Loading…
Predictions of the L\(_{\rm[CII]}\)-SFR and [C\(_{\rm II}\)] Luminosity Function at the Epoch of Reionization
We present the first predictions for the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) - SFR relation and [CII] luminosity function (LF) in the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) based on cosmological hydrodynamics simulations using the SIMBA suite plus radiative transfer calculations via SÍGAME. The sample consists of 11,137 galaxie...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2020-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Leung, T K Daisy Olsen, Karen P Somerville, Rachel S Romeel Dave Greve, Thomas R Hayward, Christopher C Narayanan, Desika Popping, Gergo |
description | We present the first predictions for the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) - SFR relation and [CII] luminosity function (LF) in the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) based on cosmological hydrodynamics simulations using the SIMBA suite plus radiative transfer calculations via SÍGAME. The sample consists of 11,137 galaxies covering halo mass \(\log M_{\rm halo}\in\)[9, 12.4] \(M_\odot\), star formation rate SFR\(\in\)[0.01, 330] \(M_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\), and metallicity \(_{\rm SFR}\in\)[0.1, 0.9] \(Z_\odot\). The simulated \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relation is consistent with the range observed, but with a spread of \(\simeq\)0.3 dex at the high end of SFR (\(>\)100 \(M_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\)) and \(\simeq\)0.6 dex at the lower end, and there is tension between our predictions and the values of \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) above 10\(^{8.5}\) \(L_\odot\) observed in some galaxies reported in the literature. The scatter in the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relation is mostly driven by galaxy properties, such that at a given SFR, galaxies with higher molecular gas mass and metallicity have higher \(L_{\rm [CII]}\). The [CII] LF predicted by SIMBA is consistent with the upper limits placed by the only existing untargeted flux-limited [CII] survey at the EoR (ASPECS) and those predicted by semi-analytic models. We compare our results with existing models and discuss differences responsible for the discrepant slopes in the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relatiion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.2004.11912 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2395431654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2395431654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a524-ceb1025986db91aa6f1ce439c0f6136e09e09b90af3e549d729e25559942b74c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj11LwzAYhYMgOOZ-gHcBb_SiM59tcyll1UJBmbtbR0nTlGXYZjatTMX_bjYHh_fAOfC8HABuMJqzmHP0IPuD-ZwThNgcY4HJBZgQSnEQM0KuwMy5HUKIhBHhnE5A-9rr2qjB2M5B28Bhq2Fe3JU_Rd-ukyzb_Bb3wVu6hLKr4To5NzDLfL6B-diazjozfMF07E4UKIcTZLG3anskLrVPzbc8ltfgspHvTs_OPgWrdLFKnoP85SlLHvNAcsICpSuMCBdxWFcCSxk2WGlGhUJNiGmokfCqBJIN1ZyJOiJC-zVcCEaqiCk6Bbf_2H1vP0bthnJnx77zH0tCBWcUh_78AZh7WOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395431654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictions of the L\(_{\rm[CII]}\)-SFR and [C\(_{\rm II}\)] Luminosity Function at the Epoch of Reionization</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Leung, T K Daisy ; Olsen, Karen P ; Somerville, Rachel S ; Romeel Dave ; Greve, Thomas R ; Hayward, Christopher C ; Narayanan, Desika ; Popping, Gergo</creator><creatorcontrib>Leung, T K Daisy ; Olsen, Karen P ; Somerville, Rachel S ; Romeel Dave ; Greve, Thomas R ; Hayward, Christopher C ; Narayanan, Desika ; Popping, Gergo</creatorcontrib><description>We present the first predictions for the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) - SFR relation and [CII] luminosity function (LF) in the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) based on cosmological hydrodynamics simulations using the SIMBA suite plus radiative transfer calculations via SÍGAME. The sample consists of 11,137 galaxies covering halo mass \(\log M_{\rm halo}\in\)[9, 12.4] \(M_\odot\), star formation rate SFR\(\in\)[0.01, 330] \(M_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\), and metallicity \(<Z_{\rm gas}>_{\rm SFR}\in\)[0.1, 0.9] \(Z_\odot\). The simulated \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relation is consistent with the range observed, but with a spread of \(\simeq\)0.3 dex at the high end of SFR (\(>\)100 \(M_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\)) and \(\simeq\)0.6 dex at the lower end, and there is tension between our predictions and the values of \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) above 10\(^{8.5}\) \(L_\odot\) observed in some galaxies reported in the literature. The scatter in the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relation is mostly driven by galaxy properties, such that at a given SFR, galaxies with higher molecular gas mass and metallicity have higher \(L_{\rm [CII]}\). The [CII] LF predicted by SIMBA is consistent with the upper limits placed by the only existing untargeted flux-limited [CII] survey at the EoR (ASPECS) and those predicted by semi-analytic models. We compare our results with existing models and discuss differences responsible for the discrepant slopes in the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relatiion.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.11912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Fluid flow ; Galaxies ; Hydrodynamics ; Ionization ; Luminosity ; Mathematical models ; Metallicity ; Molecular gases ; Radiative transfer ; Star & galaxy formation ; Star formation rate</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2020-10</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2395431654?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leung, T K Daisy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Karen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somerville, Rachel S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romeel Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greve, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Christopher C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayanan, Desika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popping, Gergo</creatorcontrib><title>Predictions of the L\(_{\rm[CII]}\)-SFR and [C\(_{\rm II}\)] Luminosity Function at the Epoch of Reionization</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>We present the first predictions for the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) - SFR relation and [CII] luminosity function (LF) in the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) based on cosmological hydrodynamics simulations using the SIMBA suite plus radiative transfer calculations via SÍGAME. The sample consists of 11,137 galaxies covering halo mass \(\log M_{\rm halo}\in\)[9, 12.4] \(M_\odot\), star formation rate SFR\(\in\)[0.01, 330] \(M_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\), and metallicity \(<Z_{\rm gas}>_{\rm SFR}\in\)[0.1, 0.9] \(Z_\odot\). The simulated \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relation is consistent with the range observed, but with a spread of \(\simeq\)0.3 dex at the high end of SFR (\(>\)100 \(M_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\)) and \(\simeq\)0.6 dex at the lower end, and there is tension between our predictions and the values of \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) above 10\(^{8.5}\) \(L_\odot\) observed in some galaxies reported in the literature. The scatter in the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relation is mostly driven by galaxy properties, such that at a given SFR, galaxies with higher molecular gas mass and metallicity have higher \(L_{\rm [CII]}\). The [CII] LF predicted by SIMBA is consistent with the upper limits placed by the only existing untargeted flux-limited [CII] survey at the EoR (ASPECS) and those predicted by semi-analytic models. We compare our results with existing models and discuss differences responsible for the discrepant slopes in the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relatiion.</description><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Galaxies</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Luminosity</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Metallicity</subject><subject>Molecular gases</subject><subject>Radiative transfer</subject><subject>Star & galaxy formation</subject><subject>Star formation rate</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotj11LwzAYhYMgOOZ-gHcBb_SiM59tcyll1UJBmbtbR0nTlGXYZjatTMX_bjYHh_fAOfC8HABuMJqzmHP0IPuD-ZwThNgcY4HJBZgQSnEQM0KuwMy5HUKIhBHhnE5A-9rr2qjB2M5B28Bhq2Fe3JU_Rd-ukyzb_Bb3wVu6hLKr4To5NzDLfL6B-diazjozfMF07E4UKIcTZLG3anskLrVPzbc8ltfgspHvTs_OPgWrdLFKnoP85SlLHvNAcsICpSuMCBdxWFcCSxk2WGlGhUJNiGmokfCqBJIN1ZyJOiJC-zVcCEaqiCk6Bbf_2H1vP0bthnJnx77zH0tCBWcUh_78AZh7WOQ</recordid><startdate>20201016</startdate><enddate>20201016</enddate><creator>Leung, T K Daisy</creator><creator>Olsen, Karen P</creator><creator>Somerville, Rachel S</creator><creator>Romeel Dave</creator><creator>Greve, Thomas R</creator><creator>Hayward, Christopher C</creator><creator>Narayanan, Desika</creator><creator>Popping, Gergo</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201016</creationdate><title>Predictions of the L\(_{\rm[CII]}\)-SFR and [C\(_{\rm II}\)] Luminosity Function at the Epoch of Reionization</title><author>Leung, T K Daisy ; Olsen, Karen P ; Somerville, Rachel S ; Romeel Dave ; Greve, Thomas R ; Hayward, Christopher C ; Narayanan, Desika ; Popping, Gergo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a524-ceb1025986db91aa6f1ce439c0f6136e09e09b90af3e549d729e25559942b74c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Galaxies</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Luminosity</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Metallicity</topic><topic>Molecular gases</topic><topic>Radiative transfer</topic><topic>Star & galaxy formation</topic><topic>Star formation rate</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leung, T K Daisy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Karen P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somerville, Rachel S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romeel Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greve, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Christopher C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narayanan, Desika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popping, Gergo</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leung, T K Daisy</au><au>Olsen, Karen P</au><au>Somerville, Rachel S</au><au>Romeel Dave</au><au>Greve, Thomas R</au><au>Hayward, Christopher C</au><au>Narayanan, Desika</au><au>Popping, Gergo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictions of the L\(_{\rm[CII]}\)-SFR and [C\(_{\rm II}\)] Luminosity Function at the Epoch of Reionization</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2020-10-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>We present the first predictions for the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) - SFR relation and [CII] luminosity function (LF) in the Epoch of Reionization (EoR) based on cosmological hydrodynamics simulations using the SIMBA suite plus radiative transfer calculations via SÍGAME. The sample consists of 11,137 galaxies covering halo mass \(\log M_{\rm halo}\in\)[9, 12.4] \(M_\odot\), star formation rate SFR\(\in\)[0.01, 330] \(M_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\), and metallicity \(<Z_{\rm gas}>_{\rm SFR}\in\)[0.1, 0.9] \(Z_\odot\). The simulated \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relation is consistent with the range observed, but with a spread of \(\simeq\)0.3 dex at the high end of SFR (\(>\)100 \(M_\odot\) yr\(^{-1}\)) and \(\simeq\)0.6 dex at the lower end, and there is tension between our predictions and the values of \(L_{\rm [CII]}\) above 10\(^{8.5}\) \(L_\odot\) observed in some galaxies reported in the literature. The scatter in the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relation is mostly driven by galaxy properties, such that at a given SFR, galaxies with higher molecular gas mass and metallicity have higher \(L_{\rm [CII]}\). The [CII] LF predicted by SIMBA is consistent with the upper limits placed by the only existing untargeted flux-limited [CII] survey at the EoR (ASPECS) and those predicted by semi-analytic models. We compare our results with existing models and discuss differences responsible for the discrepant slopes in the \(L_{\rm [CII]}\)-SFR relatiion.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2004.11912</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2020-10 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2395431654 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Computational fluid dynamics Computer simulation Fluid flow Galaxies Hydrodynamics Ionization Luminosity Mathematical models Metallicity Molecular gases Radiative transfer Star & galaxy formation Star formation rate |
title | Predictions of the L\(_{\rm[CII]}\)-SFR and [C\(_{\rm II}\)] Luminosity Function at the Epoch of Reionization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A57%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictions%20of%20the%20L%5C(_%7B%5Crm%5BCII%5D%7D%5C)-SFR%20and%20%5BC%5C(_%7B%5Crm%20II%7D%5C)%5D%20Luminosity%20Function%20at%20the%20Epoch%20of%20Reionization&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Leung,%20T%20K%20Daisy&rft.date=2020-10-16&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2004.11912&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2395431654%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a524-ceb1025986db91aa6f1ce439c0f6136e09e09b90af3e549d729e25559942b74c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395431654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |