Loading…

A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots

For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of social robotics 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.85-119
Main Authors: Yan, Haibin, Ang, Marcelo H., Poo, Aun Neow
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753
container_end_page 119
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title International journal of social robotics
container_volume 6
creator Yan, Haibin
Ang, Marcelo H.
Poo, Aun Neow
description For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what objects are in the scene, and how they interact with humans. We first enumerate representative social robots and summarize the most three important perception methods from these robots: feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and semantic understanding. For feature extraction, four widely used signals including visual-based, audio-based, tactile-based and rang sensors-based are reviewed, and they are compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. For dimensionality reduction, representative methods including principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and locality preserving projections (LPP) are reviewed. For semantic understanding, conventional techniques for several typical applications such as object recognition, object tracking, object segmentation, and speaker localization are discussed, and their characteristics and limitations are also analyzed. Moreover, several popular data sets used in social robotics and published semantic understanding results are analyzed and compared in light of our analysis of HRI perception methods. Lastly, we suggest important future work to analyze fundamental questions on perception methods in HRI.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2421250820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2421250820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWGofwFvA82qSaZLNsRS1hRbF6jlks1nd0m5qsiv05jv4hj6Jsat4cmCYgfn_f-BD6JySS0qIvIqUgVAZoZBaqUwcoQHNJc_GOeHHv7tU9BSNYlyTVMCklGKAlhO86sKb22Pf4HsXrNu1dVqXrn3xZcSVD3jWbU3z-f7x4Avf4nnTumDsQVU3eOVtbTb4cItn6KQym-hGP3OInm6uH6ezbHF3O59OFpmFnLWZYJwCKCMVByuUASJsAUBzRqSQILnIXcFdpWBsWKEklEaKUjhXGV4yyWGILvrcXfCvnYutXvsuNOmlZmNGGScpKqlor7LBxxhcpXeh3pqw15Tob3C6B6cTOP0NTovkYb0nJm3z7MJf8v-mLwqob28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2421250820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Yan, Haibin ; Ang, Marcelo H. ; Poo, Aun Neow</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haibin ; Ang, Marcelo H. ; Poo, Aun Neow</creatorcontrib><description>For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what objects are in the scene, and how they interact with humans. We first enumerate representative social robots and summarize the most three important perception methods from these robots: feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and semantic understanding. For feature extraction, four widely used signals including visual-based, audio-based, tactile-based and rang sensors-based are reviewed, and they are compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. For dimensionality reduction, representative methods including principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and locality preserving projections (LPP) are reviewed. For semantic understanding, conventional techniques for several typical applications such as object recognition, object tracking, object segmentation, and speaker localization are discussed, and their characteristics and limitations are also analyzed. Moreover, several popular data sets used in social robotics and published semantic understanding results are analyzed and compared in light of our analysis of HRI perception methods. Lastly, we suggest important future work to analyze fundamental questions on perception methods in HRI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1875-4791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-4805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Control ; Discriminant analysis ; Engineering ; Feature extraction ; Mechatronics ; Object recognition ; Perception ; Principal components analysis ; Reduction ; Robotics ; Robots ; Segmentation ; Semantics ; Survey ; Visual signals</subject><ispartof>International journal of social robotics, 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.85-119</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Marcelo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poo, Aun Neow</creatorcontrib><title>A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots</title><title>International journal of social robotics</title><addtitle>Int J of Soc Robotics</addtitle><description>For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what objects are in the scene, and how they interact with humans. We first enumerate representative social robots and summarize the most three important perception methods from these robots: feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and semantic understanding. For feature extraction, four widely used signals including visual-based, audio-based, tactile-based and rang sensors-based are reviewed, and they are compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. For dimensionality reduction, representative methods including principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and locality preserving projections (LPP) are reviewed. For semantic understanding, conventional techniques for several typical applications such as object recognition, object tracking, object segmentation, and speaker localization are discussed, and their characteristics and limitations are also analyzed. Moreover, several popular data sets used in social robotics and published semantic understanding results are analyzed and compared in light of our analysis of HRI perception methods. Lastly, we suggest important future work to analyze fundamental questions on perception methods in HRI.</description><subject>Control</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Survey</subject><subject>Visual signals</subject><issn>1875-4791</issn><issn>1875-4805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWGofwFvA82qSaZLNsRS1hRbF6jlks1nd0m5qsiv05jv4hj6Jsat4cmCYgfn_f-BD6JySS0qIvIqUgVAZoZBaqUwcoQHNJc_GOeHHv7tU9BSNYlyTVMCklGKAlhO86sKb22Pf4HsXrNu1dVqXrn3xZcSVD3jWbU3z-f7x4Avf4nnTumDsQVU3eOVtbTb4cItn6KQym-hGP3OInm6uH6ezbHF3O59OFpmFnLWZYJwCKCMVByuUASJsAUBzRqSQILnIXcFdpWBsWKEklEaKUjhXGV4yyWGILvrcXfCvnYutXvsuNOmlZmNGGScpKqlor7LBxxhcpXeh3pqw15Tob3C6B6cTOP0NTovkYb0nJm3z7MJf8v-mLwqob28</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Yan, Haibin</creator><creator>Ang, Marcelo H.</creator><creator>Poo, Aun Neow</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots</title><author>Yan, Haibin ; Ang, Marcelo H. ; Poo, Aun Neow</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Control</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Survey</topic><topic>Visual signals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haibin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Marcelo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poo, Aun Neow</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of social robotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Haibin</au><au>Ang, Marcelo H.</au><au>Poo, Aun Neow</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots</atitle><jtitle>International journal of social robotics</jtitle><stitle>Int J of Soc Robotics</stitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>85-119</pages><issn>1875-4791</issn><eissn>1875-4805</eissn><abstract>For human–robot interaction (HRI), perception is one of the most important capabilities. This paper reviews several widely used perception methods of HRI in social robots. Specifically, we investigate general perception tasks crucial for HRI, such as where the objects are located in the rooms, what objects are in the scene, and how they interact with humans. We first enumerate representative social robots and summarize the most three important perception methods from these robots: feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and semantic understanding. For feature extraction, four widely used signals including visual-based, audio-based, tactile-based and rang sensors-based are reviewed, and they are compared based on their advantages and disadvantages. For dimensionality reduction, representative methods including principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and locality preserving projections (LPP) are reviewed. For semantic understanding, conventional techniques for several typical applications such as object recognition, object tracking, object segmentation, and speaker localization are discussed, and their characteristics and limitations are also analyzed. Moreover, several popular data sets used in social robotics and published semantic understanding results are analyzed and compared in light of our analysis of HRI perception methods. Lastly, we suggest important future work to analyze fundamental questions on perception methods in HRI.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1875-4791
ispartof International journal of social robotics, 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.85-119
issn 1875-4791
1875-4805
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2421250820
source Springer Nature
subjects Control
Discriminant analysis
Engineering
Feature extraction
Mechatronics
Object recognition
Perception
Principal components analysis
Reduction
Robotics
Robots
Segmentation
Semantics
Survey
Visual signals
title A Survey on Perception Methods for Human–Robot Interaction in Social Robots
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Survey%20on%20Perception%20Methods%20for%20Human%E2%80%93Robot%20Interaction%20in%20Social%20Robots&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20social%20robotics&rft.au=Yan,%20Haibin&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=85-119&rft.issn=1875-4791&rft.eissn=1875-4805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12369-013-0199-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2421250820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-6251339a7953c69a306cb33182076737568eb5ef934a2b973da76d6eefa5d2753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2421250820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true