Loading…
Rutting behavior and rheological modeling of EVA-modified binders in the mixture and binder scales
This study addressed the rutting potential of binders prepared with ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (AC + EVA) and this same copolymer combined with polyphosphoric acid (AC + EVA + PPA). Multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) tests at 64, 70 and 76 °C were conducted in the binder samples, as wel...
Saved in:
Published in: | Materials and structures 2019-04, Vol.52 (2), Article 36 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study addressed the rutting potential of binders prepared with ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (AC + EVA) and this same copolymer combined with polyphosphoric acid (AC + EVA + PPA). Multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) tests at 64, 70 and 76 °C were conducted in the binder samples, as well as flow number tests at 60 °C in the mixture samples. The AC + EVA and the AC + EVA + PPA are equally graded on Superpave (76-xx), and rheological models were selected to further investigate this rutting behavior of the materials. The rankings of the most rut resistant mixtures—AC + EVA + PPA, followed by the AC + EVA and the 50/70 base binder—are exactly the same according to the binder parameters
J
nr
(nonrecoverable compliance from MSCR),
G
V
(viscous component of the creep stiffness from the Burgers model) and
α
from the modified power model. However, the parameter
J
nr, diff
(percent difference in compliances) showed a diametrically opposite trend in terms of the rutting resistance of binders, and this further suggests its inability to be used as a performance-related parameter in the Superpave specification. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-5997 1871-6873 |
DOI: | 10.1617/s11527-019-1335-z |