Loading…
A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots
For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of social robotics 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.85-119 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753 |
container_end_page | 119 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | International journal of social robotics |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Yan, Haibin Ang, Marcelo H. Poo, Aun Neow |
description | For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what objects are in the scene, and how they interact with humans. We first enumerate representative social robots and summarize the most three important perception methods from these robots: feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and semantic understanding. For feature extraction, four widely used signals including visual-based, audio-based, tactile-based and rang sensors-based are reviewed, and they are compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. For dimensionality reduction, representative methods including principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and locality preserving projections (LPP) are reviewed. For semantic understanding, conventional techniques for several typical applications such as object recognition, object tracking, object segmentation, and speaker localization are discussed, and their characteristics and limitations are also analyzed. Moreover, several popular data sets used in social robotics and published semantic understanding results are analyzed and compared in light of our analysis of HRI perception methods. Lastly, we suggest important future work to analyze fundamental questions on perception methods in HRI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2421250820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2421250820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWGofwFvA82qSaZLNsRS1hRbF6jlks1nd0m5qsiv05jv4hj6Jsat4cmCYgfn_f-BD6JySS0qIvIqUgVAZoZBaqUwcoQHNJc_GOeHHv7tU9BSNYlyTVMCklGKAlhO86sKb22Pf4HsXrNu1dVqXrn3xZcSVD3jWbU3z-f7x4Avf4nnTumDsQVU3eOVtbTb4cItn6KQym-hGP3OInm6uH6ezbHF3O59OFpmFnLWZYJwCKCMVByuUASJsAUBzRqSQILnIXcFdpWBsWKEklEaKUjhXGV4yyWGILvrcXfCvnYutXvsuNOmlZmNGGScpKqlor7LBxxhcpXeh3pqw15Tob3C6B6cTOP0NTovkYb0nJm3z7MJf8v-mLwqob28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2421250820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Yan, Haibin ; Ang, Marcelo H. ; Poo, Aun Neow</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haibin ; Ang, Marcelo H. ; Poo, Aun Neow</creatorcontrib><description>For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what objects are in the scene, and how they interact with humans. We first enumerate representative social robots and summarize the most three important perception methods from these robots: feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and semantic understanding. For feature extraction, four widely used signals including visual-based, audio-based, tactile-based and rang sensors-based are reviewed, and they are compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. For dimensionality reduction, representative methods including principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and locality preserving projections (LPP) are reviewed. For semantic understanding, conventional techniques for several typical applications such as object recognition, object tracking, object segmentation, and speaker localization are discussed, and their characteristics and limitations are also analyzed. Moreover, several popular data sets used in social robotics and published semantic understanding results are analyzed and compared in light of our analysis of HRI perception methods. Lastly, we suggest important future work to analyze fundamental questions on perception methods in HRI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1875-4791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-4805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Control ; Discriminant analysis ; Engineering ; Feature extraction ; Mechatronics ; Object recognition ; Perception ; Principal components analysis ; Reduction ; Robotics ; Robots ; Segmentation ; Semantics ; Survey ; Visual signals</subject><ispartof>International journal of social robotics, 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.85-119</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Marcelo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poo, Aun Neow</creatorcontrib><title>A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots</title><title>International journal of social robotics</title><addtitle>Int J of Soc Robotics</addtitle><description>For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what objects are in the scene, and how they interact with humans. We first enumerate representative social robots and summarize the most three important perception methods from these robots: feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and semantic understanding. For feature extraction, four widely used signals including visual-based, audio-based, tactile-based and rang sensors-based are reviewed, and they are compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. For dimensionality reduction, representative methods including principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and locality preserving projections (LPP) are reviewed. For semantic understanding, conventional techniques for several typical applications such as object recognition, object tracking, object segmentation, and speaker localization are discussed, and their characteristics and limitations are also analyzed. Moreover, several popular data sets used in social robotics and published semantic understanding results are analyzed and compared in light of our analysis of HRI perception methods. Lastly, we suggest important future work to analyze fundamental questions on perception methods in HRI.</description><subject>Control</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Survey</subject><subject>Visual signals</subject><issn>1875-4791</issn><issn>1875-4805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWGofwFvA82qSaZLNsRS1hRbF6jlks1nd0m5qsiv05jv4hj6Jsat4cmCYgfn_f-BD6JySS0qIvIqUgVAZoZBaqUwcoQHNJc_GOeHHv7tU9BSNYlyTVMCklGKAlhO86sKb22Pf4HsXrNu1dVqXrn3xZcSVD3jWbU3z-f7x4Avf4nnTumDsQVU3eOVtbTb4cItn6KQym-hGP3OInm6uH6ezbHF3O59OFpmFnLWZYJwCKCMVByuUASJsAUBzRqSQILnIXcFdpWBsWKEklEaKUjhXGV4yyWGILvrcXfCvnYutXvsuNOmlZmNGGScpKqlor7LBxxhcpXeh3pqw15Tob3C6B6cTOP0NTovkYb0nJm3z7MJf8v-mLwqob28</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Yan, Haibin</creator><creator>Ang, Marcelo H.</creator><creator>Poo, Aun Neow</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots</title><author>Yan, Haibin ; Ang, Marcelo H. ; Poo, Aun Neow</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Control</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Survey</topic><topic>Visual signals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Marcelo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poo, Aun Neow</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of social robotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Haibin</au><au>Ang, Marcelo H.</au><au>Poo, Aun Neow</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots</atitle><jtitle>International journal of social robotics</jtitle><stitle>Int J of Soc Robotics</stitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>85-119</pages><issn>1875-4791</issn><eissn>1875-4805</eissn><abstract>For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what objects are in the scene, and how they interact with humans. We first enumerate representative social robots and summarize the most three important perception methods from these robots: feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and semantic understanding. For feature extraction, four widely used signals including visual-based, audio-based, tactile-based and rang sensors-based are reviewed, and they are compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. For dimensionality reduction, representative methods including principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and locality preserving projections (LPP) are reviewed. For semantic understanding, conventional techniques for several typical applications such as object recognition, object tracking, object segmentation, and speaker localization are discussed, and their characteristics and limitations are also analyzed. Moreover, several popular data sets used in social robotics and published semantic understanding results are analyzed and compared in light of our analysis of HRI perception methods. Lastly, we suggest important future work to analyze fundamental questions on perception methods in HRI.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1875-4791 |
ispartof | International journal of social robotics, 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.85-119 |
issn | 1875-4791 1875-4805 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2421250820 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Control Discriminant analysis Engineering Feature extraction Mechatronics Object recognition Perception Principal components analysis Reduction Robotics Robots Segmentation Semantics Survey Visual signals |
title | A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Survey%20on%20Perception%20Methods%20for%20Human%E2%80%93Robot%20Interaction%20in%20Social%20Robots&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20social%20robotics&rft.au=Yan,%20Haibin&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=85-119&rft.issn=1875-4791&rft.eissn=1875-4805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2421250820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2421250820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |