Loading…

Behavior of Nonidentical Differently Loaded Interfering Rough Footings

AbstractIn geotechnical engineering, interference effects caused by the construction of closely spaced footings have a significant influence on the system behavior of each individual footing. As the mutual impact of two footings constructed in close proximity has only been analyzed for identical foo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2020-06, Vol.146 (6)
Main Authors: Schmüdderich, Christoph, Alimardani Lavasan, Arash, Tschuchnigg, Franz, Wichtmann, Torsten
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-931ccd996a958e4f9c631f325b0601664bed393a9688f552c0bc9903f0026cb63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-931ccd996a958e4f9c631f325b0601664bed393a9688f552c0bc9903f0026cb63
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering
container_volume 146
creator Schmüdderich, Christoph
Alimardani Lavasan, Arash
Tschuchnigg, Franz
Wichtmann, Torsten
description AbstractIn geotechnical engineering, interference effects caused by the construction of closely spaced footings have a significant influence on the system behavior of each individual footing. As the mutual impact of two footings constructed in close proximity has only been analyzed for identical footings, our aim with this paper is to investigate the interfering effects of closely spaced nonidentical rough footings considering variations of stresses applied to both footings. Therefore, lower and upper bound simulations have been carried out using the finite-element limit analysis (FELA). A validation of the numerical model was accomplished by comparing results for interference effects of identical footings with existing studies in terms of interference factors ξγ. Furthermore, nonidentical footings with equally and differently scaled stresses were studied and corresponding failure mechanisms analyzed. In total, four types of failure mechanisms could be identified in which two mechanisms always compete each other, depending on friction angle, footing widths, spacing, and loading. In contrast to identical footings with combined failure mechanisms, the results show that for nonidentical footings, failure mechanisms most likely develop only below one footing.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002255
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2386291973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2386291973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-931ccd996a958e4f9c631f325b0601664bed393a9688f552c0bc9903f0026cb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPAjEQhRujiYj-h41e9LA4bbdl6w0RkIRoonhuut0WluAW24WEf283oJ48zczLezOZD6FrDD0MHN_fDt6Ho7vJvIdFRlPGgfcAgBDGTlDnVzuNPQhIgWT4HF2EsIqmDHLSQeNHs1S7yvnE2eTF1VVp6qbSap08VdYaH6f1Ppk5VZoymdaN8VGs6kXy5raLZTJ2rolTuERnVq2DuTrWLvoYj-bD53T2OpkOB7NUUdpvUkGx1qUQXAmWm8wKzSm2lLACOGDOs8KUVFAleJ5bxoiGQgsB1MafuC447aKbw96Nd19bExq5cltfx5OS0JwTgUWfRtfDwaW9C8EbKze--lR-LzHIlpuULTc5mcuWkWwZySO3GOaHsAra_K3_Sf4f_AbOGXCS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386291973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavior of Nonidentical Differently Loaded Interfering Rough Footings</title><source>ASCE Library</source><creator>Schmüdderich, Christoph ; Alimardani Lavasan, Arash ; Tschuchnigg, Franz ; Wichtmann, Torsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmüdderich, Christoph ; Alimardani Lavasan, Arash ; Tschuchnigg, Franz ; Wichtmann, Torsten</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractIn geotechnical engineering, interference effects caused by the construction of closely spaced footings have a significant influence on the system behavior of each individual footing. As the mutual impact of two footings constructed in close proximity has only been analyzed for identical footings, our aim with this paper is to investigate the interfering effects of closely spaced nonidentical rough footings considering variations of stresses applied to both footings. Therefore, lower and upper bound simulations have been carried out using the finite-element limit analysis (FELA). A validation of the numerical model was accomplished by comparing results for interference effects of identical footings with existing studies in terms of interference factors ξγ. Furthermore, nonidentical footings with equally and differently scaled stresses were studied and corresponding failure mechanisms analyzed. In total, four types of failure mechanisms could be identified in which two mechanisms always compete each other, depending on friction angle, footing widths, spacing, and loading. In contrast to identical footings with combined failure mechanisms, the results show that for nonidentical footings, failure mechanisms most likely develop only below one footing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Failure analysis ; Failure mechanisms ; Finite element method ; Geotechnical engineering ; Interference ; Limit analysis ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Numerical models ; Stresses ; Technical Papers ; Upper bounds</subject><ispartof>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2020-06, Vol.146 (6)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-931ccd996a958e4f9c631f325b0601664bed393a9688f552c0bc9903f0026cb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-931ccd996a958e4f9c631f325b0601664bed393a9688f552c0bc9903f0026cb63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7735-9298 ; 0000-0002-4279-7703 ; 0000-0002-2238-8742</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002255$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmüdderich, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alimardani Lavasan, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschuchnigg, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wichtmann, Torsten</creatorcontrib><title>Behavior of Nonidentical Differently Loaded Interfering Rough Footings</title><title>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</title><description>AbstractIn geotechnical engineering, interference effects caused by the construction of closely spaced footings have a significant influence on the system behavior of each individual footing. As the mutual impact of two footings constructed in close proximity has only been analyzed for identical footings, our aim with this paper is to investigate the interfering effects of closely spaced nonidentical rough footings considering variations of stresses applied to both footings. Therefore, lower and upper bound simulations have been carried out using the finite-element limit analysis (FELA). A validation of the numerical model was accomplished by comparing results for interference effects of identical footings with existing studies in terms of interference factors ξγ. Furthermore, nonidentical footings with equally and differently scaled stresses were studied and corresponding failure mechanisms analyzed. In total, four types of failure mechanisms could be identified in which two mechanisms always compete each other, depending on friction angle, footing widths, spacing, and loading. In contrast to identical footings with combined failure mechanisms, the results show that for nonidentical footings, failure mechanisms most likely develop only below one footing.</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Geotechnical engineering</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Limit analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><issn>1090-0241</issn><issn>1943-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPAjEQhRujiYj-h41e9LA4bbdl6w0RkIRoonhuut0WluAW24WEf283oJ48zczLezOZD6FrDD0MHN_fDt6Ho7vJvIdFRlPGgfcAgBDGTlDnVzuNPQhIgWT4HF2EsIqmDHLSQeNHs1S7yvnE2eTF1VVp6qbSap08VdYaH6f1Ppk5VZoymdaN8VGs6kXy5raLZTJ2rolTuERnVq2DuTrWLvoYj-bD53T2OpkOB7NUUdpvUkGx1qUQXAmWm8wKzSm2lLACOGDOs8KUVFAleJ5bxoiGQgsB1MafuC447aKbw96Nd19bExq5cltfx5OS0JwTgUWfRtfDwaW9C8EbKze--lR-LzHIlpuULTc5mcuWkWwZySO3GOaHsAra_K3_Sf4f_AbOGXCS</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Schmüdderich, Christoph</creator><creator>Alimardani Lavasan, Arash</creator><creator>Tschuchnigg, Franz</creator><creator>Wichtmann, Torsten</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7735-9298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-7703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-8742</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Behavior of Nonidentical Differently Loaded Interfering Rough Footings</title><author>Schmüdderich, Christoph ; Alimardani Lavasan, Arash ; Tschuchnigg, Franz ; Wichtmann, Torsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-931ccd996a958e4f9c631f325b0601664bed393a9688f552c0bc9903f0026cb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Geotechnical engineering</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Limit analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmüdderich, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alimardani Lavasan, Arash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschuchnigg, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wichtmann, Torsten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmüdderich, Christoph</au><au>Alimardani Lavasan, Arash</au><au>Tschuchnigg, Franz</au><au>Wichtmann, Torsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavior of Nonidentical Differently Loaded Interfering Rough Footings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>1090-0241</issn><eissn>1943-5606</eissn><abstract>AbstractIn geotechnical engineering, interference effects caused by the construction of closely spaced footings have a significant influence on the system behavior of each individual footing. As the mutual impact of two footings constructed in close proximity has only been analyzed for identical footings, our aim with this paper is to investigate the interfering effects of closely spaced nonidentical rough footings considering variations of stresses applied to both footings. Therefore, lower and upper bound simulations have been carried out using the finite-element limit analysis (FELA). A validation of the numerical model was accomplished by comparing results for interference effects of identical footings with existing studies in terms of interference factors ξγ. Furthermore, nonidentical footings with equally and differently scaled stresses were studied and corresponding failure mechanisms analyzed. In total, four types of failure mechanisms could be identified in which two mechanisms always compete each other, depending on friction angle, footing widths, spacing, and loading. In contrast to identical footings with combined failure mechanisms, the results show that for nonidentical footings, failure mechanisms most likely develop only below one footing.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002255</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7735-9298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-7703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-8742</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-0241
ispartof Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2020-06, Vol.146 (6)
issn 1090-0241
1943-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2386291973
source ASCE Library
subjects Computer simulation
Failure analysis
Failure mechanisms
Finite element method
Geotechnical engineering
Interference
Limit analysis
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Numerical models
Stresses
Technical Papers
Upper bounds
title Behavior of Nonidentical Differently Loaded Interfering Rough Footings
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A50%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavior%20of%20Nonidentical%20Differently%20Loaded%20Interfering%20Rough%20Footings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geotechnical%20and%20geoenvironmental%20engineering&rft.au=Schm%C3%BCdderich,%20Christoph&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=1090-0241&rft.eissn=1943-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2386291973%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-931ccd996a958e4f9c631f325b0601664bed393a9688f552c0bc9903f0026cb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386291973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true