Loading…

Progress or pinkwashing: who benefits from digital women-focused capital funds?

This paper examines the positioning of gender within women-focused capital funds (WFCFs) to consider the extent to which these digitally enabled sources of finance reflect the tenets of entrepreneurial feminism. Content analysis of 27 funds situated in Canada and the USA informs about fund mandates,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Small business economics 2020-08, Vol.55 (2), p.363-387
Main Authors: Orser, Barbara, Coleman, Susan, Li, Yanhong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3ee4e1669e8f73b6a8d2dd6a96a0e87ffb7aeac58d57cc21f8ffc277dec1d4383
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3ee4e1669e8f73b6a8d2dd6a96a0e87ffb7aeac58d57cc21f8ffc277dec1d4383
container_end_page 387
container_issue 2
container_start_page 363
container_title Small business economics
container_volume 55
creator Orser, Barbara
Coleman, Susan
Li, Yanhong
description This paper examines the positioning of gender within women-focused capital funds (WFCFs) to consider the extent to which these digitally enabled sources of finance reflect the tenets of entrepreneurial feminism. Content analysis of 27 funds situated in Canada and the USA informs about fund mandates, rationales, types of capital, and anticipated outcomes. Our findings reveal that a minority of WFCFs examined sought to enhance equity and counter structural barriers associated with women entrepreneurs’ access to financial capital. Alternatively, the majority of WFCFs were positioned as vehicles to facilitate individual wealth creation. Eligibility ranged from multiple gender identities of the business owner to “women-led” businesses—defined as at least one woman executive, board or steering committee member. The latter of these criteria has the effect of diverting attention away from firms that are launched by women entrepreneurs. Pinkwashing was more likely to occur when WFCFs were created as add-ons to mainstream programs and services, rather than as a central element of the organization’s mission of supporting women and non-binary femmes. The findings support arguments that technology can both challenge or reinforce structural constraints that impede women entrepreneurs in the digital era.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11187-019-00302-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2426700938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48735529</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48735529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3ee4e1669e8f73b6a8d2dd6a96a0e87ffb7aeac58d57cc21f8ffc277dec1d4383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoWEfXgiAMuI6-lzRNspTBLxjQhYK7kEmT2qptTTqI_97OVHTn6m3OuZd3CTlBOEcAeZEQUUkKqCkAB0Zxh2QoJKegke-SDDRDqrR63icHKTUAGw0ycvwQuyr6lOZdnPd1-_pp00vdVodkL9i35I9-7ow8XV89Lm7p8v7mbnG5pC6XYqDc-9xjUWivguSrwqqSlWVhdWHBKxnCSlpvnVClkM4xDCoEx6QsvcMy54rPyNmU28fuY-3TYJpuHdux0rCcFRJAbyk2US52KUUfTB_rdxu_DILZfGKmAcw4gNkOYHCU-CSlEW4rH_-i_7VOJ6tJQxd_e3IluRBM82_OjWbR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2426700938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Progress or pinkwashing: who benefits from digital women-focused capital funds?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Orser, Barbara ; Coleman, Susan ; Li, Yanhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Orser, Barbara ; Coleman, Susan ; Li, Yanhong</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the positioning of gender within women-focused capital funds (WFCFs) to consider the extent to which these digitally enabled sources of finance reflect the tenets of entrepreneurial feminism. Content analysis of 27 funds situated in Canada and the USA informs about fund mandates, rationales, types of capital, and anticipated outcomes. Our findings reveal that a minority of WFCFs examined sought to enhance equity and counter structural barriers associated with women entrepreneurs’ access to financial capital. Alternatively, the majority of WFCFs were positioned as vehicles to facilitate individual wealth creation. Eligibility ranged from multiple gender identities of the business owner to “women-led” businesses—defined as at least one woman executive, board or steering committee member. The latter of these criteria has the effect of diverting attention away from firms that are launched by women entrepreneurs. Pinkwashing was more likely to occur when WFCFs were created as add-ons to mainstream programs and services, rather than as a central element of the organization’s mission of supporting women and non-binary femmes. The findings support arguments that technology can both challenge or reinforce structural constraints that impede women entrepreneurs in the digital era.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-898X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00302-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Capital ; Content analysis ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Feminism ; Finance ; Gender ; Industrial Organization ; Management ; Microeconomics ; Special Issue: Female entrepreneurship in the digital era ; Technology ; Wealth ; Women</subject><ispartof>Small business economics, 2020-08, Vol.55 (2), p.363-387</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3ee4e1669e8f73b6a8d2dd6a96a0e87ffb7aeac58d57cc21f8ffc277dec1d4383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3ee4e1669e8f73b6a8d2dd6a96a0e87ffb7aeac58d57cc21f8ffc277dec1d4383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2426700938/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2426700938?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,12846,27923,27924,33222,36059,44362,58237,58470,74766</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orser, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yanhong</creatorcontrib><title>Progress or pinkwashing: who benefits from digital women-focused capital funds?</title><title>Small business economics</title><addtitle>Small Bus Econ</addtitle><description>This paper examines the positioning of gender within women-focused capital funds (WFCFs) to consider the extent to which these digitally enabled sources of finance reflect the tenets of entrepreneurial feminism. Content analysis of 27 funds situated in Canada and the USA informs about fund mandates, rationales, types of capital, and anticipated outcomes. Our findings reveal that a minority of WFCFs examined sought to enhance equity and counter structural barriers associated with women entrepreneurs’ access to financial capital. Alternatively, the majority of WFCFs were positioned as vehicles to facilitate individual wealth creation. Eligibility ranged from multiple gender identities of the business owner to “women-led” businesses—defined as at least one woman executive, board or steering committee member. The latter of these criteria has the effect of diverting attention away from firms that are launched by women entrepreneurs. Pinkwashing was more likely to occur when WFCFs were created as add-ons to mainstream programs and services, rather than as a central element of the organization’s mission of supporting women and non-binary femmes. The findings support arguments that technology can both challenge or reinforce structural constraints that impede women entrepreneurs in the digital era.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Special Issue: Female entrepreneurship in the digital era</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0921-898X</issn><issn>1573-0913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoWEfXgiAMuI6-lzRNspTBLxjQhYK7kEmT2qptTTqI_97OVHTn6m3OuZd3CTlBOEcAeZEQUUkKqCkAB0Zxh2QoJKegke-SDDRDqrR63icHKTUAGw0ycvwQuyr6lOZdnPd1-_pp00vdVodkL9i35I9-7ow8XV89Lm7p8v7mbnG5pC6XYqDc-9xjUWivguSrwqqSlWVhdWHBKxnCSlpvnVClkM4xDCoEx6QsvcMy54rPyNmU28fuY-3TYJpuHdux0rCcFRJAbyk2US52KUUfTB_rdxu_DILZfGKmAcw4gNkOYHCU-CSlEW4rH_-i_7VOJ6tJQxd_e3IluRBM82_OjWbR</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Orser, Barbara</creator><creator>Coleman, Susan</creator><creator>Li, Yanhong</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Progress or pinkwashing</title><author>Orser, Barbara ; Coleman, Susan ; Li, Yanhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3ee4e1669e8f73b6a8d2dd6a96a0e87ffb7aeac58d57cc21f8ffc277dec1d4383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Special Issue: Female entrepreneurship in the digital era</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orser, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yanhong</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Small business economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orser, Barbara</au><au>Coleman, Susan</au><au>Li, Yanhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Progress or pinkwashing: who benefits from digital women-focused capital funds?</atitle><jtitle>Small business economics</jtitle><stitle>Small Bus Econ</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>387</epage><pages>363-387</pages><issn>0921-898X</issn><eissn>1573-0913</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the positioning of gender within women-focused capital funds (WFCFs) to consider the extent to which these digitally enabled sources of finance reflect the tenets of entrepreneurial feminism. Content analysis of 27 funds situated in Canada and the USA informs about fund mandates, rationales, types of capital, and anticipated outcomes. Our findings reveal that a minority of WFCFs examined sought to enhance equity and counter structural barriers associated with women entrepreneurs’ access to financial capital. Alternatively, the majority of WFCFs were positioned as vehicles to facilitate individual wealth creation. Eligibility ranged from multiple gender identities of the business owner to “women-led” businesses—defined as at least one woman executive, board or steering committee member. The latter of these criteria has the effect of diverting attention away from firms that are launched by women entrepreneurs. Pinkwashing was more likely to occur when WFCFs were created as add-ons to mainstream programs and services, rather than as a central element of the organization’s mission of supporting women and non-binary femmes. The findings support arguments that technology can both challenge or reinforce structural constraints that impede women entrepreneurs in the digital era.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11187-019-00302-1</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-898X
ispartof Small business economics, 2020-08, Vol.55 (2), p.363-387
issn 0921-898X
1573-0913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2426700938
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Business and Management
Capital
Content analysis
Entrepreneurs
Entrepreneurship
Feminism
Finance
Gender
Industrial Organization
Management
Microeconomics
Special Issue: Female entrepreneurship in the digital era
Technology
Wealth
Women
title Progress or pinkwashing: who benefits from digital women-focused capital funds?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A03%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Progress%20or%20pinkwashing:%20who%20benefits%20from%20digital%20women-focused%20capital%20funds?&rft.jtitle=Small%20business%20economics&rft.au=Orser,%20Barbara&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=387&rft.pages=363-387&rft.issn=0921-898X&rft.eissn=1573-0913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11187-019-00302-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48735529%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-3ee4e1669e8f73b6a8d2dd6a96a0e87ffb7aeac58d57cc21f8ffc277dec1d4383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2426700938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48735529&rfr_iscdi=true