Loading…

Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models

Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water resources research 2020-07, Vol.56 (7), p.n/a
Main Authors: Kreiling, R. M., Thoms, M. C., Bartsch, L. A., Larson, J. H., Christensen, V. G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 56
creator Kreiling, R. M.
Thoms, M. C.
Bartsch, L. A.
Larson, J. H.
Christensen, V. G.
description Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification and phosphorus retention capacity to determine direct and indirect linkages between current land use and sediment nutrient processes during base flow in the Fox River watershed, WI, USA. A large spatial‐scale dataset used for this study included sediment nitrogen and phosphorus retention measurements and land use information for 106 sites. The structural equation models for the Fox River watershed identified direct links between current land use and in‐stream sediment nutrient processes. Subwatersheds with agricultural land consisting of more natural land cover had lower surface water nitrate concentrations and higher denitrification enzyme activity than subwatersheds with less alternative cover. This indicates that best management practices implemented in the Fox River watershed that restore natural land cover can improve water quality through nitrogen removal on the agricultural landscape and in the river network. Best management practices are not having the same measurable effects on phosphorus in the river network, most likely due to legacy phosphorus stored in the sediment. Key Points Structural equation modeling of the Fox River Basin illustrates direct land use effects on river channel sediment nutrient dynamics Agricultural best management practices that restore natural land cover have a small differential effect on sediment nutrient dynamics Future scenarios modeling suggests current land management actions have a minimal effect on sediment nutrient dynamics
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019WR026655
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2427527662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2427527662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqzh8QcOto3plZSqlWqA9aS5dDmtzRlOlMTTJK_71T6sKVq3sXH-fAQeiSkhtKWHHLCC2WM8KUkvIIDWghRKYLzY_RgBDBM8oLfYrOYlwTQoVUeoC2U9M4vIiAx1UFNkXcNngOzm-gSfi5S8Hvn9fQWogRIvYNNngC5svXO_zUOl95cHhpEoT4Afso37zjeQqdTV0wNR5_dib5PrXHUMdzdFKZOsLF7x2ixf34bTTJpi8Pj6O7aWY4JyozOa-AKC3AKeqMEVbLamW5MEJQC8TZ1crZvMilrMiqyHNNhVY8J5LqwgnDh-jqkLsN7WcHMZXrtgtNX1kywbRkWinWq-uDsqGNMUBVboPfmLArKSn3m5Z_N-05P_BvX8PuX1suZ6MZE5oo_gMg-Xi3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427527662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Kreiling, R. M. ; Thoms, M. C. ; Bartsch, L. A. ; Larson, J. H. ; Christensen, V. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kreiling, R. M. ; Thoms, M. C. ; Bartsch, L. A. ; Larson, J. H. ; Christensen, V. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification and phosphorus retention capacity to determine direct and indirect linkages between current land use and sediment nutrient processes during base flow in the Fox River watershed, WI, USA. A large spatial‐scale dataset used for this study included sediment nitrogen and phosphorus retention measurements and land use information for 106 sites. The structural equation models for the Fox River watershed identified direct links between current land use and in‐stream sediment nutrient processes. Subwatersheds with agricultural land consisting of more natural land cover had lower surface water nitrate concentrations and higher denitrification enzyme activity than subwatersheds with less alternative cover. This indicates that best management practices implemented in the Fox River watershed that restore natural land cover can improve water quality through nitrogen removal on the agricultural landscape and in the river network. Best management practices are not having the same measurable effects on phosphorus in the river network, most likely due to legacy phosphorus stored in the sediment. Key Points Structural equation modeling of the Fox River Basin illustrates direct land use effects on river channel sediment nutrient dynamics Agricultural best management practices that restore natural land cover have a small differential effect on sediment nutrient dynamics Future scenarios modeling suggests current land management actions have a minimal effect on sediment nutrient dynamics</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019WR026655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural management ; Base flow ; Best management practices ; Denitrification ; Drainage ; Enzymatic activity ; Enzyme activity ; Fluvial sediments ; Fox River Basin ; Land cover ; Land use ; Land use effects ; Mineral nutrients ; Multivariate statistical analysis ; Nitrogen removal ; Phosphorus ; phosphorus retention ; resilience ; Retention ; Retention capacity ; River networks ; Rivers ; Sediment ; sediment nutrient dynamics ; Sediments ; Structural equation modeling ; Surface water ; Water quality ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2020-07, Vol.56 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1483-4845 ; 0000-0003-4166-7461 ; 0000-0002-9295-4156 ; 0000-0002-6414-9758 ; 0000-0002-8074-0476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019WR026655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019WR026655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11495,27903,27904,46446,46870</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kreiling, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoms, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, V. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification and phosphorus retention capacity to determine direct and indirect linkages between current land use and sediment nutrient processes during base flow in the Fox River watershed, WI, USA. A large spatial‐scale dataset used for this study included sediment nitrogen and phosphorus retention measurements and land use information for 106 sites. The structural equation models for the Fox River watershed identified direct links between current land use and in‐stream sediment nutrient processes. Subwatersheds with agricultural land consisting of more natural land cover had lower surface water nitrate concentrations and higher denitrification enzyme activity than subwatersheds with less alternative cover. This indicates that best management practices implemented in the Fox River watershed that restore natural land cover can improve water quality through nitrogen removal on the agricultural landscape and in the river network. Best management practices are not having the same measurable effects on phosphorus in the river network, most likely due to legacy phosphorus stored in the sediment. Key Points Structural equation modeling of the Fox River Basin illustrates direct land use effects on river channel sediment nutrient dynamics Agricultural best management practices that restore natural land cover have a small differential effect on sediment nutrient dynamics Future scenarios modeling suggests current land management actions have a minimal effect on sediment nutrient dynamics</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Base flow</subject><subject>Best management practices</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>Enzyme activity</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Fox River Basin</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use effects</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Multivariate statistical analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>phosphorus retention</subject><subject>resilience</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Retention capacity</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>sediment nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqzh8QcOto3plZSqlWqA9aS5dDmtzRlOlMTTJK_71T6sKVq3sXH-fAQeiSkhtKWHHLCC2WM8KUkvIIDWghRKYLzY_RgBDBM8oLfYrOYlwTQoVUeoC2U9M4vIiAx1UFNkXcNngOzm-gSfi5S8Hvn9fQWogRIvYNNngC5svXO_zUOl95cHhpEoT4Afso37zjeQqdTV0wNR5_dib5PrXHUMdzdFKZOsLF7x2ixf34bTTJpi8Pj6O7aWY4JyozOa-AKC3AKeqMEVbLamW5MEJQC8TZ1crZvMilrMiqyHNNhVY8J5LqwgnDh-jqkLsN7WcHMZXrtgtNX1kywbRkWinWq-uDsqGNMUBVboPfmLArKSn3m5Z_N-05P_BvX8PuX1suZ6MZE5oo_gMg-Xi3</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Kreiling, R. M.</creator><creator>Thoms, M. C.</creator><creator>Bartsch, L. A.</creator><creator>Larson, J. H.</creator><creator>Christensen, V. G.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-4845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4166-7461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9295-4156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-9758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-0476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models</title><author>Kreiling, R. M. ; Thoms, M. C. ; Bartsch, L. A. ; Larson, J. H. ; Christensen, V. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Base flow</topic><topic>Best management practices</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>Enzyme activity</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Fox River Basin</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use effects</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Multivariate statistical analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>phosphorus retention</topic><topic>resilience</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Retention capacity</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>sediment nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kreiling, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoms, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, V. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kreiling, R. M.</au><au>Thoms, M. C.</au><au>Bartsch, L. A.</au><au>Larson, J. H.</au><au>Christensen, V. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification and phosphorus retention capacity to determine direct and indirect linkages between current land use and sediment nutrient processes during base flow in the Fox River watershed, WI, USA. A large spatial‐scale dataset used for this study included sediment nitrogen and phosphorus retention measurements and land use information for 106 sites. The structural equation models for the Fox River watershed identified direct links between current land use and in‐stream sediment nutrient processes. Subwatersheds with agricultural land consisting of more natural land cover had lower surface water nitrate concentrations and higher denitrification enzyme activity than subwatersheds with less alternative cover. This indicates that best management practices implemented in the Fox River watershed that restore natural land cover can improve water quality through nitrogen removal on the agricultural landscape and in the river network. Best management practices are not having the same measurable effects on phosphorus in the river network, most likely due to legacy phosphorus stored in the sediment. Key Points Structural equation modeling of the Fox River Basin illustrates direct land use effects on river channel sediment nutrient dynamics Agricultural best management practices that restore natural land cover have a small differential effect on sediment nutrient dynamics Future scenarios modeling suggests current land management actions have a minimal effect on sediment nutrient dynamics</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019WR026655</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-4845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4166-7461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9295-4156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-9758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-0476</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2020-07, Vol.56 (7), p.n/a
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2427527662
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive
subjects Agricultural land
Agricultural management
Base flow
Best management practices
Denitrification
Drainage
Enzymatic activity
Enzyme activity
Fluvial sediments
Fox River Basin
Land cover
Land use
Land use effects
Mineral nutrients
Multivariate statistical analysis
Nitrogen removal
Phosphorus
phosphorus retention
resilience
Retention
Retention capacity
River networks
Rivers
Sediment
sediment nutrient dynamics
Sediments
Structural equation modeling
Surface water
Water quality
Watersheds
title Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A23%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land%20Use%20Effects%20on%20Sediment%20Nutrient%20Processes%20in%20a%20Heavily%20Modified%20Watershed%20Using%20Structural%20Equation%20Models&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Kreiling,%20R.%20M.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019WR026655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427527662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427527662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true