Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences

This contribution starts by presenting the three main approaches that political scientists use to analyze labor market vulnerability. We proceed to discuss various operationalizations of labor market vulnerability. We examine how they relate to the three theoretical approaches and we evaluate the co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political science research and methods 2020-04, Vol.8 (2), p.356-361
Main Authors: Marx, Paul, Picot, Georg
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Employment contracts
Gender
Labor market
Market segments
Political economy
Political scientists
Researchers
Self interest
Theory
Unemployment
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8220019020570b177685ed3f7c6da67d60a8a9ecab11e4ba502e9c375a23c1e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8220019020570b177685ed3f7c6da67d60a8a9ecab11e4ba502e9c375a23c1e3
container_end_page 361
container_issue 2
container_start_page 356
container_title Political science research and methods
container_volume 8
creator Marx, Paul
Picot, Georg
description This contribution starts by presenting the three main approaches that political scientists use to analyze labor market vulnerability. We proceed to discuss various operationalizations of labor market vulnerability. We examine how they relate to the three theoretical approaches and we evaluate the consistency between theory and measurement. Finally, we recommend three measures that political scientists should deploy when analyzing the effect of labor market vulnerability on political preferences. We point out what each of these variables captures and what methodological challenges should be taken into account when using them.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/psrm.2018.29
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2377233758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2377233758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8220019020570b177685ed3f7c6da67d60a8a9ecab11e4ba502e9c375a23c1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFOwzAQRC0EElXpjQ-wxJWUtZ3E9hFVQJEqcend2jhbNSVNgp0g9e9xVdS97ByedmeGsUcBSwFCvwwxHJcShFlKe8NmEnKbmdzY26vWcM8WMR4gjYWitPmMrbf7QMRxGEKPfk-Rjz1vsepDdsTwTSP_ndqOAlZN24wnjl3Nhz7JxmPLh0A7CtR5ig_sbodtpMX_nrPt-9t2tc42Xx-fq9dN5hWIMTNSAggLEgoNldC6NAXVaqd9WWOp6xLQoCWPlRCUV1iAJOuVLlAqL0jN2dPlbPL7M1Ec3aGfQpc-Oqm0liqhJlHPF8qHPsZk0g2hSXlOToA7t-XObblzW05a9QcqfF2R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2377233758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Marx, Paul ; Picot, Georg</creator><creatorcontrib>Marx, Paul ; Picot, Georg</creatorcontrib><description>This contribution starts by presenting the three main approaches that political scientists use to analyze labor market vulnerability. We proceed to discuss various operationalizations of labor market vulnerability. We examine how they relate to the three theoretical approaches and we evaluate the consistency between theory and measurement. Finally, we recommend three measures that political scientists should deploy when analyzing the effect of labor market vulnerability on political preferences. We point out what each of these variables captures and what methodological challenges should be taken into account when using them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-8470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2018.29</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Employment contracts ; Gender ; Labor market ; Market segments ; Political economy ; Political scientists ; Researchers ; Self interest ; Theory ; Unemployment</subject><ispartof>Political science research and methods, 2020-04, Vol.8 (2), p.356-361</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8220019020570b177685ed3f7c6da67d60a8a9ecab11e4ba502e9c375a23c1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8220019020570b177685ed3f7c6da67d60a8a9ecab11e4ba502e9c375a23c1e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3369-8727</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2377233758/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2377233758?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21387,21394,27924,27925,33611,33985,43733,43948,74221,74468</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marx, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picot, Georg</creatorcontrib><title>Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences</title><title>Political science research and methods</title><description>This contribution starts by presenting the three main approaches that political scientists use to analyze labor market vulnerability. We proceed to discuss various operationalizations of labor market vulnerability. We examine how they relate to the three theoretical approaches and we evaluate the consistency between theory and measurement. Finally, we recommend three measures that political scientists should deploy when analyzing the effect of labor market vulnerability on political preferences. We point out what each of these variables captures and what methodological challenges should be taken into account when using them.</description><subject>Employment contracts</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Market segments</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><issn>2049-8470</issn><issn>2049-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFOwzAQRC0EElXpjQ-wxJWUtZ3E9hFVQJEqcend2jhbNSVNgp0g9e9xVdS97ByedmeGsUcBSwFCvwwxHJcShFlKe8NmEnKbmdzY26vWcM8WMR4gjYWitPmMrbf7QMRxGEKPfk-Rjz1vsepDdsTwTSP_ndqOAlZN24wnjl3Nhz7JxmPLh0A7CtR5ig_sbodtpMX_nrPt-9t2tc42Xx-fq9dN5hWIMTNSAggLEgoNldC6NAXVaqd9WWOp6xLQoCWPlRCUV1iAJOuVLlAqL0jN2dPlbPL7M1Ec3aGfQpc-Oqm0liqhJlHPF8qHPsZk0g2hSXlOToA7t-XObblzW05a9QcqfF2R</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Marx, Paul</creator><creator>Picot, Georg</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3369-8727</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences</title><author>Marx, Paul ; Picot, Georg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8220019020570b177685ed3f7c6da67d60a8a9ecab11e4ba502e9c375a23c1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Employment contracts</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Market segments</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marx, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picot, Georg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marx, Paul</au><au>Picot, Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences</atitle><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>356</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>356-361</pages><issn>2049-8470</issn><eissn>2049-8489</eissn><abstract>This contribution starts by presenting the three main approaches that political scientists use to analyze labor market vulnerability. We proceed to discuss various operationalizations of labor market vulnerability. We examine how they relate to the three theoretical approaches and we evaluate the consistency between theory and measurement. Finally, we recommend three measures that political scientists should deploy when analyzing the effect of labor market vulnerability on political preferences. We point out what each of these variables captures and what methodological challenges should be taken into account when using them.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/psrm.2018.29</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3369-8727</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-8470
ispartof Political science research and methods, 2020-04, Vol.8 (2), p.356-361
issn 2049-8470
2049-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2377233758
source Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press
subjects Employment contracts
Gender
Labor market
Market segments
Political economy
Political scientists
Researchers
Self interest
Theory
Unemployment
title Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A23%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%20approaches%20to%20labor-market%20vulnerability%20and%20political%20preferences&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20research%20and%20methods&rft.au=Marx,%20Paul&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=356&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=356-361&rft.issn=2049-8470&rft.eissn=2049-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/psrm.2018.29&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2377233758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8220019020570b177685ed3f7c6da67d60a8a9ecab11e4ba502e9c375a23c1e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2377233758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true