Loading…
The Adaptability Paradox: Constitutional Resilience and Principles of Good Government in Twenty-First-Century America
Faith in the resilience of the US Constitution prompts many observers to discount evidence of a deepening crisis of governance in our day. A long history of success in navigating tough times and adapting to new circumstances instills confidence that the fundamentals of the system are sound and the i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Perspectives on politics 2020-06, Vol.18 (2), p.354-369 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8f9061174ce4d9d3c50877388848d84706a7f72941cc5b36e5c2a5a80791e3323 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8f9061174ce4d9d3c50877388848d84706a7f72941cc5b36e5c2a5a80791e3323 |
container_end_page | 369 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 354 |
container_title | Perspectives on politics |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Skowronek, Stephen Orren, Karen |
description | Faith in the resilience of the US Constitution prompts many observers to discount evidence of a deepening crisis of governance in our day. A long history of success in navigating tough times and adapting to new circumstances instills confidence that the fundamentals of the system are sound and the institutions self-correcting. The aim of this article is to push assessments of this sort beyond the usual nod to great crises surmounted in the past and to identify institutional adaptation as a developmental problem worthy of study in its own right. To that end, we call attention to dynamics of adjustment that have played out over the long haul. Our historical-structural approach points to the “bounded resilience” of previous adaptations and to dynamics of reordering conditioned on the operation of other governance outside the Constitution’s formal written arrangements. We look to the successive overthrow of these other incongruous elements and to the serial incorporation of previously excluded groups to posit increasing stress on constitutional forms and greater reliance on principles for support of new institutional arrangements. Following these developments into the present, we find principles losing traction, now seemingly unable to foster new rules in support of agreeable governing arrangements. Our analysis generates a set of propositions about why the difficulties of our day might be different from those of the past in ways that bear directly on resilience and adaptability going forward. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1537592719002640 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2408525782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2408525782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8f9061174ce4d9d3c50877388848d84706a7f72941cc5b36e5c2a5a80791e3323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuA19V8Nql3o7gpDBw6r0uWppjRJTVJdf33tsw7b8554H04cF4AbjG6xwiLh3fMqeAFEbhAiOQMnYEZ5gxnqJD5-cRUZFN-Ca5i3I8OoUjOQL_9NHBRqy6pnW1tGuBGBVX74yMsvYvJpj5Z71QL30wcBeO0gcrVcBOs07ZrTYS-gSvv63F8m-AOxiVoHdz-jDBkSxtiysqR-zDAxcEEq9U1uGhUG83N356Dj-XTtnzO1q-rl3KxzjTFecpkU6AcY8G0YXVRU82RFIJKKZmsJRMoV6IRpGBYa76jueGaKK4kEgU2lBI6B3enu13wX72Jqdr7PozfxIowJDnhQk4WPlk6-BiDaaou2IMKQ4VRNbVb_WuX_gIPnmyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2408525782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Adaptability Paradox: Constitutional Resilience and Principles of Good Government in Twenty-First-Century America</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Skowronek, Stephen ; Orren, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Skowronek, Stephen ; Orren, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Faith in the resilience of the US Constitution prompts many observers to discount evidence of a deepening crisis of governance in our day. A long history of success in navigating tough times and adapting to new circumstances instills confidence that the fundamentals of the system are sound and the institutions self-correcting. The aim of this article is to push assessments of this sort beyond the usual nod to great crises surmounted in the past and to identify institutional adaptation as a developmental problem worthy of study in its own right. To that end, we call attention to dynamics of adjustment that have played out over the long haul. Our historical-structural approach points to the “bounded resilience” of previous adaptations and to dynamics of reordering conditioned on the operation of other governance outside the Constitution’s formal written arrangements. We look to the successive overthrow of these other incongruous elements and to the serial incorporation of previously excluded groups to posit increasing stress on constitutional forms and greater reliance on principles for support of new institutional arrangements. Following these developments into the present, we find principles losing traction, now seemingly unable to foster new rules in support of agreeable governing arrangements. Our analysis generates a set of propositions about why the difficulties of our day might be different from those of the past in ways that bear directly on resilience and adaptability going forward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592719002640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>20th century ; Adaptability ; Constitution-US ; Constitutional law ; Constitutions ; Crises ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Governance ; History ; Innovations ; Judicial appointments ; Politics ; Principles ; Reliance ; Resilience ; Success</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2020-06, Vol.18 (2), p.354-369</ispartof><rights>American Political Science Association 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8f9061174ce4d9d3c50877388848d84706a7f72941cc5b36e5c2a5a80791e3323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8f9061174ce4d9d3c50877388848d84706a7f72941cc5b36e5c2a5a80791e3323</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4454-9014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2408525782/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2408525782?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,12826,21366,21373,27901,27902,33200,33588,33962,43709,43924,73964,74211</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skowronek, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orren, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>The Adaptability Paradox: Constitutional Resilience and Principles of Good Government in Twenty-First-Century America</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><description>Faith in the resilience of the US Constitution prompts many observers to discount evidence of a deepening crisis of governance in our day. A long history of success in navigating tough times and adapting to new circumstances instills confidence that the fundamentals of the system are sound and the institutions self-correcting. The aim of this article is to push assessments of this sort beyond the usual nod to great crises surmounted in the past and to identify institutional adaptation as a developmental problem worthy of study in its own right. To that end, we call attention to dynamics of adjustment that have played out over the long haul. Our historical-structural approach points to the “bounded resilience” of previous adaptations and to dynamics of reordering conditioned on the operation of other governance outside the Constitution’s formal written arrangements. We look to the successive overthrow of these other incongruous elements and to the serial incorporation of previously excluded groups to posit increasing stress on constitutional forms and greater reliance on principles for support of new institutional arrangements. Following these developments into the present, we find principles losing traction, now seemingly unable to foster new rules in support of agreeable governing arrangements. Our analysis generates a set of propositions about why the difficulties of our day might be different from those of the past in ways that bear directly on resilience and adaptability going forward.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Constitution-US</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Judicial appointments</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Reliance</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNplkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuA19V8Nql3o7gpDBw6r0uWppjRJTVJdf33tsw7b8554H04cF4AbjG6xwiLh3fMqeAFEbhAiOQMnYEZ5gxnqJD5-cRUZFN-Ca5i3I8OoUjOQL_9NHBRqy6pnW1tGuBGBVX74yMsvYvJpj5Z71QL30wcBeO0gcrVcBOs07ZrTYS-gSvv63F8m-AOxiVoHdz-jDBkSxtiysqR-zDAxcEEq9U1uGhUG83N356Dj-XTtnzO1q-rl3KxzjTFecpkU6AcY8G0YXVRU82RFIJKKZmsJRMoV6IRpGBYa76jueGaKK4kEgU2lBI6B3enu13wX72Jqdr7PozfxIowJDnhQk4WPlk6-BiDaaou2IMKQ4VRNbVb_WuX_gIPnmyU</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Skowronek, Stephen</creator><creator>Orren, Karen</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4454-9014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>The Adaptability Paradox: Constitutional Resilience and Principles of Good Government in Twenty-First-Century America</title><author>Skowronek, Stephen ; Orren, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8f9061174ce4d9d3c50877388848d84706a7f72941cc5b36e5c2a5a80791e3323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Constitution-US</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Judicial appointments</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Reliance</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skowronek, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orren, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skowronek, Stephen</au><au>Orren, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Adaptability Paradox: Constitutional Resilience and Principles of Good Government in Twenty-First-Century America</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>354-369</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>Faith in the resilience of the US Constitution prompts many observers to discount evidence of a deepening crisis of governance in our day. A long history of success in navigating tough times and adapting to new circumstances instills confidence that the fundamentals of the system are sound and the institutions self-correcting. The aim of this article is to push assessments of this sort beyond the usual nod to great crises surmounted in the past and to identify institutional adaptation as a developmental problem worthy of study in its own right. To that end, we call attention to dynamics of adjustment that have played out over the long haul. Our historical-structural approach points to the “bounded resilience” of previous adaptations and to dynamics of reordering conditioned on the operation of other governance outside the Constitution’s formal written arrangements. We look to the successive overthrow of these other incongruous elements and to the serial incorporation of previously excluded groups to posit increasing stress on constitutional forms and greater reliance on principles for support of new institutional arrangements. Following these developments into the present, we find principles losing traction, now seemingly unable to foster new rules in support of agreeable governing arrangements. Our analysis generates a set of propositions about why the difficulties of our day might be different from those of the past in ways that bear directly on resilience and adaptability going forward.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592719002640</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4454-9014</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1537-5927 |
ispartof | Perspectives on politics, 2020-06, Vol.18 (2), p.354-369 |
issn | 1537-5927 1541-0986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2408525782 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press |
subjects | 20th century Adaptability Constitution-US Constitutional law Constitutions Crises Democracy Democratization Governance History Innovations Judicial appointments Politics Principles Reliance Resilience Success |
title | The Adaptability Paradox: Constitutional Resilience and Principles of Good Government in Twenty-First-Century America |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A29%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Adaptability%20Paradox:%20Constitutional%20Resilience%20and%20Principles%20of%20Good%20Government%20in%20Twenty-First-Century%20America&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Skowronek,%20Stephen&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=354-369&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592719002640&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2408525782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-8f9061174ce4d9d3c50877388848d84706a7f72941cc5b36e5c2a5a80791e3323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2408525782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |