Loading…
Hungry people prefer larger bodies and objects: The importance of testing boundary effects
Several lab‐based studies have indicated that when people are hungry, they judge larger women's bodies as more attractive, compared to when they are satiated. These satiety‐dependent judgements are assumed to provide explanatory power when it comes to the noted cross‐cultural differences in att...
Saved in:
Published in: | The British journal of psychology 2020-08, Vol.111 (3), p.492-507 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-ddcb898c4fb00109931f7da37c97ae9325b0bebac7ac81b64d83715090b1c2473 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-ddcb898c4fb00109931f7da37c97ae9325b0bebac7ac81b64d83715090b1c2473 |
container_end_page | 507 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 492 |
container_title | The British journal of psychology |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Saxton, Tamsin K. McCarty, Kristofor Caizley, Jasmine McCarrick, Dane Pollet, Thomas V. |
description | Several lab‐based studies have indicated that when people are hungry, they judge larger women's bodies as more attractive, compared to when they are satiated. These satiety‐dependent judgements are assumed to provide explanatory power when it comes to the noted cross‐cultural differences in attitudes towards women's adiposity, whereby people who live in regions that are under greater nutritional stress tend to have more favourable attitudes towards bigger bodies. However, it is premature to assume that women's bodies are the proper or actual domain of the satiety‐dependent judgement shifts found within research study testing contexts until stimuli other than female bodies have also been tested: The research programme falls into the trap of confirmation bias unless we also seek out disconfirmatory evidence and test the boundaries of the effects of hunger. Accordingly, we collected attractiveness judgements of female and male bodies manipulated to vary in size by varying level of adiposity, and objects manipulated to vary in size, from 186 participants who also reported their current hunger level. We found that larger sizes of stimuli in general, and women's bodies in particular, especially when judged by women, were judged as more attractive by the hungrier participants. We discuss these patterns in the context of the Insurance Hypothesis, the Environmental Security Hypothesis, and the impact of hunger on acquisition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjop.12417 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2420584489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2420584489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-ddcb898c4fb00109931f7da37c97ae9325b0bebac7ac81b64d83715090b1c2473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EoqWw8AOQJTakFDt26pgNKj5VqQxlYbH8lZIojYOdCPXf45LCyFvecnTefReAc4ymOM61qlw7xSnF7ACMU0Rpkqc8OwRjhBBLcDrjI3ASQoUQxpzxYzAimDAy43gM3p_6Zu23sLWurS1svS2sh7X067iUM6UNUDYGOlVZ3YUbuPqwsNy0zney0Ra6AnY2dGWzjnTfGBldtih27Ck4KmQd7Nl-T8Dbw_1q_pQslo_P89tFogknLDFGq5znmhYqBkScE1wwIwnTnEnLSZoppKySmkmdYzWjJicMZ4gjhXVKGZmAy8HbevfZxzCicr1v4kmR0hRlOaU5j9TVQGnvQohvitaXmxhXYCR2NYpdjeKnxghf7JW92ljzh_72FgE8AF9lbbf_qMTdy_J1kH4D1IF9Uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2420584489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hungry people prefer larger bodies and objects: The importance of testing boundary effects</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Saxton, Tamsin K. ; McCarty, Kristofor ; Caizley, Jasmine ; McCarrick, Dane ; Pollet, Thomas V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saxton, Tamsin K. ; McCarty, Kristofor ; Caizley, Jasmine ; McCarrick, Dane ; Pollet, Thomas V.</creatorcontrib><description>Several lab‐based studies have indicated that when people are hungry, they judge larger women's bodies as more attractive, compared to when they are satiated. These satiety‐dependent judgements are assumed to provide explanatory power when it comes to the noted cross‐cultural differences in attitudes towards women's adiposity, whereby people who live in regions that are under greater nutritional stress tend to have more favourable attitudes towards bigger bodies. However, it is premature to assume that women's bodies are the proper or actual domain of the satiety‐dependent judgement shifts found within research study testing contexts until stimuli other than female bodies have also been tested: The research programme falls into the trap of confirmation bias unless we also seek out disconfirmatory evidence and test the boundaries of the effects of hunger. Accordingly, we collected attractiveness judgements of female and male bodies manipulated to vary in size by varying level of adiposity, and objects manipulated to vary in size, from 186 participants who also reported their current hunger level. We found that larger sizes of stimuli in general, and women's bodies in particular, especially when judged by women, were judged as more attractive by the hungrier participants. We discuss these patterns in the context of the Insurance Hypothesis, the Environmental Security Hypothesis, and the impact of hunger on acquisition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1269</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31373691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Psychological Society</publisher><subject>Adiposity ; Attitudes ; attractiveness judgements ; body image ; Confirmatory bias ; Cultural differences ; Female ; Humans ; Hunger ; Hypotheses ; Insurance ; Judgment ; Male ; nutritional stress ; Obesity ; Physical attractiveness ; Women</subject><ispartof>The British journal of psychology, 2020-08, Vol.111 (3), p.492-507</ispartof><rights>2019 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2019 The British Psychological Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The British Psychological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-ddcb898c4fb00109931f7da37c97ae9325b0bebac7ac81b64d83715090b1c2473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-ddcb898c4fb00109931f7da37c97ae9325b0bebac7ac81b64d83715090b1c2473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9902-5624 ; 0000-0002-4210-935X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31373691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saxton, Tamsin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarty, Kristofor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caizley, Jasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarrick, Dane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollet, Thomas V.</creatorcontrib><title>Hungry people prefer larger bodies and objects: The importance of testing boundary effects</title><title>The British journal of psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Psychol</addtitle><description>Several lab‐based studies have indicated that when people are hungry, they judge larger women's bodies as more attractive, compared to when they are satiated. These satiety‐dependent judgements are assumed to provide explanatory power when it comes to the noted cross‐cultural differences in attitudes towards women's adiposity, whereby people who live in regions that are under greater nutritional stress tend to have more favourable attitudes towards bigger bodies. However, it is premature to assume that women's bodies are the proper or actual domain of the satiety‐dependent judgement shifts found within research study testing contexts until stimuli other than female bodies have also been tested: The research programme falls into the trap of confirmation bias unless we also seek out disconfirmatory evidence and test the boundaries of the effects of hunger. Accordingly, we collected attractiveness judgements of female and male bodies manipulated to vary in size by varying level of adiposity, and objects manipulated to vary in size, from 186 participants who also reported their current hunger level. We found that larger sizes of stimuli in general, and women's bodies in particular, especially when judged by women, were judged as more attractive by the hungrier participants. We discuss these patterns in the context of the Insurance Hypothesis, the Environmental Security Hypothesis, and the impact of hunger on acquisition.</description><subject>Adiposity</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>attractiveness judgements</subject><subject>body image</subject><subject>Confirmatory bias</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hunger</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>nutritional stress</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Physical attractiveness</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0007-1269</issn><issn>2044-8295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EoqWw8AOQJTakFDt26pgNKj5VqQxlYbH8lZIojYOdCPXf45LCyFvecnTefReAc4ymOM61qlw7xSnF7ACMU0Rpkqc8OwRjhBBLcDrjI3ASQoUQxpzxYzAimDAy43gM3p_6Zu23sLWurS1svS2sh7X067iUM6UNUDYGOlVZ3YUbuPqwsNy0zney0Ra6AnY2dGWzjnTfGBldtih27Ck4KmQd7Nl-T8Dbw_1q_pQslo_P89tFogknLDFGq5znmhYqBkScE1wwIwnTnEnLSZoppKySmkmdYzWjJicMZ4gjhXVKGZmAy8HbevfZxzCicr1v4kmR0hRlOaU5j9TVQGnvQohvitaXmxhXYCR2NYpdjeKnxghf7JW92ljzh_72FgE8AF9lbbf_qMTdy_J1kH4D1IF9Uw</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Saxton, Tamsin K.</creator><creator>McCarty, Kristofor</creator><creator>Caizley, Jasmine</creator><creator>McCarrick, Dane</creator><creator>Pollet, Thomas V.</creator><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9902-5624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-935X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Hungry people prefer larger bodies and objects: The importance of testing boundary effects</title><author>Saxton, Tamsin K. ; McCarty, Kristofor ; Caizley, Jasmine ; McCarrick, Dane ; Pollet, Thomas V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-ddcb898c4fb00109931f7da37c97ae9325b0bebac7ac81b64d83715090b1c2473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adiposity</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>attractiveness judgements</topic><topic>body image</topic><topic>Confirmatory bias</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hunger</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>nutritional stress</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Physical attractiveness</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saxton, Tamsin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarty, Kristofor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caizley, Jasmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarrick, Dane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollet, Thomas V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The British journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saxton, Tamsin K.</au><au>McCarty, Kristofor</au><au>Caizley, Jasmine</au><au>McCarrick, Dane</au><au>Pollet, Thomas V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hungry people prefer larger bodies and objects: The importance of testing boundary effects</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychol</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>492</spage><epage>507</epage><pages>492-507</pages><issn>0007-1269</issn><eissn>2044-8295</eissn><abstract>Several lab‐based studies have indicated that when people are hungry, they judge larger women's bodies as more attractive, compared to when they are satiated. These satiety‐dependent judgements are assumed to provide explanatory power when it comes to the noted cross‐cultural differences in attitudes towards women's adiposity, whereby people who live in regions that are under greater nutritional stress tend to have more favourable attitudes towards bigger bodies. However, it is premature to assume that women's bodies are the proper or actual domain of the satiety‐dependent judgement shifts found within research study testing contexts until stimuli other than female bodies have also been tested: The research programme falls into the trap of confirmation bias unless we also seek out disconfirmatory evidence and test the boundaries of the effects of hunger. Accordingly, we collected attractiveness judgements of female and male bodies manipulated to vary in size by varying level of adiposity, and objects manipulated to vary in size, from 186 participants who also reported their current hunger level. We found that larger sizes of stimuli in general, and women's bodies in particular, especially when judged by women, were judged as more attractive by the hungrier participants. We discuss these patterns in the context of the Insurance Hypothesis, the Environmental Security Hypothesis, and the impact of hunger on acquisition.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Psychological Society</pub><pmid>31373691</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjop.12417</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9902-5624</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-935X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1269 |
ispartof | The British journal of psychology, 2020-08, Vol.111 (3), p.492-507 |
issn | 0007-1269 2044-8295 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2420584489 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Wiley |
subjects | Adiposity Attitudes attractiveness judgements body image Confirmatory bias Cultural differences Female Humans Hunger Hypotheses Insurance Judgment Male nutritional stress Obesity Physical attractiveness Women |
title | Hungry people prefer larger bodies and objects: The importance of testing boundary effects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A48%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hungry%20people%20prefer%20larger%20bodies%20and%20objects:%20The%20importance%20of%20testing%20boundary%20effects&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Saxton,%20Tamsin%20K.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=492&rft.epage=507&rft.pages=492-507&rft.issn=0007-1269&rft.eissn=2044-8295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjop.12417&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420584489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-ddcb898c4fb00109931f7da37c97ae9325b0bebac7ac81b64d83715090b1c2473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2420584489&rft_id=info:pmid/31373691&rfr_iscdi=true |