Loading…

Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies

Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Outlook on Agriculture 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.187-203
Main Authors: Olum, Solomon, Gellynck, Xavier, Juvinal, Joel, Ongeng, Duncan, De Steur, Hans
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233
container_end_page 203
container_issue 3
container_start_page 187
container_title Outlook on Agriculture
container_volume 49
creator Olum, Solomon
Gellynck, Xavier
Juvinal, Joel
Ongeng, Duncan
De Steur, Hans
description Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models. After searching and screening, 80 studies qualified for review. Majority (n = 30) of studies focused on farmers’ WTP for innovations in agricultural water provision or environmental and crop protection (n = 35), while the remaining studies handled crop or animal improvement innovations. Most studies were performed in developing countries, using stated preference methods for economic valuation, with 55% of the studies (n = 44) applying contingent valuation compared to 39% taking choice modeling approach. While farmers are generally willing to pay premium for improvement in agriculture technologies, WTP (WTA) depends on the innovation (system). For example, premiums ranged from about 0.125 to 2 USD/m3 of water depending on water supply (e.g. ground vs. surface water). Furthermore, the determinants of farmers’ WTP can be grouped into sociodemographic, biophysical, technological, institutional, and behavioral factors. As illustrated by relatively high WTP, the review demonstrates that farmers embrace most innovations, regardless of the context and methods applied.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0030727019879453
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429435345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0030727019879453</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429435345</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFb3LgdcR-eSzCTuSrEqFNzoOsxMT8qUNBPnJC3d-Rq-nk9iQgVBcHX4-S8HPkKuObvlXOs7xiTTQjNe5LpIM3lCJoKlMlG5UqdkMtrJ6J-TC8QNY4IroSbELkzcQsSvj09qVqHtfGhoqKhZR-_6uuujqalvmrAzo4X3dEbxgB1sB-1ohJ2HPR06e1_Xvlk3gEi7QFtzoNj1Kw94Sc4qUyNc_dwpeVs8vM6fkuXL4_N8tkycZEWXcAOps9yKTAiwmXJKZzznhbaKaQ5gTFoVvLCScelU5qzkTmQVsDyVJhdSTsnNcbeN4b0H7MpN6GMzvCxFKopUZnLgMiXsmHIxIEaoyjb6rYmHkrNyJFn-JTlUkmMFzRp-R__NfwPH_XRR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429435345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Olum, Solomon ; Gellynck, Xavier ; Juvinal, Joel ; Ongeng, Duncan ; De Steur, Hans</creator><creatorcontrib>Olum, Solomon ; Gellynck, Xavier ; Juvinal, Joel ; Ongeng, Duncan ; De Steur, Hans</creatorcontrib><description>Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models. After searching and screening, 80 studies qualified for review. Majority (n = 30) of studies focused on farmers’ WTP for innovations in agricultural water provision or environmental and crop protection (n = 35), while the remaining studies handled crop or animal improvement innovations. Most studies were performed in developing countries, using stated preference methods for economic valuation, with 55% of the studies (n = 44) applying contingent valuation compared to 39% taking choice modeling approach. While farmers are generally willing to pay premium for improvement in agriculture technologies, WTP (WTA) depends on the innovation (system). For example, premiums ranged from about 0.125 to 2 USD/m3 of water depending on water supply (e.g. ground vs. surface water). Furthermore, the determinants of farmers’ WTP can be grouped into sociodemographic, biophysical, technological, institutional, and behavioral factors. As illustrated by relatively high WTP, the review demonstrates that farmers embrace most innovations, regardless of the context and methods applied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-7270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-6866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0030727019879453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Contingent valuation ; Developing countries ; Farmers ; Innovations ; LDCs ; Premiums ; Sociodemographics ; Systematic review ; Water supply ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Outlook on Agriculture, 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.187-203</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2213-2210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27922,27924,27925,33223,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olum, Solomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gellynck, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juvinal, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongeng, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Steur, Hans</creatorcontrib><title>Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies</title><title>Outlook on Agriculture</title><description>Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models. After searching and screening, 80 studies qualified for review. Majority (n = 30) of studies focused on farmers’ WTP for innovations in agricultural water provision or environmental and crop protection (n = 35), while the remaining studies handled crop or animal improvement innovations. Most studies were performed in developing countries, using stated preference methods for economic valuation, with 55% of the studies (n = 44) applying contingent valuation compared to 39% taking choice modeling approach. While farmers are generally willing to pay premium for improvement in agriculture technologies, WTP (WTA) depends on the innovation (system). For example, premiums ranged from about 0.125 to 2 USD/m3 of water depending on water supply (e.g. ground vs. surface water). Furthermore, the determinants of farmers’ WTP can be grouped into sociodemographic, biophysical, technological, institutional, and behavioral factors. As illustrated by relatively high WTP, the review demonstrates that farmers embrace most innovations, regardless of the context and methods applied.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Contingent valuation</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Premiums</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0030-7270</issn><issn>2043-6866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFb3LgdcR-eSzCTuSrEqFNzoOsxMT8qUNBPnJC3d-Rq-nk9iQgVBcHX4-S8HPkKuObvlXOs7xiTTQjNe5LpIM3lCJoKlMlG5UqdkMtrJ6J-TC8QNY4IroSbELkzcQsSvj09qVqHtfGhoqKhZR-_6uuujqalvmrAzo4X3dEbxgB1sB-1ohJ2HPR06e1_Xvlk3gEi7QFtzoNj1Kw94Sc4qUyNc_dwpeVs8vM6fkuXL4_N8tkycZEWXcAOps9yKTAiwmXJKZzznhbaKaQ5gTFoVvLCScelU5qzkTmQVsDyVJhdSTsnNcbeN4b0H7MpN6GMzvCxFKopUZnLgMiXsmHIxIEaoyjb6rYmHkrNyJFn-JTlUkmMFzRp-R__NfwPH_XRR</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Olum, Solomon</creator><creator>Gellynck, Xavier</creator><creator>Juvinal, Joel</creator><creator>Ongeng, Duncan</creator><creator>De Steur, Hans</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-2210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies</title><author>Olum, Solomon ; Gellynck, Xavier ; Juvinal, Joel ; Ongeng, Duncan ; De Steur, Hans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Contingent valuation</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Premiums</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olum, Solomon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gellynck, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juvinal, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongeng, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Steur, Hans</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Outlook on Agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olum, Solomon</au><au>Gellynck, Xavier</au><au>Juvinal, Joel</au><au>Ongeng, Duncan</au><au>De Steur, Hans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies</atitle><jtitle>Outlook on Agriculture</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>187-203</pages><issn>0030-7270</issn><eissn>2043-6866</eissn><abstract>Unlike most studies that focused on specific innovations, this study systematically analyzed farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations in general. It reports willingness to pay (WTP; willingness to accept (WTA)) as a proxy for adoption, its determinants, applied methods, and statistical models. After searching and screening, 80 studies qualified for review. Majority (n = 30) of studies focused on farmers’ WTP for innovations in agricultural water provision or environmental and crop protection (n = 35), while the remaining studies handled crop or animal improvement innovations. Most studies were performed in developing countries, using stated preference methods for economic valuation, with 55% of the studies (n = 44) applying contingent valuation compared to 39% taking choice modeling approach. While farmers are generally willing to pay premium for improvement in agriculture technologies, WTP (WTA) depends on the innovation (system). For example, premiums ranged from about 0.125 to 2 USD/m3 of water depending on water supply (e.g. ground vs. surface water). Furthermore, the determinants of farmers’ WTP can be grouped into sociodemographic, biophysical, technological, institutional, and behavioral factors. As illustrated by relatively high WTP, the review demonstrates that farmers embrace most innovations, regardless of the context and methods applied.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0030727019879453</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-2210</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-7270
ispartof Outlook on Agriculture, 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.187-203
issn 0030-7270
2043-6866
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2429435345
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sage Journals Online
subjects Agriculture
Contingent valuation
Developing countries
Farmers
Innovations
LDCs
Premiums
Sociodemographics
Systematic review
Water supply
Willingness to pay
title Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A39%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farmers%E2%80%99%20adoption%20of%20agricultural%20innovations:%20A%20systematic%20review%20on%20willingness%20to%20pay%20studies&rft.jtitle=Outlook%20on%20Agriculture&rft.au=Olum,%20Solomon&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=187-203&rft.issn=0030-7270&rft.eissn=2043-6866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0030727019879453&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429435345%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1ae4cb1b2522eb56c67518197b6071eeaa4f919b3013c65cb31c25fe0843a8233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429435345&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0030727019879453&rfr_iscdi=true