Loading…

Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength

AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal mas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of materials in civil engineering 2020-10, Vol.32 (10)
Main Authors: Yang, Suhang, Zhou, Junwen, Bian, Zhengning, Xu, Zhifeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Journal of materials in civil engineering
container_volume 32
creator Yang, Suhang
Zhou, Junwen
Bian, Zhengning
Xu, Zhifeng
description AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal masonry joints by drilling cores out, with little preparatory work required. The test mortar sheets were subjected to pressure from two opposing cone heads, and the peak load at the failure of the mortar sheet was recorded. The effect of specimen size and mortar thickness on the point-load strength was examined. A suitable size of mortar sheet was selected for the experiment. The thickness correction method was used to improve the accuracy of the empirical formula. Scattering characteristics were investigated to check the reliability and repeatability of the PLTM results. A strong relationship was noted between the point-load strength of the mortar sheet and cube compressive strength, ranging from M2.5 to M15.0. Contrast tests with other available test methods verified that the PLTM offers an alternative to the masonry mortar compressive test and has high accuracy, requires little preparation, and involves reproducible and quick operation following specimen extraction from joints.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2427198546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2427198546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDhZc4JCy_omTcENVoZUagdRwthzHpqkgLrZ76NuTqAVOnFbanZnd_RC6JjAhIMj97eNqOrsrqwkpOEvSlLEJADDGsxM0-u2dohHkRZGQVJBzdBHCZhABhxGav7q2i8nSqQZXJkRcmrh2DbbO41mI7aeKreuws3jR4VUbd7hUwXV-j0vno_J4Fb3p3uP6Ep1Z9RHM1bGO0dvTrJrOk-XL82L6uEwUY1lM0lw3mSEc0kJYBlA3ihWmyJWtgdaN1UJzoCanYEHUjCragK5rbfuholSzMbo55G69-9r1F8uN2_muXykppxkp8pSLXvVwUGnvQvDGyq3vf_F7SUAO5KQcyMmykgMlOVCSR3K9WRzMKmjzF__j_N_4DS7Cckw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427198546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength</title><source>ASCE library</source><creator>Yang, Suhang ; Zhou, Junwen ; Bian, Zhengning ; Xu, Zhifeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Suhang ; Zhou, Junwen ; Bian, Zhengning ; Xu, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal masonry joints by drilling cores out, with little preparatory work required. The test mortar sheets were subjected to pressure from two opposing cone heads, and the peak load at the failure of the mortar sheet was recorded. The effect of specimen size and mortar thickness on the point-load strength was examined. A suitable size of mortar sheet was selected for the experiment. The thickness correction method was used to improve the accuracy of the empirical formula. Scattering characteristics were investigated to check the reliability and repeatability of the PLTM results. A strong relationship was noted between the point-load strength of the mortar sheet and cube compressive strength, ranging from M2.5 to M15.0. Contrast tests with other available test methods verified that the PLTM offers an alternative to the masonry mortar compressive test and has high accuracy, requires little preparation, and involves reproducible and quick operation following specimen extraction from joints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Building materials ; Civil engineering ; Compressive strength ; Load tests ; Masonry ; Mortars (material) ; Peak load ; Reproducibility ; Sheets ; Technical Papers ; Test methods ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2020-10, Vol.32 (10)</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7095-880X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Suhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Junwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Zhengning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><title>Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal masonry joints by drilling cores out, with little preparatory work required. The test mortar sheets were subjected to pressure from two opposing cone heads, and the peak load at the failure of the mortar sheet was recorded. The effect of specimen size and mortar thickness on the point-load strength was examined. A suitable size of mortar sheet was selected for the experiment. The thickness correction method was used to improve the accuracy of the empirical formula. Scattering characteristics were investigated to check the reliability and repeatability of the PLTM results. A strong relationship was noted between the point-load strength of the mortar sheet and cube compressive strength, ranging from M2.5 to M15.0. Contrast tests with other available test methods verified that the PLTM offers an alternative to the masonry mortar compressive test and has high accuracy, requires little preparation, and involves reproducible and quick operation following specimen extraction from joints.</description><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Load tests</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Mortars (material)</subject><subject>Peak load</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Sheets</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Test methods</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDhZc4JCy_omTcENVoZUagdRwthzHpqkgLrZ76NuTqAVOnFbanZnd_RC6JjAhIMj97eNqOrsrqwkpOEvSlLEJADDGsxM0-u2dohHkRZGQVJBzdBHCZhABhxGav7q2i8nSqQZXJkRcmrh2DbbO41mI7aeKreuws3jR4VUbd7hUwXV-j0vno_J4Fb3p3uP6Ep1Z9RHM1bGO0dvTrJrOk-XL82L6uEwUY1lM0lw3mSEc0kJYBlA3ihWmyJWtgdaN1UJzoCanYEHUjCragK5rbfuholSzMbo55G69-9r1F8uN2_muXykppxkp8pSLXvVwUGnvQvDGyq3vf_F7SUAO5KQcyMmykgMlOVCSR3K9WRzMKmjzF__j_N_4DS7Cckw</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Yang, Suhang</creator><creator>Zhou, Junwen</creator><creator>Bian, Zhengning</creator><creator>Xu, Zhifeng</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-880X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength</title><author>Yang, Suhang ; Zhou, Junwen ; Bian, Zhengning ; Xu, Zhifeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Load tests</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Mortars (material)</topic><topic>Peak load</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Sheets</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Test methods</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Suhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Junwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bian, Zhengning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Suhang</au><au>Zhou, Junwen</au><au>Bian, Zhengning</au><au>Xu, Zhifeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractThe point-load test method (PLTM) commonly used in the geotechnical area is shown in this paper to estimate the compressive strength of in situ masonry mortar. A specially developed portable PLTM instrument was used for mortar sheet testing. The mortar sheets were removed from horizontal masonry joints by drilling cores out, with little preparatory work required. The test mortar sheets were subjected to pressure from two opposing cone heads, and the peak load at the failure of the mortar sheet was recorded. The effect of specimen size and mortar thickness on the point-load strength was examined. A suitable size of mortar sheet was selected for the experiment. The thickness correction method was used to improve the accuracy of the empirical formula. Scattering characteristics were investigated to check the reliability and repeatability of the PLTM results. A strong relationship was noted between the point-load strength of the mortar sheet and cube compressive strength, ranging from M2.5 to M15.0. Contrast tests with other available test methods verified that the PLTM offers an alternative to the masonry mortar compressive test and has high accuracy, requires little preparation, and involves reproducible and quick operation following specimen extraction from joints.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-880X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-1561
ispartof Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2020-10, Vol.32 (10)
issn 0899-1561
1943-5533
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2427198546
source ASCE library
subjects Building materials
Civil engineering
Compressive strength
Load tests
Masonry
Mortars (material)
Peak load
Reproducibility
Sheets
Technical Papers
Test methods
Thickness
title Point-Load Test Method for Estimation of In Situ Masonry Mortar Strength
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A11%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Point-Load%20Test%20Method%20for%20Estimation%20of%20In%20Situ%20Masonry%20Mortar%20Strength&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=Yang,%20Suhang&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427198546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a337t-58cd7e140596f300bda39e98afb02bdfc6c402e820f06b32a2d0cbbcf2bda22c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427198546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true