De-contextualising competence:: Can business best practice be bundled and sold?

• Published in: European management journal 1999-02, Vol.17 (1), p.39-49
• Main Authors: Wareham, Jonathan, Gerrits, Han
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Benchmarks; Best practice; Economic theory; Guidelines; Manycompanies; Trends
• ISSN: 0263-2373; 1873-5681
• DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2373(98)00057-7

The study of Business Best Practice (BBP) currently enjoys broad popularity amongst IT-based consultancies as well as the academic community. Unfortunately, despite the growth of practice, BBP lacks sound theoretical foundations. This paper addresses the shortcomings of current best practice benchmarking literature and offers a first step towards a more solid foundation for the study of BBP. We begin by surveying current normative trends in benchmarking and BBP literature. We continue by examining a group of BBP cases and show how these prescriptions can become quite problematic and complex when transferring knowledge across organisations, industries, institutional environments, and cultures. In illustrating these challenges, we form a context for a critical evaluation of BBP's underlying assumptions. Explicitly addressing these assumptions opens an avenue for analysing the epistemological challenges in identifying and defining `best practice'. Concluding that apart from the identification of `best practice', the mechanisms of best practice knowledge acquisition and co-ordination are of interest, we turn to contemporary economic `theories of the firm', showing where these concepts do — and do not — provide guidance and foundations for the study of the accumulation and management of `best practice' knowledge. Based upon the epistemological challenges, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of existing theory, we synthesise our argument by formulating premises and practical guidelines for the practice of BBP transfer.