Loading…
How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time
Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative...
Saved in:
Published in: | Creativity and innovation management 2020-03, Vol.29 (1), p.161-177 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253 |
container_end_page | 177 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Creativity and innovation management |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Faccin, Kadígia Wegner, Douglas Balestrin, Alsones |
description | Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative practices. We based our study on the three orchestration subprocesses proposed by Dhanaraj and Parkhe, namely, to foster knowledge mobility, guarantee innovation appropriability, and maintain network stability. To achieve our goal, we analysed the collaborative practices in an R&D network in the semiconductor industry in France. The case consists of an R&D network among 26 companies to create a new transistor. The data include 65 interviews and 192 documents. The study contributes to the literature on network orchestration by showing that specific collaborative practices performed by a hub firm enable a fourth orchestration subprocess—network reconfiguration—which is necessary in long‐lasting and complex R&D networks and also affects the other three subprocesses. Network reconfiguration consists in disassociating and attracting new members to the R&D network to cover knowledge demands, and is performed by the hub‐firm through specific collaborative practices. The results can benefit practitioners by showing which collaborative practices may be useful for a hub firm throughout the development of an R&D network. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/caim.12355 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2365128567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2365128567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4RdYQuKAlOJH7CQnhMqjlYqQUO-W7azVlCQudtqq_56UcODEXvYw3-yOBqFrSia0n3urq2ZCGRfiBI1oKrMklwU9RSNSSJ5QWZBzdBHjmhCSckZHqJn5Pe489sGuIHZBd4A_bp9wC93eh8_4gJcrwMHXgL37Q1W-xXFrNsFbiBEi1m2Jra9rbfxR3gHeBG27qpex30HAXdXAJTpzuo5w9bvHaPnyvJzOksX763z6uEgsJ1QkQkpIOWG50ZJKlxrKCqNLIyxxRNiMEaOpI5yAlc4ZZmRZ5sykLM9yywQfo5vhbB_va9sHVmu_DW3_UTEuBWW5kFlP3Q2UDT7GAE5tQtXocFCUqGOb6tim-mmzh-kA76saDv-Qavo4fxs8303KeJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2365128567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</source><creator>Faccin, Kadígia ; Wegner, Douglas ; Balestrin, Alsones</creator><creatorcontrib>Faccin, Kadígia ; Wegner, Douglas ; Balestrin, Alsones</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative practices. We based our study on the three orchestration subprocesses proposed by Dhanaraj and Parkhe, namely, to foster knowledge mobility, guarantee innovation appropriability, and maintain network stability. To achieve our goal, we analysed the collaborative practices in an R&D network in the semiconductor industry in France. The case consists of an R&D network among 26 companies to create a new transistor. The data include 65 interviews and 192 documents. The study contributes to the literature on network orchestration by showing that specific collaborative practices performed by a hub firm enable a fourth orchestration subprocess—network reconfiguration—which is necessary in long‐lasting and complex R&D networks and also affects the other three subprocesses. Network reconfiguration consists in disassociating and attracting new members to the R&D network to cover knowledge demands, and is performed by the hub‐firm through specific collaborative practices. The results can benefit practitioners by showing which collaborative practices may be useful for a hub firm throughout the development of an R&D network.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/caim.12355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Environmental scanning ; Foundations ; Initiatives ; Innovations ; Networks ; Project management ; R&D ; Reconfiguration ; Research & development ; Social networks ; Stability analysis ; Transistors</subject><ispartof>Creativity and innovation management, 2020-03, Vol.29 (1), p.161-177</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2804-2328 ; 0000-0001-6397-1582 ; 0000-0001-8634-5971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34130</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faccin, Kadígia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegner, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balestrin, Alsones</creatorcontrib><title>How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time</title><title>Creativity and innovation management</title><description><![CDATA[Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative practices. We based our study on the three orchestration subprocesses proposed by Dhanaraj and Parkhe, namely, to foster knowledge mobility, guarantee innovation appropriability, and maintain network stability. To achieve our goal, we analysed the collaborative practices in an R&D network in the semiconductor industry in France. The case consists of an R&D network among 26 companies to create a new transistor. The data include 65 interviews and 192 documents. The study contributes to the literature on network orchestration by showing that specific collaborative practices performed by a hub firm enable a fourth orchestration subprocess—network reconfiguration—which is necessary in long‐lasting and complex R&D networks and also affects the other three subprocesses. Network reconfiguration consists in disassociating and attracting new members to the R&D network to cover knowledge demands, and is performed by the hub‐firm through specific collaborative practices. The results can benefit practitioners by showing which collaborative practices may be useful for a hub firm throughout the development of an R&D network.]]