Variation is information: Analyses of variation across items, participants, time, and methods in metalinguistic judgment data

In a usage-based framework, variation is part and parcel of our linguistic experiences, and therefore also of our mental representations of language. In this article, we bring attention to variation as a source of information. Instead of discarding variation as mere noise, we examine what it can rev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistics 2020-02, Vol.58 (1), p.37-81
Main Authors: Verhagen, Véronique, Mos, Maria, Schilperoord, Joost, Backus, Ad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dutch language
Familiarity
Individual differences
individual variation
Judgment
linguistic representations
Linguistics
Mental representation
metalinguistic judgments
Metalinguistics
multiword units
Noise
Prepositional phrases
usage-based linguistics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In a usage-based framework, variation is part and parcel of our linguistic experiences, and therefore also of our mental representations of language. In this article, we bring attention to variation as a source of information. Instead of discarding variation as mere noise, we examine what it can reveal about the representation and use of linguistic knowledge. By means of metalinguistic judgment data, we demonstrate how to quantify and interpret four types of variation: variation across items, participants, time, and methods. The data concern familiarity ratings assigned by 91 native speakers of Dutch to 79 Dutch prepositional phrases such as ‘in the garden’ and ‘around the entrance’. Participants performed the judgment task twice within a period of one to two weeks, using either a 7-point Likert scale or a Magnitude Estimation scale. We explicate the principles according to which the different types of variation can be considered information about mental representation, and we show how they can be used to test hypotheses regarding linguistic representations.
ISSN:0024-3949
1613-396X
DOI:10.1515/ling-2018-0036