Loading…

Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa

Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthropod-plant interactions 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.327-332
Main Authors: Grof-Tisza, Patrick, Karban, Richard, Pan, Vincent S., Blande, James D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693
container_end_page 332
container_issue 3
container_start_page 327
container_title Arthropod-plant interactions
container_volume 14
creator Grof-Tisza, Patrick
Karban, Richard
Pan, Vincent S.
Blande, James D.
description Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage at the end of the season; this measure is slow and lacks accuracy and interpretability because so many other factors also affect levels of damage. Herbivore choice offers a potentially rapid and accurate alternative assay of induced resistance. Here we evaluate whether feeding behavior of a specialized Chrysomelid beetle, Trirhabda pilosa , could be used to assay induced changes in plant quality. Beetle larvae were offered the choice between two leaves in Petri dish arenas. We found that beetles avoided leaves that were naturally damaged by herbivores, experimentally clipped with scissors, and exposed to the volatiles from naturally or experimentally damaged neighboring leaves compared to control leaves. Experiments varied the source of the damage, the duration of the feeding test, and how damage was measured, still, beetles consistently preferred uninduced controls by a 2:1 ratio over leaves exposed to cues of damage. These results suggest that behavioral assays using T. pilosa larvae can be used to rapidly evaluate induced resistance in this system. More generally, movement and feeding behaviors of herbivores are an important and underappreciated component of induced plant responses.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11829-020-09749-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2394634446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2394634446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscTb4J7HjY1UBRarEpZwtx3FaV6kTvMkBnp60QcCJy-5qNDMrfQjdMnrPKFUPwFjBNaGcEqpVpok8QzNWKE6KIlPnP3eeX6IrgD2lUvBMzdDnAsADhLjFXWNjT_qWnA7s2sNhiMHZPrQR21jhEKvB-QonDwF6G50fJQx268s0wA4Pp5p-5_9o0HkXbDP68SaFtLNlZXEXmhbsNbqobQP-5nvP0dvT42a5IuvX55flYk2ckKInSkhunXcu13Xp81plORdclcIWubaMS19WitdKK1ZqOXJwtBKs0oVwnEmpxRzdTb1dat8HD73Zt0OK40vDhc6kyLJxzBGfXC61AMnXpkvhYNOHYdQcGZuJsRkZmxNjcwyJKQSjOW59-q3-J_UF5EmBcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394634446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Grof-Tisza, Patrick ; Karban, Richard ; Pan, Vincent S. ; Blande, James D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grof-Tisza, Patrick ; Karban, Richard ; Pan, Vincent S. ; Blande, James D.</creatorcontrib><description>Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage at the end of the season; this measure is slow and lacks accuracy and interpretability because so many other factors also affect levels of damage. Herbivore choice offers a potentially rapid and accurate alternative assay of induced resistance. Here we evaluate whether feeding behavior of a specialized Chrysomelid beetle, Trirhabda pilosa , could be used to assay induced changes in plant quality. Beetle larvae were offered the choice between two leaves in Petri dish arenas. We found that beetles avoided leaves that were naturally damaged by herbivores, experimentally clipped with scissors, and exposed to the volatiles from naturally or experimentally damaged neighboring leaves compared to control leaves. Experiments varied the source of the damage, the duration of the feeding test, and how damage was measured, still, beetles consistently preferred uninduced controls by a 2:1 ratio over leaves exposed to cues of damage. These results suggest that behavioral assays using T. pilosa larvae can be used to rapidly evaluate induced resistance in this system. More generally, movement and feeding behaviors of herbivores are an important and underappreciated component of induced plant responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1872-8855</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11829-020-09749-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Allelochemicals ; Assaying ; Beetles ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coleoptera ; Cutting tools ; Damage ; Ecology ; Entomology ; Evaluation ; Feeding behavior ; Herbivores ; Invertebrates ; Larvae ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences ; Trirhabda pilosa ; Volatiles</subject><ispartof>Arthropod-plant interactions, 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.327-332</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0217-4253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grof-Tisza, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karban, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Vincent S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blande, James D.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa</title><title>Arthropod-plant interactions</title><addtitle>Arthropod-Plant Interactions</addtitle><description>Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage at the end of the season; this measure is slow and lacks accuracy and interpretability because so many other factors also affect levels of damage. Herbivore choice offers a potentially rapid and accurate alternative assay of induced resistance. Here we evaluate whether feeding behavior of a specialized Chrysomelid beetle, Trirhabda pilosa , could be used to assay induced changes in plant quality. Beetle larvae were offered the choice between two leaves in Petri dish arenas. We found that beetles avoided leaves that were naturally damaged by herbivores, experimentally clipped with scissors, and exposed to the volatiles from naturally or experimentally damaged neighboring leaves compared to control leaves. Experiments varied the source of the damage, the duration of the feeding test, and how damage was measured, still, beetles consistently preferred uninduced controls by a 2:1 ratio over leaves exposed to cues of damage. These results suggest that behavioral assays using T. pilosa larvae can be used to rapidly evaluate induced resistance in this system. More generally, movement and feeding behaviors of herbivores are an important and underappreciated component of induced plant responses.