Loading…
Fertilizer and manure equivalent rates on forage corn production (Zea mays)
An experiment with increasing rates of fertilizer and manure in silage corn was established to evaluate the agronomic crop response and to estimate the manure nitrogen availability. The treatments were designed to deliver 0, 67, 100 and 133% of the crop nitrogen requirements (CNR), using ammonium su...
Saved in:
Published in: | Phyton (Buenos Aires) 2015-01, Vol.84 (1), p.8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; fre ; ger ; ita ; por ; spa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Phyton (Buenos Aires) |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | López-Calderón Mj Figueroa-Viramontes, U tis-Hernández, M Núñez-Hernández, G Ochoa-Martínez, E Sanchez-Duarte, Ji |
description | An experiment with increasing rates of fertilizer and manure in silage corn was established to evaluate the agronomic crop response and to estimate the manure nitrogen availability. The treatments were designed to deliver 0, 67, 100 and 133% of the crop nitrogen requirements (CNR), using ammonium sulphate and manure as N source. Dry matter (DM) yield was similar among treatments receiving N, but those values were greater than those found in the control. Nitrogen extraction at harvest was not statistically different in treatments with fertilizer or manure, but it was higher in these treatments than in the control without N (p≤ 0.05). With both sources of N, crop N extraction was adjusted to a quadratic regression equation, as a function of N rates. According to the fertilizer equivalence (EF) methodology, the rate of 231.3 kg/ha of inorganic fertilizer N, and 752.9 kg/ha of total N in manure, had 129.5 kg/ha of N extracted by the crop. The ratio of the above rates, fertilizer N/ manure total N, represents the crop available manure N; in the present study, it was 30.7% of total N in the manure. Since no differences in yield were observed between N sources, it is concluded that N fertilizer can be substituted by manure, at a rate estimated to provide the crop N requirements. The estimation of the manure available N is important to adjust manure rates, thereafter avoiding excessive applications and pollution risks. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2398004629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2398004629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_23980046293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjssKwjAURIMoWB__cMGNLgrpI32sxSK4deWmhPZWWmpibxJBv94s_ABXA2fOwMxYEBUiCkUm8jkLOE-isExFvmQrYwbO01jkRcAuFZLtx_6DBFK18JDKEQJOrn_JEZUFkhYNaAWdJnlHaDQpeJJuXWN7j_c3lH72NocNW3RyNLj95ZrtqtP1eA69PTk0th60I-WrOk7Kwn_I4jL5z_oCILQ-YA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2398004629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fertilizer and manure equivalent rates on forage corn production (Zea mays)</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>López-Calderón Mj ; Figueroa-Viramontes, U ; tis-Hernández, M ; Núñez-Hernández, G ; Ochoa-Martínez, E ; Sanchez-Duarte, Ji</creator><creatorcontrib>López-Calderón Mj ; Figueroa-Viramontes, U ; tis-Hernández, M ; Núñez-Hernández, G ; Ochoa-Martínez, E ; Sanchez-Duarte, Ji</creatorcontrib><description>An experiment with increasing rates of fertilizer and manure in silage corn was established to evaluate the agronomic crop response and to estimate the manure nitrogen availability. The treatments were designed to deliver 0, 67, 100 and 133% of the crop nitrogen requirements (CNR), using ammonium sulphate and manure as N source. Dry matter (DM) yield was similar among treatments receiving N, but those values were greater than those found in the control. Nitrogen extraction at harvest was not statistically different in treatments with fertilizer or manure, but it was higher in these treatments than in the control without N (p≤ 0.05). With both sources of N, crop N extraction was adjusted to a quadratic regression equation, as a function of N rates. According to the fertilizer equivalence (EF) methodology, the rate of 231.3 kg/ha of inorganic fertilizer N, and 752.9 kg/ha of total N in manure, had 129.5 kg/ha of N extracted by the crop. The ratio of the above rates, fertilizer N/ manure total N, represents the crop available manure N; in the present study, it was 30.7% of total N in the manure. Since no differences in yield were observed between N sources, it is concluded that N fertilizer can be substituted by manure, at a rate estimated to provide the crop N requirements. The estimation of the manure available N is important to adjust manure rates, thereafter avoiding excessive applications and pollution risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1851-5657</identifier><language>eng ; fre ; ger ; ita ; por ; spa</language><publisher>Buenos Aires: Tech Science Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agrochemicals ; Agronomic crops ; Agronomy ; Ammonium ; Ammonium sulfate ; Corn ; Crops ; Dry matter ; Environmental risk ; Equivalence ; Fertilizers ; Manures ; Nitrogen ; Quadratic equations</subject><ispartof>Phyton (Buenos Aires), 2015-01, Vol.84 (1), p.8</ispartof><rights>2015. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2398004629?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>López-Calderón Mj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueroa-Viramontes, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>tis-Hernández, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez-Hernández, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa-Martínez, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Duarte, Ji</creatorcontrib><title>Fertilizer and manure equivalent rates on forage corn production (Zea mays)</title><title>Phyton (Buenos Aires)</title><description>An experiment with increasing rates of fertilizer and manure in silage corn was established to evaluate the agronomic crop response and to estimate the manure nitrogen availability. The treatments were designed to deliver 0, 67, 100 and 133% of the crop nitrogen requirements (CNR), using ammonium sulphate and manure as N source. Dry matter (DM) yield was similar among treatments receiving N, but those values were greater than those found in the control. Nitrogen extraction at harvest was not statistically different in treatments with fertilizer or manure, but it was higher in these treatments than in the control without N (p≤ 0.05). With both sources of N, crop N extraction was adjusted to a quadratic regression equation, as a function of N rates. According to the fertilizer equivalence (EF) methodology, the rate of 231.3 kg/ha of inorganic fertilizer N, and 752.9 kg/ha of total N in manure, had 129.5 kg/ha of N extracted by the crop. The ratio of the above rates, fertilizer N/ manure total N, represents the crop available manure N; in the present study, it was 30.7% of total N in the manure. Since no differences in yield were observed between N sources, it is concluded that N fertilizer can be substituted by manure, at a rate estimated to provide the crop N requirements. The estimation of the manure available N is important to adjust manure rates, thereafter avoiding excessive applications and pollution risks.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Agronomic crops</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium sulfate</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Quadratic equations</subject><issn>0031-9457</issn><issn>1851-5657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjssKwjAURIMoWB__cMGNLgrpI32sxSK4deWmhPZWWmpibxJBv94s_ABXA2fOwMxYEBUiCkUm8jkLOE-isExFvmQrYwbO01jkRcAuFZLtx_6DBFK18JDKEQJOrn_JEZUFkhYNaAWdJnlHaDQpeJJuXWN7j_c3lH72NocNW3RyNLj95ZrtqtP1eA69PTk0th60I-WrOk7Kwn_I4jL5z_oCILQ-YA</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>López-Calderón Mj</creator><creator>Figueroa-Viramontes, U</creator><creator>tis-Hernández, M</creator><creator>Núñez-Hernández, G</creator><creator>Ochoa-Martínez, E</creator><creator>Sanchez-Duarte, Ji</creator><general>Tech Science Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Fertilizer and manure equivalent rates on forage corn production (Zea mays)</title><author>López-Calderón Mj ; Figueroa-Viramontes, U ; tis-Hernández, M ; Núñez-Hernández, G ; Ochoa-Martínez, E ; Sanchez-Duarte, Ji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_23980046293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; fre ; ger ; ita ; por ; spa</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Agronomic crops</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium sulfate</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Quadratic equations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López-Calderón Mj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueroa-Viramontes, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>tis-Hernández, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez-Hernández, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochoa-Martínez, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Duarte, Ji</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Phyton (Buenos Aires)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López-Calderón Mj</au><au>Figueroa-Viramontes, U</au><au>tis-Hernández, M</au><au>Núñez-Hernández, G</au><au>Ochoa-Martínez, E</au><au>Sanchez-Duarte, Ji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fertilizer and manure equivalent rates on forage corn production (Zea mays)</atitle><jtitle>Phyton (Buenos Aires)</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><pages>8-</pages><issn>0031-9457</issn><eissn>1851-5657</eissn><abstract>An experiment with increasing rates of fertilizer and manure in silage corn was established to evaluate the agronomic crop response and to estimate the manure nitrogen availability. The treatments were designed to deliver 0, 67, 100 and 133% of the crop nitrogen requirements (CNR), using ammonium sulphate and manure as N source. Dry matter (DM) yield was similar among treatments receiving N, but those values were greater than those found in the control. Nitrogen extraction at harvest was not statistically different in treatments with fertilizer or manure, but it was higher in these treatments than in the control without N (p≤ 0.05). With both sources of N, crop N extraction was adjusted to a quadratic regression equation, as a function of N rates. According to the fertilizer equivalence (EF) methodology, the rate of 231.3 kg/ha of inorganic fertilizer N, and 752.9 kg/ha of total N in manure, had 129.5 kg/ha of N extracted by the crop. The ratio of the above rates, fertilizer N/ manure total N, represents the crop available manure N; in the present study, it was 30.7% of total N in the manure. Since no differences in yield were observed between N sources, it is concluded that N fertilizer can be substituted by manure, at a rate estimated to provide the crop N requirements. The estimation of the manure available N is important to adjust manure rates, thereafter avoiding excessive applications and pollution risks.</abstract><cop>Buenos Aires</cop><pub>Tech Science Press</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9457 |
ispartof | Phyton (Buenos Aires), 2015-01, Vol.84 (1), p.8 |
issn | 0031-9457 1851-5657 |
language | eng ; fre ; ger ; ita ; por ; spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2398004629 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Agricultural production Agrochemicals Agronomic crops Agronomy Ammonium Ammonium sulfate Corn Crops Dry matter Environmental risk Equivalence Fertilizers Manures Nitrogen Quadratic equations |
title | Fertilizer and manure equivalent rates on forage corn production (Zea mays) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A06%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fertilizer%20and%20manure%20equivalent%20rates%20on%20forage%20corn%20production%20(Zea%20mays)&rft.jtitle=Phyton%20(Buenos%20Aires)&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-Calder%C3%B3n%20Mj&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.pages=8-&rft.issn=0031-9457&rft.eissn=1851-5657&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2398004629%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_23980046293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2398004629&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |