A comparison of some structural models of private information arrival

We show that the PIN and the Duarte and Young (2009) (APIN) models do not match the variability of noise trade in the data and that this limitation has severe implications for how these models identify private information. We examine two alternatives to these models, the Generalized PIN model (GPIN)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of financial economics 2020-03, Vol.135 (3), p.795-815
Main Authors: Duarte, Jefferson, Hu, Edwin, Young, Lance
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Confidentiality
Information asymmetry
Information management
Liquidity
Noise
Structural models
Variability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f5ff7cdc2480d37470b3a1bc01e6f0e84c9e87cb7944acd69999f29290bede4d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f5ff7cdc2480d37470b3a1bc01e6f0e84c9e87cb7944acd69999f29290bede4d3
container_end_page 815
container_issue 3
container_start_page 795
container_title Journal of financial economics
container_volume 135
creator Duarte, Jefferson
Hu, Edwin
Young, Lance
description We show that the PIN and the Duarte and Young (2009) (APIN) models do not match the variability of noise trade in the data and that this limitation has severe implications for how these models identify private information. We examine two alternatives to these models, the Generalized PIN model (GPIN) and the Odders-White and Ready (2008) model (OWR). Our tests indicate that measures of private information based on the OWR and GPIN models are promising alternatives to the APIN’s Adj.PIN and PIN.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.08.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2375480783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304405X19301965</els_id><sourcerecordid>2375480783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f5ff7cdc2480d37470b3a1bc01e6f0e84c9e87cb7944acd69999f29290bede4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLguvoThILn1kmbbpqTLMv6AQteFLyFNJlAStusSbvgvzdlvfsuAzPvvZl5hNxTKCjQzWNXdNaNqH1RAhUFNAVAfUFWtOEiLzlnl2QFFbCcQf11TW5i7CCB12JF9ttM--Gogot-zLzNoh8wi1OY9TQH1WeDN9jHZXIM7qQmzNxofRjU5JJAhaXZ35Irq_qId391TT6f9x-71_zw_vK22x5yzaCccltby7XRJWvAVJxxaCtFWw0UNxawYVpgw3XLBWNKm41IsKUoBbRokJlqTR7Ovsfgv2eMk-z8HMa0UpYVr5Mtb6rEqs8sHXyMAa1Mpw8q_EgKcklMdvIvMbkkJqGRKbGkezrr0sN4chhk1A5HjcYF1JM03v3j8AvieHgK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375480783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of some structural models of private information arrival</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Duarte, Jefferson ; Hu, Edwin ; Young, Lance</creator><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Jefferson ; Hu, Edwin ; Young, Lance</creatorcontrib><description>We show that the PIN and the Duarte and Young (2009) (APIN) models do not match the variability of noise trade in the data and that this limitation has severe implications for how these models identify private information. We examine two alternatives to these models, the Generalized PIN model (GPIN) and the Odders-White and Ready (2008) model (OWR). Our tests indicate that measures of private information based on the OWR and GPIN models are promising alternatives to the APIN’s Adj.PIN and PIN.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-405X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.08.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Confidentiality ; Information asymmetry ; Information management ; Liquidity ; Noise ; Structural models ; Variability</subject><ispartof>Journal of financial economics, 2020-03, Vol.135 (3), p.795-815</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f5ff7cdc2480d37470b3a1bc01e6f0e84c9e87cb7944acd69999f29290bede4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f5ff7cdc2480d37470b3a1bc01e6f0e84c9e87cb7944acd69999f29290bede4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Jefferson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Lance</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of some structural models of private information arrival</title><title>Journal of financial economics</title><description>We show that the PIN and the Duarte and Young (2009) (APIN) models do not match the variability of noise trade in the data and that this limitation has severe implications for how these models identify private information. We examine two alternatives to these models, the Generalized PIN model (GPIN) and the Odders-White and Ready (2008) model (OWR). Our tests indicate that measures of private information based on the OWR and GPIN models are promising alternatives to the APIN’s Adj.PIN and PIN.</description><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Information asymmetry</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Structural models</subject><subject>Variability</subject><issn>0304-405X</issn><issn>1879-2774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAQDaLguvoThILn1kmbbpqTLMv6AQteFLyFNJlAStusSbvgvzdlvfsuAzPvvZl5hNxTKCjQzWNXdNaNqH1RAhUFNAVAfUFWtOEiLzlnl2QFFbCcQf11TW5i7CCB12JF9ttM--Gogot-zLzNoh8wi1OY9TQH1WeDN9jHZXIM7qQmzNxofRjU5JJAhaXZ35Irq_qId391TT6f9x-71_zw_vK22x5yzaCccltby7XRJWvAVJxxaCtFWw0UNxawYVpgw3XLBWNKm41IsKUoBbRokJlqTR7Ovsfgv2eMk-z8HMa0UpYVr5Mtb6rEqs8sHXyMAa1Mpw8q_EgKcklMdvIvMbkkJqGRKbGkezrr0sN4chhk1A5HjcYF1JM03v3j8AvieHgK</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Duarte, Jefferson</creator><creator>Hu, Edwin</creator><creator>Young, Lance</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>A comparison of some structural models of private information arrival</title><author>Duarte, Jefferson ; Hu, Edwin ; Young, Lance</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f5ff7cdc2480d37470b3a1bc01e6f0e84c9e87cb7944acd69999f29290bede4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Information asymmetry</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Structural models</topic><topic>Variability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Jefferson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Lance</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duarte, Jefferson</au><au>Hu, Edwin</au><au>Young, Lance</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of some structural models of private information arrival</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>795</spage><epage>815</epage><pages>795-815</pages><issn>0304-405X</issn><eissn>1879-2774</eissn><abstract>We show that the PIN and the Duarte and Young (2009) (APIN) models do not match the variability of noise trade in the data and that this limitation has severe implications for how these models identify private information. We examine two alternatives to these models, the Generalized PIN model (GPIN) and the Odders-White and Ready (2008) model (OWR). Our tests indicate that measures of private information based on the OWR and GPIN models are promising alternatives to the APIN’s Adj.PIN and PIN.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.08.005</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-405X
ispartof Journal of financial economics, 2020-03, Vol.135 (3), p.795-815
issn 0304-405X
1879-2774
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2375480783
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Confidentiality
Information asymmetry
Information management
Liquidity
Noise
Structural models
Variability
title A comparison of some structural models of private information arrival
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A56%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20some%20structural%20models%20of%20private%20information%20arrival&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20economics&rft.au=Duarte,%20Jefferson&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=795&rft.epage=815&rft.pages=795-815&rft.issn=0304-405X&rft.eissn=1879-2774&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375480783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-f5ff7cdc2480d37470b3a1bc01e6f0e84c9e87cb7944acd69999f29290bede4d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375480783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true