Loading…
Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa
Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Arthropod-plant interactions 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.327-332 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693 |
container_end_page | 332 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 327 |
container_title | Arthropod-plant interactions |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Grof-Tisza, Patrick Karban, Richard Pan, Vincent S. Blande, James D. |
description | Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage at the end of the season; this measure is slow and lacks accuracy and interpretability because so many other factors also affect levels of damage. Herbivore choice offers a potentially rapid and accurate alternative assay of induced resistance. Here we evaluate whether feeding behavior of a specialized Chrysomelid beetle,
Trirhabda pilosa
, could be used to assay induced changes in plant quality. Beetle larvae were offered the choice between two leaves in Petri dish arenas. We found that beetles avoided leaves that were naturally damaged by herbivores, experimentally clipped with scissors, and exposed to the volatiles from naturally or experimentally damaged neighboring leaves compared to control leaves. Experiments varied the source of the damage, the duration of the feeding test, and how damage was measured, still, beetles consistently preferred uninduced controls by a 2:1 ratio over leaves exposed to cues of damage. These results suggest that behavioral assays using
T. pilosa
larvae can be used to rapidly evaluate induced resistance in this system. More generally, movement and feeding behaviors of herbivores are an important and underappreciated component of induced plant responses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11829-020-09749-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2394634446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2394634446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscTb4J7HjY1UBRarEpZwtx3FaV6kTvMkBnp60QcCJy-5qNDMrfQjdMnrPKFUPwFjBNaGcEqpVpok8QzNWKE6KIlPnP3eeX6IrgD2lUvBMzdDnAsADhLjFXWNjT_qWnA7s2sNhiMHZPrQR21jhEKvB-QonDwF6G50fJQx268s0wA4Pp5p-5_9o0HkXbDP68SaFtLNlZXEXmhbsNbqobQP-5nvP0dvT42a5IuvX55flYk2ckKInSkhunXcu13Xp81plORdclcIWubaMS19WitdKK1ZqOXJwtBKs0oVwnEmpxRzdTb1dat8HD73Zt0OK40vDhc6kyLJxzBGfXC61AMnXpkvhYNOHYdQcGZuJsRkZmxNjcwyJKQSjOW59-q3-J_UF5EmBcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394634446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Grof-Tisza, Patrick ; Karban, Richard ; Pan, Vincent S. ; Blande, James D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grof-Tisza, Patrick ; Karban, Richard ; Pan, Vincent S. ; Blande, James D.</creatorcontrib><description>Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage at the end of the season; this measure is slow and lacks accuracy and interpretability because so many other factors also affect levels of damage. Herbivore choice offers a potentially rapid and accurate alternative assay of induced resistance. Here we evaluate whether feeding behavior of a specialized Chrysomelid beetle,
Trirhabda pilosa
, could be used to assay induced changes in plant quality. Beetle larvae were offered the choice between two leaves in Petri dish arenas. We found that beetles avoided leaves that were naturally damaged by herbivores, experimentally clipped with scissors, and exposed to the volatiles from naturally or experimentally damaged neighboring leaves compared to control leaves. Experiments varied the source of the damage, the duration of the feeding test, and how damage was measured, still, beetles consistently preferred uninduced controls by a 2:1 ratio over leaves exposed to cues of damage. These results suggest that behavioral assays using
T. pilosa
larvae can be used to rapidly evaluate induced resistance in this system. More generally, movement and feeding behaviors of herbivores are an important and underappreciated component of induced plant responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1872-8855</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11829-020-09749-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Allelochemicals ; Assaying ; Beetles ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coleoptera ; Cutting tools ; Damage ; Ecology ; Entomology ; Evaluation ; Feeding behavior ; Herbivores ; Invertebrates ; Larvae ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences ; Trirhabda pilosa ; Volatiles</subject><ispartof>Arthropod-plant interactions, 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.327-332</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0217-4253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grof-Tisza, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karban, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Vincent S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blande, James D.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa</title><title>Arthropod-plant interactions</title><addtitle>Arthropod-Plant Interactions</addtitle><description>Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage at the end of the season; this measure is slow and lacks accuracy and interpretability because so many other factors also affect levels of damage. Herbivore choice offers a potentially rapid and accurate alternative assay of induced resistance. Here we evaluate whether feeding behavior of a specialized Chrysomelid beetle,
Trirhabda pilosa
