Loading…
Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models
Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water resources research 2020-07, Vol.56 (7), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Kreiling, R. M. Thoms, M. C. Bartsch, L. A. Larson, J. H. Christensen, V. G. |
description | Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification and phosphorus retention capacity to determine direct and indirect linkages between current land use and sediment nutrient processes during base flow in the Fox River watershed, WI, USA. A large spatial‐scale dataset used for this study included sediment nitrogen and phosphorus retention measurements and land use information for 106 sites. The structural equation models for the Fox River watershed identified direct links between current land use and in‐stream sediment nutrient processes. Subwatersheds with agricultural land consisting of more natural land cover had lower surface water nitrate concentrations and higher denitrification enzyme activity than subwatersheds with less alternative cover. This indicates that best management practices implemented in the Fox River watershed that restore natural land cover can improve water quality through nitrogen removal on the agricultural landscape and in the river network. Best management practices are not having the same measurable effects on phosphorus in the river network, most likely due to legacy phosphorus stored in the sediment.
Key Points
Structural equation modeling of the Fox River Basin illustrates direct land use effects on river channel sediment nutrient dynamics
Agricultural best management practices that restore natural land cover have a small differential effect on sediment nutrient dynamics
Future scenarios modeling suggests current land management actions have a minimal effect on sediment nutrient dynamics |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019WR026655 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2427527662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2427527662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqzh8QcOto3plZSqlWqA9aS5dDmtzRlOlMTTJK_71T6sKVq3sXH-fAQeiSkhtKWHHLCC2WM8KUkvIIDWghRKYLzY_RgBDBM8oLfYrOYlwTQoVUeoC2U9M4vIiAx1UFNkXcNngOzm-gSfi5S8Hvn9fQWogRIvYNNngC5svXO_zUOl95cHhpEoT4Afso37zjeQqdTV0wNR5_dib5PrXHUMdzdFKZOsLF7x2ixf34bTTJpi8Pj6O7aWY4JyozOa-AKC3AKeqMEVbLamW5MEJQC8TZ1crZvMilrMiqyHNNhVY8J5LqwgnDh-jqkLsN7WcHMZXrtgtNX1kywbRkWinWq-uDsqGNMUBVboPfmLArKSn3m5Z_N-05P_BvX8PuX1suZ6MZE5oo_gMg-Xi3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427527662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Kreiling, R. M. ; Thoms, M. C. ; Bartsch, L. A. ; Larson, J. H. ; Christensen, V. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kreiling, R. M. ; Thoms, M. C. ; Bartsch, L. A. ; Larson, J. H. ; Christensen, V. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification and phosphorus retention capacity to determine direct and indirect linkages between current land use and sediment nutrient processes during base flow in the Fox River watershed, WI, USA. A large spatial‐scale dataset used for this study included sediment nitrogen and phosphorus retention measurements and land use information for 106 sites. The structural equation models for the Fox River watershed identified direct links between current land use and in‐stream sediment nutrient processes. Subwatersheds with agricultural land consisting of more natural land cover had lower surface water nitrate concentrations and higher denitrification enzyme activity than subwatersheds with less alternative cover. This indicates that best management practices implemented in the Fox River watershed that restore natural land cover can improve water quality through nitrogen removal on the agricultural landscape and in the river network. Best management practices are not having the same measurable effects on phosphorus in the river network, most likely due to legacy phosphorus stored in the sediment.
Key Points
Structural equation modeling of the Fox River Basin illustrates direct land use effects on river channel sediment nutrient dynamics
Agricultural best management practices that restore natural land cover have a small differential effect on sediment nutrient dynamics
Future scenarios modeling suggests current land management actions have a minimal effect on sediment nutrient dynamics</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019WR026655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural management ; Base flow ; Best management practices ; Denitrification ; Drainage ; Enzymatic activity ; Enzyme activity ; Fluvial sediments ; Fox River Basin ; Land cover ; Land use ; Land use effects ; Mineral nutrients ; Multivariate statistical analysis ; Nitrogen removal ; Phosphorus ; phosphorus retention ; resilience ; Retention ; Retention capacity ; River networks ; Rivers ; Sediment ; sediment nutrient dynamics ; Sediments ; Structural equation modeling ; Surface water ; Water quality ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2020-07, Vol.56 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1483-4845 ; 0000-0003-4166-7461 ; 0000-0002-9295-4156 ; 0000-0002-6414-9758 ; 0000-0002-8074-0476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019WR026655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019WR026655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11495,27903,27904,46446,46870</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kreiling, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoms, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, V. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification and phosphorus retention capacity to determine direct and indirect linkages between current land use and sediment nutrient processes during base flow in the Fox River watershed, WI, USA. A large spatial‐scale dataset used for this study included sediment nitrogen and phosphorus retention measurements and land use information for 106 sites. The structural equation models for the Fox River watershed identified direct links between current land use and in‐stream sediment nutrient processes. Subwatersheds with agricultural land consisting of more natural land cover had lower surface water nitrate concentrations and higher denitrification enzyme activity than subwatersheds with less alternative cover. This indicates that best management practices implemented in the Fox River watershed that restore natural land cover can improve water quality through nitrogen removal on the agricultural landscape and in the river network. Best management practices are not having the same measurable effects on phosphorus in the river network, most likely due to legacy phosphorus stored in the sediment.
