Loading…

POSNoise: An Effective Countermeasure Against Topic Biases in Authorship Analysis

Authorship verification (AV) is a fundamental research task in digital text forensics, which addresses the problem of whether two texts were written by the same person. In recent years, a variety of AV methods have been proposed that focus on this problem and can be divided into two categories: The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2021-07
Main Authors: Halvani, Oren, Graner, Lukas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Halvani, Oren
Graner, Lukas
description Authorship verification (AV) is a fundamental research task in digital text forensics, which addresses the problem of whether two texts were written by the same person. In recent years, a variety of AV methods have been proposed that focus on this problem and can be divided into two categories: The first category refers to such methods that are based on explicitly defined features, where one has full control over which features are considered and what they actually represent. The second category, on the other hand, relates to such AV methods that are based on implicitly defined features, where no control mechanism is involved, so that any character sequence in a text can serve as a potential feature. However, AV methods belonging to the second category bear the risk that the topic of the texts may bias their classification predictions, which in turn may lead to misleading conclusions regarding their results. To tackle this problem, we propose a preprocessing technique called POSNoise, which effectively masks topic-related content in a given text. In this way, AV methods are forced to focus on such text units that are more related to the writing style. Our empirical evaluation based on six AV methods (falling into the second category) and seven corpora shows that POSNoise leads to better results compared to a well-known topic masking approach in 34 out of 42 cases, with an increase in accuracy of up to 10%.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.2005.06605
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2403203115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2403203115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-a2d4e51a6c46403034aa3197ecaac4590ab4a3645eaec3444474326e0abc61243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1Lw0AURQdBsNT-AHcDrhPffKZ1F0u1QrGK2Zfn-GKn1CTOS4r-ewN6NxcunMMV4kpBbufOwQ2m73jKNYDLwXtwZ2KijVHZ3Gp9IWbMBwDQvtDOmYl4ed6-PrWR6VaWjVzVNYU-nkgu26HpKX0S8pBIlh8YG-5l1XYxyLuITCxjI8uh37eJ97EbcTz-cORLcV7jkWn231NR3a-q5TrbbB8el-UmQ6ddhvrdklPog_UWDBiLaNSioIAYrFsAvlk03jpCCsaOKazRnsY9eKWtmYrrP22X2q-BuN8d2iGNH3inR6EGo5Qzv-BfT-s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2403203115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>POSNoise: An Effective Countermeasure Against Topic Biases in Authorship Analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Halvani, Oren ; Graner, Lukas</creator><creatorcontrib>Halvani, Oren ; Graner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><description>Authorship verification (AV) is a fundamental research task in digital text forensics, which addresses the problem of whether two texts were written by the same person. In recent years, a variety of AV methods have been proposed that focus on this problem and can be divided into two categories: The first category refers to such methods that are based on explicitly defined features, where one has full control over which features are considered and what they actually represent. The second category, on the other hand, relates to such AV methods that are based on implicitly defined features, where no control mechanism is involved, so that any character sequence in a text can serve as a potential feature. However, AV methods belonging to the second category bear the risk that the topic of the texts may bias their classification predictions, which in turn may lead to misleading conclusions regarding their results. To tackle this problem, we propose a preprocessing technique called POSNoise, which effectively masks topic-related content in a given text. In this way, AV methods are forced to focus on such text units that are more related to the writing style. Our empirical evaluation based on six AV methods (falling into the second category) and seven corpora shows that POSNoise leads to better results compared to a well-known topic masking approach in 34 out of 42 cases, with an increase in accuracy of up to 10%.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.06605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Authoring ; Authorship ; Masking ; Questions</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2021-07</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2403203115?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halvani, Oren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><title>POSNoise: An Effective Countermeasure Against Topic Biases in Authorship Analysis</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Authorship verification (AV) is a fundamental research task in digital text forensics, which addresses the problem of whether two texts were written by the same person. In recent years, a variety of AV methods have been proposed that focus on this problem and can be divided into two categories: The first category refers to such methods that are based on explicitly defined features, where one has full control over which features are considered and what they actually represent. The second category, on the other hand, relates to such AV methods that are based on implicitly defined features, where no control mechanism is involved, so that any character sequence in a text can serve as a potential feature. However, AV methods belonging to the second category bear the risk that the topic of the texts may bias their classification predictions, which in turn may lead to misleading conclusions regarding their results. To tackle this problem, we propose a preprocessing technique called POSNoise, which effectively masks topic-related content in a given text. In this way, AV methods are forced to focus on such text units that are more related to the writing style. Our empirical evaluation based on six AV methods (falling into the second category) and seven corpora shows that POSNoise leads to better results compared to a well-known topic masking approach in 34 out of 42 cases, with an increase in accuracy of up to 10%.</description><subject>Authoring</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Masking</subject><subject>Questions</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotjk1Lw0AURQdBsNT-AHcDrhPffKZ1F0u1QrGK2Zfn-GKn1CTOS4r-ewN6NxcunMMV4kpBbufOwQ2m73jKNYDLwXtwZ2KijVHZ3Gp9IWbMBwDQvtDOmYl4ed6-PrWR6VaWjVzVNYU-nkgu26HpKX0S8pBIlh8YG-5l1XYxyLuITCxjI8uh37eJ97EbcTz-cORLcV7jkWn231NR3a-q5TrbbB8el-UmQ6ddhvrdklPog_UWDBiLaNSioIAYrFsAvlk03jpCCsaOKazRnsY9eKWtmYrrP22X2q-BuN8d2iGNH3inR6EGo5Qzv-BfT-s</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Halvani, Oren</creator><creator>Graner, Lukas</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>POSNoise: An Effective Countermeasure Against Topic Biases in Authorship Analysis</title><author>Halvani, Oren ; Graner, Lukas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-a2d4e51a6c46403034aa3197ecaac4590ab4a3645eaec3444474326e0abc61243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Authoring</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Masking</topic><topic>Questions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halvani, Oren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halvani, Oren</au><au>Graner, Lukas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>POSNoise: An Effective Countermeasure Against Topic Biases in Authorship Analysis</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Authorship verification (AV) is a fundamental research task in digital text forensics, which addresses the problem of whether two texts were written by the same person. In recent years, a variety of AV methods have been proposed that focus on this problem and can be divided into two categories: The first category refers to such methods that are based on explicitly defined features, where one has full control over which features are considered and what they actually represent. The second category, on the other hand, relates to such AV methods that are based on implicitly defined features, where no control mechanism is involved, so that any character sequence in a text can serve as a potential feature. However, AV methods belonging to the second category bear the risk that the topic of the texts may bias their classification predictions, which in turn may lead to misleading conclusions regarding their results. To tackle this problem, we propose a preprocessing technique called POSNoise, which effectively masks topic-related content in a given text. In this way, AV methods are forced to focus on such text units that are more related to the writing style. Our empirical evaluation based on six AV methods (falling into the second category) and seven corpora shows that POSNoise leads to better results compared to a well-known topic masking approach in 34 out of 42 cases, with an increase in accuracy of up to 10%.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.2005.06605</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2021-07
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2403203115
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Authoring
Authorship
Masking
Questions
title POSNoise: An Effective Countermeasure Against Topic Biases in Authorship Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A54%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=POSNoise:%20An%20Effective%20Countermeasure%20Against%20Topic%20Biases%20in%20Authorship%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Halvani,%20Oren&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.2005.06605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2403203115%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-a2d4e51a6c46403034aa3197ecaac4590ab4a3645eaec3444474326e0abc61243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2403203115&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true