Carbon Dioxide Fluxes and Carbon Stocks under Conservation Agricultural Practices in South Africa

• Published in: Agriculture (Basel) 2020-09, Vol.10 (9), p.374
• Main Authors: Nyambo, Patrick, Cornelius, Chiduza, Araya, Tesfay
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural conservation; Agricultural management; Agricultural practices; Agriculture; Aridity; Biomass; Carbon dioxide; Carbon dioxide emissions; Cereal crops; Charcoal; Climate change; Conservation practices; Corn; Crop management; Crop residues; Crop rotation; Crops; Emission analysis; Emissions; Farmers; Fertilizers; Fluxes; Livestock; Moisture content; Productivity; Rain; Residues; Retention; Seasons; Soil moisture; Soil sciences; Soil temperature; Soils; Summer; Tillage; Water content; Winter
• ISSN: 2077-0472; 2077-0472
• DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10090374

Understanding the impacts of agricultural practices on carbon stocks and CO2 emission is imperative in order to recommend low emission strategies. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of tillage, crop rotation, and residue management on soil CO2 fluxes, carbon stock, soil temperature, and moisture in the semi-arid conditions in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. The field trial was laid out as a split-split-plot design replicated three times. The main plots were tillage viz conventional tillage (CT) and no-till (NT). The sub-plots were allocated to crop rotations viz maize–fallow–maize (MFM), maize–oat–maize (MOM), and maize–vetch–maize (MVM). Crop residue management was in the sub-sub plots, viz retention (R+), removal (R−), and biochar (B). There were no significant interactions (p > 0.05) with respect to the cumulative CO2 fluxes, soil moisture, and soil temperature. Crop residue retention significantly increased the soil moisture content relative to residue removal, but was not different to biochar application. Soil tilling increased the CO2 fluxes by approximately 26.3% relative to the NT. The carbon dioxide fluxes were significantly lower in R− (2.04 µmoL m−2 s−1) relative to the R+ (2.32 µmoL m−2 s−1) and B treatments (2.36 µmoL m−2 s−1). The carbon dioxide fluxes were higher in the summer (October–February) months compared to the winter period (May–July), irrespective of treatment factors. No tillage had a significantly higher carbon stock at the 0-5 cm depth relative to CT. Amending the soils with biochar resulted in significantly lower total carbon stock relative to both R+ and R−. The results of the study show that NT can potentially reduce CO2 fluxes. In the short term, amending soils with biochar did not reduce the CO2 fluxes compared to R+, however the soil moisture increases were comparable.