Loading…
Discussion of A UK Test of an Inflation-Adjusted Ohlson Model
If the residual income/abnormal earnings (RI) valuation model (RIVM) is implemented using book values plus a series of explicit RI forecasts, it should give the same value estimate regardless of whether it is formulated on an historical-cost or inflation adjusted basis. However, it is possible that...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of business finance & accounting 2005-04, Vol.32 (3-4), p.535-547 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | If the residual income/abnormal earnings (RI) valuation model (RIVM) is implemented using book values plus a series of explicit RI forecasts, it should give the same value estimate regardless of whether it is formulated on an historical-cost or inflation adjusted basis. However, it is possible that the parameters used in the LIM-RIVM could be affected by inflation adjustment, and that the Ohlson LIM-RIVM might work better with inflation-adjusted inputs than with historical-cost inputs. The question address by Gegory, Saleh, and Tucker (GST) of whether inflation adjustment might facilitate implementation of Linear Information Models-RIMV (LIM-RIMV) is an interesting one. Their results indicate that inflation adjustment of accounting inputs has little impact on LIM persistence parameters, and this is a useful contribution to knowledge. More generally, it is important to note that inflation adjustment of historical-cost accounting inputs can involve complexity that may easily outweigh the benefits. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-686X 1468-5957 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00603.x |