Loading…

Precision orientation herbicide spraying against weeds in plastic-mulched fields of spring hybrid millet

Foxtail millet (Setaria italic [L.] P. Beauv.) is an important food and fodder crop that is cultivated worldwide. However, weeds severely inhibit the growth of spring foxtail millet, and no suitable herbicide or method is available for weed control in foxtail millet fields. Field experiments were co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Emirates journal of food and agriculture 2019-11, Vol.31 (11), p.837-846
Main Authors: Guo, Meijun, Song, Xi-e, Shen, Jie, Wang, Jianming, Zhao, Xiatong, Liu, Shaoguang, Dong, Shuqi, Yuan, Xiangyang, Wen, Yinyuan, Guo, Pingyi, Shi, Xiaoxin, Shi, Yongfeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2090c71c1cf55a3c87cf98275d25c5b6c118ff7fe8b64db7871dca0addb29e053
cites
container_end_page 846
container_issue 11
container_start_page 837
container_title Emirates journal of food and agriculture
container_volume 31
creator Guo, Meijun
Song, Xi-e
Shen, Jie
Wang, Jianming
Zhao, Xiatong
Liu, Shaoguang
Dong, Shuqi
Yuan, Xiangyang
Wen, Yinyuan
Guo, Pingyi
Shi, Xiaoxin
Shi, Yongfeng
description Foxtail millet (Setaria italic [L.] P. Beauv.) is an important food and fodder crop that is cultivated worldwide. However, weeds severely inhibit the growth of spring foxtail millet, and no suitable herbicide or method is available for weed control in foxtail millet fields. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various herbicides and their safety toward hybrid foxtail millet, that is, ‘Zhangzagu 10’. The present study was conducted using seven herbicides applied by precision orientation spraying between plastic mulches in a foxtail millet field. All herbicide treatments exhibited no significant difference on foxtail millet shoot and root biomass. No difference in grain yield was observed among herbicide treatments, including MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid), mesotrione, acetochlor, trifluralin, and pendimethalin, at the recommended dosage in field efficacy evaluation trial. For the same herbicide, the tendency of weed control increased with the increase in herbicide concentration. Following this finding, all herbicides applied at the highest dosage controlled weeds by 92.06% compared with the other treatments utilizing lower concentration. At the same concentration level, mesotrione controlled all weed populations was the highest observed among all herbicides, followed by prometryne and MCPA. Mesotrione controlled all weeds by at least 76.85%, exhibiting the highest weed injury among the herbicides and satisfying the requirement for weed species control. Finally, comprehensive analyses showed that mesotrione at 0.8 L ha-1, yielded the highest comprehensive evaluation value in foxtail millet field. Thus, this herbicide can be a good option in controlling weeds in foxtail millet field. This new model can aid in protecting hybrid ‘Zhangzagu 10’ foxtail millet seeds or seedlings against herbicide damage and is a good option in expanding the application range of herbicide in foxtail millet.
doi_str_mv 10.9755/ejfa.2019.v31.i11.2032
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2363845435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2363845435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2090c71c1cf55a3c87cf98275d25c5b6c118ff7fe8b64db7871dca0addb29e053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOOb-ggS8bs1H07SXMvyCgV4oeBfS5GTN6NqZZMr-vQ2KV-c9nPd8PQhdU1K2Uohb2DldMkLb8ovT0lM6J5ydoQUjsi2I4M35v2Yfl2gVo-9IVUkupKAL1L8GMD76acRT8DAmnbLuIXTeeAs4HoI--XGL9Vb7MSb8DWAj9iM-DDomb4r9cTA9WOw8DHNlcrknd_SnLniL934YIF2hC6eHCKu_uETvD_dv66di8_L4vL7bFIaLOhWMtMRIaqhxQmhuGmlc2zApLBNGdLWhtHFOOmi6urKdbCS1RhNtbcdamP9dopvfuYcwfR4hJrWbjmGcVyrGa95UouLZVf-6TJhiDODUfPJeh5OiRGWwKoNVGayawaoZrMpg-Q_OanAu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2363845435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Precision orientation herbicide spraying against weeds in plastic-mulched fields of spring hybrid millet</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Guo, Meijun ; Song, Xi-e ; Shen, Jie ; Wang, Jianming ; Zhao, Xiatong ; Liu, Shaoguang ; Dong, Shuqi ; Yuan, Xiangyang ; Wen, Yinyuan ; Guo, Pingyi ; Shi, Xiaoxin ; Shi, Yongfeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Meijun ; Song, Xi-e ; Shen, Jie ; Wang, Jianming ; Zhao, Xiatong ; Liu, Shaoguang ; Dong, Shuqi ; Yuan, Xiangyang ; Wen, Yinyuan ; Guo, Pingyi ; Shi, Xiaoxin ; Shi, Yongfeng</creatorcontrib><description>Foxtail millet (Setaria italic [L.] P. Beauv.) is an important food and fodder crop that is cultivated worldwide. However, weeds severely inhibit the growth of spring foxtail millet, and no suitable herbicide or method is available for weed control in foxtail millet fields. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various herbicides and their safety toward hybrid foxtail millet, that is, ‘Zhangzagu 10’. The present study was conducted using seven herbicides applied by precision orientation spraying between plastic mulches in a foxtail millet field. All herbicide treatments exhibited no significant difference on foxtail millet shoot and root biomass. No difference in grain yield was observed among herbicide treatments, including MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid), mesotrione, acetochlor, trifluralin, and pendimethalin, at the recommended dosage in field efficacy evaluation trial. For the same herbicide, the tendency of weed control increased with the increase in herbicide concentration. Following this finding, all herbicides applied at the highest dosage controlled weeds by 92.06% compared with the other treatments utilizing lower concentration. At the same concentration level, mesotrione controlled all weed