Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K7 of the air-kerma standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in mammography x-rays

A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the NRC and the BIPM in mammography x ray beams. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the combined standard uncertainty of 3.2 parts in 10 3 . The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Metrologia 2020-01, Vol.57 (1A), p.6011
Main Authors: Kessler, C, Burns, D T, Mainegra-Hing, E, Shen, H, McEwen, M R
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1A
container_start_page 6011
container_title Metrologia
container_volume 57
creator Kessler, C
Burns, D T
Mainegra-Hing, E
Shen, H
McEwen, M R
description A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the NRC and the BIPM in mammography x ray beams. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the combined standard uncertainty of 3.2 parts in 10 3 . The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/06011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2401331793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401331793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-a8e3cf35a045f6a63bbab69f857647653ae37a815a0655d5091cd37e83e6a2e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKc_QQh4o2DWpGmS9nIWD2XzwNDr8LVNXac9mHRg_73tpl598L4P7wcPQueMzhgNQ49SXxLGo8ATymNzj0rK2AGaMBkyooQSh2jyzxyjE-c2lDLlCzVB1cL0OGuqFmzpmhrfJC-Ps1VymVyRhcJNgbu1wVBa8mFsBdh1UOdgc_dXPa3iaxxDDTngodpl4wYua1xBVTXvFtp1j7-Jhd6doqMCPp05-71T9HZ3-xo_kOXzfRLPlyTzleoIhIZnBRdAA1FIkDxNIZVREQolAyUFB8MVhGwApBC5oBHLcq5MyI0E3wg-RRf73dY2X1vjOr1ptrYeXmo_oIxzpiI-UGJPZbZxzppCt7aswPaaUT2a1aM1PVrTQmk21zuz_AdcgWjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401331793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K7 of the air-kerma standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in mammography x-rays</title><source>Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:IOP Publishing Read and Publish 2024-2025 (Reading List)</source><creator>Kessler, C ; Burns, D T ; Mainegra-Hing, E ; Shen, H ; McEwen, M R</creator><creatorcontrib>Kessler, C ; Burns, D T ; Mainegra-Hing, E ; Shen, H ; McEwen, M R</creatorcontrib><description>A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the NRC and the BIPM in mammography x ray beams. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the combined standard uncertainty of 3.2 parts in 10 3 . The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1681-7575</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/06011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><ispartof>Metrologia, 2020-01, Vol.57 (1A), p.6011</ispartof><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kessler, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, D T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainegra-Hing, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, M R</creatorcontrib><title>Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K7 of the air-kerma standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in mammography x-rays</title><title>Metrologia</title><description>A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the NRC and the BIPM in mammography x ray beams. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the combined standard uncertainty of 3.2 parts in 10 3 . The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).</description><issn>0026-1394</issn><issn>1681-7575</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKc_QQh4o2DWpGmS9nIWD2XzwNDr8LVNXac9mHRg_73tpl598L4P7wcPQueMzhgNQ49SXxLGo8ATymNzj0rK2AGaMBkyooQSh2jyzxyjE-c2lDLlCzVB1cL0OGuqFmzpmhrfJC-Ps1VymVyRhcJNgbu1wVBa8mFsBdh1UOdgc_dXPa3iaxxDDTngodpl4wYua1xBVTXvFtp1j7-Jhd6doqMCPp05-71T9HZ3-xo_kOXzfRLPlyTzleoIhIZnBRdAA1FIkDxNIZVREQolAyUFB8MVhGwApBC5oBHLcq5MyI0E3wg-RRf73dY2X1vjOr1ptrYeXmo_oIxzpiI-UGJPZbZxzppCt7aswPaaUT2a1aM1PVrTQmk21zuz_AdcgWjQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Kessler, C</creator><creator>Burns, D T</creator><creator>Mainegra-Hing, E</creator><creator>Shen, H</creator><creator>McEwen, M R</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K7 of the air-kerma standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in mammography x-rays</title><author>Kessler, C ; Burns, D T ; Mainegra-Hing, E ; Shen, H ; McEwen, M R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-a8e3cf35a045f6a63bbab69f857647653ae37a815a0655d5091cd37e83e6a2e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kessler, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, D T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainegra-Hing, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, M R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Metrologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kessler, C</au><au>Burns, D T</au><au>Mainegra-Hing, E</au><au>Shen, H</au><au>McEwen, M R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K7 of the air-kerma standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in mammography x-rays</atitle><jtitle>Metrologia</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1A</issue><spage>6011</spage><pages>6011-</pages><issn>0026-1394</issn><eissn>1681-7575</eissn><abstract>A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the NRC and the BIPM in mammography x ray beams. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the combined standard uncertainty of 3.2 parts in 10 3 . The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database. Main text To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCRI, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/06011</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-1394
ispartof Metrologia, 2020-01, Vol.57 (1A), p.6011
issn 0026-1394
1681-7575
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2401331793
source Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:IOP Publishing Read and Publish 2024-2025 (Reading List)
title Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K7 of the air-kerma standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in mammography x-rays
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Key%20comparison%20BIPM.RI(I)-K7%20of%20the%20air-kerma%20standards%20of%20the%20NRC,%20Canada%20and%20the%20BIPM%20in%20mammography%20x-rays&rft.jtitle=Metrologia&rft.au=Kessler,%20C&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1A&rft.spage=6011&rft.pages=6011-&rft.issn=0026-1394&rft.eissn=1681-7575&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/06011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2401331793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-a8e3cf35a045f6a63bbab69f857647653ae37a815a0655d5091cd37e83e6a2e53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401331793&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true