Loading…
Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength
AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal mas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of materials in civil engineering 2020-10, Vol.32 (10) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of materials in civil engineering |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Yang, Suhang Zhou, Junwen Bian, Zhengning Xu, Zhifeng |
description | AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal masonry joints by drilling cores out, with little preparatory work required. The test mortar sheets were subjected to pressure from two opposing cone heads, and the peak load at the failure of the mortar sheet was recorded. The effect of specimen size and mortar thickness on the point-load strength was examined. A suitable size of mortar sheet was selected for the experiment. The thickness correction method was used to improve the accuracy of the empirical formula. Scattering characteristics were investigated to check the reliability and repeatability of the PLTM results. A strong relationship was noted between the point-load strength of the mortar sheet and cube compressive strength, ranging from M2.5 to M15.0. Contrast tests with other available test methods verified that the PLTM offers an alternative to the masonry mortar compressive test and has high accuracy, requires little preparation, and involves reproducible and quick operation following specimen extraction from joints. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2427198546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2427198546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDhZc4JCy_omTcENVoZUagdRwthzHpqkgLrZ76NuTqAVOnFbanZnd_RC6JjAhIMj97eNqOrsrqwkpOEvSlLEJADDGsxM0-u2dohHkRZGQVJBzdBHCZhABhxGav7q2i8nSqQZXJkRcmrh2DbbO41mI7aeKreuws3jR4VUbd7hUwXV-j0vno_J4Fb3p3uP6Ep1Z9RHM1bGO0dvTrJrOk-XL82L6uEwUY1lM0lw3mSEc0kJYBlA3ihWmyJWtgdaN1UJzoCanYEHUjCragK5rbfuholSzMbo55G69-9r1F8uN2_muXykppxkp8pSLXvVwUGnvQvDGyq3vf_F7SUAO5KQcyMmykgMlOVCSR3K9WRzMKmjzF__j_N_4DS7Cckw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427198546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength</title><source>ASCE library</source><creator>Yang, Suhang ; Zhou, Junwen ; Bian, Zhengning ; Xu, Zhifeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Suhang ; Zhou, Junwen ; Bian, Zhengning ; Xu, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal masonry joints by drilling cores out, with little preparatory work required. The test mortar sheets were subjected to pressure from two opposing cone heads, and the peak load at the failure of the mortar sheet was recorded. The effect of specimen size and mortar thickness on the point-load strength was examined. A suitable size of mortar sheet was selected for the experiment. The thickness correction method was used to improve the accuracy of the empirical formula. Scattering characteristics were investigated to check the reliability and repeatability of the PLTM results. A strong relationship was noted between the point-load strength of the mortar sheet and cube compressive strength, ranging from M2.5 to M15.0. Contrast tests with other available test methods verified that the PLTM offers an alternative to the masonry mortar compressive test and has high accuracy, requires little preparation, and involves reproducible and quick operation following specimen extraction from joints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Building materials ; Civil engineering ; Compressive strength ; Load tests ; Masonry ; Mortars (material) ; Peak load ; Reproducibility ; Sheets ; Technical Papers ; Test methods ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2020-10, Vol.32 (10)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7095-880X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Suhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Junwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Zhengning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><title>Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal masonry joints by drilling cores out, with little preparatory work required. The test mortar sheets were subjected to pressure from two opposing cone heads, and the peak load at the failure of the mortar sheet was recorded. The effect of specimen size and mortar thickness on the point-load strength was examined. A suitable size of mortar sheet was selected for the experiment. The thickness correction method was used to improve the accuracy of the empirical formula. Scattering characteristics were investigated to check the reliability and repeatability of the PLTM results. A strong relationship was noted between the point-load strength of the mortar sheet and cube compressive strength, ranging from M2.5 to M15.0. Contrast tests with other available test methods verified that the PLTM offers an alternative to the masonry mortar compressive test and has high accuracy, requires little preparation, and involves reproducible and quick operation following specimen extraction from joints.</description><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Load tests</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Mortars (material)</subject><subject>Peak load</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Sheets</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Test methods</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDhZc4JCy_omTcENVoZUagdRwthzHpqkgLrZ76NuTqAVOnFbanZnd_RC6JjAhIMj97eNqOrsrqwkpOEvSlLEJADDGsxM0-u2dohHkRZGQVJBzdBHCZhABhxGav7q2i8nSqQZXJkRcmrh2DbbO41mI7aeKreuws3jR4VUbd7hUwXV-j0vno_J4Fb3p3uP6Ep1Z9RHM1bGO0dvTrJrOk-XL82L6uEwUY1lM0lw3mSEc0kJYBlA3ihWmyJWtgdaN1UJzoCanYEHUjCragK5rbfuholSzMbo55G69-9r1F8uN2_muXykppxkp8pSLXvVwUGnvQvDGyq3vf_F7SUAO5KQcyMmykgMlOVCSR3K9WRzMKmjzF__j_N_4DS7Cckw</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Yang, Suhang</creator><creator>Zhou, Junwen</creator><creator>Bian, Zhengning</creator><creator>Xu, Zhifeng</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-880X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength</title><author>Yang, Suhang ; Zhou, Junwen ; Bian, Zhengning ; Xu, Zhifeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Load tests</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Mortars (material)</topic><topic>Peak load</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Sheets</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Test methods</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Suhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Junwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Zhengning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Suhang</au><au>Zhou, Junwen</au><au>Bian, Zhengning</au><au>Xu, Zhifeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal masonry joints by drilling cores out, with little preparatory work required. The test mortar sheets were subjected to pressure from two opposing cone heads, and the peak load at the failure of the mortar sheet was recorded. The effect of specimen size and mortar thickness on the point-load strength was examined. A suitable size of mortar sheet was selected for the experiment. The thickness correction method was used to improve the accuracy of the empirical formula. Scattering characteristics were investigated to check the reliability and repeatability of the PLTM results. A strong relationship was noted between the point-load strength of the mortar sheet and cube compressive strength, ranging from M2.5 to M15.0. Contrast tests with other available test methods verified that the PLTM offers an alternative to the masonry mortar compressive test and has high accuracy, requires little preparation, and involves reproducible and quick operation following specimen extraction from joints.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-880X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-1561 |
ispartof | Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2020-10, Vol.32 (10) |
issn | 0899-1561 1943-5533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2427198546 |
source | ASCE library |
subjects | Building materials Civil engineering Compressive strength Load tests Masonry Mortars (material) Peak load Reproducibility Sheets Technical Papers Test methods Thickness |
title | Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A11%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Point-Load%20Test%20Method%20for%20Estimation%20of%20In%20Situ%20Masonry%20Mortar%20Strength&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=Yang,%20Suhang&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427198546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427198546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |