Evaluation of sensor-based field-scale spatial application of granular N to maize

Improved genetics and better management have increased maize productivity, but often at the expense of excess water and N fertilizer. Environmental concerns have prompted the development of precision technologies and associated management strategies intended to increase crop N use efficiency. This s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Precision agriculture 2020-10, Vol.21 (5), p.1008-1026
Main Authors: Evangelou, E., Stamatiadis, S., Schepers, J. S., Glampedakis, A., Glampedakis, M., Dercas, N., Tsadilas, C., Nikoli, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agriculture
Agronomy
Algorithms
Atmospheric Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
Computation
Computer Science
Corn
Economics
Excess water
Fertilizers
Field tests
Genetics
Life Sciences
Physics
Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry
Soil quality
Soil Science & Conservation
Soil water
Soils
Statistics for Engineering
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Improved genetics and better management have increased maize productivity, but often at the expense of excess water and N fertilizer. Environmental concerns have prompted the development of precision technologies and associated management strategies intended to increase crop N use efficiency. This study evaluated the effectiveness of variable-rate application (VRA) of granular N fertilizer to maize when N requirement was computed using the Holland-Schepers algorithm in field experiments conducted in central Greece from 2015 to 2017. In plot-scale trials, the algorithm applied 34–51% less in-season N, or 13–31% less total N, without any yield losses when compared to the conventional practice. An Economic Optimum N Rate was applied under field-scale conditions when the algorithm computed N rates on-the-go to guide a variable-rate spreader for spatially adjusted N rates with 1-m on-the-row precision. The VRA system delivered on average 34% less in-season N, or 24% less total N, than the farmer rate. As a result of reduced N inputs, VRA improved the agronomic N-use efficiency by 21 to 30%, decreased soil nitrate levels by 22 to 70% and increased returns over N cost by €33 to €92/ha in all trials compared to the conventional practice. These economic estimates do not include the VRA technology costs, and they also do not consider the environmental benefits arising from improving water and soil quality.
ISSN:1385-2256
1573-1618
DOI:10.1007/s11119-019-09705-2