populations was the highest observed among all herbicides, followed by prometryne and MCPA. Mesotrione controlled all weeds by at least 76.85%, exhibiting the highest weed injury among the herbicides and satisfying the requirement for weed species control. Finally, comprehensive analyses showed that mesotrione at 0.8 L ha-1, yielded the highest comprehensive evaluation value in foxtail millet field. Thus, this herbicide can be a good option in controlling weeds in foxtail millet field. This new model can aid in protecting hybrid ‘Zhangzagu 10’ foxtail millet seeds or seedlings against herbicide damage and is a good option in expanding the application range of herbicide in foxtail millet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-052X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-0538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2019.v31.i11.2032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sofia: Pensoft Publishers</publisher><subject>Acetochlor ; Agricultural production ; Biomass ; Chlorophenoxyacetic acids ; Crop yield ; Dosage ; Experiments ; Field tests ; Fodder ; Forage crops ; Herbicides ; Millet ; Mulches ; Pendimethalin ; Pesticides ; Phytotoxicity ; Seedlings ; Seeds ; Setaria italica ; Spraying ; Trifluralin ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Emirates journal of food and agriculture, 2019-11, Vol.31 (11), p.837-846</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2090c71c1cf55a3c87cf98275d25c5b6c118ff7fe8b64db7871dca0addb29e053</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2363845435/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2363845435?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Meijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xi-e</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiatong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shaoguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shuqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Xiangyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Yinyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Pingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiaoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yongfeng</creatorcontrib><title>Precision orientation herbicide spraying against weeds in plastic-mulched fields of spring hybrid millet</title><title>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</title><description>Foxtail millet (Setaria italic [L.] P. Beauv.) is an important food and fodder crop that is cultivated worldwide. However, weeds severely inhibit the growth of spring foxtail millet, and no suitable herbicide or method is available for weed control in foxtail millet fields. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various herbicides and their safety toward hybrid foxtail millet, that is, ‘Zhangzagu 10’. The present study was conducted using seven herbicides applied by precision orientation spraying between plastic mulches in a foxtail millet field. All herbicide treatments exhibited no significant difference on foxtail millet shoot and root biomass. No difference in grain yield was observed among herbicide treatments, including MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid), mesotrione, acetochlor, trifluralin, and pendimethalin, at the recommended dosage in field efficacy evaluation trial. For the same herbicide, the tendency of weed control increased with the increase in herbicide concentration. Following this finding, all herbicides applied at the highest dosage controlled weeds by 92.06% compared with the other treatments utilizing lower concentration. At the same concentration level, mesotrione controlled all weed populations was the highest observed among all herbicides, followed by prometryne and MCPA. Mesotrione controlled all weeds by at least 76.85%, exhibiting the highest weed injury among the herbicides and satisfying the requirement for weed species control. Finally, comprehensive analyses showed that mesotrione at 0.8 L ha-1, yielded the highest comprehensive evaluation value in foxtail millet field. Thus, this herbicide can be a good option in controlling weeds in foxtail millet field. This new model can aid in protecting hybrid ‘Zhangzagu 10’ foxtail millet seeds or seedlings against herbicide damage and is a good option in expanding the application range of herbicide in foxtail millet.</description><subject>Acetochlor</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Chlorophenoxyacetic acids</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Fodder</subject><subject>Forage crops</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Millet</subject><subject>Mulches</subject><subject>Pendimethalin</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Phytotoxicity</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Setaria italica</subject><subject>Spraying</subject><subject>Trifluralin</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>2079-052X</issn><issn>2079-0538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOOb-ggS8bs1H07SXMvyCgV4oeBfS5GTN6NqZZMr-vQ2KV-c9nPd8PQhdU1K2Uohb2DldMkLb8ovT0lM6J5ydoQUjsi2I4M35v2Yfl2gVo-9IVUkupKAL1L8GMD76acRT8DAmnbLuIXTeeAs4HoI--XGL9Vb7MSb8DWAj9iM-DDomb4r9cTA9WOw8DHNlcrknd_SnLniL934YIF2hC6eHCKu_uETvD_dv66di8_L4vL7bFIaLOhWMtMRIaqhxQmhuGmlc2zApLBNGdLWhtHFOOmi6urKdbCS1RhNtbcdamP9dopvfuYcwfR4hJrWbjmGcVyrGa95UouLZVf-6TJhiDODUfPJeh5OiRGWwKoNVGayawaoZrMpg-Q_OanAu</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Guo, Meijun</creator><creator>Song, Xi-e</creator><creator>Shen, Jie</creator><creator>Wang, Jianming</creator><creator>Zhao, Xiatong</creator><creator>Liu, Shaoguang</creator><creator>Dong, Shuqi</creator><creator>Yuan, Xiangyang</creator><creator>Wen, Yinyuan</creator><creator>Guo, Pingyi</creator><creator>Shi, Xiaoxin</creator><creator>Shi, Yongfeng</creator><general>Pensoft Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Precision orientation herbicide spraying against weeds in plastic-mulched fields of spring hybrid millet</title><author>Guo, Meijun ; Song, Xi-e ; Shen, Jie ; Wang, Jianming ; Zhao, Xiatong ; Liu, Shaoguang ; Dong, Shuqi ; Yuan, Xiangyang ; Wen, Yinyuan ; Guo, Pingyi ; Shi, Xiaoxin ; Shi, Yongfeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2090c71c1cf55a3c87cf98275d25c5b6c118ff7fe8b64db7871dca0addb29e053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acetochlor</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Chlorophenoxyacetic acids</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Fodder</topic><topic>Forage crops</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Millet</topic><topic>Mulches</topic><topic>Pendimethalin</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Phytotoxicity</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Setaria italica</topic><topic>Spraying</topic><topic>Trifluralin</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Meijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Xi-e</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiatong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shaoguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Shuqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Xiangyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Yinyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Pingyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiaoxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yongfeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Meijun</au><au>Song, Xi-e</au><au>Shen, Jie</au><au>Wang, Jianming</au><au>Zhao, Xiatong</au><au>Liu, Shaoguang</au><au>Dong, Shuqi</au><au>Yuan, Xiangyang</au><au>Wen, Yinyuan</au><au>Guo, Pingyi</au><au>Shi, Xiaoxin</au><au>Shi, Yongfeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Precision orientation herbicide spraying against weeds in plastic-mulched fields of spring hybrid millet</atitle><jtitle>Emirates journal of food and agriculture</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>846</epage><pages>837-846</pages><issn>2079-052X</issn><eissn>2079-0538</eissn><abstract>Foxtail millet (Setaria italic [L.] P. Beauv.) is an important food and fodder crop that is cultivated worldwide. However, weeds severely inhibit the growth of spring foxtail millet, and no suitable herbicide or method is available for weed control in foxtail millet fields. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various herbicides and their safety toward hybrid foxtail millet, that is, ‘Zhangzagu 10’. The present study was conducted using seven herbicides applied by precision orientation spraying between plastic mulches in a foxtail millet field. All herbicide treatments exhibited no significant difference on foxtail millet shoot and root biomass. No difference in grain yield was observed among herbicide treatments, including MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid), mesotrione, acetochlor, trifluralin, and pendimethalin, at the recommended dosage in field efficacy evaluation trial. For the same herbicide, the tendency of weed control increased with the increase in herbicide concentration. Following this finding, all herbicides applied at the highest dosage controlled weeds by 92.06% compared with the other treatments utilizing lower concentration. At the same concentration level, mesotrione controlled all weed populations was the highest observed among all herbicides, followed by prometryne and MCPA. Mesotrione controlled all weeds by at least 76.85%, exhibiting the highest weed injury among the herbicides and satisfying the requirement for weed species control. Finally, comprehensive analyses showed that mesotrione at 0.8 L ha-1, yielded the highest comprehensive evaluation value in foxtail millet field. Thus, this herbicide can be a good option in controlling weeds in foxtail millet field. This new model can aid in protecting hybrid ‘Zhangzagu 10’ foxtail millet seeds or seedlings against herbicide damage and is a good option in expanding the application range of herbicide in foxtail millet.</abstract><cop>Sofia</cop><pub>Pensoft Publishers</pub><doi>10.9755/ejfa.2019.v31.i11.2032</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-052X
ispartof Emirates journal of food and agriculture, 2019-11, Vol.31 (11), p.837-846
issn 2079-052X
2079-0538
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2363845435
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Acetochlor
Agricultural production
Biomass
Chlorophenoxyacetic acids
Crop yield
Dosage
Experiments
Field tests
Fodder
Forage crops
Herbicides
Millet
Mulches
Pendimethalin
Pesticides
Phytotoxicity
Seedlings
Seeds
Setaria italica
Spraying
Trifluralin
Weed control
Weeds
title Precision orientation herbicide spraying against weeds in plastic-mulched fields of spring hybrid millet
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T03%3A21%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Precision%20orientation%20herbicide%20spraying%20against%20weeds%20in%20plastic-mulched%20fields%20of%20spring%20hybrid%20millet&rft.jtitle=Emirates%20journal%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Guo,%20Meijun&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=846&rft.pages=837-846&rft.issn=2079-052X&rft.eissn=2079-0538&rft_id=info:doi/10.9755/ejfa.2019.v31.i11.2032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2363845435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2090c71c1cf55a3c87cf98275d25c5b6c118ff7fe8b64db7871dca0addb29e053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2363845435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true