</description><subject>Allelochemicals</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Cutting tools</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Trirhabda pilosa</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><issn>1872-8855</issn><issn>1872-8847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscTb4J7HjY1UBRarEpZwtx3FaV6kTvMkBnp60QcCJy-5qNDMrfQjdMnrPKFUPwFjBNaGcEqpVpok8QzNWKE6KIlPnP3eeX6IrgD2lUvBMzdDnAsADhLjFXWNjT_qWnA7s2sNhiMHZPrQR21jhEKvB-QonDwF6G50fJQx268s0wA4Pp5p-5_9o0HkXbDP68SaFtLNlZXEXmhbsNbqobQP-5nvP0dvT42a5IuvX55flYk2ckKInSkhunXcu13Xp81plORdclcIWubaMS19WitdKK1ZqOXJwtBKs0oVwnEmpxRzdTb1dat8HD73Zt0OK40vDhc6kyLJxzBGfXC61AMnXpkvhYNOHYdQcGZuJsRkZmxNjcwyJKQSjOW59-q3-J_UF5EmBcQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Grof-Tisza, Patrick</creator><creator>Karban, Richard</creator><creator>Pan, Vincent S.</creator><creator>Blande, James D.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-4253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa</title><author>Grof-Tisza, Patrick ; Karban, Richard ; Pan, Vincent S. ; Blande, James D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Allelochemicals</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Cutting tools</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Trirhabda pilosa</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grof-Tisza, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karban, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Vincent S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blande, James D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Arthropod-plant interactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grof-Tisza, Patrick</au><au>Karban, Richard</au><au>Pan, Vincent S.</au><au>Blande, James D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa</atitle><jtitle>Arthropod-plant interactions</jtitle><stitle>Arthropod-Plant Interactions</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>327-332</pages><issn>1872-8855</issn><eissn>1872-8847</eissn><abstract>Plants respond to damage by herbivores or to reliable cues of damage by changing in ways that provide greater resistance and increase their fitness. Sagebrush has been a model system for understanding induced resistance, although resistance in this system is commonly assessed by quantifying damage at the end of the season; this measure is slow and lacks accuracy and interpretability because so many other factors also affect levels of damage. Herbivore choice offers a potentially rapid and accurate alternative assay of induced resistance. Here we evaluate whether feeding behavior of a specialized Chrysomelid beetle, Trirhabda pilosa , could be used to assay induced changes in plant quality. Beetle larvae were offered the choice between two leaves in Petri dish arenas. We found that beetles avoided leaves that were naturally damaged by herbivores, experimentally clipped with scissors, and exposed to the volatiles from naturally or experimentally damaged neighboring leaves compared to control leaves. Experiments varied the source of the damage, the duration of the feeding test, and how damage was measured, still, beetles consistently preferred uninduced controls by a 2:1 ratio over leaves exposed to cues of damage. These results suggest that behavioral assays using T. pilosa larvae can be used to rapidly evaluate induced resistance in this system. More generally, movement and feeding behaviors of herbivores are an important and underappreciated component of induced plant responses.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11829-020-09749-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-4253</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1872-8855
ispartof Arthropod-plant interactions, 2020-06, Vol.14 (3), p.327-332
issn 1872-8855
1872-8847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2394634446
source Springer Nature
subjects Allelochemicals
Assaying
Beetles
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Coleoptera
Cutting tools
Damage
Ecology
Entomology
Evaluation
Feeding behavior
Herbivores
Invertebrates
Larvae
Leaves
Life Sciences
Original Paper
Plant Pathology
Plant Sciences
Trirhabda pilosa
Volatiles
title Assessing plant-to-plant communication and induced resistance in sagebrush using the sagebrush specialist Trirhabda pilosa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20plant-to-plant%20communication%20and%20induced%20resistance%20in%20sagebrush%20using%20the%20sagebrush%20specialist%20Trirhabda%20pilosa&rft.jtitle=Arthropod-plant%20interactions&rft.au=Grof-Tisza,%20Patrick&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=327-332&rft.issn=1872-8855&rft.eissn=1872-8847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11829-020-09749-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2394634446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-7362acecc59fbe5f7452327b3a859a126ebd72f7971b96118c0d31d983c216693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394634446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true