Nuclear Energy Safety, Regulatory Independence, and Judicial Deference: The Case of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board of India

Research examining regulatory independence has either suggested de jure independence to be a predictor of de facto independence or suggested that the presence of de jure may not always indicate de facto independence. We study the Indian Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) to emphasize how AERB has...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Administration & society 2020-08, Vol.52 (7), p.1009-1037
Main Authors: Ram Mohan, M. P., Gopakumar, K. V., Smith, Tyson
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Courts
Decision making
Deference
Independence
Judiciary
Mapping
Nuclear energy
Safety
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Research examining regulatory independence has either suggested de jure independence to be a predictor of de facto independence or suggested that the presence of de jure may not always indicate de facto independence. We study the Indian Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) to emphasize how AERB has enjoyed de facto independence, even in the absence of de jure independence. Using “judicial deference” principle, and through a mapping of substantive court cases, the article demonstrates Indian judiciary has consistently applied deference to AERB’s decision-making process, thereby showing confidence in the nuclear regulatory regime sustained as its inception.
ISSN:0095-3997
1552-3039
DOI:10.1177/0095399719882640