Loading…

Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design

AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-08, Vol.146 (8)
Main Authors: Xiao, Weifang, Andrae, Matthias, Gebbeken, Norbert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 146
creator Xiao, Weifang
Andrae, Matthias
Gebbeken, Norbert
description AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7  m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2  m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., at one end>at the center>at both ends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9  m/kg1/3 (5.7  m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2405428972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2405428972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUQIMoOKf_IeiLPnQmzcda32btdDAQ7ATfQkzTLWOmM8nE4Z83ZVOffAo3nHMvHADOMRpgxPH15agqyqtqNsA5JQmj-GWAEEp5Tg9A7_fvEPTQkJAkp5QdgxPvlxEaMpz1wFfZNFoF2DawWEg317BayLWG0tZwYk0wMpjWwqK1jZlv3G6KcPm5XrXefGhYbFfG1tp5eKdDayNh59BYOHZaw5FxMAq3K-lD8qS98UHaEElv5vYUHDVy5fXZ_u2D53E5Kx6S6eP9pBhNE0mGPCQ1UTTnPM0YyllDJUec1OmrzhhDJMsIplIxTqisEVOaEaawUoTLPI0ARRnpg4vd3rVr3zfaB7FsN87GkyKliNE0y4dppG52lHKt9043Yu3Mm3RbgZHoYgvRxRbVTHRhRRdW7GNHme9k6ZX-W_9j_i9-A026g34</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2405428972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design</title><source>ASCE library</source><creator>Xiao, Weifang ; Andrae, Matthias ; Gebbeken, Norbert</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Weifang ; Andrae, Matthias ; Gebbeken, Norbert</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7  m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2  m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., at one end&gt;at the center&gt;at both ends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9  m/kg1/3 (5.7  m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-541X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Blast loads ; Blast resistance ; Blasting (explosive) ; Computer simulation ; Configurations ; Detonation ; Explosions ; Mathematical models ; Numerical models ; Overpressure ; Protective structures ; Shape effects ; Structural engineering ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2020-08, Vol.146 (8)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9433-9133 ; 0000-0002-5324-3028</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3238,10048,27903,27904,75937,75945</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Weifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrae, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebbeken, Norbert</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design</title><title>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7  m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2  m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., at one end&gt;at the center&gt;at both ends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9  m/kg1/3 (5.7  m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations.</description><subject>Blast loads</subject><subject>Blast resistance</subject><subject>Blasting (explosive)</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Detonation</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Overpressure</subject><subject>Protective structures</subject><subject>Shape effects</subject><subject>Structural engineering</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>0733-9445</issn><issn>1943-541X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUQIMoOKf_IeiLPnQmzcda32btdDAQ7ATfQkzTLWOmM8nE4Z83ZVOffAo3nHMvHADOMRpgxPH15agqyqtqNsA5JQmj-GWAEEp5Tg9A7_fvEPTQkJAkp5QdgxPvlxEaMpz1wFfZNFoF2DawWEg317BayLWG0tZwYk0wMpjWwqK1jZlv3G6KcPm5XrXefGhYbFfG1tp5eKdDayNh59BYOHZaw5FxMAq3K-lD8qS98UHaEElv5vYUHDVy5fXZ_u2D53E5Kx6S6eP9pBhNE0mGPCQ1UTTnPM0YyllDJUec1OmrzhhDJMsIplIxTqisEVOaEaawUoTLPI0ARRnpg4vd3rVr3zfaB7FsN87GkyKliNE0y4dppG52lHKt9043Yu3Mm3RbgZHoYgvRxRbVTHRhRRdW7GNHme9k6ZX-W_9j_i9-A026g34</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Xiao, Weifang</creator><creator>Andrae, Matthias</creator><creator>Gebbeken, Norbert</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-9133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-3028</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design</title><author>Xiao, Weifang ; Andrae, Matthias ; Gebbeken, Norbert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blast loads</topic><topic>Blast resistance</topic><topic>Blasting (explosive)</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Detonation</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Overpressure</topic><topic>Protective structures</topic><topic>Shape effects</topic><topic>Structural engineering</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Weifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrae, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebbeken, Norbert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Weifang</au><au>Andrae, Matthias</au><au>Gebbeken, Norbert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0733-9445</issn><eissn>1943-541X</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7  m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2  m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., at one end&gt;at the center&gt;at both ends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9  m/kg1/3 (5.7  m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-9133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-3028</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9445
ispartof Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2020-08, Vol.146 (8)
issn 0733-9445
1943-541X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2405428972
source ASCE library
subjects Blast loads
Blast resistance
Blasting (explosive)
Computer simulation
Configurations
Detonation
Explosions
Mathematical models
Numerical models
Overpressure
Protective structures
Shape effects
Structural engineering
Technical Papers
title Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Charge%20Shape%20and%20Initiation%20Configuration%20of%20Explosive%20Cylinders%20Detonating%20in%20Free%20Air%20on%20Blast-Resistant%20Design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20structural%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Xiao,%20Weifang&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0733-9445&rft.eissn=1943-541X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2405428972%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2405428972&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true