Loading…
Characteristic invariants in Hennessy–Milner logic
In this paper, we prove that Hennessy–Milner Logic (HML), despite its structural limitations, is sufficiently expressive to specify an initial property φ 0 and a characteristic invariant χ I for an arbitrary finite-state process P such that φ 0 ∧ AG ( χ I ) is a characteristic formula for P . This m...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta informatica 2020-10, Vol.57 (3-5), p.671-687 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this paper, we prove that Hennessy–Milner Logic (HML), despite its structural limitations, is sufficiently expressive to specify an initial property
φ
0
and a characteristic invariant
χ
I
for an arbitrary finite-state process
P
such that
φ
0
∧
AG
(
χ
I
)
is a characteristic formula for
P
. This means that a process
Q
, even if infinite state, is bisimulation equivalent to
P
iff
Q
⊧
φ
0
∧
AG
(
χ
I
)
. It follows, in particular, that it is sufficient to check an HML formula for each state of a finite-state process to verify that it is bisimulation equivalent to
P
. In addition, more complex systems such as context-free processes can be checked for bisimulation equivalence with
P
using corresponding model checking algorithms. Our characteristic invariant is based on so called class-distinguishing formulas that identify bisimulation equivalence classes in
P
and which are expressed in HML. We extend Kanellakis and Smolka’s partition refinement algorithm for bisimulation checking in order to generate concise class-distinguishing formulas for finite-state processes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-5903 1432-0525 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00236-020-00376-5 |