Loading…
Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies
Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models....
Saved in:
Published in: | Outlook on Agriculture 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.187-203 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233 |
container_end_page | 203 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 187 |
container_title | Outlook on Agriculture |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Olum, Solomon Gellynck, Xavier Juvinal, Joel Ongeng, Duncan De Steur, Hans |
description | Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models. After searching and screening, 80 studies qualified for review. Majority (n = 30) of studies focused on farmers’ WTP for innovations in agricultural water provision or environmental and crop protection (n = 35), while the remaining studies handled crop or animal improvement innovations. Most studies were performed in developing countries, using stated preference methods for economic valuation, with 55% of the studies (n = 44) applying contingent valuation compared to 39% taking choice modeling approach. While farmers are generally willing to pay premium for improvement in agriculture technologies, WTP (WTA) depends on the innovation (system). For example, premiums ranged from about 0.125 to 2 USD/m3 of water depending on water supply (e.g. ground vs. surface water). Furthermore, the determinants of farmers’ WTP can be grouped into sociodemographic, biophysical, technological, institutional, and behavioral factors. As illustrated by relatively high WTP, the review demonstrates that farmers embrace most innovations, regardless of the context and methods applied. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0030727019879453 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429435345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0030727019879453</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429435345</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFb3LgdcR-eSzCTuSrEqFNzoOsxMT8qUNBPnJC3d-Rq-nk9iQgVBcHX4-S8HPkKuObvlXOs7xiTTQjNe5LpIM3lCJoKlMlG5UqdkMtrJ6J-TC8QNY4IroSbELkzcQsSvj09qVqHtfGhoqKhZR-_6uuujqalvmrAzo4X3dEbxgB1sB-1ohJ2HPR06e1_Xvlk3gEi7QFtzoNj1Kw94Sc4qUyNc_dwpeVs8vM6fkuXL4_N8tkycZEWXcAOps9yKTAiwmXJKZzznhbaKaQ5gTFoVvLCScelU5qzkTmQVsDyVJhdSTsnNcbeN4b0H7MpN6GMzvCxFKopUZnLgMiXsmHIxIEaoyjb6rYmHkrNyJFn-JTlUkmMFzRp-R__NfwPH_XRR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429435345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Olum, Solomon ; Gellynck, Xavier ; Juvinal, Joel ; Ongeng, Duncan ; De Steur, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Olum, Solomon ; Gellynck, Xavier ; Juvinal, Joel ; Ongeng, Duncan ; De Steur, Hans</creatorcontrib><description>Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models. After searching and screening, 80 studies qualified for review. Majority (n = 30) of studies focused on farmers’ WTP for innovations in agricultural water provision or environmental and crop protection (n = 35), while the remaining studies handled crop or animal improvement innovations. Most studies were performed in developing countries, using stated preference methods for economic valuation, with 55% of the studies (n = 44) applying contingent valuation compared to 39% taking choice modeling approach. While farmers are generally willing to pay premium for improvement in agriculture technologies, WTP (WTA) depends on the innovation (system). For example, premiums ranged from about 0.125 to 2 USD/m3 of water depending on water supply (e.g. ground vs. surface water). Furthermore, the determinants of farmers’ WTP can be grouped into sociodemographic, biophysical, technological, institutional, and behavioral factors. As illustrated by relatively high WTP, the review demonstrates that farmers embrace most innovations, regardless of the context and methods applied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-7270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-6866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0030727019879453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Contingent valuation ; Developing countries ; Farmers ; Innovations ; LDCs ; Premiums ; Sociodemographics ; Systematic review ; Water supply ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Outlook on Agriculture, 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.187-203</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2213-2210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27922,27924,27925,33223,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olum, Solomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gellynck, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juvinal, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongeng, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Steur, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies</title><title>Outlook on Agriculture</title><description>Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models. After searching and screening, 80 studies qualified for review. Majority (n = 30) of studies focused on farmers’ WTP for innovations in agricultural water provision or environmental and crop protection (n = 35), while the remaining studies handled crop or animal improvement innovations. Most studies were performed in developing countries, using stated preference methods for economic valuation, with 55% of the studies (n = 44) applying contingent valuation compared to 39% taking choice modeling approach. While farmers are generally willing to pay premium for improvement in agriculture technologies, WTP (WTA) depends on the innovation (system). For example, premiums ranged from about 0.125 to 2 USD/m3 of water depending on water supply (e.g. ground vs. surface water). Furthermore, the determinants of farmers’ WTP can be grouped into sociodemographic, biophysical, technological, institutional, and behavioral factors. As illustrated by relatively high WTP, the review demonstrates that farmers embrace most innovations, regardless of the context and methods applied.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Contingent valuation</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Premiums</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0030-7270</issn><issn>2043-6866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFb3LgdcR-eSzCTuSrEqFNzoOsxMT8qUNBPnJC3d-Rq-nk9iQgVBcHX4-S8HPkKuObvlXOs7xiTTQjNe5LpIM3lCJoKlMlG5UqdkMtrJ6J-TC8QNY4IroSbELkzcQsSvj09qVqHtfGhoqKhZR-_6uuujqalvmrAzo4X3dEbxgB1sB-1ohJ2HPR06e1_Xvlk3gEi7QFtzoNj1Kw94Sc4qUyNc_dwpeVs8vM6fkuXL4_N8tkycZEWXcAOps9yKTAiwmXJKZzznhbaKaQ5gTFoVvLCScelU5qzkTmQVsDyVJhdSTsnNcbeN4b0H7MpN6GMzvCxFKopUZnLgMiXsmHIxIEaoyjb6rYmHkrNyJFn-JTlUkmMFzRp-R__NfwPH_XRR</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Olum, Solomon</creator><creator>Gellynck, Xavier</creator><creator>Juvinal, Joel</creator><creator>Ongeng, Duncan</creator><creator>De Steur, Hans</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-2210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies</title><author>Olum, Solomon ; Gellynck, Xavier ; Juvinal, Joel ; Ongeng, Duncan ; De Steur, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Contingent valuation</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Premiums</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olum, Solomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gellynck, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juvinal, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongeng, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Steur, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Outlook on Agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olum, Solomon</au><au>Gellynck, Xavier</au><au>Juvinal, Joel</au><au>Ongeng, Duncan</au><au>De Steur, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies</atitle><jtitle>Outlook on Agriculture</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>187-203</pages><issn>0030-7270</issn><eissn>2043-6866</eissn><abstract>Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models. After searching and screening, 80 studies qualified for review. Majority (n = 30) of studies focused on farmers’ WTP for innovations in agricultural water provision or environmental and crop protection (n = 35), while the remaining studies handled crop or animal improvement innovations. Most studies were performed in developing countries, using stated preference methods for economic valuation, with 55% of the studies (n = 44) applying contingent valuation compared to 39% taking choice modeling approach. While farmers are generally willing to pay premium for improvement in agriculture technologies, WTP (WTA) depends on the innovation (system). For example, premiums ranged from about 0.125 to 2 USD/m3 of water depending on water supply (e.g. ground vs. surface water). Furthermore, the determinants of farmers’ WTP can be grouped into sociodemographic, biophysical, technological, institutional, and behavioral factors. As illustrated by relatively high WTP, the review demonstrates that farmers embrace most innovations, regardless of the context and methods applied.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0030727019879453</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-2210</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-7270 |
ispartof | Outlook on Agriculture, 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.187-203 |
issn | 0030-7270 2043-6866 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2429435345 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Agriculture Contingent valuation Developing countries Farmers Innovations LDCs Premiums Sociodemographics Systematic review Water supply Willingness to pay |
title | Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A39%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farmers%E2%80%99%20adoption%20of%20agricultural%20innovations:%20A%20systematic%20review%20on%20willingness%20to%20pay%20studies&rft.jtitle=Outlook%20on%20Agriculture&rft.au=Olum,%20Solomon&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=187-203&rft.issn=0030-7270&rft.eissn=2043-6866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0030727019879453&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429435345%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429435345&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0030727019879453&rfr_iscdi=true |