Separation of Cerium Oxide Abrasive and Glass Powder in an Abrasive-Glass Polishing Waste by Means of Liquid–Liquid–Powder Extraction Method for Recovery: A Comparison of Using a Cationic and an Anionic Surfactant Collector

• Published in: Sustainability 2020-06, Vol.12 (11), p.4662
• Main Authors: Wang, Li-Pang, Chen, Yan-Jhang, Tso, Yun-Chen, Sheng, Chia-Feng, Ponou, Josiane, Kou, Mingyin, Zhou, Heng, Chen, Wei-Sheng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acetic acid; Cations; Cerium; Cerium oxides; Chemical industry; Dodecylamine; Glass; Glass substrates; Isooctane; Methods; Mineral processing; Particle size; Polishes; Polishing; Powder; Separation; Surfactants; Sustainability; Trace elements
• ISSN: 2071-1050; 2071-1050
• DOI: 10.3390/su12114662

Applying a cerium oxide abrasive to polish glass components generates a polishing waste containing the cerium oxide abrasive and the glass powder produced during polishing. This research applied the liquid–liquid–powder extraction method to separate the cerium oxide abrasive and the polished glass powder in an abrasive-glass polishing waste for recovering the cerium oxide abrasive. Two liquids of isooctane and water were utilized. The effectiveness of using a cationic and an anionic surfactant collector, i.e., dodecylamine acetate (DAA) and sodium oleate (NaOL), respectively, in improving their extraction and separation was investigated and compared. The results indicated that NaOL addition could improve the mutual separation of cerium oxide abrasive and glass powder but DAA could not, because the former could selectively improve the extraction of cerium oxide abrasive from the water phase to isooctane phase whereas the latter could improve that of both powders. Optimal separation for the cerium oxide abrasive and the polished glass powder in an abrasive-glass polishing waste were achieved by adding NaOL of 7.5 kg/ton at pH 7; the content of cerium oxide abrasive in the solid recovered from the isooctane phase was 96.4% with a recovery of 88.1%.