Loading…

How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time

Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Creativity and innovation management 2020-03, Vol.29 (1), p.161-177
Main Authors: Faccin, Kadígia, Wegner, Douglas, Balestrin, Alsones
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253
container_end_page 177
container_issue 1
container_start_page 161
container_title Creativity and innovation management
container_volume 29
creator Faccin, Kadígia
Wegner, Douglas
Balestrin, Alsones
description Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative practices. We based our study on the three orchestration subprocesses proposed by Dhanaraj and Parkhe, namely, to foster knowledge mobility, guarantee innovation appropriability, and maintain network stability. To achieve our goal, we analysed the collaborative practices in an R&D network in the semiconductor industry in France. The case consists of an R&D network among 26 companies to create a new transistor. The data include 65 interviews and 192 documents. The study contributes to the literature on network orchestration by showing that specific collaborative practices performed by a hub firm enable a fourth orchestration subprocess—network reconfiguration—which is necessary in long‐lasting and complex R&D networks and also affects the other three subprocesses. Network reconfiguration consists in disassociating and attracting new members to the R&D network to cover knowledge demands, and is performed by the hub‐firm through specific collaborative practices. The results can benefit practitioners by showing which collaborative practices may be useful for a hub firm throughout the development of an R&D network.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/caim.12355
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2365128567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2365128567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4RdYQuKAlOJH7CQnhMqjlYqQUO-W7azVlCQudtqq_56UcODEXvYw3-yOBqFrSia0n3urq2ZCGRfiBI1oKrMklwU9RSNSSJ5QWZBzdBHjmhCSckZHqJn5Pe489sGuIHZBd4A_bp9wC93eh8_4gJcrwMHXgL37Q1W-xXFrNsFbiBEi1m2Jra9rbfxR3gHeBG27qpex30HAXdXAJTpzuo5w9bvHaPnyvJzOksX763z6uEgsJ1QkQkpIOWG50ZJKlxrKCqNLIyxxRNiMEaOpI5yAlc4ZZmRZ5sykLM9yywQfo5vhbB_va9sHVmu_DW3_UTEuBWW5kFlP3Q2UDT7GAE5tQtXocFCUqGOb6tim-mmzh-kA76saDv-Qavo4fxs8303KeJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2365128567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to orchestrate R&amp;D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</source><creator>Faccin, Kadígia ; Wegner, Douglas ; Balestrin, Alsones</creator><creatorcontrib>Faccin, Kadígia ; Wegner, Douglas ; Balestrin, Alsones</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative practices. We based our study on the three orchestration subprocesses proposed by Dhanaraj and Parkhe, namely, to foster knowledge mobility, guarantee innovation appropriability, and maintain network stability. To achieve our goal, we analysed the collaborative practices in an R&D network in the semiconductor industry in France. The case consists of an R&D network among 26 companies to create a new transistor. The data include 65 interviews and 192 documents. The study contributes to the literature on network orchestration by showing that specific collaborative practices performed by a hub firm enable a fourth orchestration subprocess—network reconfiguration—which is necessary in long‐lasting and complex R&D networks and also affects the other three subprocesses. Network reconfiguration consists in disassociating and attracting new members to the R&D network to cover knowledge demands, and is performed by the hub‐firm through specific collaborative practices. The results can benefit practitioners by showing which collaborative practices may be useful for a hub firm throughout the development of an R&D network.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/caim.12355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Environmental scanning ; Foundations ; Initiatives ; Innovations ; Networks ; Project management ; R&amp;D ; Reconfiguration ; Research &amp; development ; Social networks ; Stability analysis ; Transistors</subject><ispartof>Creativity and innovation management, 2020-03, Vol.29 (1), p.161-177</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2804-2328 ; 0000-0001-6397-1582 ; 0000-0001-8634-5971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34130</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faccin, Kadígia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegner, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balestrin, Alsones</creatorcontrib><title>How to orchestrate R&amp;D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time</title><title>Creativity and innovation management</title><description><![CDATA[Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative practices. We based our study on the three orchestration subprocesses proposed by Dhanaraj and Parkhe, namely, to foster knowledge mobility, guarantee innovation appropriability, and maintain network stability. To achieve our goal, we analysed the collaborative practices in an R&D network in the semiconductor industry in France. The case consists of an R&D network among 26 companies to create a new transistor. The data include 65 interviews and 192 documents. The study contributes to the literature on network orchestration by showing that specific collaborative practices performed by a hub firm enable a fourth orchestration subprocess—network reconfiguration—which is necessary in long‐lasting and complex R&D networks and also affects the other three subprocesses. Network reconfiguration consists in disassociating and attracting new members to the R&D network to cover knowledge demands, and is performed by the hub‐firm through specific collaborative practices. The results can benefit practitioners by showing which collaborative practices may be useful for a hub firm throughout the development of an R&D network.]]></description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Environmental scanning</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Reconfiguration</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Transistors</subject><issn>0963-1690</issn><issn>1467-8691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F29</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4RdYQuKAlOJH7CQnhMqjlYqQUO-W7azVlCQudtqq_56UcODEXvYw3-yOBqFrSia0n3urq2ZCGRfiBI1oKrMklwU9RSNSSJ5QWZBzdBHjmhCSckZHqJn5Pe489sGuIHZBd4A_bp9wC93eh8_4gJcrwMHXgL37Q1W-xXFrNsFbiBEi1m2Jra9rbfxR3gHeBG27qpex30HAXdXAJTpzuo5w9bvHaPnyvJzOksX763z6uEgsJ1QkQkpIOWG50ZJKlxrKCqNLIyxxRNiMEaOpI5yAlc4ZZmRZ5sykLM9yywQfo5vhbB_va9sHVmu_DW3_UTEuBWW5kFlP3Q2UDT7GAE5tQtXocFCUqGOb6tim-mmzh-kA76saDv-Qavo4fxs8303KeJI</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Faccin, Kadígia</creator><creator>Wegner, Douglas</creator><creator>Balestrin, Alsones</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2804-2328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-1582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-5971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>How to orchestrate R&amp;D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time</title><author>Faccin, Kadígia ; Wegner, Douglas ; Balestrin, Alsones</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Environmental scanning</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Reconfiguration</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Transistors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faccin, Kadígia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegner, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balestrin, Alsones</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faccin, Kadígia</au><au>Wegner, Douglas</au><au>Balestrin, Alsones</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to orchestrate R&amp;D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time</atitle><jtitle>Creativity and innovation management</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>161-177</pages><issn>0963-1690</issn><eissn>1467-8691</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Although R&D networks have been increasingly used by companies to foster innovation through collaboration, there are still challenges regarding how to successfully orchestrate such projects. The goal of this study is to analyse how a hub firm orchestrates an R&D network through collaborative practices. We based our study on the three orchestration subprocesses proposed by Dhanaraj and Parkhe, namely, to foster knowledge mobility, guarantee innovation appropriability, and maintain network stability. To achieve our goal, we analysed the collaborative practices in an R&D network in the semiconductor industry in France. The case consists of an R&D network among 26 companies to create a new transistor. The data include 65 interviews and 192 documents. The study contributes to the literature on network orchestration by showing that specific collaborative practices performed by a hub firm enable a fourth orchestration subprocess—network reconfiguration—which is necessary in long‐lasting and complex R&D networks and also affects the other three subprocesses. Network reconfiguration consists in disassociating and attracting new members to the R&D network to cover knowledge demands, and is performed by the hub‐firm through specific collaborative practices. The results can benefit practitioners by showing which collaborative practices may be useful for a hub firm throughout the development of an R&D network.]]></abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/caim.12355</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2804-2328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-1582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-5971</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-1690
ispartof Creativity and innovation management, 2020-03, Vol.29 (1), p.161-177
issn 0963-1690
1467-8691
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2365128567
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Wiley; Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)
subjects Collaboration
Environmental scanning
Foundations
Initiatives
Innovations
Networks
Project management
R&D
Reconfiguration
Research & development
Social networks
Stability analysis
Transistors
title How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20orchestrate%20R&D%20networks?%20The%20role%20of%20orchestration%20subprocesses%20and%20collaborative%20practices%20over%20time&rft.jtitle=Creativity%20and%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Faccin,%20Kad%C3%ADgia&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=161-177&rft.issn=0963-1690&rft.eissn=1467-8691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/caim.12355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2365128567%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3015-566e43028ba616f4b129badb5c0f05c720ba1f030ec6ffb2b6dd82b42878c253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2365128567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true