Loading…

Short Communication: Osmotic Dehydration of Physalis—Influence of Ultrasound Pretreatment

Physalis peruviana Linnaeus belongs to the family Solanaceae, and its potential cultivation is currently being explored due to its high productivity, sensory aspects and presence of several bioactive compounds. The shelf life of fresh physalis after harvesting is short, and its water content is high...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food engineering reviews 2015-06, Vol.7 (2), p.193-197
Main Authors: Luchese, Cláudia Leites, Gurak, Poliana Deyse, Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7256409da7dd8489056028e306c4853aeb1746997010933f9783570184cb26a13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7256409da7dd8489056028e306c4853aeb1746997010933f9783570184cb26a13
container_end_page 197
container_issue 2
container_start_page 193
container_title Food engineering reviews
container_volume 7
creator Luchese, Cláudia Leites
Gurak, Poliana Deyse
Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira
description Physalis peruviana Linnaeus belongs to the family Solanaceae, and its potential cultivation is currently being explored due to its high productivity, sensory aspects and presence of several bioactive compounds. The shelf life of fresh physalis after harvesting is short, and its water content is high; therefore, osmotic dehydration, an alternative technology, could reduce the postharvest loss of this fruit. However, one factor that has hindered the application of this technology is the waxy skin of the fruit; in this context, the aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of the pretreatment using an ultrasound probe (frequency, 20 kHz; amplitude, 80 %; for 30 min) on mass transfer during osmotic dehydration (ODU) and compare the results of the osmotic dehydration process without ultrasound (OD). The results showed that after 10 h, the loss of moisture was 47.6 ± 3.8 % and 46.1 ± 0.9 % for OD and ODU, respectively. The results for total sugar (normalized) showed a gain of 2.01 ± 0.22 and 2.05 ± 0.26 (g glucose g −1 of fruit) for OD and ODU, respectively. The carotenoid values were not observed to be influenced significantly by pretreatment; the ratios between the initial and final values of carotenoids were 0.74 ± 0.04 and 0.78 ± 0.06 for OD and ODU, respectively. The effective mass diffusivity of water calculated was 3.24 ± 0.49 × 10 −10  m 2  s −1 for OD and 3.34 ± 0.11 × 10 −10  m 2  s −1 for ODU, and the values founded were statistically equal (Tukey; p  > 0.05). Additionally, the water activity and total color difference were measured for both the OD and ODU processes after 10 h, and statistically equal results were observed. Thus, for the conditions analyzed in this work, osmotic dehydration without and with an ultrasound probe as pretreatment showed no influence on the parameters studied. However, the food industry is constantly investigating new preservation technologies to improve and/or to replace of traditional food preservation techniques, and the treatment using ultrasonic waves has been used in conservation of fruits because it modifies the structure of the fruit increasing the water loss in the processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12393-014-9086-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2410939443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2410939443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7256409da7dd8489056028e306c4853aeb1746997010933f9783570184cb26a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtOwzAUtBBIVKUHYBeJdcCOndhmh8qvUqVWgq5YWK7jkFSJXWxn0R2H4IScBIcgWPE2b95oZp40AJwjeIkgpFceZZjjFCKScsiKlB6BCWJFBDzjx78YwVMw834H42BEGCET8PJUWxeSue263jRKhsaa62TlOxsaldzq-lC6bzKxVbKuD162jf98_1iYqu21UXrgN21w0tvelMna6eC0DJ024QycVLL1evazp2Bzf_c8f0yXq4fF_GaZKkx4SGmWFwTyUtKyZIRxmBcwYxrDQhGWY6m3iJKCcwoR5BhXnDKcx4MRtc0KifAUXIy5e2ffeu2D2NnemfhSZGTwcEJwVKFRpZz13ulK7F3TSXcQCIqhRjHWKGKNYqhR0OjJRo-PWvOq3V_y_6YvTqV03A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2410939443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short Communication: Osmotic Dehydration of Physalis—Influence of Ultrasound Pretreatment</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Luchese, Cláudia Leites ; Gurak, Poliana Deyse ; Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira</creator><creatorcontrib>Luchese, Cláudia Leites ; Gurak, Poliana Deyse ; Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira</creatorcontrib><description>Physalis peruviana Linnaeus belongs to the family Solanaceae, and its potential cultivation is currently being explored due to its high productivity, sensory aspects and presence of several bioactive compounds. The shelf life of fresh physalis after harvesting is short, and its water content is high; therefore, osmotic dehydration, an alternative technology, could reduce the postharvest loss of this fruit. However, one factor that has hindered the application of this technology is the waxy skin of the fruit; in this context, the aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of the pretreatment using an ultrasound probe (frequency, 20 kHz; amplitude, 80 %; for 30 min) on mass transfer during osmotic dehydration (ODU) and compare the results of the osmotic dehydration process without ultrasound (OD). The results showed that after 10 h, the loss of moisture was 47.6 ± 3.8 % and 46.1 ± 0.9 % for OD and ODU, respectively. The results for total sugar (normalized) showed a gain of 2.01 ± 0.22 and 2.05 ± 0.26 (g glucose g −1 of fruit) for OD and ODU, respectively. The carotenoid values were not observed to be influenced significantly by pretreatment; the ratios between the initial and final values of carotenoids were 0.74 ± 0.04 and 0.78 ± 0.06 for OD and ODU, respectively. The effective mass diffusivity of water calculated was 3.24 ± 0.49 × 10 −10  m 2  s −1 for OD and 3.34 ± 0.11 × 10 −10  m 2  s −1 for ODU, and the values founded were statistically equal (Tukey; p  &gt; 0.05). Additionally, the water activity and total color difference were measured for both the OD and ODU processes after 10 h, and statistically equal results were observed. Thus, for the conditions analyzed in this work, osmotic dehydration without and with an ultrasound probe as pretreatment showed no influence on the parameters studied. However, the food industry is constantly investigating new preservation technologies to improve and/or to replace of traditional food preservation techniques, and the treatment using ultrasonic waves has been used in conservation of fruits because it modifies the structure of the fruit increasing the water loss in the processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7929</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12393-014-9086-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Alternative technology ; Bioactive compounds ; Carotenoids ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Cultivation ; Dehydration ; Food industry ; Food preservation ; Food processing industry ; Food Science ; Fruits ; Mass transfer ; Moisture content ; Original Paper ; Preservation ; Pretreatment ; Shelf life ; Traditional foods ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Water activity ; Water content ; Water loss</subject><ispartof>Food engineering reviews, 2015-06, Vol.7 (2), p.193-197</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7256409da7dd8489056028e306c4853aeb1746997010933f9783570184cb26a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7256409da7dd8489056028e306c4853aeb1746997010933f9783570184cb26a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luchese, Cláudia Leites</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurak, Poliana Deyse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira</creatorcontrib><title>Short Communication: Osmotic Dehydration of Physalis—Influence of Ultrasound Pretreatment</title><title>Food engineering reviews</title><addtitle>Food Eng Rev</addtitle><description>Physalis peruviana Linnaeus belongs to the family Solanaceae, and its potential cultivation is currently being explored due to its high productivity, sensory aspects and presence of several bioactive compounds. The shelf life of fresh physalis after harvesting is short, and its water content is high; therefore, osmotic dehydration, an alternative technology, could reduce the postharvest loss of this fruit. However, one factor that has hindered the application of this technology is the waxy skin of the fruit; in this context, the aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of the pretreatment using an ultrasound probe (frequency, 20 kHz; amplitude, 80 %; for 30 min) on mass transfer during osmotic dehydration (ODU) and compare the results of the osmotic dehydration process without ultrasound (OD). The results showed that after 10 h, the loss of moisture was 47.6 ± 3.8 % and 46.1 ± 0.9 % for OD and ODU, respectively. The results for total sugar (normalized) showed a gain of 2.01 ± 0.22 and 2.05 ± 0.26 (g glucose g −1 of fruit) for OD and ODU, respectively. The carotenoid values were not observed to be influenced significantly by pretreatment; the ratios between the initial and final values of carotenoids were 0.74 ± 0.04 and 0.78 ± 0.06 for OD and ODU, respectively. The effective mass diffusivity of water calculated was 3.24 ± 0.49 × 10 −10  m 2  s −1 for OD and 3.34 ± 0.11 × 10 −10  m 2  s −1 for ODU, and the values founded were statistically equal (Tukey; p  &gt; 0.05). Additionally, the water activity and total color difference were measured for both the OD and ODU processes after 10 h, and statistically equal results were observed. Thus, for the conditions analyzed in this work, osmotic dehydration without and with an ultrasound probe as pretreatment showed no influence on the parameters studied. However, the food industry is constantly investigating new preservation technologies to improve and/or to replace of traditional food preservation techniques, and the treatment using ultrasonic waves has been used in conservation of fruits because it modifies the structure of the fruit increasing the water loss in the processing.</description><subject>Alternative technology</subject><subject>Bioactive compounds</subject><subject>Carotenoids</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Dehydration</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Food preservation</subject><subject>Food processing industry</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Shelf life</subject><subject>Traditional foods</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Water activity</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water loss</subject><issn>1866-7910</issn><issn>1866-7929</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtOwzAUtBBIVKUHYBeJdcCOndhmh8qvUqVWgq5YWK7jkFSJXWxn0R2H4IScBIcgWPE2b95oZp40AJwjeIkgpFceZZjjFCKScsiKlB6BCWJFBDzjx78YwVMw834H42BEGCET8PJUWxeSue263jRKhsaa62TlOxsaldzq-lC6bzKxVbKuD162jf98_1iYqu21UXrgN21w0tvelMna6eC0DJ024QycVLL1evazp2Bzf_c8f0yXq4fF_GaZKkx4SGmWFwTyUtKyZIRxmBcwYxrDQhGWY6m3iJKCcwoR5BhXnDKcx4MRtc0KifAUXIy5e2ffeu2D2NnemfhSZGTwcEJwVKFRpZz13ulK7F3TSXcQCIqhRjHWKGKNYqhR0OjJRo-PWvOq3V_y_6YvTqV03A</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Luchese, Cláudia Leites</creator><creator>Gurak, Poliana Deyse</creator><creator>Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Short Communication: Osmotic Dehydration of Physalis—Influence of Ultrasound Pretreatment</title><author>Luchese, Cláudia Leites ; Gurak, Poliana Deyse ; Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7256409da7dd8489056028e306c4853aeb1746997010933f9783570184cb26a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alternative technology</topic><topic>Bioactive compounds</topic><topic>Carotenoids</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Dehydration</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Food preservation</topic><topic>Food processing industry</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Shelf life</topic><topic>Traditional foods</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Water activity</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luchese, Cláudia Leites</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurak, Poliana Deyse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Food engineering reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luchese, Cláudia Leites</au><au>Gurak, Poliana Deyse</au><au>Marczak, Ligia Damasceno Ferreira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short Communication: Osmotic Dehydration of Physalis—Influence of Ultrasound Pretreatment</atitle><jtitle>Food engineering reviews</jtitle><stitle>Food Eng Rev</stitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>193-197</pages><issn>1866-7910</issn><eissn>1866-7929</eissn><abstract>Physalis peruviana Linnaeus belongs to the family Solanaceae, and its potential cultivation is currently being explored due to its high productivity, sensory aspects and presence of several bioactive compounds. The shelf life of fresh physalis after harvesting is short, and its water content is high; therefore, osmotic dehydration, an alternative technology, could reduce the postharvest loss of this fruit. However, one factor that has hindered the application of this technology is the waxy skin of the fruit; in this context, the aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of the pretreatment using an ultrasound probe (frequency, 20 kHz; amplitude, 80 %; for 30 min) on mass transfer during osmotic dehydration (ODU) and compare the results of the osmotic dehydration process without ultrasound (OD). The results showed that after 10 h, the loss of moisture was 47.6 ± 3.8 % and 46.1 ± 0.9 % for OD and ODU, respectively. The results for total sugar (normalized) showed a gain of 2.01 ± 0.22 and 2.05 ± 0.26 (g glucose g −1 of fruit) for OD and ODU, respectively. The carotenoid values were not observed to be influenced significantly by pretreatment; the ratios between the initial and final values of carotenoids were 0.74 ± 0.04 and 0.78 ± 0.06 for OD and ODU, respectively. The effective mass diffusivity of water calculated was 3.24 ± 0.49 × 10 −10  m 2  s −1 for OD and 3.34 ± 0.11 × 10 −10  m 2  s −1 for ODU, and the values founded were statistically equal (Tukey; p  &gt; 0.05). Additionally, the water activity and total color difference were measured for both the OD and ODU processes after 10 h, and statistically equal results were observed. Thus, for the conditions analyzed in this work, osmotic dehydration without and with an ultrasound probe as pretreatment showed no influence on the parameters studied. However, the food industry is constantly investigating new preservation technologies to improve and/or to replace of traditional food preservation techniques, and the treatment using ultrasonic waves has been used in conservation of fruits because it modifies the structure of the fruit increasing the water loss in the processing.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12393-014-9086-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-7910
ispartof Food engineering reviews, 2015-06, Vol.7 (2), p.193-197
issn 1866-7910
1866-7929
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2410939443
source Springer Nature
subjects Alternative technology
Bioactive compounds
Carotenoids
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Chemistry/Food Science
Cultivation
Dehydration
Food industry
Food preservation
Food processing industry
Food Science
Fruits
Mass transfer
Moisture content
Original Paper
Preservation
Pretreatment
Shelf life
Traditional foods
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
Water activity
Water content
Water loss
title Short Communication: Osmotic Dehydration of Physalis—Influence of Ultrasound Pretreatment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A48%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20Communication:%20Osmotic%20Dehydration%20of%20Physalis%E2%80%94Influence%20of%20Ultrasound%20Pretreatment&rft.jtitle=Food%20engineering%20reviews&rft.au=Luchese,%20Cl%C3%A1udia%20Leites&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=193-197&rft.issn=1866-7910&rft.eissn=1866-7929&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12393-014-9086-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2410939443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7256409da7dd8489056028e306c4853aeb1746997010933f9783570184cb26a13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2410939443&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true