Loading…

From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works

— Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, toget...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Russian journal of developmental biology 2019-11, Vol.50 (6), p.290-302
Main Authors: Porges, Karl, Stewart, Ian G., Hoßfeld, Uwe, Levit, Georgy S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3
container_end_page 302
container_issue 6
container_start_page 290
container_title Russian journal of developmental biology
container_volume 50
creator Porges, Karl
Stewart, Ian G.
Hoßfeld, Uwe
Levit, Georgy S.
description — Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [ General Morphology of Organisms ] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both within the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the General Morphology (hereafter GM ), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S1062360419060079
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2375935974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2375935974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsP4C7g1tGbn0ln3ElpbaHgwoq4GkLmTp12JqnJlNKdr-Hr-SSmVHAhru6B851z4RByyeCGMSFvnxgoLhRIloMCGORHpMcUZIkQXB1HHe1k75-SsxCWAAwi1yOvY-9aOi1R087Rmd7e0fkbOr-7pkNnDa47qm1J5-jb2rrGLWqjGzp2vtVd7SytLR15Gzo60WhW2Hx9fAb64vwqnJOTSjcBL35unzyPR_PhJJk9PkyH97PEcKm6RFaySrHUgmdZyRWXUgJgzni0gWfSSASWaYVCgFSpysq0VAIjjVIbU4o-uTr0rr1732DoiqXbeBtfFlwM0lyk-UBGih0o410IHqti7etW-13BoNgvWPxZMGb4IRMiaxfof5v_D30DDLBxKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375935974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Porges, Karl ; Stewart, Ian G. ; Hoßfeld, Uwe ; Levit, Georgy S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Porges, Karl ; Stewart, Ian G. ; Hoßfeld, Uwe ; Levit, Georgy S.</creatorcontrib><description>— Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [ General Morphology of Organisms ] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both within the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the General Morphology (hereafter GM ), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-3604</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-3326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S1062360419060079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Developmental Biology ; Evolution ; Haeckel, Ernst ; Histology ; History of Biology ; Life Sciences ; Morphology ; Ontogeny ; Phylogeny</subject><ispartof>Russian journal of developmental biology, 2019-11, Vol.50 (6), p.290-302</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019</rights><rights>2019© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porges, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Ian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoßfeld, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levit, Georgy S.</creatorcontrib><title>From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works</title><title>Russian journal of developmental biology</title><addtitle>Russ J Dev Biol</addtitle><description>— Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [ General Morphology of Organisms ] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both within the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the General Morphology (hereafter GM ), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Haeckel, Ernst</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>History of Biology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><issn>1062-3604</issn><issn>1608-3326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsP4C7g1tGbn0ln3ElpbaHgwoq4GkLmTp12JqnJlNKdr-Hr-SSmVHAhru6B851z4RByyeCGMSFvnxgoLhRIloMCGORHpMcUZIkQXB1HHe1k75-SsxCWAAwi1yOvY-9aOi1R087Rmd7e0fkbOr-7pkNnDa47qm1J5-jb2rrGLWqjGzp2vtVd7SytLR15Gzo60WhW2Hx9fAb64vwqnJOTSjcBL35unzyPR_PhJJk9PkyH97PEcKm6RFaySrHUgmdZyRWXUgJgzni0gWfSSASWaYVCgFSpysq0VAIjjVIbU4o-uTr0rr1732DoiqXbeBtfFlwM0lyk-UBGih0o410IHqti7etW-13BoNgvWPxZMGb4IRMiaxfof5v_D30DDLBxKQ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Porges, Karl</creator><creator>Stewart, Ian G.</creator><creator>Hoßfeld, Uwe</creator><creator>Levit, Georgy S.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works</title><author>Porges, Karl ; Stewart, Ian G. ; Hoßfeld, Uwe ; Levit, Georgy S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Haeckel, Ernst</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>History of Biology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porges, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Ian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoßfeld, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levit, Georgy S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Russian journal of developmental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porges, Karl</au><au>Stewart, Ian G.</au><au>Hoßfeld, Uwe</au><au>Levit, Georgy S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works</atitle><jtitle>Russian journal of developmental biology</jtitle><stitle>Russ J Dev Biol</stitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>290-302</pages><issn>1062-3604</issn><eissn>1608-3326</eissn><abstract>— Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [ General Morphology of Organisms ] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both within the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the General Morphology (hereafter GM ), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S1062360419060079</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-3604
ispartof Russian journal of developmental biology, 2019-11, Vol.50 (6), p.290-302
issn 1062-3604
1608-3326
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2375935974
source Springer Link
subjects Animal Anatomy
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Developmental Biology
Evolution
Haeckel, Ernst
Histology
History of Biology
Life Sciences
Morphology
Ontogeny
Phylogeny
title From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Idea%20to%20Law:%20Theory,%20Concept%20and%20Terminological%20Formation%20in%20Ernst%20Haeckel%E2%80%99s%20Works&rft.jtitle=Russian%20journal%20of%20developmental%20biology&rft.au=Porges,%20Karl&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=290-302&rft.issn=1062-3604&rft.eissn=1608-3326&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S1062360419060079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375935974%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375935974&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true