Loading…

Nomogram predicting survival as a selection criterion for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes

Background The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in women with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer is controversial. The authors developed a nomogram that was predictive for overall survival (OS) and identified patients who derived no benefit from PMRT. Methods The authors retrospectively evaluated 4869...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 2020-08, Vol.126 (S16), p.3857-3866
Main Authors: Tang, Yu, Zhang, Yu-Jing, Zhang, Na, Shi, Mei, Wen, Ge, Cheng, Jing, Wang, Hong-Mei, Liu, Min, Wang, Xiao-Hu, Guo, Qi-Shuai, Wu, Hong-Fen, Ma, Chang-Ying, Jin, Jing, Liu, Yue-Ping, Song, Yong-Wen, Fang, Hui, Ren, Hua, Wang, Shu-Lian, Li, Ye-Xiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-a58fad224f7341ff6f8f78b3b70941edc05eb023a208897fccee303160008e183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-a58fad224f7341ff6f8f78b3b70941edc05eb023a208897fccee303160008e183
container_end_page 3866
container_issue S16
container_start_page 3857
container_title Cancer
container_volume 126
creator Tang, Yu
Zhang, Yu-Jing
Zhang, Na
Shi, Mei
Wen, Ge
Cheng, Jing
Wang, Hong-Mei
Liu, Min
Wang, Xiao-Hu
Guo, Qi-Shuai
Wu, Hong-Fen
Ma, Chang-Ying
Jin, Jing
Liu, Yue-Ping
Song, Yong-Wen
Fang, Hui
Ren, Hua
Wang, Shu-Lian
Li, Ye-Xiong
description Background The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in women with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer is controversial. The authors developed a nomogram that was predictive for overall survival (OS) and identified patients who derived no benefit from PMRT. Methods The authors retrospectively evaluated 4869 patients with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer who were treated with mastectomy between 2000 and 2014 in 11 Chinese hospitals. Rates of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis were calculated using competing risk analysis, and disease‐free survival and OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Based on the risk factors identified from Cox regression analysis in 3298 unirradiated patients, a nomogram predicting OS was developed. The benefit of PMRT was evaluated in different risk groups stratified by the nomogram model. Results After a median follow‐up of 65.9 months, the 5‐year OS, disease‐free survival, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis rates were 93.3%, 84.3%, 5.2%, and 8.3%, respectively. A total of 1571 patients (32.3%) underwent PMRT. On multivariable analyses, PMRT was found to increase OS significantly (hazard ratio, 0.61; P = .002). An OS prediction nomogram evaluated the effect of age; tumor location; tumor size; positive lymph node ratio; estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status; and treatment with trastuzumab. Based on nomogram scores, the entire patient cohort was classified into 3 risk groups. PMRT significantly improved the OS of patients in the intermediate‐risk (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.32963
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2426801666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2426801666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-a58fad224f7341ff6f8f78b3b70941edc05eb023a208897fccee303160008e183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokNhwwOgI7GrlOJLxkmWaAQFqSpSNZXYRY5z3HGVxOHYM1VehmclaQpLVr78nz9L52fsveCXgnP5yQ6WLpWstHrBNoJXRcZFLl-yDee8zLa5-nnG3sT4MB8LuVWv2ZmSheBayw37fRP6cE-mh5Gw9Tb54R7ikU7-ZDowEQxE7HC-DwNY8glp2blAMIaYehPTHIZ-AjKtD-mAZMYJ_ACjSR6HFOHRpwPsBaQAewkN4fwGrBks0po9RWrx-eRPCN3UjwcYQovxLXvlTBfx3fN6zu6-ftnvvmXXP66-7z5fZ1ZVSmVmWzrTSpm7QuXCOe1KV5SNagpe5QJby7fYcKmM5GVZFc5aRMWV0MuEUJTqnH1cvSOFX0eMqX4IRxrmL2uZS11yobWeqYuVshRiJHT1SL43NNWC10sV9VJF_VTFDH94Vh6bHtt_6N_Zz4BYgUff4fQfVb272d2u0j-MF5Yi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2426801666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nomogram predicting survival as a selection criterion for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Tang, Yu ; Zhang, Yu-Jing ; Zhang, Na ; Shi, Mei ; Wen, Ge ; Cheng, Jing ; Wang, Hong-Mei ; Liu, Min ; Wang, Xiao-Hu ; Guo, Qi-Shuai ; Wu, Hong-Fen ; Ma, Chang-Ying ; Jin, Jing ; Liu, Yue-Ping ; Song, Yong-Wen ; Fang, Hui ; Ren, Hua ; Wang, Shu-Lian ; Li, Ye-Xiong</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yu ; Zhang, Yu-Jing ; Zhang, Na ; Shi, Mei ; Wen, Ge ; Cheng, Jing ; Wang, Hong-Mei ; Liu, Min ; Wang, Xiao-Hu ; Guo, Qi-Shuai ; Wu, Hong-Fen ; Ma, Chang-Ying ; Jin, Jing ; Liu, Yue-Ping ; Song, Yong-Wen ; Fang, Hui ; Ren, Hua ; Wang, Shu-Lian ; Li, Ye-Xiong</creatorcontrib><description>Background The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in women with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer is controversial. The authors developed a nomogram that was predictive for overall survival (OS) and identified