Loading…
From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works
— Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, toget...
Saved in:
Published in: | Russian journal of developmental biology 2019-11, Vol.50 (6), p.290-302 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3 |
container_end_page | 302 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 290 |
container_title | Russian journal of developmental biology |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Porges, Karl Stewart, Ian G. Hoßfeld, Uwe Levit, Georgy S. |
description | —
Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s
Generelle Morphologie der Organismen
[
General Morphology of Organisms
] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both
within
the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the
General Morphology
(hereafter
GM
), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1134/S1062360419060079 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2375935974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2375935974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsP4C7g1tGbn0ln3ElpbaHgwoq4GkLmTp12JqnJlNKdr-Hr-SSmVHAhru6B851z4RByyeCGMSFvnxgoLhRIloMCGORHpMcUZIkQXB1HHe1k75-SsxCWAAwi1yOvY-9aOi1R087Rmd7e0fkbOr-7pkNnDa47qm1J5-jb2rrGLWqjGzp2vtVd7SytLR15Gzo60WhW2Hx9fAb64vwqnJOTSjcBL35unzyPR_PhJJk9PkyH97PEcKm6RFaySrHUgmdZyRWXUgJgzni0gWfSSASWaYVCgFSpysq0VAIjjVIbU4o-uTr0rr1732DoiqXbeBtfFlwM0lyk-UBGih0o410IHqti7etW-13BoNgvWPxZMGb4IRMiaxfof5v_D30DDLBxKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375935974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Porges, Karl ; Stewart, Ian G. ; Hoßfeld, Uwe ; Levit, Georgy S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Porges, Karl ; Stewart, Ian G. ; Hoßfeld, Uwe ; Levit, Georgy S.</creatorcontrib><description>—
Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s
Generelle Morphologie der Organismen
[
General Morphology of Organisms
] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both
within
the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the
General Morphology
(hereafter
GM
), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-3604</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-3326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S1062360419060079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Anatomy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Developmental Biology ; Evolution ; Haeckel, Ernst ; Histology ; History of Biology ; Life Sciences ; Morphology ; Ontogeny ; Phylogeny</subject><ispartof>Russian journal of developmental biology, 2019-11, Vol.50 (6), p.290-302</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019</rights><rights>2019© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porges, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Ian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoßfeld, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levit, Georgy S.</creatorcontrib><title>From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works</title><title>Russian journal of developmental biology</title><addtitle>Russ J Dev Biol</addtitle><description>—
Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s
Generelle Morphologie der Organismen
[
General Morphology of Organisms
] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both
within
the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the
General Morphology
(hereafter
GM
), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work.</description><subject>Animal Anatomy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Haeckel, Ernst</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>History of Biology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><issn>1062-3604</issn><issn>1608-3326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsP4C7g1tGbn0ln3ElpbaHgwoq4GkLmTp12JqnJlNKdr-Hr-SSmVHAhru6B851z4RByyeCGMSFvnxgoLhRIloMCGORHpMcUZIkQXB1HHe1k75-SsxCWAAwi1yOvY-9aOi1R087Rmd7e0fkbOr-7pkNnDa47qm1J5-jb2rrGLWqjGzp2vtVd7SytLR15Gzo60WhW2Hx9fAb64vwqnJOTSjcBL35unzyPR_PhJJk9PkyH97PEcKm6RFaySrHUgmdZyRWXUgJgzni0gWfSSASWaYVCgFSpysq0VAIjjVIbU4o-uTr0rr1732DoiqXbeBtfFlwM0lyk-UBGih0o410IHqti7etW-13BoNgvWPxZMGb4IRMiaxfof5v_D30DDLBxKQ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Porges, Karl</creator><creator>Stewart, Ian G.</creator><creator>Hoßfeld, Uwe</creator><creator>Levit, Georgy S.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works</title><author>Porges, Karl ; Stewart, Ian G. ; Hoßfeld, Uwe ; Levit, Georgy S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Anatomy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Haeckel, Ernst</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>History of Biology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porges, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Ian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoßfeld, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levit, Georgy S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Russian journal of developmental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porges, Karl</au><au>Stewart, Ian G.</au><au>Hoßfeld, Uwe</au><au>Levit, Georgy S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works</atitle><jtitle>Russian journal of developmental biology</jtitle><stitle>Russ J Dev Biol</stitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>290-302</pages><issn>1062-3604</issn><eissn>1608-3326</eissn><abstract>—
Since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) published their trailblazing ideas, the scientific community’s discussion of evolutionary biology has included the topic of embryological development. The concepts of ontogeny and phylogeny, still current in contemporary biology, together with the now obsolete biogenetic law and his Gastraea theory, which trace back to Haeckel, all underwent an evolution of their own in Haeckel’s works. The record of this evolution makes clear how the features of his thinking that proved durable, such as ontogeny and phylogeny, were established as such through a difficult creative process of formation of concepts, theories, and terminology that themselves enjoyed varying fortunes. Beginning with Haeckel’s
Generelle Morphologie der Organismen
[
General Morphology of Organisms
] (1866), this paper traces aspects of the conceptual and terminological evolution that takes place both
within
the pages of this highly complex but seminal work and then chronologically in later works. We include the use of text data mining of his works to establish and analyse word frequency patterns. We seek to indicate here some of the challenges Haeckel faced in establishing new concepts and terminology in the
General Morphology
(hereafter
GM
), and we draw attention to his efforts in later works to extend this didactic work.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S1062360419060079</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1062-3604 |
ispartof | Russian journal of developmental biology, 2019-11, Vol.50 (6), p.290-302 |
issn | 1062-3604 1608-3326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2375935974 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Animal Anatomy Biomedical and Life Sciences Developmental Biology Evolution Haeckel, Ernst Histology History of Biology Life Sciences Morphology Ontogeny Phylogeny |
title | From Idea to Law: Theory, Concept and Terminological Formation in Ernst Haeckel’s Works |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A03%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Idea%20to%20Law:%20Theory,%20Concept%20and%20Terminological%20Formation%20in%20Ernst%20Haeckel%E2%80%99s%20Works&rft.jtitle=Russian%20journal%20of%20developmental%20biology&rft.au=Porges,%20Karl&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=290-302&rft.issn=1062-3604&rft.eissn=1608-3326&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S1062360419060079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375935974%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4f4f5eda3288d26244400e912c240284c4e018a6e33046568d5d63e288e4accd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375935974&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |