Loading…
Can a Machine Learn the Outcome of Planetary Collisions?
Planetary-scale collisions are common during the last stages of formation of solid planets, including the solar system terrestrial planets. The problem of growing planets has been divided into studying the gravitational interaction of embryos relevant on million year timescales and treated with N-bo...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Astrophysical journal 2019-09, Vol.882 (1), p.35 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a3c3afa70848d979fee687602d0d6d2e4d7bb6e0af24a1a5160523e5746c33e43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a3c3afa70848d979fee687602d0d6d2e4d7bb6e0af24a1a5160523e5746c33e43 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | The Astrophysical journal |
container_volume | 882 |
creator | Valencia, Diana Paracha, Emaad Jackson, Alan P. |
description | Planetary-scale collisions are common during the last stages of formation of solid planets, including the solar system terrestrial planets. The problem of growing planets has been divided into studying the gravitational interaction of embryos relevant on million year timescales and treated with N-body codes and the collision between objects with a timescale of hours to days and treated with smoothed-particle hydrodynamics. These are now being coupled with simple parameterized models. We set out to investigate if machine-learning techniques can offer a better solution by predicting the outcome of collisions that can then be used in N-body simulations. We considered three different supervised machine-learning approaches: gradient boosting regression trees, nested models, and Gaussian processes (GPs). We found that the former produced the best results, and that it was slightly surpassed by ensembling different algorithms. With GPs, we found the regions of parameter space that may yield the most information to machine-learning algorithms. Thus, we suggest new smoothed-particle hydrodynamics calculations to focus first on mass ratios 0.5. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bfb |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2365901044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2365901044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a3c3afa70848d979fee687602d0d6d2e4d7bb6e0af24a1a5160523e5746c33e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvHgNerZuvJu1JpPgFK-tBwVuYthO2S7dZk-7B_96Wip48DTO89-bxI-SSsxuZK7PkmcxTJTOzhEpUrjoiye_pmCSMMZVqaT5OyVmM22kVRZGQvISeAn2BetP2SFcIoafDBun6MNR-h9Q7-tpBjwOEL1r6rmtj6_t4e05OHHQRL37mgrw_3L-VT-lq_fhc3q3SWnE9pCBrCQ4My1XeFKZwiDo3momGNboRqBpTVRoZOKGAQ8Y1y4TEzChdS4lKLsjVnLsP_vOAcbBbfwj9-NIKqbOCcaYmFZtVdfAxBnR2H9rdWNlyZic-doJhJxh25jNarmdL6_d_mf_KvwHFNGWm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2365901044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a Machine Learn the Outcome of Planetary Collisions?</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Valencia, Diana ; Paracha, Emaad ; Jackson, Alan P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Valencia, Diana ; Paracha, Emaad ; Jackson, Alan P.</creatorcontrib><description>Planetary-scale collisions are common during the last stages of formation of solid planets, including the solar system terrestrial planets. The problem of growing planets has been divided into studying the gravitational interaction of embryos relevant on million year timescales and treated with N-body codes and the collision between objects with a timescale of hours to days and treated with smoothed-particle hydrodynamics. These are now being coupled with simple parameterized models. We set out to investigate if machine-learning techniques can offer a better solution by predicting the outcome of collisions that can then be used in N-body simulations. We considered three different supervised machine-learning approaches: gradient boosting regression trees, nested models, and Gaussian processes (GPs). We found that the former produced the best results, and that it was slightly surpassed by ensembling different algorithms. With GPs, we found the regions of parameter space that may yield the most information to machine-learning algorithms. Thus, we suggest new smoothed-particle hydrodynamics calculations to focus first on mass ratios 0.5.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bfb</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Astrophysics ; Collisions ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Embryos ; Fluid flow ; Fluid mechanics ; Gaussian process ; Hydrodynamics ; Machine learning ; Mass ratios ; Planet formation ; Planets ; planets and satellites: formation ; Regression analysis ; Smooth particle hydrodynamics ; Solar system ; Terrestrial environments ; Terrestrial planets</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2019-09, Vol.882 (1), p.35</ispartof><rights>2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing Sep 01, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a3c3afa70848d979fee687602d0d6d2e4d7bb6e0af24a1a5160523e5746c33e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a3c3afa70848d979fee687602d0d6d2e4d7bb6e0af24a1a5160523e5746c33e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3993-4030 ; 0000-0003-4393-9520</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valencia, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paracha, Emaad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Alan P.</creatorcontrib><title>Can a Machine Learn the Outcome of Planetary Collisions?</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><addtitle>APJ</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><description>Planetary-scale collisions are common during the last stages of formation of solid planets, including the solar system terrestrial planets. The problem of growing planets has been divided into studying the gravitational interaction of embryos relevant on million year timescales and treated with N-body codes and the collision between objects with a timescale of hours to days and treated with smoothed-particle hydrodynamics. These are now being coupled with simple parameterized models. We set out to investigate if machine-learning techniques can offer a better solution by predicting the outcome of collisions that can then be used in N-body simulations. We considered three different supervised machine-learning approaches: gradient boosting regression trees, nested models, and Gaussian processes (GPs). We found that the former produced the best results, and that it was slightly surpassed by ensembling different algorithms. With GPs, we found the regions of parameter space that may yield the most information to machine-learning algorithms. Thus, we suggest new smoothed-particle hydrodynamics calculations to focus first on mass ratios 0.5.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Collisions</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mass ratios</subject><subject>Planet formation</subject><subject>Planets</subject><subject>planets and satellites: formation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Smooth particle hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Solar system</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Terrestrial planets</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMoWFfvHgNerZuvJu1JpPgFK-tBwVuYthO2S7dZk-7B_96Wip48DTO89-bxI-SSsxuZK7PkmcxTJTOzhEpUrjoiye_pmCSMMZVqaT5OyVmM22kVRZGQvISeAn2BetP2SFcIoafDBun6MNR-h9Q7-tpBjwOEL1r6rmtj6_t4e05OHHQRL37mgrw_3L-VT-lq_fhc3q3SWnE9pCBrCQ4My1XeFKZwiDo3momGNboRqBpTVRoZOKGAQ8Y1y4TEzChdS4lKLsjVnLsP_vOAcbBbfwj9-NIKqbOCcaYmFZtVdfAxBnR2H9rdWNlyZic-doJhJxh25jNarmdL6_d_mf_KvwHFNGWm</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Valencia, Diana</creator><creator>Paracha, Emaad</creator><creator>Jackson, Alan P.</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3993-4030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4393-9520</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Can a Machine Learn the Outcome of Planetary Collisions?</title><author>Valencia, Diana ; Paracha, Emaad ; Jackson, Alan P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a3c3afa70848d979fee687602d0d6d2e4d7bb6e0af24a1a5160523e5746c33e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Collisions</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mass ratios</topic><topic>Planet formation</topic><topic>Planets</topic><topic>planets and satellites: formation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Smooth particle hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Solar system</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Terrestrial planets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valencia, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paracha, Emaad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Alan P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valencia, Diana</au><au>Paracha, Emaad</au><au>Jackson, Alan P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a Machine Learn the Outcome of Planetary Collisions?</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><stitle>APJ</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>882</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><pages>35-</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><abstract>Planetary-scale collisions are common during the last stages of formation of solid planets, including the solar system terrestrial planets. The problem of growing planets has been divided into studying the gravitational interaction of embryos relevant on million year timescales and treated with N-body codes and the collision between objects with a timescale of hours to days and treated with smoothed-particle hydrodynamics. These are now being coupled with simple parameterized models. We set out to investigate if machine-learning techniques can offer a better solution by predicting the outcome of collisions that can then be used in N-body simulations. We considered three different supervised machine-learning approaches: gradient boosting regression trees, nested models, and Gaussian processes (GPs). We found that the former produced the best results, and that it was slightly surpassed by ensembling different algorithms. With GPs, we found the regions of parameter space that may yield the most information to machine-learning algorithms. Thus, we suggest new smoothed-particle hydrodynamics calculations to focus first on mass ratios 0.5.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bfb</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3993-4030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4393-9520</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-637X |
ispartof | The Astrophysical journal, 2019-09, Vol.882 (1), p.35 |
issn | 0004-637X 1538-4357 1538-4357 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2365901044 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Algorithms Astrophysics Collisions Computational fluid dynamics Computer simulation Embryos Fluid flow Fluid mechanics Gaussian process Hydrodynamics Machine learning Mass ratios Planet formation Planets planets and satellites: formation Regression analysis Smooth particle hydrodynamics Solar system Terrestrial environments Terrestrial planets |
title | Can a Machine Learn the Outcome of Planetary Collisions? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20Machine%20Learn%20the%20Outcome%20of%20Planetary%20Collisions?&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Valencia,%20Diana&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=882&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.pages=35-&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bfb&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2365901044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a3c3afa70848d979fee687602d0d6d2e4d7bb6e0af24a1a5160523e5746c33e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2365901044&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |