Effect of acid etching on dentin bond strength of ultra-mild self-etch adhesives

Nowadays, most of the dental manufacturers claimed that ‘Universal’ or ‘multi-mode’ adhesives in self-etch technique can obtain good bonding results comparing to etch-and-rinse or selective etching application techniques. The rationale behind this study was that a multi-mode adhesive, when proven to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of adhesion and adhesives 2020-06, Vol.99, p.102567, Article 102567
Main Authors: Elkaffas, Ali A., Hamama, Hamdi H., Mahmoud, Salah H., Fawzy, Amr S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adhesive bonding
Adhesives
Bond strength
Bonding strength
Deionization
Dental materials
Dentin
Etching
Ethanol
Evaluation
Microtensile
Nanoleakage
Penetration
Resins
Restoration
Scanning electron microscopy
Self-etch adhesive
Silver nitrate
Thickness
Universal adhesive
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nowadays, most of the dental manufacturers claimed that ‘Universal’ or ‘multi-mode’ adhesives in self-etch technique can obtain good bonding results comparing to etch-and-rinse or selective etching application techniques. The rationale behind this study was that a multi-mode adhesive, when proven to be effective, would enable general practitioners to apply the adhesive using either an ‘etch-and-rinse’ or an ‘self-etch’ adhesive mode strategy, basically depending on their interpretation of what appears to be most appropriate upon examination of the actual cavity and the overall restoration conditions. This study examined the effect of acid etching on microtensile bond strength (μTBS), micromorphological patterns of resin-dentin interface using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and SEM of tracer-infused water-rich zones within the hybrid layers of ultra-mild self-etch adhesives bonded to coronal dentin. Sixty extracted permanent molars were assigned into six groups based on μTBS (n = 10). The groups were bonded with Adper single bond (SB) plus adhesive in etch-and-rinse mode and Adper easy one (EO) bond in self-etch mode as controls; Single Bond Universal self-etch (SUSe) and etch-and-rinse (SUEr); Adhese Universal self-etch (AUSe) and etch-and-rinse (AUEr). The bonded specimens were stored in deionized water for 24 h. Composite/dentin beams were prepared (1 mm2). μTBS testing was performed. Micromorphological evaluation of extra teeth from each study group was conducted using SEM, and nanoleakage (NL) was evaluated. μTBS data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and multiple comparison post-hoc tests. AUEr had the highest μTBS (p  0.05), while the μTBS for SUSe was higher than the EO control adhesive (p 
ISSN:0143-7496
1879-0127
DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102567