Loading…
Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States
This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consisten...
Saved in:
Published in: | Communication quarterly 2020-03, Vol.68 (2), p.115-137 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63 |
container_end_page | 137 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Communication quarterly |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | McNallie, Jenna Timmermans, Elisabeth Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth Van den Bulck, Jan Wilson, Steven R. |
description | This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consistent media messages can shape attitudes and beliefs about self and other, perceptions of others' academic ease (or the perceptions of how difficult it is for peers to do well in college) was included as a mediator. For the U.S., Twitter was directly and indirectly associated with self-efficacy. In the Flanders sample, both Facebook and Twitter had significant direct and indirect effects on self-efficacy. The results' opposite directionality (e.g., Twitter's positive direct effect, Facebook's negative direct effect) suggest the two media operate differently. Contextual differences and theoretical implications for media effects research are discussed along with practical implications for the first-year transition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01463373.2019.1703774 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2400040757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2400040757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPIAQ8eNqabLKb7E0pVgXBg_YcxmSiKdvdmqTIvr1bW6_CwFy-_x_mI-SSsxlnmt0wLmshlJiVjDczrphQSh6RCVeyLiRn5TGZ7JhiB52Ss5RWjDGuqnJCNq-9DdDSNboANHQZuxTyQKFz1IeYcjEgRGr7tsUPpClvHXY5XVOw4HAdLE3Y-gK9DxbsMDbQRTuGMabfjvyJdNmFjI6-ZsiYzsmJhzbhxWFPyXJx_zZ_LJ5fHp7md8-FFbrKBWeNBK1kaZnT6p3JpiqbWguoRekrx0vXMEDUuvGjA9DVOFVta11zbYWtxZRc7Xs3sf_aYspm1W9jN540pRzfl0xVaqSqPWVjn1JEbzYxrCEOhjOzk2v-5JqdXHOQO-Zu97nQ-T6u4buPrTMZhraPPkJnQzLi_4ofxdN_3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400040757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><creator>McNallie, Jenna ; Timmermans, Elisabeth ; Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth ; Van den Bulck, Jan ; Wilson, Steven R.</creator><creatorcontrib>McNallie, Jenna ; Timmermans, Elisabeth ; Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth ; Van den Bulck, Jan ; Wilson, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consistent media messages can shape attitudes and beliefs about self and other, perceptions of others' academic ease (or the perceptions of how difficult it is for peers to do well in college) was included as a mediator. For the U.S., Twitter was directly and indirectly associated with self-efficacy. In the Flanders sample, both Facebook and Twitter had significant direct and indirect effects on self-efficacy. The results' opposite directionality (e.g., Twitter's positive direct effect, Facebook's negative direct effect) suggest the two media operate differently. Contextual differences and theoretical implications for media effects research are discussed along with practical implications for the first-year transition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-3373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-4102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2019.1703774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University Park: Routledge</publisher><subject>academic self-efficacy ; College students ; Cultivation ; cultivation theory ; Digital media ; Educational psychology ; Self-efficacy ; Social media ; Social networks ; student adjustment ; Students</subject><ispartof>Communication quarterly, 2020-03, Vol.68 (2), p.115-137</ispartof><rights>2019 Eastern Communication Association 2019</rights><rights>2019 Eastern Communication Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8558-0977 ; 0000-0003-4737-3659 ; 0000-0003-0885-0854 ; 0000-0003-1805-2020 ; 0000-0001-5694-3882</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNallie, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Bulck, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><title>Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States</title><title>Communication quarterly</title><description>This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consistent media messages can shape attitudes and beliefs about self and other, perceptions of others' academic ease (or the perceptions of how difficult it is for peers to do well in college) was included as a mediator. For the U.S., Twitter was directly and indirectly associated with self-efficacy. In the Flanders sample, both Facebook and Twitter had significant direct and indirect effects on self-efficacy. The results' opposite directionality (e.g., Twitter's positive direct effect, Facebook's negative direct effect) suggest the two media operate differently. Contextual differences and theoretical implications for media effects research are discussed along with practical implications for the first-year transition.</description><subject>academic self-efficacy</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>cultivation theory</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>student adjustment</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0146-3373</issn><issn>1746-4102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPIAQ8eNqabLKb7E0pVgXBg_YcxmSiKdvdmqTIvr1bW6_CwFy-_x_mI-SSsxlnmt0wLmshlJiVjDczrphQSh6RCVeyLiRn5TGZ7JhiB52Ss5RWjDGuqnJCNq-9DdDSNboANHQZuxTyQKFz1IeYcjEgRGr7tsUPpClvHXY5XVOw4HAdLE3Y-gK9DxbsMDbQRTuGMabfjvyJdNmFjI6-ZsiYzsmJhzbhxWFPyXJx_zZ_LJ5fHp7md8-FFbrKBWeNBK1kaZnT6p3JpiqbWguoRekrx0vXMEDUuvGjA9DVOFVta11zbYWtxZRc7Xs3sf_aYspm1W9jN540pRzfl0xVaqSqPWVjn1JEbzYxrCEOhjOzk2v-5JqdXHOQO-Zu97nQ-T6u4buPrTMZhraPPkJnQzLi_4ofxdN_3g</recordid><startdate>20200314</startdate><enddate>20200314</enddate><creator>McNallie, Jenna</creator><creator>Timmermans, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Van den Bulck, Jan</creator><creator>Wilson, Steven R.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Eastern Communication Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8558-0977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4737-3659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-0854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-2020</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5694-3882</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200314</creationdate><title>Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States</title><author>McNallie, Jenna ; Timmermans, Elisabeth ; Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth ; Van den Bulck, Jan ; Wilson, Steven R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>academic self-efficacy</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>cultivation theory</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>student adjustment</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNallie, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timmermans, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van den Bulck, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communication quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNallie, Jenna</au><au>Timmermans, Elisabeth</au><au>Dorrance Hall, Elizabeth</au><au>Van den Bulck, Jan</au><au>Wilson, Steven R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States</atitle><jtitle>Communication quarterly</jtitle><date>2020-03-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>115-137</pages><issn>0146-3373</issn><eissn>1746-4102</eissn><abstract>This study examined the association between social media use and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in two large, research intensive universities in Flanders (N = 513) and the United States (N = 431). Given cultivation and social cognitive theories' premises that consistent media messages can shape attitudes and beliefs about self and other, perceptions of others' academic ease (or the perceptions of how difficult it is for peers to do well in college) was included as a mediator. For the U.S., Twitter was directly and indirectly associated with self-efficacy. In the Flanders sample, both Facebook and Twitter had significant direct and indirect effects on self-efficacy. The results' opposite directionality (e.g., Twitter's positive direct effect, Facebook's negative direct effect) suggest the two media operate differently. Contextual differences and theoretical implications for media effects research are discussed along with practical implications for the first-year transition.</abstract><cop>University Park</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01463373.2019.1703774</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8558-0977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4737-3659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-0854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-2020</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5694-3882</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-3373 |
ispartof | Communication quarterly, 2020-03, Vol.68 (2), p.115-137 |
issn | 0146-3373 1746-4102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2400040757 |
source | Taylor & Francis |
subjects | academic self-efficacy College students Cultivation cultivation theory Digital media Educational psychology Self-efficacy Social media Social networks student adjustment Students |
title | Social media intensity and first-year college students' academic self-efficacy in Flanders and the United States |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20media%20intensity%20and%20first-year%20college%20students'%20academic%20self-efficacy%20in%20Flanders%20and%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Communication%20quarterly&rft.au=McNallie,%20Jenna&rft.date=2020-03-14&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=115-137&rft.issn=0146-3373&rft.eissn=1746-4102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01463373.2019.1703774&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2400040757%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-1094a8742c0d87b049529683a632f5d12d90aee889f108a85a8556c68618c3c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400040757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |