Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap

• Published in: Learned publishing 2018-07, Vol.31 (3), p.222-229
• Main Authors: Shehata, Ahmed Maher Khafaga, Elgllab, Mohammed Fathy Mahmoud
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arab people; Behavior; Humanities; Questionnaires; Scholarly publishing; Scholars; Social sciences
• ISSN: 0953-1513; 1741-4857
• DOI: 10.1002/leap.1167

The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a study of publishing behaviour among a group of Arab scholars in social science and humanities disciplines. The paper also investigated the number of Arab scholars who are publishing in predatory journals and the reasons that drive them to select these journals to share their scholarly findings. The study adopted a mixed methods approach. Eighteen journals that were categorized as predatory journals were scanned to find the number of Arab scholars who published in them. Then, a questionnaire was sent to Egyptian and Saudi scholars as they were found to be the top Arab contributors in these journals. The questionnaire was followed by semi‐structured interviews to gain an in‐depth understanding of the publishing behaviour. The data showed that many Arab scholars prefer publishing in predatory journals as these journals are easier and faster. The results also indicate that there is a need to raise the awareness of the harm that predatory journals can cause to the scholars and how they can avoid these journals. This study was conducted with social science and humanities scholars in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. The publishing behaviour may differ in other scholarly disciplines and other Arabic countries.