Long-term care system in Taiwan: the 2017 major reform and its challenges

This paper reviews the past development of the publicly funded long-term care (LTC) system and aims to advance further discussion of LTC in Taiwan. The Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 introduced in 2017 calls for a major reform of a publicly funded LTC system in Taiwan. The reform expands on the pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ageing and society 2020-06, Vol.40 (6), p.1334-1351
Main Author: Yeh, Ming-Jui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aging
Citizenship
Cultural values
Disability
Discontinuity
Ethics
Foreign labor
Foreign workers
Governance
Government agencies
Health care policy
Health insurance
Health services
Long term
Long term care insurance
Long term health care
Medical ethics
Older people
Political change
Political factors
Reforms
Social services
Sociocultural factors
Subsidies
Taxation
Workers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper reviews the past development of the publicly funded long-term care (LTC) system and aims to advance further discussion of LTC in Taiwan. The Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 introduced in 2017 calls for a major reform of a publicly funded LTC system in Taiwan. The reform expands on the previous universal tax-based LTC system, allowing for more comprehensive and accessible subsidies on LTC services. This paper provides a brief overview of the political context of the reform and an introduction to the legal basis, financing and delivery mechanisms of the reform plan. To this end, as a preliminary evaluation, this paper identifies major institutional and socio-cultural tensions that could challenge the implementation of the plan. Institutional tensions include the dominant foreign worker caring model, which relies on approximately 220,000 foreign workers to provide LTC services, and the discontinuity between health and social care governance, which leads to a discontinuity between curative and LTC care. Socio-cultural tensions focus on conflicting values in the allocation of responsibility of care and in the understanding of disability between universal social citizenship in the modern state and traditional Confucian ethics. Policy implications of these tensions for the LTC system are then discussed.
ISSN:0144-686X
1469-1779
DOI:10.1017/S0144686X18001745