patients who derived no benefit from PMRT. Methods The authors retrospectively evaluated 4869 patients with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer who were treated with mastectomy between 2000 and 2014 in 11 Chinese hospitals. Rates of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis were calculated using competing risk analysis, and disease‐free survival and OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Based on the risk factors identified from Cox regression analysis in 3298 unirradiated patients, a nomogram predicting OS was developed. The benefit of PMRT was evaluated in different risk groups stratified by the nomogram model. Results After a median follow‐up of 65.9 months, the 5‐year OS, disease‐free survival, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis rates were 93.3%, 84.3%, 5.2%, and 8.3%, respectively. A total of 1571 patients (32.3%) underwent PMRT. On multivariable analyses, PMRT was found to increase OS significantly (hazard ratio, 0.61; P = .002). An OS prediction nomogram evaluated the effect of age; tumor location; tumor size; positive lymph node ratio; estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status; and treatment with trastuzumab. Based on nomogram scores, the entire patient cohort was classified into 3 risk groups. PMRT significantly improved the OS of patients in the intermediate‐risk (P &lt; .001) and high‐risk groups (P = .004), but not in the low‐risk group (P = .728). Conclusions The authors developed a nomogram that is predictive of OS among women with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy. This nomogram may help to select a subgroup of patients with a good prognosis who will not benefit from PMRT. The authors have developed a nomogram that is predictive of overall survival in patients with T1‐T2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy based on clinical and treatment factors in a multicenter database from China. They are able to stratify patients into low‐risk, intermediate‐risk, and high‐risk groups. Postmastectomy radiotherapy appears to provide no survival benefit among low‐risk patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32710662</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Age factors ; Breast cancer ; breast neoplasm ; Epidermal growth factor ; Estrogens ; Evaluation ; Growth factors ; Health risks ; Lymph nodes ; Mastectomy ; Medical prognosis ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Monoclonal antibodies ; nomogram ; Nomograms ; Oncology ; Patients ; Progesterone ; Radiation therapy ; radiotherapy ; Receptors ; Regression analysis ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Risk groups ; Subgroups ; Survival ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Trastuzumab ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2020-08, Vol.126 (S16), p.3857-3866</ispartof><rights>2020 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2020 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-a58fad224f7341ff6f8f78b3b70941edc05eb023a208897fccee303160008e183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-a58fad224f7341ff6f8f78b3b70941edc05eb023a208897fccee303160008e183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5243-2425 ; 0000-0003-0985-235X ; 0000-0002-7067-8066</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32710662$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu-Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hong-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao-Hu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Qi-Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hong-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chang-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yue-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yong-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shu-Lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ye-Xiong</creatorcontrib><title>Nomogram predicting survival as a selection criterion for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in women with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer is controversial. The authors developed a nomogram that was predictive for overall survival (OS) and identified patients who derived no benefit from PMRT. Methods The authors retrospectively evaluated 4869 patients with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer who were treated with mastectomy between 2000 and 2014 in 11 Chinese hospitals. Rates of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis were calculated using competing risk analysis, and disease‐free survival and OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Based on the risk factors identified from Cox regression analysis in 3298 unirradiated patients, a nomogram predicting OS was developed. The benefit of PMRT was evaluated in different risk groups stratified by the nomogram model. Results After a median follow‐up of 65.9 months, the 5‐year OS, disease‐free survival, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis rates were 93.3%, 84.3%, 5.2%, and 8.3%, respectively. A total of 1571 patients (32.3%) underwent PMRT. On multivariable analyses, PMRT was found to increase OS significantly (hazard ratio, 0.61; P = .002). An OS prediction nomogram evaluated the effect of age; tumor location; tumor size; positive lymph node ratio; estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status; and treatment with trastuzumab. Based on nomogram scores, the entire patient cohort was classified into 3 risk groups. PMRT significantly improved the OS of patients in the intermediate‐risk (P &lt; .001) and high‐risk groups (P = .004), but not in the low‐risk group (P = .728). Conclusions The authors developed a nomogram that is predictive of OS among women with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy. This nomogram may help to select a subgroup of patients with a good prognosis who will not benefit from PMRT. The authors have developed a nomogram that is predictive of overall survival in patients with T1‐T2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy based on clinical and treatment factors in a multicenter database from China. They are able to stratify patients into low‐risk, intermediate‐risk, and high‐risk groups. Postmastectomy radiotherapy appears to provide no survival benefit among low‐risk patients.</description><subject>Age factors</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>breast neoplasm</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor</subject><subject>Estrogens</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>nomogram</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Progesterone</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>Receptors</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Trastuzumab</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokNhwwOgI7GrlOJLxkmWaAQFqSpSNZXYRY5z3HGVxOHYM1VehmclaQpLVr78nz9L52fsveCXgnP5yQ6WLpWstHrBNoJXRcZFLl-yDee8zLa5-nnG3sT4MB8LuVWv2ZmSheBayw37fRP6cE-mh5Gw9Tb54R7ikU7-ZDowEQxE7HC-DwNY8glp2blAMIaYehPTHIZ-AjKtD-mAZMYJ_ACjSR6HFOHRpwPsBaQAewkN4fwGrBks0po9RWrx-eRPCN3UjwcYQovxLXvlTBfx3fN6zu6-ftnvvmXXP66-7z5fZ1ZVSmVmWzrTSpm7QuXCOe1KV5SNagpe5QJby7fYcKmM5GVZFc5aRMWV0MuEUJTqnH1cvSOFX0eMqX4IRxrmL2uZS11yobWeqYuVshRiJHT1SL43NNWC10sV9VJF_VTFDH94Vh6bHtt_6N_Zz4BYgUff4fQfVb272d2u0j-MF5Yi</recordid><startdate>20200815</startdate><enddate>20200815</enddate><creator>Tang, Yu</creator><creator>Zhang, Yu-Jing</creator><creator>Zhang, Na</creator><creator>Shi, Mei</creator><creator>Wen, Ge</creator><creator>Cheng, Jing</creator><creator>Wang, Hong-Mei</creator><creator>Liu, Min</creator><creator>Wang, Xiao-Hu</creator><creator>Guo, Qi-Shuai</creator><creator>Wu, Hong-Fen</creator><creator>Ma, Chang-Ying</creator><creator>Jin, Jing</creator><creator>Liu, Yue-Ping</creator><creator>Song, Yong-Wen</creator><creator>Fang, Hui</creator><creator>Ren, Hua</creator><creator>Wang, Shu-Lian</creator><creator>Li, Ye-Xiong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5243-2425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-235X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7067-8066</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200815</creationdate><title>Nomogram predicting survival as a selection criterion for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes</title><author>Tang, Yu ; Zhang, Yu-Jing ; Zhang, Na ; Shi, Mei ; Wen, Ge ; Cheng, Jing ; Wang, Hong-Mei ; Liu, Min ; Wang, Xiao-Hu ; Guo, Qi-Shuai ; Wu, Hong-Fen ; Ma, Chang-Ying ; Jin, Jing ; Liu, Yue-Ping ; Song, Yong-Wen ; Fang, Hui ; Ren, Hua ; Wang, Shu-Lian ; Li, Ye-Xiong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-a58fad224f7341ff6f8f78b3b70941edc05eb023a208897fccee303160008e183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age factors</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>breast neoplasm</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor</topic><topic>Estrogens</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>nomogram</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Progesterone</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>Receptors</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Trastuzumab</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu-Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Ge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hong-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao-Hu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Qi-Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hong-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chang-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yue-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yong-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shu-Lian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ye-Xiong</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Yu</au><au>Zhang, Yu-Jing</au><au>Zhang, Na</au><au>Shi, Mei</au><au>Wen, Ge</au><au>Cheng, Jing</au><au>Wang, Hong-Mei</au><au>Liu, Min</au><au>Wang, Xiao-Hu</au><au>Guo, Qi-Shuai</au><au>Wu, Hong-Fen</au><au>Ma, Chang-Ying</au><au>Jin, Jing</au><au>Liu, Yue-Ping</au><au>Song, Yong-Wen</au><au>Fang, Hui</au><au>Ren, Hua</au><au>Wang, Shu-Lian</au><au>Li, Ye-Xiong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nomogram predicting survival as a selection criterion for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2020-08-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>S16</issue><spage>3857</spage><epage>3866</epage><pages>3857-3866</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background The role of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in women with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer is controversial. The authors developed a nomogram that was predictive for overall survival (OS) and identified patients who derived no benefit from PMRT. Methods The authors retrospectively evaluated 4869 patients with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer who were treated with mastectomy between 2000 and 2014 in 11 Chinese hospitals. Rates of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis were calculated using competing risk analysis, and disease‐free survival and OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Based on the risk factors identified from Cox regression analysis in 3298 unirradiated patients, a nomogram predicting OS was developed. The benefit of PMRT was evaluated in different risk groups stratified by the nomogram model. Results After a median follow‐up of 65.9 months, the 5‐year OS, disease‐free survival, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis rates were 93.3%, 84.3%, 5.2%, and 8.3%, respectively. A total of 1571 patients (32.3%) underwent PMRT. On multivariable analyses, PMRT was found to increase OS significantly (hazard ratio, 0.61; P = .002). An OS prediction nomogram evaluated the effect of age; tumor location; tumor size; positive lymph node ratio; estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status; and treatment with trastuzumab. Based on nomogram scores, the entire patient cohort was classified into 3 risk groups. PMRT significantly improved the OS of patients in the intermediate‐risk (P &lt; .001) and high‐risk groups (P = .004), but not in the low‐risk group (P = .728). Conclusions The authors developed a nomogram that is predictive of OS among women with pT1‐T2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy. This nomogram may help to select a subgroup of patients with a good prognosis who will not benefit from PMRT. The authors have developed a nomogram that is predictive of overall survival in patients with T1‐T2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy based on clinical and treatment factors in a multicenter database from China. They are able to stratify patients into low‐risk, intermediate‐risk, and high‐risk groups. Postmastectomy radiotherapy appears to provide no survival benefit among low‐risk patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32710662</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.32963</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5243-2425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-235X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7067-8066</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2020-08, Vol.126 (S16), p.3857-3866
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2426801666
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Age factors
Breast cancer
breast neoplasm
Epidermal growth factor
Estrogens
Evaluation
Growth factors
Health risks
Lymph nodes
Mastectomy
Medical prognosis
Metastases
Metastasis
Monoclonal antibodies
nomogram
Nomograms
Oncology
Patients
Progesterone
Radiation therapy
radiotherapy
Receptors
Regression analysis
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Risk groups
Subgroups
Survival
Targeted cancer therapy
Trastuzumab
Tumors
title Nomogram predicting survival as a selection criterion for postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nomogram%20predicting%20survival%20as%20a%20selection%20criterion%20for%20postmastectomy%20radiotherapy%20in%20patients%20with%20T1%20to%20T2%20breast%20cancer%20with%201%20to%203%20positive%20lymph%20nodes&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Tang,%20Yu&rft.date=2020-08-15&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=S16&rft.spage=3857&rft.epage=3866&rft.pages=3857-3866&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.32963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2426801666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-a58fad224f7341ff6f8f78b3b70941edc05eb023a208897fccee303160008e183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2426801666&rft_id=info:pmid/32710662&rfr_iscdi=true