Loading…
Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design
AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-08, Vol.146 (8) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 146 |
creator | Xiao, Weifang Andrae, Matthias Gebbeken, Norbert |
description | AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7 m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2 m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., at one end>at the center>at both ends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9 m/kg1/3 (5.7 m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2405428972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2405428972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUQIMoOKf_IeiLPnQmzcda32btdDAQ7ATfQkzTLWOmM8nE4Z83ZVOffAo3nHMvHADOMRpgxPH15agqyqtqNsA5JQmj-GWAEEp5Tg9A7_fvEPTQkJAkp5QdgxPvlxEaMpz1wFfZNFoF2DawWEg317BayLWG0tZwYk0wMpjWwqK1jZlv3G6KcPm5XrXefGhYbFfG1tp5eKdDayNh59BYOHZaw5FxMAq3K-lD8qS98UHaEElv5vYUHDVy5fXZ_u2D53E5Kx6S6eP9pBhNE0mGPCQ1UTTnPM0YyllDJUec1OmrzhhDJMsIplIxTqisEVOaEaawUoTLPI0ARRnpg4vd3rVr3zfaB7FsN87GkyKliNE0y4dppG52lHKt9043Yu3Mm3RbgZHoYgvRxRbVTHRhRRdW7GNHme9k6ZX-W_9j_i9-A026g34</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2405428972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design</title><source>ASCE library</source><creator>Xiao, Weifang ; Andrae, Matthias ; Gebbeken, Norbert</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Weifang ; Andrae, Matthias ; Gebbeken, Norbert</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7 m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2 m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., at one end>at the center>at both ends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9 m/kg1/3 (5.7 m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-541X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Blast loads ; Blast resistance ; Blasting (explosive) ; Computer simulation ; Configurations ; Detonation ; Explosions ; Mathematical models ; Numerical models ; Overpressure ; Protective structures ; Shape effects ; Structural engineering ; Technical Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2020-08, Vol.146 (8)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9433-9133 ; 0000-0002-5324-3028</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3238,10048,27903,27904,75937,75945</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Weifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrae, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebbeken, Norbert</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design</title><title>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7 m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2 m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., at one end>at the center>at both ends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9 m/kg1/3 (5.7 m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations.</description><subject>Blast loads</subject><subject>Blast resistance</subject><subject>Blasting (explosive)</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Detonation</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Overpressure</subject><subject>Protective structures</subject><subject>Shape effects</subject><subject>Structural engineering</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><issn>0733-9445</issn><issn>1943-541X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUQIMoOKf_IeiLPnQmzcda32btdDAQ7ATfQkzTLWOmM8nE4Z83ZVOffAo3nHMvHADOMRpgxPH15agqyqtqNsA5JQmj-GWAEEp5Tg9A7_fvEPTQkJAkp5QdgxPvlxEaMpz1wFfZNFoF2DawWEg317BayLWG0tZwYk0wMpjWwqK1jZlv3G6KcPm5XrXefGhYbFfG1tp5eKdDayNh59BYOHZaw5FxMAq3K-lD8qS98UHaEElv5vYUHDVy5fXZ_u2D53E5Kx6S6eP9pBhNE0mGPCQ1UTTnPM0YyllDJUec1OmrzhhDJMsIplIxTqisEVOaEaawUoTLPI0ARRnpg4vd3rVr3zfaB7FsN87GkyKliNE0y4dppG52lHKt9043Yu3Mm3RbgZHoYgvRxRbVTHRhRRdW7GNHme9k6ZX-W_9j_i9-A026g34</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Xiao, Weifang</creator><creator>Andrae, Matthias</creator><creator>Gebbeken, Norbert</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-9133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-3028</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design</title><author>Xiao, Weifang ; Andrae, Matthias ; Gebbeken, Norbert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blast loads</topic><topic>Blast resistance</topic><topic>Blasting (explosive)</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Detonation</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Overpressure</topic><topic>Protective structures</topic><topic>Shape effects</topic><topic>Structural engineering</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Weifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrae, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebbeken, Norbert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Weifang</au><au>Andrae, Matthias</au><au>Gebbeken, Norbert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0733-9445</issn><eissn>1943-541X</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis paper investigates the influence of the cylindrical charge characteristics, i.e., the length-to-diameter ratio, orientation, and initiation configuration, on the blast loads (peak overpressure and maximum impulse). Three different initiation configurations were considered, i.e., at the center, at one end, and at both ends. Numerical models were developed for the spherical and cylindrical charges. The numerical results were analyzed along the gauge lines at different azimuth angles around the cylindrical charges. Some important observations were made. Neglecting the charge shape effect, the peak overpressure (maximum impulse) in the near field generated from centrally initiated cylindrical charges can be underestimated by a factor as high as 3.0 (1.9). Therefore, the cylindrical charge shape should be explicitly modeled in the numerical simulations for the blast-resistant design of protective structures subjected to near-field detonations. It is confirmed that the shock front heals into a spherical one in the far field. Hence, the blast loads generated from the spherical charge of the same mass can be used. In addition, the influence range, beyond which the charge shape effect can be neglected, is 5.7 m/kg1/3 for the impulse, which is about twice that for the overpressure (3.2 m/kg1/3). In general, the maximum values of blast loads resulted by the three considered initiation configurations can be sorted in descending order, i.e., at one end>at the center>at both ends. The initiation configuration at one end (at the center) has the largest influence range of 3.9 m/kg1/3 (5.7 m/kg1/3) for the overpressure (impulse) among the three considered initiation configurations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-9133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-3028</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-9445 |
ispartof | Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2020-08, Vol.146 (8) |
issn | 0733-9445 1943-541X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2405428972 |
source | ASCE library |
subjects | Blast loads Blast resistance Blasting (explosive) Computer simulation Configurations Detonation Explosions Mathematical models Numerical models Overpressure Protective structures Shape effects Structural engineering Technical Papers |
title | Effect of Charge Shape and Initiation Configuration of Explosive Cylinders Detonating in Free Air on Blast-Resistant Design |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Charge%20Shape%20and%20Initiation%20Configuration%20of%20Explosive%20Cylinders%20Detonating%20in%20Free%20Air%20on%20Blast-Resistant%20Design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20structural%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Xiao,%20Weifang&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0733-9445&rft.eissn=1943-541X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2405428972%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-d3c4966285095f4a6063d2be8550388314ac5634ad05ce535c1cc36a925504083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2405428972&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |