Loading…

Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States

This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consisten...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communication quarterly 2020-03, Vol.68 (2), p.115-137
Main Authors: McNallie, Jenna, Timmermans, Elisabeth, Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth, Van den Bulck, Jan, Wilson, Steven R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63
container_end_page 137
container_issue 2
container_start_page 115
container_title Communication quarterly
container_volume 68
creator McNallie, Jenna
Timmermans, Elisabeth
Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth
Van den Bulck, Jan
Wilson, Steven R.
description This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consistent media messages can shape attitudes and beliefs about self and other, perceptions of others' academic ease (or the perceptions of how difficult it is for peers to do well in college) was included as a mediator. For the U.S., Twitter was directly and indirectly associated with self-efficacy. In the Flanders sample, both Facebook and Twitter had significant direct and indirect effects on self-efficacy. The results' opposite directionality (e.g., Twitter's positive direct effect, Facebook's negative direct effect) suggest the two media operate differently. Contextual differences and theoretical implications for media effects research are discussed along with practical implications for the first-year transition.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01463373.2019.1703774
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2400040757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2400040757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPIAQ8eNqabLKb7E0pVgXBg_YcxmSiKdvdmqTIvr1bW6_CwFy-_x_mI-SSsxlnmt0wLmshlJiVjDczrphQSh6RCVeyLiRn5TGZ7JhiB52Ss5RWjDGuqnJCNq-9DdDSNboANHQZuxTyQKFz1IeYcjEgRGr7tsUPpClvHXY5XVOw4HAdLE3Y-gK9DxbsMDbQRTuGMabfjvyJdNmFjI6-ZsiYzsmJhzbhxWFPyXJx_zZ_LJ5fHp7md8-FFbrKBWeNBK1kaZnT6p3JpiqbWguoRekrx0vXMEDUuvGjA9DVOFVta11zbYWtxZRc7Xs3sf_aYspm1W9jN540pRzfl0xVaqSqPWVjn1JEbzYxrCEOhjOzk2v-5JqdXHOQO-Zu97nQ-T6u4buPrTMZhraPPkJnQzLi_4ofxdN_3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400040757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>McNallie, Jenna ; Timmermans, Elisabeth ; Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth ; Van den Bulck, Jan ; Wilson, Steven R.</creator><creatorcontrib>McNallie, Jenna ; Timmermans, Elisabeth ; Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth ; Van den Bulck, Jan ; Wilson, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consistent media messages can shape attitudes and beliefs about self and other, perceptions of others' academic ease (or the perceptions of how difficult it is for peers to do well in college) was included as a mediator. For the U.S., Twitter was directly and indirectly associated with self-efficacy. In the Flanders sample, both Facebook and Twitter had significant direct and indirect effects on self-efficacy. The results' opposite directionality (e.g., Twitter's positive direct effect, Facebook's negative direct effect) suggest the two media operate differently. Contextual differences and theoretical implications for media effects research are discussed along with practical implications for the first-year transition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-3373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-4102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2019.1703774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University Park: Routledge</publisher><subject>academic self-efficacy ; College students ; Cultivation ; cultivation theory ; Digital media ; Educational psychology ; Self-efficacy ; Social media ; Social networks ; student adjustment ; Students</subject><ispartof>Communication quarterly, 2020-03, Vol.68 (2), p.115-137</ispartof><rights>2019 Eastern Communication Association 2019</rights><rights>2019 Eastern Communication Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8558-0977 ; 0000-0003-4737-3659 ; 0000-0003-0885-0854 ; 0000-0003-1805-2020 ; 0000-0001-5694-3882</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNallie, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Bulck, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><title>Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States</title><title>Communication quarterly</title><description>This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consistent media messages can shape attitudes and beliefs about self and other, perceptions of others' academic ease (or the perceptions of how difficult it is for peers to do well in college) was included as a mediator. For the U.S., Twitter was directly and indirectly associated with self-efficacy. In the Flanders sample, both Facebook and Twitter had significant direct and indirect effects on self-efficacy. The results' opposite directionality (e.g., Twitter's positive direct effect, Facebook's negative direct effect) suggest the two media operate differently. Contextual differences and theoretical implications for media effects research are discussed along with practical implications for the first-year transition.</description><subject>academic self-efficacy</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>cultivation theory</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>student adjustment</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0146-3373</issn><issn>1746-4102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPIAQ8eNqabLKb7E0pVgXBg_YcxmSiKdvdmqTIvr1bW6_CwFy-_x_mI-SSsxlnmt0wLmshlJiVjDczrphQSh6RCVeyLiRn5TGZ7JhiB52Ss5RWjDGuqnJCNq-9DdDSNboANHQZuxTyQKFz1IeYcjEgRGr7tsUPpClvHXY5XVOw4HAdLE3Y-gK9DxbsMDbQRTuGMabfjvyJdNmFjI6-ZsiYzsmJhzbhxWFPyXJx_zZ_LJ5fHp7md8-FFbrKBWeNBK1kaZnT6p3JpiqbWguoRekrx0vXMEDUuvGjA9DVOFVta11zbYWtxZRc7Xs3sf_aYspm1W9jN540pRzfl0xVaqSqPWVjn1JEbzYxrCEOhjOzk2v-5JqdXHOQO-Zu97nQ-T6u4buPrTMZhraPPkJnQzLi_4ofxdN_3g</recordid><startdate>20200314</startdate><enddate>20200314</enddate><creator>McNallie, Jenna</creator><creator>Timmermans, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Van den Bulck, Jan</creator><creator>Wilson, Steven R.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Eastern Communication Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8558-0977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4737-3659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-0854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-2020</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5694-3882</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200314</creationdate><title>Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States</title><author>McNallie, Jenna ; Timmermans, Elisabeth ; Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth ; Van den Bulck, Jan ; Wilson, Steven R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>academic self-efficacy</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>cultivation theory</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>student adjustment</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNallie, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Bulck, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNallie, Jenna</au><au>Timmermans, Elisabeth</au><au>Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth</au><au>Van den Bulck, Jan</au><au>Wilson, Steven R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States</atitle><jtitle>Communication quarterly</jtitle><date>2020-03-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>115-137</pages><issn>0146-3373</issn><eissn>1746-4102</eissn><abstract>This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consistent media messages can shape attitudes and beliefs about self and other, perceptions of others' academic ease (or the perceptions of how difficult it is for peers to do well in college) was included as a mediator. For the U.S., Twitter was directly and indirectly associated with self-efficacy. In the Flanders sample, both Facebook and Twitter had significant direct and indirect effects on self-efficacy. The results' opposite directionality (e.g., Twitter's positive direct effect, Facebook's negative direct effect) suggest the two media operate differently. Contextual differences and theoretical implications for media effects research are discussed along with practical implications for the first-year transition.</abstract><cop>University Park</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01463373.2019.1703774</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8558-0977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4737-3659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-0854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-2020</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5694-3882</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-3373
ispartof Communication quarterly, 2020-03, Vol.68 (2), p.115-137
issn 0146-3373
1746-4102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2400040757
source Taylor & Francis
subjects academic self-efficacy
College students
Cultivation
cultivation theory
Digital media
Educational psychology
Self-efficacy
Social media
Social networks
student adjustment
Students
title Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20media%20intensity%20and%20first-year%20college%20students'%20academic%20self-efficacy%20in%20Flanders%20and%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Communication%20quarterly&rft.au=McNallie,%20Jenna&rft.date=2020-03-14&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=115-137&rft.issn=0146-3373&rft.eissn=1746-4102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01463373.2019.1703774&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2400040757%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400040757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true