Key Points
Structural equation modeling of the Fox River Basin illustrates direct land use effects on river channel sediment nutrient dynamics
Agricultural best management practices that restore natural land cover have a small differential effect on sediment nutrient dynamics
Future scenarios modeling suggests current land management actions have a minimal effect on sediment nutrient dynamics</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Base flow</subject><subject>Best management practices</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>Enzyme activity</subject><subject>Fluvial sediments</subject><subject>Fox River Basin</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use effects</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Multivariate statistical analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>phosphorus retention</subject><subject>resilience</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Retention capacity</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>sediment nutrient dynamics</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqzh8QcOto3plZSqlWqA9aS5dDmtzRlOlMTTJK_71T6sKVq3sXH-fAQeiSkhtKWHHLCC2WM8KUkvIIDWghRKYLzY_RgBDBM8oLfYrOYlwTQoVUeoC2U9M4vIiAx1UFNkXcNngOzm-gSfi5S8Hvn9fQWogRIvYNNngC5svXO_zUOl95cHhpEoT4Afso37zjeQqdTV0wNR5_dib5PrXHUMdzdFKZOsLF7x2ixf34bTTJpi8Pj6O7aWY4JyozOa-AKC3AKeqMEVbLamW5MEJQC8TZ1crZvMilrMiqyHNNhVY8J5LqwgnDh-jqkLsN7WcHMZXrtgtNX1kywbRkWinWq-uDsqGNMUBVboPfmLArKSn3m5Z_N-05P_BvX8PuX1suZ6MZE5oo_gMg-Xi3</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Kreiling, R. M.</creator><creator>Thoms, M. C.</creator><creator>Bartsch, L. A.</creator><creator>Larson, J. H.</creator><creator>Christensen, V. G.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-4845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4166-7461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9295-4156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-9758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-0476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models</title><author>Kreiling, R. M. ; Thoms, M. C. ; Bartsch, L. A. ; Larson, J. H. ; Christensen, V. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Base flow</topic><topic>Best management practices</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>Enzyme activity</topic><topic>Fluvial sediments</topic><topic>Fox River Basin</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use effects</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Multivariate statistical analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>phosphorus retention</topic><topic>resilience</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Retention capacity</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>sediment nutrient dynamics</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kreiling, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoms, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, V. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kreiling, R. M.</au><au>Thoms, M. C.</au><au>Bartsch, L. A.</au><au>Larson, J. H.</au><au>Christensen, V. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Contemporary land use can affect sediment nutrient processes in rivers draining heavily modified watersheds; however, studies linking land use to sediment nutrient processes in large river networks are limited. In this study, we developed and evaluated structural equation models for denitrification and phosphorus retention capacity to determine direct and indirect linkages between current land use and sediment nutrient processes during base flow in the Fox River watershed, WI, USA. A large spatial‐scale dataset used for this study included sediment nitrogen and phosphorus retention measurements and land use information for 106 sites. The structural equation models for the Fox River watershed identified direct links between current land use and in‐stream sediment nutrient processes. Subwatersheds with agricultural land consisting of more natural land cover had lower surface water nitrate concentrations and higher denitrification enzyme activity than subwatersheds with less alternative cover. This indicates that best management practices implemented in the Fox River watershed that restore natural land cover can improve water quality through nitrogen removal on the agricultural landscape and in the river network. Best management practices are not having the same measurable effects on phosphorus in the river network, most likely due to legacy phosphorus stored in the sediment.
Key Points
Structural equation modeling of the Fox River Basin illustrates direct land use effects on river channel sediment nutrient dynamics
Agricultural best management practices that restore natural land cover have a small differential effect on sediment nutrient dynamics
Future scenarios modeling suggests current land management actions have a minimal effect on sediment nutrient dynamics</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019WR026655</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-4845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4166-7461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9295-4156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-9758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-0476</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2020-07, Vol.56 (7), p.n/a |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2427527662 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural management Base flow Best management practices Denitrification Drainage Enzymatic activity Enzyme activity Fluvial sediments Fox River Basin Land cover Land use Land use effects Mineral nutrients Multivariate statistical analysis Nitrogen removal Phosphorus phosphorus retention resilience Retention Retention capacity River networks Rivers Sediment sediment nutrient dynamics Sediments Structural equation modeling Surface water Water quality Watersheds |
title | Land Use Effects on Sediment Nutrient Processes in a Heavily Modified Watershed Using Structural Equation Models |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A23%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land%20Use%20Effects%20on%20Sediment%20Nutrient%20Processes%20in%20a%20Heavily%20Modified%20Watershed%20Using%20Structural%20Equation%20Models&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Kreiling,%20R.%20M.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019WR026655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427527662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3306-a83fe0674ed61daa4c75fbc34a441ce0dcbbdc89855f0b988714763805179d4a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427527662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |