Loading…

Constructing optimal global timberland investment portfolios

Modern portfolio theory can support institutional investment decision-making around the design and management of risk-efficient timberland investment portfolios. Using a portfolio optimization modeling framework and assumptions reflecting the investable timberland universe, we describe the set of op...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forest policy and economics 2020-02, Vol.111, p.102083, Article 102083
Main Authors: Busby, Gwenlyn M., Binkley, Clark S., Chudy, Rafal P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-da82dc06f7fc7b20110980f28f51118d97c3e3dcfc31d5c1cb54198bf6940bc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-da82dc06f7fc7b20110980f28f51118d97c3e3dcfc31d5c1cb54198bf6940bc3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102083
container_title Forest policy and economics
container_volume 111
creator Busby, Gwenlyn M.
Binkley, Clark S.
Chudy, Rafal P.
description Modern portfolio theory can support institutional investment decision-making around the design and management of risk-efficient timberland investment portfolios. Using a portfolio optimization modeling framework and assumptions reflecting the investable timberland universe, we describe the set of optimal global timberland portfolios. Based on this analysis, timberland may achieve returns in the range of 6.1% to 8.5% real (8.5% to 10.9% nominal) (USD, post-tax, pre-investment management fee). The maximum-return portfolio carries considerably more return volatility, having a Sharpe ratio of about 0.53 compared to about 0.80 for the portfolio that maximizes risk-adjusted returns. All portfolios include significant allocations to both the US and Latin America, with the allocation to Latin America (and Asia) increasing as the risk budget increases. Significantly, Oceania—a popular location for institutional investment—does not enter the set of risk-efficient portfolios but requires return boosts of just 10 to 20 basis points to do so. Conservation impact forestry— a US strategy focusing on the joint production of ecosystem services and sawlogs—enters the set of risk-efficient timberland portfolios. •Using a mean-variance optimization approach, we describe the optimal composition of a global timberland portfolio.•Our results show that risk-efficient, optimal timberland portfolios may achieve returns between 8.5% and 10.9% nominal.•We find that all risk-efficient portfolios include significant allocations to both the U.S. and Latin America.•Investment in a U.S. strategy focusing on the joint production of carbon and timber enters the set of optimal portfolios.•Opportunities exist for efficiency-improving adjustments to institutional investors’ current timberland portfolio.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102083
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2375821970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S138993411930259X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2375821970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-da82dc06f7fc7b20110980f28f51118d97c3e3dcfc31d5c1cb54198bf6940bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtqwzAQRUVpoWnaP-jC0LXTGcuOJCiFEvqCQDfZC1uPIONYrqQE-vdVcNddzYM7M3cOIfcIKwRcP_Yr68Pkh1UFKHKrAk4vyAI5q0oGDVzmnHJRClrjNbmJsQdABkgX5Gnjx5jCUSU37gs_JXdoh2I_-C6HXHQmDO2oCzeeTEwHM6Zi8iFZPzgfb8mVbYdo7v7ikuzeXnebj3L79f65edmWitI6lbrllVawtswq1mWPCIKDrbhtEJFrwRQ1VCurKOpGoeqaGgXv7FrU0Cm6JA_z2in472O2IXt_DGO-KCvKGl6hYJBV9axSwccYjJVTyM-EH4kgz5hkL2dM8oxJzpjy2PM8ZvIDJ2eCjMqZURntglFJau_-X_ALgV9zQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375821970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Constructing optimal global timberland investment portfolios</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Busby, Gwenlyn M. ; Binkley, Clark S. ; Chudy, Rafal P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Busby, Gwenlyn M. ; Binkley, Clark S. ; Chudy, Rafal P.</creatorcontrib><description>Modern portfolio theory can support institutional investment decision-making around the design and management of risk-efficient timberland investment portfolios. Using a portfolio optimization modeling framework and assumptions reflecting the investable timberland universe, we describe the set of optimal global timberland portfolios. Based on this analysis, timberland may achieve returns in the range of 6.1% to 8.5% real (8.5% to 10.9% nominal) (USD, post-tax, pre-investment management fee). The maximum-return portfolio carries considerably more return volatility, having a Sharpe ratio of about 0.53 compared to about 0.80 for the portfolio that maximizes risk-adjusted returns. All portfolios include significant allocations to both the US and Latin America, with the allocation to Latin America (and Asia) increasing as the risk budget increases. Significantly, Oceania—a popular location for institutional investment—does not enter the set of risk-efficient portfolios but requires return boosts of just 10 to 20 basis points to do so. Conservation impact forestry— a US strategy focusing on the joint production of ecosystem services and sawlogs—enters the set of risk-efficient timberland portfolios. •Using a mean-variance optimization approach, we describe the optimal composition of a global timberland portfolio.•Our results show that risk-efficient, optimal timberland portfolios may achieve returns between 8.5% and 10.9% nominal.•We find that all risk-efficient portfolios include significant allocations to both the U.S. and Latin America.•Investment in a U.S. strategy focusing on the joint production of carbon and timber enters the set of optimal portfolios.•Opportunities exist for efficiency-improving adjustments to institutional investors’ current timberland portfolio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Allocations ; Astronomical models ; Conservation impact forestry ; Decision making ; Decision theory ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Forest conservation ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Global investments ; Institutional investments ; Investment ; Optimization ; Portfolio optimization ; Portfolios ; Risk ; Risk management ; Sharpe ratio ; Taxation ; Timberland ; Timberlands ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2020-02, Vol.111, p.102083, Article 102083</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-da82dc06f7fc7b20110980f28f51118d97c3e3dcfc31d5c1cb54198bf6940bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-da82dc06f7fc7b20110980f28f51118d97c3e3dcfc31d5c1cb54198bf6940bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27857,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Busby, Gwenlyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binkley, Clark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chudy, Rafal P.</creatorcontrib><title>Constructing optimal global timberland investment portfolios</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>Modern portfolio theory can support institutional investment decision-making around the design and management of risk-efficient timberland investment portfolios. Using a portfolio optimization modeling framework and assumptions reflecting the investable timberland universe, we describe the set of optimal global timberland portfolios. Based on this analysis, timberland may achieve returns in the range of 6.1% to 8.5% real (8.5% to 10.9% nominal) (USD, post-tax, pre-investment management fee). The maximum-return portfolio carries considerably more return volatility, having a Sharpe ratio of about 0.53 compared to about 0.80 for the portfolio that maximizes risk-adjusted returns. All portfolios include significant allocations to both the US and Latin America, with the allocation to Latin America (and Asia) increasing as the risk budget increases. Significantly, Oceania—a popular location for institutional investment—does not enter the set of risk-efficient portfolios but requires return boosts of just 10 to 20 basis points to do so. Conservation impact forestry— a US strategy focusing on the joint production of ecosystem services and sawlogs—enters the set of risk-efficient timberland portfolios. •Using a mean-variance optimization approach, we describe the optimal composition of a global timberland portfolio.•Our results show that risk-efficient, optimal timberland portfolios may achieve returns between 8.5% and 10.9% nominal.•We find that all risk-efficient portfolios include significant allocations to both the U.S. and Latin America.•Investment in a U.S. strategy focusing on the joint production of carbon and timber enters the set of optimal portfolios.•Opportunities exist for efficiency-improving adjustments to institutional investors’ current timberland portfolio.</description><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Astronomical models</subject><subject>Conservation impact forestry</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Global investments</subject><subject>Institutional investments</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Portfolio optimization</subject><subject>Portfolios</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sharpe ratio</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Timberland</subject><subject>Timberlands</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtqwzAQRUVpoWnaP-jC0LXTGcuOJCiFEvqCQDfZC1uPIONYrqQE-vdVcNddzYM7M3cOIfcIKwRcP_Yr68Pkh1UFKHKrAk4vyAI5q0oGDVzmnHJRClrjNbmJsQdABkgX5Gnjx5jCUSU37gs_JXdoh2I_-C6HXHQmDO2oCzeeTEwHM6Zi8iFZPzgfb8mVbYdo7v7ikuzeXnebj3L79f65edmWitI6lbrllVawtswq1mWPCIKDrbhtEJFrwRQ1VCurKOpGoeqaGgXv7FrU0Cm6JA_z2in472O2IXt_DGO-KCvKGl6hYJBV9axSwccYjJVTyM-EH4kgz5hkL2dM8oxJzpjy2PM8ZvIDJ2eCjMqZURntglFJau_-X_ALgV9zQA</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Busby, Gwenlyn M.</creator><creator>Binkley, Clark S.</creator><creator>Chudy, Rafal P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Constructing optimal global timberland investment portfolios</title><author>Busby, Gwenlyn M. ; Binkley, Clark S. ; Chudy, Rafal P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-da82dc06f7fc7b20110980f28f51118d97c3e3dcfc31d5c1cb54198bf6940bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Astronomical models</topic><topic>Conservation impact forestry</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Global investments</topic><topic>Institutional investments</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Portfolio optimization</topic><topic>Portfolios</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sharpe ratio</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Timberland</topic><topic>Timberlands</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Busby, Gwenlyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binkley, Clark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chudy, Rafal P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Busby, Gwenlyn M.</au><au>Binkley, Clark S.</au><au>Chudy, Rafal P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Constructing optimal global timberland investment portfolios</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>102083</spage><pages>102083-</pages><artnum>102083</artnum><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>Modern portfolio theory can support institutional investment decision-making around the design and management of risk-efficient timberland investment portfolios. Using a portfolio optimization modeling framework and assumptions reflecting the investable timberland universe, we describe the set of optimal global timberland portfolios. Based on this analysis, timberland may achieve returns in the range of 6.1% to 8.5% real (8.5% to 10.9% nominal) (USD, post-tax, pre-investment management fee). The maximum-return portfolio carries considerably more return volatility, having a Sharpe ratio of about 0.53 compared to about 0.80 for the portfolio that maximizes risk-adjusted returns. All portfolios include significant allocations to both the US and Latin America, with the allocation to Latin America (and Asia) increasing as the risk budget increases. Significantly, Oceania—a popular location for institutional investment—does not enter the set of risk-efficient portfolios but requires return boosts of just 10 to 20 basis points to do so. Conservation impact forestry— a US strategy focusing on the joint production of ecosystem services and sawlogs—enters the set of risk-efficient timberland portfolios. •Using a mean-variance optimization approach, we describe the optimal composition of a global timberland portfolio.•Our results show that risk-efficient, optimal timberland portfolios may achieve returns between 8.5% and 10.9% nominal.•We find that all risk-efficient portfolios include significant allocations to both the U.S. and Latin America.•Investment in a U.S. strategy focusing on the joint production of carbon and timber enters the set of optimal portfolios.•Opportunities exist for efficiency-improving adjustments to institutional investors’ current timberland portfolio.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102083</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-9341
ispartof Forest policy and economics, 2020-02, Vol.111, p.102083, Article 102083
issn 1389-9341
1872-7050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2375821970
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Allocations
Astronomical models
Conservation impact forestry
Decision making
Decision theory
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Forest conservation
Forest management
Forestry
Global investments
Institutional investments
Investment
Optimization
Portfolio optimization
Portfolios
Risk
Risk management
Sharpe ratio
Taxation
Timberland
Timberlands
Volatility
title Constructing optimal global timberland investment portfolios
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Constructing%20optimal%20global%20timberland%20investment%20portfolios&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Busby,%20Gwenlyn%20M.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=102083&rft.pages=102083-&rft.artnum=102083&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375821970%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-da82dc06f7fc7b20110980f28f51118d97c3e3dcfc31d5c1cb54198bf6940bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375821970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true