></description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Environmental scanning</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Reconfiguration</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Transistors</subject><issn>0963-1690</issn><issn>1467-8691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F29</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4RdYQuKAlOJH7CQnhMqjlYqQUO-W7azVlCQudtqq_56UcODEXvYw3-yOBqFrSia0n3urq2ZCGRfiBI1oKrMklwU9RSNSSJ5QWZBzdBHjmhCSckZHqJn5Pe489sGuIHZBd4A_bp9wC93eh8_4gJcrwMHXgL37Q1W-xXFrNsFbiBEi1m2Jra9rbfxR3gHeBG27qpex30HAXdXAJTpzuo5w9bvHaPnyvJzOksX763z6uEgsJ1QkQkpIOWG50ZJKlxrKCqNLIyxxRNiMEaOpI5yAlc4ZZmRZ5sykLM9yywQfo5vhbB_va9sHVmu_DW3_UTEuBWW5kFlP3Q2UDT7GAE5tQtXocFCUqGOb6tim-mmzh-kA76saDv-Qavo4fxs8303KeJI</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Faccin, Kadígia</creator><creator>Wegner, Douglas</creator><creator>Balestrin, Alsones</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2804-2328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-1582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-5971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time</title><author>Faccin, Kadígia ; Wegner, Douglas ; Balestrin, Alsones</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Environmental scanning</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Reconfiguration</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Transistors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faccin, Kadígia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegner, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balestrin, Alsones</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faccin, Kadígia</au><au>Wegner, Douglas</au><au>Balestrin, Alsones</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time</atitle><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>161-177</pages><issn>0963-1690</issn><eissn>1467-8691</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative practices. We based our study on the three orchestration subprocesses proposed by Dhanaraj and Parkhe, namely, to foster knowledge mobility, guarantee innovation appropriability, and maintain network stability. To achieve our goal, we analysed the collaborative practices in an R&D network in the semiconductor industry in France. The case consists of an R&D network among 26 companies to create a new transistor. The data include 65 interviews and 192 documents. The study contributes to the literature on network orchestration by showing that specific collaborative practices performed by a hub firm enable a fourth orchestration subprocess—network reconfiguration—which is necessary in long‐lasting and complex R&D networks and also affects the other three subprocesses. Network reconfiguration consists in disassociating and attracting new members to the R&D network to cover knowledge demands, and is performed by the hub‐firm through specific collaborative practices. The results can benefit practitioners by showing which collaborative practices may be useful for a hub firm throughout the development of an R&D network.]]></abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/caim.12355</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2804-2328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-1582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-5971</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-1690 |
ispartof | Creativity and innovation management, 2020-03, Vol.29 (1), p.161-177 |
issn | 0963-1690 1467-8691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2365128567 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Wiley; Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI) |
subjects | Collaboration Environmental scanning Foundations Initiatives Innovations Networks Project management R&D Reconfiguration Research & development Social networks Stability analysis Transistors |
title | How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20orchestrate%20R&D%20networks?%20The%20role%20of%20orchestration%20subprocesses%20and%20collaborative%20practices%20over%20time&rft.jtitle=Creativity%20and%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Faccin,%20Kad%C3%ADgia&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=161-177&rft.issn=0963-1690&rft.eissn=1467-8691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/caim.12355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2365128567%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2365128567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |