Loading…
Intrinsic vs. extrinsic incentives for reform: An informational mechanism of E(M)U conditionality
How does the prospect of accession to an international union affect a non-member-state government’s incentives to implement political and economic liberalization reforms? To answer this question, we propose an informational mechanism of international union accession conditionality drawing on Bénabou...
Saved in:
Published in: | Review of International Organizations 2020-07, Vol.15 (3), p.601-632 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | How does the prospect of accession to an international union affect a non-member-state government’s incentives to implement political and economic liberalization reforms? To answer this question, we propose an informational mechanism of international union accession conditionality drawing on Bénabou and Tirole’s (
The Review of Economic Studies
, 70, 489–520,
2003
) formalization of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In a Bayesian game of union accession between a
supranational
principal (e.g., EU Commission) and a
national
agent (e.g., the government of the target country), we find that the extrinsic bonus of post-accession transfers may on the one hand reinforce the agent’s short-term incentives to meet the accession criteria but on the other hand can also “crowd out” its intrinsic motivation to liberalize and comply with the union’s
acquis
in the long run. As a result, we expect that (i) net-recipient countries’ post-accession pace of reform may decline or even turn negative over time (
temporal
effect), (ii) the crowding-out effect will be stronger for countries that enjoy higher levels of distributive net transfers and those that go through a lengthier negotiation period (
spatial
effect), and (iii) early liberalizers are
ex ante
more likely to be officially selected as union candidate members, accept the accession contract, and implement the required reforms. We illustrate the theoretical mechanism and dynamics of the model with anecdotal evidence from two paired comparisons in respect to the effects of
economic
conditionality attached to EMU accession (Greece vs. Spain) and
political
conditionality attached to EU accession (Hungary vs. Estonia). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1559-7431 1559-744X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11558-020-09387-w |