Loading…

Modularity measures: Concepts, computation, and applications to manufacturing systems

We propose a measure to quantify the modularity of industrial production (manufacturing) systems and optimization formulations to compute it. From a manufacturing perspective, we argue that a system is deemed modular if: (a) the equipment units that comprise it form clusters (modules) of dense conne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AIChE journal 2020-06, Vol.66 (6), p.n/a
Main Authors: Shao, Yue, Zavala, Victor M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-2674de3d23538ad31d363511dd8ac89c9687f7428de29813f485e4d3a590dc313
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-2674de3d23538ad31d363511dd8ac89c9687f7428de29813f485e4d3a590dc313
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title AIChE journal
container_volume 66
creator Shao, Yue
Zavala, Victor M.
description We propose a measure to quantify the modularity of industrial production (manufacturing) systems and optimization formulations to compute it. From a manufacturing perspective, we argue that a system is deemed modular if: (a) the equipment units that comprise it form clusters (modules) of dense connectivity (i.e., difficult module assembly tasks are performed off‐site), (b) connectivity between modules is sparse (i.e., easy assembly tasks are performed on‐site), (c) the number of modules is small, and (d) the module dimensions facilitate transportation. We show that the measure proposed satisfies these requirements and that it can be computed by solving a convex mixed‐integer quadratic program. We provide a discussion on advantages and disadvantages of alternative modularity measures used in different scientific and engineering communities. Our results seek to highlight conceptual and computational challenges that arise from the need to define and quantify modularity in a manufacturing context.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aic.16965
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2400193463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2400193463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-2674de3d23538ad31d363511dd8ac89c9687f7428de29813f485e4d3a590dc313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOAT8K65W-b-jbK1MHEF_ccQpJKR9vUJEX67Y2rrz5d7uF37uUcAO4xWmOEyEY1eo3zMucXYIE5KzJeIn4JFgghnCUBX4ObEE5pI4UgC3B8c2ZslW_iBDurwuhteIKV67UdYlhB7bphjCo2rl9B1RuohqFt9FkIMDrYqX6slY6jb_pPGKYQbRduwVWt2mDv_uYSHJ93H9Vrdnh_2VfbQ6YZYjwjecGMpYZQToUyFBuaU46xMUJpUeoyF0VdMCKMJaXAtGaCW2aoSqGMppguwcN8d_Dua7QhypMbfZ9eSsJSxpKynCbqcaa0dyF4W8vBN53yk8RI_rYmU2vy3FpiNzP73bR2-h-U2301O34AHSJuJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400193463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modularity measures: Concepts, computation, and applications to manufacturing systems</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Shao, Yue ; Zavala, Victor M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shao, Yue ; Zavala, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><description>We propose a measure to quantify the modularity of industrial production (manufacturing) systems and optimization formulations to compute it. From a manufacturing perspective, we argue that a system is deemed modular if: (a) the equipment units that comprise it form clusters (modules) of dense connectivity (i.e., difficult module assembly tasks are performed off‐site), (b) connectivity between modules is sparse (i.e., easy assembly tasks are performed on‐site), (c) the number of modules is small, and (d) the module dimensions facilitate transportation. We show that the measure proposed satisfies these requirements and that it can be computed by solving a convex mixed‐integer quadratic program. We provide a discussion on advantages and disadvantages of alternative modularity measures used in different scientific and engineering communities. Our results seek to highlight conceptual and computational challenges that arise from the need to define and quantify modularity in a manufacturing context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aic.16965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Assembly ; Computer applications ; graph theory ; Industrial production ; Manufacturing ; Modular equipment ; Modular systems ; Modularity ; Modules ; Optimization ; organization</subject><ispartof>AIChE journal, 2020-06, Vol.66 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-2674de3d23538ad31d363511dd8ac89c9687f7428de29813f485e4d3a590dc313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-2674de3d23538ad31d363511dd8ac89c9687f7428de29813f485e4d3a590dc313</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5744-7378</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavala, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><title>Modularity measures: Concepts, computation, and applications to manufacturing systems</title><title>AIChE journal</title><description>We propose a measure to quantify the modularity of industrial production (manufacturing) systems and optimization formulations to compute it. From a