful interpretations instant light‐response curves can be an enormous advantage in ecophysiological field work.