, could be used to assay induced changes in plant quality. Beetle larvae were offered the choice between two leaves in Petri dish arenas. We found that beetles avoided leaves that were naturally damaged by herbivores, experimentally clipped with scissors, and exposed to the volatiles from naturally or experimentally damaged neighboring leaves compared to control leaves. Experiments varied the source of the damage, the duration of the feeding test, and how damage was measured, still, beetles consistently preferred uninduced controls by a 2:1 ratio over leaves exposed to cues of damage. These results suggest that behavioral assays using
T. pilosa
larvae can be used to rapidly evaluate induced resistance in this system. More generally, movement and feeding behaviors of herbivores are an important and underappreciated component of induced plant responses.</description><subject>Allelochemicals</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Cutting tools</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Trirhabda pilosa</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><issn>1872-8855</issn><issn>1872-8847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscTb4J7HjY1UBRarEpZwtx3FaV6kTvMkBnp60QcCJy-5qNDMrfQjdMnrPKFUPwFjBNaGcEqpVpok8QzNWKE6KIlPnP3eeX6IrgD2lUvBMzdDnAsADhLjFXWNjT_qWnA7s2sNhiMHZPrQR21jhEKvB-QonDwF6G50fJQx268s0wA4Pp5p-5_9o0HkXbDP68SaFtLNlZXEXmhbsNbqobQP-5nvP0dvT42a5IuvX55flYk2ckKInSkhunXcu13Xp81plORdclcIWubaMS19WitdKK1ZqOXJwtBKs0oVwnEmpxRzdTb1dat8HD73Zt0OK40vDhc6kyLJxzBGfXC61AMnXpkvhYNOHYdQcGZuJsRkZmxNjcwyJKQSjOW59-q3-J_UF5EmBcQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Grof-Tisza, Patrick</creator><creator>Karban, Richard</creator><creator>Pan, Vincent S.</creator><creator>Blande, James D.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-4253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa</title><author>Grof-Tisza, Patrick ; Karban, Richard ; Pan, Vincent S. ; Blande, James D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Allelochemicals</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Cutting tools</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Trirhabda pilosa</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grof-Tisza, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karban, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Vincent S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blande, James D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Arthropod-plant interactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grof-Tisza, Patrick</au><au>Karban, Richard</au><au>Pan, Vincent S.</au><au>Blande, James D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa</atitle><jtitle>Arthropod-plant interactions</jtitle><stitle>Arthropod-Plant Interactions</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>327-332</pages><issn>1872-8855</issn><eissn>1872-8847</eissn><abstract>Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage at the end of the season; this measure is slow and lacks accuracy and interpretability because so many other factors also affect levels of damage. Herbivore choice offers a potentially rapid and accurate alternative assay of induced resistance. Here we evaluate whether feeding behavior of a specialized Chrysomelid beetle,
Trirhabda pilosa
, could be used to assay induced changes in plant quality. Beetle larvae were offered the choice between two leaves in Petri dish arenas. We found that beetles avoided leaves that were naturally damaged by herbivores, experimentally clipped with scissors, and exposed to the volatiles from naturally or experimentally damaged neighboring leaves compared to control leaves. Experiments varied the source of the damage, the duration of the feeding test, and how damage was measured, still, beetles consistently preferred uninduced controls by a 2:1 ratio over leaves exposed to cues of damage. These results suggest that behavioral assays using
T. pilosa
larvae can be used to rapidly evaluate induced resistance in this system. More generally, movement and feeding behaviors of herbivores are an important and underappreciated component of induced plant responses.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11829-020-09749-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-4253</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1872-8855 |
ispartof | Arthropod-plant interactions, 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.327-332 |
issn | 1872-8855 1872-8847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2394634446 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Allelochemicals Assaying Beetles Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Coleoptera Cutting tools Damage Ecology Entomology Evaluation Feeding behavior Herbivores Invertebrates Larvae Leaves Life Sciences Original Paper Plant Pathology Plant Sciences Trirhabda pilosa Volatiles |
title | Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20plant-to-plant%20communication%20and%20induced%20resistance%20in%20sagebrush%20using%20the%20sagebrush%20specialist%20Trirhabda%20pilosa&rft.jtitle=Arthropod-plant%20interactions&rft.au=Grof-Tisza,%20Patrick&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=327-332&rft.issn=1872-8855&rft.eissn=1872-8847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11829-020-09749-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2394634446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394634446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |