The Dark Sides of Social Policy: From Neoliberalism to Resurgent Right‐wing Populism

ABSTRACT This Forum Debate explores the confluence of neoliberal, populist, conservative and reactionary influences on contemporary ideologies and practices of social policy, with a focus on the poorer peripheries of global capitalism. Several fundamental tensions are highlighted, which are largely...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Development and change 2020-03, Vol.51 (2), p.371-397
Main Author: Fischer, Andrew M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Capitalism
Debates
Development policy
Discontent
Discredited
Ethnic identity
Global economy
Globalization
Identity
Identity politics
Ideology
Innovations
Left wing politics
Nationalism
Nativism
Neoliberalism
Politics
Populism
Power
Right wing politics
Segregation
Social development
Social order
Social policy
Subordination
Welfare state
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT This Forum Debate explores the confluence of neoliberal, populist, conservative and reactionary influences on contemporary ideologies and practices of social policy, with a focus on the poorer peripheries of global capitalism. Several fundamental tensions are highlighted, which are largely overlooked by the social policy and development literatures. First, many recent social policy innovations have been discredited by their association with neoliberalism. The rising political Right has been much more successful than the Left at exploiting this discontent, despite simultaneously deepening many aspects of neoliberalism once in power. At the same time, right‐wing movements have proactively used social policy as a political tool to fashion the social order along lines deemed amenable for their interests and ideologies, expressed along nationalist, racialized, ethnicized, nativist, religious, patriarchal or other lines, and to innovate practices of segregation, exclusion and subordination. While these synergies of neoliberal and right‐wing populism are observed globally, they need to be carefully and differentially interpreted from the perspective of late industrializing (or late welfare state) peripheral countries. Nonetheless, common themes occurring across both centres and peripheries, as identified by the invited contributions to this Debate section, include exclusionary identity politics, hierarchical and subordinating inclusions, and patriarchal familialism. In this context, segregationism is an ominous possibility of post‐neoliberal social policy.
ISSN:0012-155X
1467-7660
DOI:10.1111/dech.12577