manufacturing perspective, we argue that a system is deemed modular if: (a) the equipment units that comprise it form clusters (modules) of dense connectivity (i.e., difficult module assembly tasks are performed off‐site), (b) connectivity between modules is sparse (i.e., easy assembly tasks are performed on‐site), (c) the number of modules is small, and (d) the module dimensions facilitate transportation. We show that the measure proposed satisfies these requirements and that it can be computed by solving a convex mixed‐integer quadratic program. We provide a discussion on advantages and disadvantages of alternative modularity measures used in different scientific and engineering communities. Our results seek to highlight conceptual and computational challenges that arise from the need to define and quantify modularity in a manufacturing context.</description><subject>Assembly</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>graph theory</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Modular equipment</subject><subject>Modular systems</subject><subject>Modularity</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>organization</subject><issn>0001-1541</issn><issn>1547-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOAT8K65W-b-jbK1MHEF_ccQpJKR9vUJEX67Y2rrz5d7uF37uUcAO4xWmOEyEY1eo3zMucXYIE5KzJeIn4JFgghnCUBX4ObEE5pI4UgC3B8c2ZslW_iBDurwuhteIKV67UdYlhB7bphjCo2rl9B1RuohqFt9FkIMDrYqX6slY6jb_pPGKYQbRduwVWt2mDv_uYSHJ93H9Vrdnh_2VfbQ6YZYjwjecGMpYZQToUyFBuaU46xMUJpUeoyF0VdMCKMJaXAtGaCW2aoSqGMppguwcN8d_Dua7QhypMbfZ9eSsJSxpKynCbqcaa0dyF4W8vBN53yk8RI_rYmU2vy3FpiNzP73bR2-h-U2301O34AHSJuJA</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Shao, Yue</creator><creator>Zavala, Victor M.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-7378</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Modularity measures: Concepts, computation, and applications to manufacturing systems</title><author>Shao, Yue ; Zavala, Victor M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-2674de3d23538ad31d363511dd8ac89c9687f7428de29813f485e4d3a590dc313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Assembly</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>graph theory</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Modular equipment</topic><topic>Modular systems</topic><topic>Modularity</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavala, Victor M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>AIChE journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shao, Yue</au><au>Zavala, Victor M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modularity measures: Concepts, computation, and applications to manufacturing systems</atitle><jtitle>AIChE journal</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0001-1541</issn><eissn>1547-5905</eissn><abstract>We propose a measure to quantify the modularity of industrial production (manufacturing) systems and optimization formulations to compute it. From a manufacturing perspective, we argue that a system is deemed modular if: (a) the equipment units that comprise it form clusters (modules) of dense connectivity (i.e., difficult module assembly tasks are performed off‐site), (b) connectivity between modules is sparse (i.e., easy assembly tasks are performed on‐site), (c) the number of modules is small, and (d) the module dimensions facilitate transportation. We show that the measure proposed satisfies these requirements and that it can be computed by solving a convex mixed‐integer quadratic program. We provide a discussion on advantages and disadvantages of alternative modularity measures used in different scientific and engineering communities. Our results seek to highlight conceptual and computational challenges that arise from the need to define and quantify modularity in a manufacturing context.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aic.16965</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-7378</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1541
ispartof AIChE journal, 2020-06, Vol.66 (6), p.n/a
issn 0001-1541
1547-5905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2400193463
source Wiley
subjects Assembly
Computer applications
graph theory
Industrial production
Manufacturing
Modular equipment
Modular systems
Modularity
Modules
Optimization
organization
title Modularity measures: Concepts, computation, and applications to manufacturing systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A48%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modularity%20measures:%20Concepts,%20computation,%20and%20applications%20to%20manufacturing%20systems&rft.jtitle=AIChE%20journal&rft.au=Shao,%20Yue&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0001-1541&rft.eissn=1547-5905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aic.16965&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2400193463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-2674de3d23538ad31d363511dd8ac89c9687f7428de29813f485e4d3a590dc313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400193463&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true