Loading…

A probabilistic model for designing and assessing the performance of eDNA sampling protocols

Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, the detection of species‐specific genetic material in water samples, is an emerging tool for monitoring aquatic invasive species. Optimizing eDNA sampling protocols can be challenging because there is imperfect understanding of how each step of the protocol influen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular ecology resources 2020-03, Vol.20 (2), p.404-414
Main Authors: Song, Jeffery W., Schultz, Martin T., Casman, Elizabeth A., Bockrath, Katherine D., Mize, Erica, Monroe, Emy M., Tuttle‐Lau, Maren, Small, Mitchell J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-1d15fc6df86059a60654eda4cc110f0cf92258f3a14a2c4ead4327673cc4a7403
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-1d15fc6df86059a60654eda4cc110f0cf92258f3a14a2c4ead4327673cc4a7403
container_end_page 414
container_issue 2
container_start_page 404
container_title Molecular ecology resources
container_volume 20
creator Song, Jeffery W.
Schultz, Martin T.
Casman, Elizabeth A.
Bockrath, Katherine D.
Mize, Erica
Monroe, Emy M.
Tuttle‐Lau, Maren
Small, Mitchell J.
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, the detection of species‐specific genetic material in water samples, is an emerging tool for monitoring aquatic invasive species. Optimizing eDNA sampling protocols can be challenging because there is imperfect understanding of how each step of the protocol influences its sensitivity. This paper develops a probabilistic model that characterizes each step of an eDNA sampling protocol to evaluate the protocol's overall detection sensitivity for one sample. The model is then applied to analyse how changes over time made to the eDNA sampling protocol to detect bighead (BH) and silver carp (SC) eDNA have influenced its sensitivity, and hence interpretation of the results. The model shows that changes to the protocol have caused the sensitivity of the protocol to fluctuate. A more efficient extraction method in 2013, new species‐specific markers with a qPCR assay in 2014, and a more efficient capture method in 2015 have improved the sensitivity, while switching to a larger elution volume in 2013 and a smaller sample volume in 2015 have reduced the sensitivity. Overall, the sensitivity of the current protocol is higher for BH eDNA detection and SC eDNA detection compared to the original protocol used from 2009 to 2012. The paper shows how this model of eDNA sampling can be used to evaluate the effect of proposed changes in an eDNA sampling and analysis protocol on the sensitivity of that protocol to help researchers optimize their design.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1755-0998.13113
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2366245616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2366245616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-1d15fc6df86059a60654eda4cc110f0cf92258f3a14a2c4ead4327673cc4a7403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkElLAzEYQIMotlbP3iTgedrsmTmWWheo9aLgQQhpljpllppMkf57Z5zaq7lk4eV98AC4xmiM2zXBkvMEZVk6xhRjegKGx5fT4zl9H4CLGDcICZRJdg4GFAspCSFD8DGF21Cv9Cov8tjkBpa1dQX0dYDWxXxd5dUa6spCHaOLsbs1nw5uXWiRUlfGwdpDd7ecwqjLbdEBrbCpTV3ES3DmdRHd1WEfgbf7-evsMVm8PDzNpovEUIlpgi3m3gjrU4F4pgUSnDmrmTEYI4-MzwjhqacaM00Mc9oySqSQ1BimJUN0BG57bzv5a-diozb1LlTtSEWoEIRxgUVLTXrKhDrG4LzahrzUYa8wUl1N1fVSXTv1W7P9cXPw7lals0f-L18L8B74zgu3_8-nnufLXvwDPF1-eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2366245616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A probabilistic model for designing and assessing the performance of eDNA sampling protocols</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Song, Jeffery W. ; Schultz, Martin T. ; Casman, Elizabeth A. ; Bockrath, Katherine D. ; Mize, Erica ; Monroe, Emy M. ; Tuttle‐Lau, Maren ; Small, Mitchell J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Jeffery W. ; Schultz, Martin T. ; Casman, Elizabeth A. ; Bockrath, Katherine D. ; Mize, Erica ; Monroe, Emy M. ; Tuttle‐Lau, Maren ; Small, Mitchell J.</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, the detection of species‐specific genetic material in water samples, is an emerging tool for monitoring aquatic invasive species. Optimizing eDNA sampling protocols can be challenging because there is imperfect understanding of how each step of the protocol influences its sensitivity. This paper develops a probabilistic model that characterizes each step of an eDNA sampling protocol to evaluate the protocol's overall detection sensitivity for one sample. The model is then applied to analyse how changes over time made to the eDNA sampling protocol to detect bighead (BH) and silver carp (SC) eDNA have influenced its sensitivity, and hence interpretation of the results. The model shows that changes to the protocol have caused the sensitivity of the protocol to fluctuate. A more efficient extraction method in 2013, new species‐specific markers with a qPCR assay in 2014, and a more efficient capture method in 2015 have improved the sensitivity, while switching to a larger elution volume in 2013 and a smaller sample volume in 2015 have reduced the sensitivity. Overall, the sensitivity of the current protocol is higher for BH eDNA detection and SC eDNA detection compared to the original protocol used from 2009 to 2012. The paper shows how this model of eDNA sampling can be used to evaluate the effect of proposed changes in an eDNA sampling and analysis protocol on the sensitivity of that protocol to help researchers optimize their design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-098X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-0998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13113</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31677222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Carp ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Design optimization ; detection sensitivity ; DNA ; Elution ; Environmental DNA ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; New species ; Probabilistic models ; Probability theory ; Protocol ; Sampling ; sampling protocol ; Sensitivity analysis ; Water analysis ; Water sampling</subject><ispartof>Molecular ecology resources, 2020-03, Vol.20 (2), p.404-414</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-1d15fc6df86059a60654eda4cc110f0cf92258f3a14a2c4ead4327673cc4a7403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-1d15fc6df86059a60654eda4cc110f0cf92258f3a14a2c4ead4327673cc4a7403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0964-8888</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31677222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Jeffery W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Martin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casman, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bockrath, Katherine D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mize, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monroe, Emy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle‐Lau, Maren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Mitchell J.</creatorcontrib><title>A probabilistic model for designing and assessing the performance of eDNA sampling protocols</title><title>Molecular ecology resources</title><addtitle>Mol Ecol Resour</addtitle><description>Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, the detection of species‐specific genetic material in water samples, is an emerging tool for monitoring aquatic invasive species. Optimizing eDNA sampling protocols can be challenging because there is imperfect understanding of how each step of the protocol influences its sensitivity. This paper develops a probabilistic model that characterizes each step of an eDNA sampling protocol to evaluate the protocol's overall detection sensitivity for one sample. The model is then applied to analyse how changes over time made to the eDNA sampling protocol to detect bighead (BH) and silver carp (SC) eDNA have influenced its sensitivity, and hence interpretation of the results. The model shows that changes to the protocol have caused the sensitivity of the protocol to fluctuate. A more efficient extraction method in 2013, new species‐specific markers with a qPCR assay in 2014, and a more efficient capture method in 2015 have improved the sensitivity, while switching to a larger elution volume in 2013 and a smaller sample volume in 2015 have reduced the sensitivity. Overall, the sensitivity of the current protocol is higher for BH eDNA detection and SC eDNA detection compared to the original protocol used from 2009 to 2012. The paper shows how this model of eDNA sampling can be used to evaluate the effect of proposed changes in an eDNA sampling and analysis protocol on the sensitivity of that protocol to help researchers optimize their design.</description><subject>Carp</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>detection sensitivity</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Elution</subject><subject>Environmental DNA</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>New species</subject><subject>Probabilistic models</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>sampling protocol</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><issn>1755-098X</issn><issn>1755-0998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkElLAzEYQIMotlbP3iTgedrsmTmWWheo9aLgQQhpljpllppMkf57Z5zaq7lk4eV98AC4xmiM2zXBkvMEZVk6xhRjegKGx5fT4zl9H4CLGDcICZRJdg4GFAspCSFD8DGF21Cv9Cov8tjkBpa1dQX0dYDWxXxd5dUa6spCHaOLsbs1nw5uXWiRUlfGwdpDd7ecwqjLbdEBrbCpTV3ES3DmdRHd1WEfgbf7-evsMVm8PDzNpovEUIlpgi3m3gjrU4F4pgUSnDmrmTEYI4-MzwjhqacaM00Mc9oySqSQ1BimJUN0BG57bzv5a-diozb1LlTtSEWoEIRxgUVLTXrKhDrG4LzahrzUYa8wUl1N1fVSXTv1W7P9cXPw7lals0f-L18L8B74zgu3_8-nnufLXvwDPF1-eg</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Song, Jeffery W.</creator><creator>Schultz, Martin T.</creator><creator>Casman, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Bockrath, Katherine D.</creator><creator>Mize, Erica</creator><creator>Monroe, Emy M.</creator><creator>Tuttle‐Lau, Maren</creator><creator>Small, Mitchell J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-8888</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>A probabilistic model for designing and assessing the performance of eDNA sampling protocols</title><author>Song, Jeffery W. ; Schultz, Martin T. ; Casman, Elizabeth A. ; Bockrath, Katherine D. ; Mize, Erica ; Monroe, Emy M. ; Tuttle‐Lau, Maren ; Small, Mitchell J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-1d15fc6df86059a60654eda4cc110f0cf92258f3a14a2c4ead4327673cc4a7403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carp</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>detection sensitivity</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Elution</topic><topic>Environmental DNA</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>New species</topic><topic>Probabilistic models</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>sampling protocol</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Jeffery W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Martin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casman, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bockrath, Katherine D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mize, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monroe, Emy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle‐Lau, Maren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, Mitchell J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Molecular ecology resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Jeffery W.</au><au>Schultz, Martin T.</au><au>Casman, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Bockrath, Katherine D.</au><au>Mize, Erica</au><au>Monroe, Emy M.</au><au>Tuttle‐Lau, Maren</au><au>Small, Mitchell J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A probabilistic model for designing and assessing the performance of eDNA sampling protocols</atitle><jtitle>Molecular ecology resources</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Ecol Resour</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>404</spage><epage>414</epage><pages>404-414</pages><issn>1755-098X</issn><eissn>1755-0998</eissn><abstract>Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, the detection of species‐specific genetic material in water samples, is an emerging tool for monitoring aquatic invasive species. Optimizing eDNA sampling protocols can be challenging because there is imperfect understanding of how each step of the protocol influences its sensitivity. This paper develops a probabilistic model that characterizes each step of an eDNA sampling protocol to evaluate the protocol's overall detection sensitivity for one sample. The model is then applied to analyse how changes over time made to the eDNA sampling protocol to detect bighead (BH) and silver carp (SC) eDNA have influenced its sensitivity, and hence interpretation of the results. The model shows that changes to the protocol have caused the sensitivity of the protocol to fluctuate. A more efficient extraction method in 2013, new species‐specific markers with a qPCR assay in 2014, and a more efficient capture method in 2015 have improved the sensitivity, while switching to a larger elution volume in 2013 and a smaller sample volume in 2015 have reduced the sensitivity. Overall, the sensitivity of the current protocol is higher for BH eDNA detection and SC eDNA detection compared to the original protocol used from 2009 to 2012. The paper shows how this model of eDNA sampling can be used to evaluate the effect of proposed changes in an eDNA sampling and analysis protocol on the sensitivity of that protocol to help researchers optimize their design.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31677222</pmid><doi>10.1111/1755-0998.13113</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-8888</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-098X
ispartof Molecular ecology resources, 2020-03, Vol.20 (2), p.404-414
issn 1755-098X
1755-0998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2366245616
source Wiley
subjects Carp
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Design optimization
detection sensitivity
DNA
Elution
Environmental DNA
Introduced species
Invasive species
New species
Probabilistic models
Probability theory
Protocol
Sampling
sampling protocol
Sensitivity analysis
Water analysis
Water sampling
title A probabilistic model for designing and assessing the performance of eDNA sampling protocols
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A42%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20probabilistic%20model%20for%20designing%20and%20assessing%20the%20performance%20of%20eDNA%20sampling%20protocols&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20ecology%20resources&rft.au=Song,%20Jeffery%20W.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=404&rft.epage=414&rft.pages=404-414&rft.issn=1755-098X&rft.eissn=1755-0998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1755-0998.13113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2366245616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-1d15fc6df86059a60654eda4cc110f0cf92258f3a14a2c4ead4327673cc4a7403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2366245616&rft_id=info:pmid/31677222&rfr_iscdi=true