Loading…

Is the von Mises criterion generally applicable to soft solids?

The purely viscoplastic paradigm has forged the understanding of yield stress materials, leading to misconceptions associated to the set of quantities that are needed to characterize yielding transition and also to the significance of the measured quantities (Thompson et al. , 2018). The following a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soft matter 2020-01, Vol.16 (32), p.7576-7584
Main Authors: Sica, Luiz U. R, de Souza Mendes, Paulo R, Thompson, Roney L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c04dc9df12d25b104ad65ed0470e06338baab530e6834dc663927bd4df7ecc1f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c04dc9df12d25b104ad65ed0470e06338baab530e6834dc663927bd4df7ecc1f3
container_end_page 7584
container_issue 32
container_start_page 7576
container_title Soft matter
container_volume 16
creator Sica, Luiz U. R
de Souza Mendes, Paulo R
Thompson, Roney L
description The purely viscoplastic paradigm has forged the understanding of yield stress materials, leading to misconceptions associated to the set of quantities that are needed to characterize yielding transition and also to the significance of the measured quantities (Thompson et al. , 2018). The following assertions, usually taken for granted, are actually simplistic constitutive assumptions: (i) there exists a scalar that represents the yielding condition, (ii) there is a universal rule that maps the yield stress tensor onto that scalar, (iii) the von Mises yielding criterion holds (Thompson et al. , 2018). That is, these statements are not necessarily true for a general yield stress material. In the present study we investigate the yielding of seven materials in two extensional loading conditions: traction and compression. We show that the von Mises criterion does not perform well for the yielding of these materials. A new criterion that includes the third invariant of the (deviatoric) yield stress tensor is proposed to handle the differences between traction and compression values of the stress at the yielding point. Even this criterion is not able to accommodate the yielding obtained in shear loading for these materials. In this regard, the most likely scenario is that no universal criterion exists for all kinds of yield stress materials. Traction and compression experiments were performed with yield stress materials, to determine their yielding points and then check if the von Mises criterion is applicable. All the materials were shown not to yield according to this criterion.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d0sm00762e
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2435150011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2435150011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c04dc9df12d25b104ad65ed0470e06338baab530e6834dc663927bd4df7ecc1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKcX70LEm1B9adK0PQ3Zpg42PKjgLaTJq3Z0a006Yf-9mZV58_J-wIf3fXwIOWdww4Dntxb8CiCVMR6QAUuFiGQmssP9zN-OyYn3SwCeCSYHZDTztPtA-tWs6aLy6KlxVYeuCvs7rtHput5S3bZ1ZXRRI-0a6puyC6WurB-dkqNS1x7PfvuQvN5PX8aP0fzpYTa-m0dGMOgiA8Ka3JYstnFSMBDaygQtiBQQJOdZoXWRcMDwYiCl5HmcFlbYMkVjWMmH5Kq_27rmc4O-U8tm49YhUsWCJywBYCxQ1z1lXOO9w1K1rlppt1UM1E6QmsDz4kfQNMCXPey82XN_AlVrd7EX_zH8G7UQbVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435150011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the von Mises criterion generally applicable to soft solids?</title><source>Royal Society of Chemistry</source><creator>Sica, Luiz U. R ; de Souza Mendes, Paulo R ; Thompson, Roney L</creator><creatorcontrib>Sica, Luiz U. R ; de Souza Mendes, Paulo R ; Thompson, Roney L</creatorcontrib><description>The purely viscoplastic paradigm has forged the understanding of yield stress materials, leading to misconceptions associated to the set of quantities that are needed to characterize yielding transition and also to the significance of the measured quantities (Thompson et al. , 2018). The following assertions, usually taken for granted, are actually simplistic constitutive assumptions: (i) there exists a scalar that represents the yielding condition, (ii) there is a universal rule that maps the yield stress tensor onto that scalar, (iii) the von Mises yielding criterion holds (Thompson et al. , 2018). That is, these statements are not necessarily true for a general yield stress material. In the present study we investigate the yielding of seven materials in two extensional loading conditions: traction and compression. We show that the von Mises criterion does not perform well for the yielding of these materials. A new criterion that includes the third invariant of the (deviatoric) yield stress tensor is proposed to handle the differences between traction and compression values of the stress at the yielding point. Even this criterion is not able to accommodate the yielding obtained in shear loading for these materials. In this regard, the most likely scenario is that no universal criterion exists for all kinds of yield stress materials. Traction and compression experiments were performed with yield stress materials, to determine their yielding points and then check if the von Mises criterion is applicable. All the materials were shown not to yield according to this criterion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-683X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6848</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d0sm00762e</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Compression ; Criteria ; Mathematical analysis ; Tensors ; Traction ; Yield ; Yield strength ; Yield stress</subject><ispartof>Soft matter, 2020-01, Vol.16 (32), p.7576-7584</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c04dc9df12d25b104ad65ed0470e06338baab530e6834dc663927bd4df7ecc1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c04dc9df12d25b104ad65ed0470e06338baab530e6834dc663927bd4df7ecc1f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8631-6377 ; 0000-0002-7813-3028</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sica, Luiz U. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza Mendes, Paulo R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Roney L</creatorcontrib><title>Is the von Mises criterion generally applicable to soft solids?</title><title>Soft matter</title><description>The purely viscoplastic paradigm has forged the understanding of yield stress materials, leading to misconceptions associated to the set of quantities that are needed to characterize yielding transition and also to the significance of the measured quantities (Thompson et al. , 2018). The following assertions, usually taken for granted, are actually simplistic constitutive assumptions: (i) there exists a scalar that represents the yielding condition, (ii) there is a universal rule that maps the yield stress tensor onto that scalar, (iii) the von Mises yielding criterion holds (Thompson et al. , 2018). That is, these statements are not necessarily true for a general yield stress material. In the present study we investigate the yielding of seven materials in two extensional loading conditions: traction and compression. We show that the von Mises criterion does not perform well for the yielding of these materials. A new criterion that includes the third invariant of the (deviatoric) yield stress tensor is proposed to handle the differences between traction and compression values of the stress at the yielding point. Even this criterion is not able to accommodate the yielding obtained in shear loading for these materials. In this regard, the most likely scenario is that no universal criterion exists for all kinds of yield stress materials. Traction and compression experiments were performed with yield stress materials, to determine their yielding points and then check if the von Mises criterion is applicable. All the materials were shown not to yield according to this criterion.</description><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Tensors</subject><subject>Traction</subject><subject>Yield</subject><subject>Yield strength</subject><subject>Yield stress</subject><issn>1744-683X</issn><issn>1744-6848</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKcX70LEm1B9adK0PQ3Zpg42PKjgLaTJq3Z0a006Yf-9mZV58_J-wIf3fXwIOWdww4Dntxb8CiCVMR6QAUuFiGQmssP9zN-OyYn3SwCeCSYHZDTztPtA-tWs6aLy6KlxVYeuCvs7rtHput5S3bZ1ZXRRI-0a6puyC6WurB-dkqNS1x7PfvuQvN5PX8aP0fzpYTa-m0dGMOgiA8Ka3JYstnFSMBDaygQtiBQQJOdZoXWRcMDwYiCl5HmcFlbYMkVjWMmH5Kq_27rmc4O-U8tm49YhUsWCJywBYCxQ1z1lXOO9w1K1rlppt1UM1E6QmsDz4kfQNMCXPey82XN_AlVrd7EX_zH8G7UQbVk</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Sica, Luiz U. R</creator><creator>de Souza Mendes, Paulo R</creator><creator>Thompson, Roney L</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-6377</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-3028</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Is the von Mises criterion generally applicable to soft solids?</title><author>Sica, Luiz U. R ; de Souza Mendes, Paulo R ; Thompson, Roney L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c04dc9df12d25b104ad65ed0470e06338baab530e6834dc663927bd4df7ecc1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Tensors</topic><topic>Traction</topic><topic>Yield</topic><topic>Yield strength</topic><topic>Yield stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sica, Luiz U. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza Mendes, Paulo R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Roney L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soft matter</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sica, Luiz U. R</au><au>de Souza Mendes, Paulo R</au><au>Thompson, Roney L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the von Mises criterion generally applicable to soft solids?</atitle><jtitle>Soft matter</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>7576</spage><epage>7584</epage><pages>7576-7584</pages><issn>1744-683X</issn><eissn>1744-6848</eissn><abstract>The purely viscoplastic paradigm has forged the understanding of yield stress materials, leading to misconceptions associated to the set of quantities that are needed to characterize yielding transition and also to the significance of the measured quantities (Thompson et al. , 2018). The following assertions, usually taken for granted, are actually simplistic constitutive assumptions: (i) there exists a scalar that represents the yielding condition, (ii) there is a universal rule that maps the yield stress tensor onto that scalar, (iii) the von Mises yielding criterion holds (Thompson et al. , 2018). That is, these statements are not necessarily true for a general yield stress material. In the present study we investigate the yielding of seven materials in two extensional loading conditions: traction and compression. We show that the von Mises criterion does not perform well for the yielding of these materials. A new criterion that includes the third invariant of the (deviatoric) yield stress tensor is proposed to handle the differences between traction and compression values of the stress at the yielding point. Even this criterion is not able to accommodate the yielding obtained in shear loading for these materials. In this regard, the most likely scenario is that no universal criterion exists for all kinds of yield stress materials. Traction and compression experiments were performed with yield stress materials, to determine their yielding points and then check if the von Mises criterion is applicable. All the materials were shown not to yield according to this criterion.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/d0sm00762e</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-6377</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-3028</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-683X
ispartof Soft matter, 2020-01, Vol.16 (32), p.7576-7584
issn 1744-683X
1744-6848
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2435150011
source Royal Society of Chemistry
subjects Compression
Criteria
Mathematical analysis
Tensors
Traction
Yield
Yield strength
Yield stress
title Is the von Mises criterion generally applicable to soft solids?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A18%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20von%20Mises%20criterion%20generally%20applicable%20to%20soft%20solids?&rft.jtitle=Soft%20matter&rft.au=Sica,%20Luiz%20U.%20R&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=7576&rft.epage=7584&rft.pages=7576-7584&rft.issn=1744-683X&rft.eissn=1744-6848&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d0sm00762e&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2435150011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c04dc9df12d25b104ad65ed0470e06338baab530e6834dc663927bd4df7ecc1f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435150011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true