Social Isolation and Repertoires of Resistance

Checkpoints in the West Bank’s Hebron Governorate represent Israel’s ever-present power over Palestinian civilians. Drawing on 71 interviews conducted during the Intifada of Individuals (2015), this article inductively builds theory about the relationship between social isolation and different modal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American political science review 2020-05, Vol.114 (2), p.309-325
Main Author: GADE, EMILY KALAH
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Built environment
Civilians
Community
Community Relations
Connectedness
Hopelessness
Mass murders
Military training
Nonviolence
Oppression
Palestinian people
Physical Environment
Political science
Power
Preferences
Rebellions
Resistance
Semi Structured Interviews
Social Behavior
Social isolation
State power
Surveillance
Terrorism
Texture
Violence
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Checkpoints in the West Bank’s Hebron Governorate represent Israel’s ever-present power over Palestinian civilians. Drawing on 71 interviews conducted during the Intifada of Individuals (2015), this article inductively builds theory about the relationship between social isolation and different modalities of resistance. Rather than forcing civilians to comply with the state, checkpoint apparatus instead change the nature and texture of resistance. I suggest that checkpoints structure social connections for civilians on the ground. Checkpoint apparatus which inhibit social connection engender a feeling of hopelessness and foster support for individual, often violent, resistance. Where checkpoints isolate a community as a whole but did not disrupt within-community social connections, citizens maintain hope for the possibility of change, which facilitates a preference for collective resistance. This article identifies troubling consequences checkpoints have on civilians and highlights how oppressive state power can limit some modalities of resistance only to engender support for others.
ISSN:0003-0554
1537-5943
DOI:10.1017/S0003055420000015