Loading…

Vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to climate‐induced NPP fluctuations in the US Great Plains

The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to increasing climate variability in the US Great Plains has received minimal attention in spite of potentially adverse socioeconomic and ecological consequences. Vulnerability was assessed as the frequency and magnitude of years in which net pri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global change biology 2020-09, Vol.26 (9), p.4841-4853
Main Authors: Klemm, Toni, Briske, David D., Reeves, Matthew C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-d157f10f01f49569c32883de5076710f67d8da88091bca888457a8678b282d053
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-d157f10f01f49569c32883de5076710f67d8da88091bca888457a8678b282d053
container_end_page 4853
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4841
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 26
creator Klemm, Toni
Briske, David D.
Reeves, Matthew C.
description The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to increasing climate variability in the US Great Plains has received minimal attention in spite of potentially adverse socioeconomic and ecological consequences. Vulnerability was assessed as the frequency and magnitude of years in which net primary production (NPP) deviated >±25% from mean values, to represent major forage surplus and deficit years, for a historic reference period (1981–2010), mid‐century (2041–2065), and late‐century (2075–2099) periods. NPP was simulated by MC2, a dynamic global vegetation model, driven by five climate projections for representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5. Historically, 4–4.7 years per decade showed either NPP surpluses or deficits. The future number of extreme years increased to 5.4–6.4 and 5.9–6.9 per decade for RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively, which represents an increase of 33%–56% and 38%–73%, respectively. Future simulations exhibited increases in surplus years to between 3 and 5 years in the Northern Plains and 3–3.5 in the Southern Plains. The number of deficit years remained near historic values of 2 in the Northern Plains, but increased in the Southern Plains from 2.5 to 3.3 per decade. Historically, NPP in extreme surplus and deficit years both deviated 40% from mean NPP in all three regions. The magnitude of deficit years increased by 6%–17% in future simulations for all three regions, while the magnitude of surplus years decreased 16% in the Northern Plains and increased 16% in the Southern Plains. The Southern Plains was the only region to exhibit an increase in the magnitude of both surplus and deficit years. Unprecedented future variability of NPP may surpass the existing adaptive capacity of beef producers and adversely impact the economic viability of rangeland cattle production and ecological sustainability of rangeland resources. The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production in the US Great Plains was assessed by simulating annual NPP throughout the century with a dynamic global vegetation model. Minor changes in mean decadal NPP belie large increases in inter‐annual variability. Historically, 4–4.7 years per decade had annual NPP that varied at least ±25% from the long‐term mean, but these forage surplus and deficit years increased to 5.4–6.9 years per decade in future simulations. Greater inter‐annual variability may surpass the existing adaptive capacity of beef producers to adversely impact the economic viability, and c
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.15202
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2432407755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432407755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-d157f10f01f49569c32883de5076710f67d8da88091bca888457a8678b282d053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4ALIEisWaf0TO-4SKihIFVSCso2c2C6pXKc4jlB3HIEzchIcCuyYzRuNPr2ZeQCcYjTEsUbLshhiRhDZA31MOUtIKvh-17M0wQjTHjhqmhVCiBLED0GPEoYQ47wP3HNrnfayqGwVtrA20Eu31FY6BQutDSxlCFbDja9VW4aqdjDUsLTVWgb9-f5RuTjWCt7P59DYSLSygxpYRfBFw8UjnHotA5xbWbnmGBwYaRt98qMDsLi5fprcJrOH6d3kcpaUlFGSKMwyg5FB2KRjxsclJUJQpRnKeBbnPFNCSSHQGBdlVJGyTAqeiYIIohCjA3C-8413v7a6Cfmqbr2LK3OSUpKiLGMddbGjSl83jdcm3_j4mN_mGOVdsnlMNv9ONrJnP45tsdbqj_yNMgKjHfBWWb393ymfTq52ll_L5IHr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2432407755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to climate‐induced NPP fluctuations in the US Great Plains</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Klemm, Toni ; Briske, David D. ; Reeves, Matthew C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Klemm, Toni ; Briske, David D. ; Reeves, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><description>The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to increasing climate variability in the US Great Plains has received minimal attention in spite of potentially adverse socioeconomic and ecological consequences. Vulnerability was assessed as the frequency and magnitude of years in which net primary production (NPP) deviated &gt;±25% from mean values, to represent major forage surplus and deficit years, for a historic reference period (1981–2010), mid‐century (2041–2065), and late‐century (2075–2099) periods. NPP was simulated by MC2, a dynamic global vegetation model, driven by five climate projections for representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5. Historically, 4–4.7 years per decade showed either NPP surpluses or deficits. The future number of extreme years increased to 5.4–6.4 and 5.9–6.9 per decade for RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively, which represents an increase of 33%–56% and 38%–73%, respectively. Future simulations exhibited increases in surplus years to between 3 and 5 years in the Northern Plains and 3–3.5 in the Southern Plains. The number of deficit years remained near historic values of 2 in the Northern Plains, but increased in the Southern Plains from 2.5 to 3.3 per decade. Historically, NPP in extreme surplus and deficit years both deviated 40% from mean NPP in all three regions. The magnitude of deficit years increased by 6%–17% in future simulations for all three regions, while the magnitude of surplus years decreased 16% in the Northern Plains and increased 16% in the Southern Plains. The Southern Plains was the only region to exhibit an increase in the magnitude of both surplus and deficit years. Unprecedented future variability of NPP may surpass the existing adaptive capacity of beef producers and adversely impact the economic viability of rangeland cattle production and ecological sustainability of rangeland resources. The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production in the US Great Plains was assessed by simulating annual NPP throughout the century with a dynamic global vegetation model. Minor changes in mean decadal NPP belie large increases in inter‐annual variability. Historically, 4–4.7 years per decade had annual NPP that varied at least ±25% from the long‐term mean, but these forage surplus and deficit years increased to 5.4–6.9 years per decade in future simulations. Greater inter‐annual variability may surpass the existing adaptive capacity of beef producers to adversely impact the economic viability, and challenge ecological sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15202</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32500566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>adaptive capacity ; Animals ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Cattle ; Cattle production ; Climate ; Climate Change ; Climate variability ; Computer simulation ; ecological sustainability ; economic sustainability ; Economics ; Ecosystem ; exposure ; Extreme values ; Forecasting ; Impact analysis ; Net Primary Productivity ; Primary production ; Rangelands ; Regions ; sensitivity ; Sustainability ; Variability ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2020-09, Vol.26 (9), p.4841-4853</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-d157f10f01f49569c32883de5076710f67d8da88091bca888457a8678b282d053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-d157f10f01f49569c32883de5076710f67d8da88091bca888457a8678b282d053</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9487-0506 ; 0000-0002-3948-9574 ; 0000-0001-7733-6803</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klemm, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briske, David D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><title>Vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to climate‐induced NPP fluctuations in the US Great Plains</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to increasing climate variability in the US Great Plains has received minimal attention in spite of potentially adverse socioeconomic and ecological consequences. Vulnerability was assessed as the frequency and magnitude of years in which net primary production (NPP) deviated &gt;±25% from mean values, to represent major forage surplus and deficit years, for a historic reference period (1981–2010), mid‐century (2041–2065), and late‐century (2075–2099) periods. NPP was simulated by MC2, a dynamic global vegetation model, driven by five climate projections for representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5. Historically, 4–4.7 years per decade showed either NPP surpluses or deficits. The future number of extreme years increased to 5.4–6.4 and 5.9–6.9 per decade for RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively, which represents an increase of 33%–56% and 38%–73%, respectively. Future simulations exhibited increases in surplus years to between 3 and 5 years in the Northern Plains and 3–3.5 in the Southern Plains. The number of deficit years remained near historic values of 2 in the Northern Plains, but increased in the Southern Plains from 2.5 to 3.3 per decade. Historically, NPP in extreme surplus and deficit years both deviated 40% from mean NPP in all three regions. The magnitude of deficit years increased by 6%–17% in future simulations for all three regions, while the magnitude of surplus years decreased 16% in the Northern Plains and increased 16% in the Southern Plains. The Southern Plains was the only region to exhibit an increase in the magnitude of both surplus and deficit years. Unprecedented future variability of NPP may surpass the existing adaptive capacity of beef producers and adversely impact the economic viability of rangeland cattle production and ecological sustainability of rangeland resources. The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production in the US Great Plains was assessed by simulating annual NPP throughout the century with a dynamic global vegetation model. Minor changes in mean decadal NPP belie large increases in inter‐annual variability. Historically, 4–4.7 years per decade had annual NPP that varied at least ±25% from the long‐term mean, but these forage surplus and deficit years increased to 5.4–6.9 years per decade in future simulations. Greater inter‐annual variability may surpass the existing adaptive capacity of beef producers to adversely impact the economic viability, and challenge ecological sustainability.</description><subject>adaptive capacity</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle production</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate variability</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>ecological sustainability</subject><subject>economic sustainability</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>exposure</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>sensitivity</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4ALIEisWaf0TO-4SKihIFVSCso2c2C6pXKc4jlB3HIEzchIcCuyYzRuNPr2ZeQCcYjTEsUbLshhiRhDZA31MOUtIKvh-17M0wQjTHjhqmhVCiBLED0GPEoYQ47wP3HNrnfayqGwVtrA20Eu31FY6BQutDSxlCFbDja9VW4aqdjDUsLTVWgb9-f5RuTjWCt7P59DYSLSygxpYRfBFw8UjnHotA5xbWbnmGBwYaRt98qMDsLi5fprcJrOH6d3kcpaUlFGSKMwyg5FB2KRjxsclJUJQpRnKeBbnPFNCSSHQGBdlVJGyTAqeiYIIohCjA3C-8413v7a6Cfmqbr2LK3OSUpKiLGMddbGjSl83jdcm3_j4mN_mGOVdsnlMNv9ONrJnP45tsdbqj_yNMgKjHfBWWb393ymfTq52ll_L5IHr</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Klemm, Toni</creator><creator>Briske, David D.</creator><creator>Reeves, Matthew C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9487-0506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-9574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-6803</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to climate‐induced NPP fluctuations in the US Great Plains</title><author>Klemm, Toni ; Briske, David D. ; Reeves, Matthew C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-d157f10f01f49569c32883de5076710f67d8da88091bca888457a8678b282d053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>adaptive capacity</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle production</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate variability</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>ecological sustainability</topic><topic>economic sustainability</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>exposure</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>sensitivity</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klemm, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briske, David D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klemm, Toni</au><au>Briske, David D.</au><au>Reeves, Matthew C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to climate‐induced NPP fluctuations in the US Great Plains</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4841</spage><epage>4853</epage><pages>4841-4853</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to increasing climate variability in the US Great Plains has received minimal attention in spite of potentially adverse socioeconomic and ecological consequences. Vulnerability was assessed as the frequency and magnitude of years in which net primary production (NPP) deviated &gt;±25% from mean values, to represent major forage surplus and deficit years, for a historic reference period (1981–2010), mid‐century (2041–2065), and late‐century (2075–2099) periods. NPP was simulated by MC2, a dynamic global vegetation model, driven by five climate projections for representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5. Historically, 4–4.7 years per decade showed either NPP surpluses or deficits. The future number of extreme years increased to 5.4–6.4 and 5.9–6.9 per decade for RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively, which represents an increase of 33%–56% and 38%–73%, respectively. Future simulations exhibited increases in surplus years to between 3 and 5 years in the Northern Plains and 3–3.5 in the Southern Plains. The number of deficit years remained near historic values of 2 in the Northern Plains, but increased in the Southern Plains from 2.5 to 3.3 per decade. Historically, NPP in extreme surplus and deficit years both deviated 40% from mean NPP in all three regions. The magnitude of deficit years increased by 6%–17% in future simulations for all three regions, while the magnitude of surplus years decreased 16% in the Northern Plains and increased 16% in the Southern Plains. The Southern Plains was the only region to exhibit an increase in the magnitude of both surplus and deficit years. Unprecedented future variability of NPP may surpass the existing adaptive capacity of beef producers and adversely impact the economic viability of rangeland cattle production and ecological sustainability of rangeland resources. The vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production in the US Great Plains was assessed by simulating annual NPP throughout the century with a dynamic global vegetation model. Minor changes in mean decadal NPP belie large increases in inter‐annual variability. Historically, 4–4.7 years per decade had annual NPP that varied at least ±25% from the long‐term mean, but these forage surplus and deficit years increased to 5.4–6.9 years per decade in future simulations. Greater inter‐annual variability may surpass the existing adaptive capacity of beef producers to adversely impact the economic viability, and challenge ecological sustainability.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32500566</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.15202</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9487-0506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-9574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-6803</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2020-09, Vol.26 (9), p.4841-4853
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2432407755
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects adaptive capacity
Animals
Beef
Beef cattle
Cattle
Cattle production
Climate
Climate Change
Climate variability
Computer simulation
ecological sustainability
economic sustainability
Economics
Ecosystem
exposure
Extreme values
Forecasting
Impact analysis
Net Primary Productivity
Primary production
Rangelands
Regions
sensitivity
Sustainability
Variability
Vulnerability
title Vulnerability of rangeland beef cattle production to climate‐induced NPP fluctuations in the US Great Plains
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T23%3A19%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vulnerability%20of%20rangeland%20beef%20cattle%20production%20to%20climate%E2%80%90induced%20NPP%20fluctuations%20in%20the%20US%20Great%20Plains&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Klemm,%20Toni&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4841&rft.epage=4853&rft.pages=4841-4853&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.15202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432407755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-d157f10f01f49569c32883de5076710f67d8da88091bca888457a8678b282d053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2432407755&rft_id=info:pmid/32500566&rfr_iscdi=true