Loading…
Onset of Hydrothermal Instability in Liquid Bridge. Experimental Benchmark
The experimental results from nine benchmark test cases conducted by five different groups are presented. The goal of this study is to build an experimental database for validation of numerical models in liquid bridge geometry. The need arises as comparison of numerical results with a single experim...
Saved in:
Published in: | Fluid dynamics & materials processing 2011-01, Vol.7 (1), p.1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-64e4e6b5860859a3cebcbb5f0ed2d67683d819e42cd68332fe1b8ac8ffcd1a753 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Fluid dynamics & materials processing |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Shevtsova, V Mialdun, A Kawamura, H Ueno, I Nishino, K Lappa, M |
description | The experimental results from nine benchmark test cases conducted by five different groups are presented. The goal of this study is to build an experimental database for validation of numerical models in liquid bridge geometry. The need arises as comparison of numerical results with a single experiment can lead to a large discrepancy due to specific experimental conditions. Perfectly conducting rigid walls and, especially, idealized boundary conditions at the free surface employed in numerical studies are not always realized in experiments. The experimental benchmark has emphasized strong sensitivity of the threshold of instability to the liquid bridge shape. A clear distinction should be made between results belonging to the different disturbance patterns, i.e. different wave numbers. The results of benchmark contributors are in a satisfactory agreement when they are associated with the stability branch with an identical wave number. In this case the discrepancy of the results for determination of the critical parameters is about ±15%-18% and they can be used for the validation of numerical models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3970/fdmp.2011.007.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2397177283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2397177283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-64e4e6b5860859a3cebcbb5f0ed2d67683d819e42cd68332fe1b8ac8ffcd1a753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UEtLAzEYDKJgrf4AbwHPu-ax2WSPtlRbWehFwVvJJl9s6r6apGD_vQuKh2HmMA8YhO4pyXklyaOz3ZgzQmlOiJxAL9CMCiEyJqS6_NflxzW6ifFACJeVKGboddtHSHhweH22YUh7CJ1u8aaPSTe-9emMfY9rfzx5ixfB20_I8ep7hOA76NNkXUBv9p0OX7foyuk2wt0fz9H78-ptuc7q7ctm-VRnhnGasrKAAspGqJIoUWluoDFNIxwBy2wpS8WtohUUzNhJc-aANkob5ZyxVEvB5-jht3cMw_EEMe0Owyn00-SOTV9QKdmU-wGXlFCK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2397177283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Onset of Hydrothermal Instability in Liquid Bridge. Experimental Benchmark</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Shevtsova, V ; Mialdun, A ; Kawamura, H ; Ueno, I ; Nishino, K ; Lappa, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Shevtsova, V ; Mialdun, A ; Kawamura, H ; Ueno, I ; Nishino, K ; Lappa, M</creatorcontrib><description>The experimental results from nine benchmark test cases conducted by five different groups are presented. The goal of this study is to build an experimental database for validation of numerical models in liquid bridge geometry. The need arises as comparison of numerical results with a single experiment can lead to a large discrepancy due to specific experimental conditions. Perfectly conducting rigid walls and, especially, idealized boundary conditions at the free surface employed in numerical studies are not always realized in experiments. The experimental benchmark has emphasized strong sensitivity of the threshold of instability to the liquid bridge shape. A clear distinction should be made between results belonging to the different disturbance patterns, i.e. different wave numbers. The results of benchmark contributors are in a satisfactory agreement when they are associated with the stability branch with an identical wave number. In this case the discrepancy of the results for determination of the critical parameters is about ±15%-18% and they can be used for the validation of numerical models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-256X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-2578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3970/fdmp.2011.007.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Duluth: Tech Science Press</publisher><subject>Benchmarks ; Boundary conditions ; Free surfaces ; Liquid bridges ; Mathematical models ; Numerical models ; Rigid walls ; Wavelengths</subject><ispartof>Fluid dynamics & materials processing, 2011-01, Vol.7 (1), p.1</ispartof><rights>2011. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-64e4e6b5860859a3cebcbb5f0ed2d67683d819e42cd68332fe1b8ac8ffcd1a753</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2397177283?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shevtsova, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mialdun, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishino, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappa, M</creatorcontrib><title>Onset of Hydrothermal Instability in Liquid Bridge. Experimental Benchmark</title><title>Fluid dynamics & materials processing</title><description>The experimental results from nine benchmark test cases conducted by five different groups are presented. The goal of this study is to build an experimental database for validation of numerical models in liquid bridge geometry. The need arises as comparison of numerical results with a single experiment can lead to a large discrepancy due to specific experimental conditions. Perfectly conducting rigid walls and, especially, idealized boundary conditions at the free surface employed in numerical studies are not always realized in experiments. The experimental benchmark has emphasized strong sensitivity of the threshold of instability to the liquid bridge shape. A clear distinction should be made between results belonging to the different disturbance patterns, i.e. different wave numbers. The results of benchmark contributors are in a satisfactory agreement when they are associated with the stability branch with an identical wave number. In this case the discrepancy of the results for determination of the critical parameters is about ±15%-18% and they can be used for the validation of numerical models.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Free surfaces</subject><subject>Liquid bridges</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Rigid walls</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><issn>1555-256X</issn><issn>1555-2578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UEtLAzEYDKJgrf4AbwHPu-ax2WSPtlRbWehFwVvJJl9s6r6apGD_vQuKh2HmMA8YhO4pyXklyaOz3ZgzQmlOiJxAL9CMCiEyJqS6_NflxzW6ifFACJeVKGboddtHSHhweH22YUh7CJ1u8aaPSTe-9emMfY9rfzx5ixfB20_I8ep7hOA76NNkXUBv9p0OX7foyuk2wt0fz9H78-ptuc7q7ctm-VRnhnGasrKAAspGqJIoUWluoDFNIxwBy2wpS8WtohUUzNhJc-aANkob5ZyxVEvB5-jht3cMw_EEMe0Owyn00-SOTV9QKdmU-wGXlFCK</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Shevtsova, V</creator><creator>Mialdun, A</creator><creator>Kawamura, H</creator><creator>Ueno, I</creator><creator>Nishino, K</creator><creator>Lappa, M</creator><general>Tech Science Press</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Onset of Hydrothermal Instability in Liquid Bridge. Experimental Benchmark</title><author>Shevtsova, V ; Mialdun, A ; Kawamura, H ; Ueno, I ; Nishino, K ; Lappa, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-64e4e6b5860859a3cebcbb5f0ed2d67683d819e42cd68332fe1b8ac8ffcd1a753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Free surfaces</topic><topic>Liquid bridges</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Rigid walls</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shevtsova, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mialdun, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishino, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappa, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Fluid dynamics & materials processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shevtsova, V</au><au>Mialdun, A</au><au>Kawamura, H</au><au>Ueno, I</au><au>Nishino, K</au><au>Lappa, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Onset of Hydrothermal Instability in Liquid Bridge. Experimental Benchmark</atitle><jtitle>Fluid dynamics & materials processing</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1555-256X</issn><eissn>1555-2578</eissn><abstract>The experimental results from nine benchmark test cases conducted by five different groups are presented. The goal of this study is to build an experimental database for validation of numerical models in liquid bridge geometry. The need arises as comparison of numerical results with a single experiment can lead to a large discrepancy due to specific experimental conditions. Perfectly conducting rigid walls and, especially, idealized boundary conditions at the free surface employed in numerical studies are not always realized in experiments. The experimental benchmark has emphasized strong sensitivity of the threshold of instability to the liquid bridge shape. A clear distinction should be made between results belonging to the different disturbance patterns, i.e. different wave numbers. The results of benchmark contributors are in a satisfactory agreement when they are associated with the stability branch with an identical wave number. In this case the discrepancy of the results for determination of the critical parameters is about ±15%-18% and they can be used for the validation of numerical models.</abstract><cop>Duluth</cop><pub>Tech Science Press</pub><doi>10.3970/fdmp.2011.007.001</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1555-256X |
ispartof | Fluid dynamics & materials processing, 2011-01, Vol.7 (1), p.1 |
issn | 1555-256X 1555-2578 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2397177283 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Benchmarks Boundary conditions Free surfaces Liquid bridges Mathematical models Numerical models Rigid walls Wavelengths |
title | Onset of Hydrothermal Instability in Liquid Bridge. Experimental Benchmark |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A56%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Onset%20of%20Hydrothermal%20Instability%20in%20Liquid%20Bridge.%20Experimental%20Benchmark&rft.jtitle=Fluid%20dynamics%20&%20materials%20processing&rft.au=Shevtsova,%20V&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1555-256X&rft.eissn=1555-2578&rft_id=info:doi/10.3970/fdmp.2011.007.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2397177283%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-64e4e6b5860859a3cebcbb5f0ed2d67683d819e42cd68332fe1b8ac8ffcd1a753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2397177283&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |