The case for integrating household social needs and social policy into the international family farm research agenda

• Published in: Journal of rural studies 2020-07, Vol.77, p.185-198
• Main Authors: Becot, Florence A., Inwood, Shoshanah M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural industry; Agricultural policy; Agricultural research; Comparative study; Family farms; Farm households; Farm persistence; Farms; France; Households; Housework; Needs; Safety; Social needs; Social policy; Social programs; Social safety net; United States; Well being
• ISSN: 0743-0167; 1873-1392
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.05.005

Some farm scholars have contended that agricultural policies are seldom designed with the well-being and social needs of farm households in mind, even though the challenges experienced in the farm sector directly impact the farm household. Surprisingly little is known about how farm households meet their social needs and the role of social policy in the agricultural sector. As a first step towards a holistic understanding of the interactions between social policy, farm viability, and farm persistence, we conducted a cross-national comparative document review of government-sponsored social safety net programs available to farm households in two countries on opposite sides of the social policy continuum: France and the United States. In particular, we developed a foundational framework of social safety net programs to be used in future empirical work, identified four factors that may shape farm households’ use of social safety net programs and potential consequences on family farms, and propose a research agenda to move the literature forward. By grounding our article in the farm persistence theoretical tradition, our article offers an opportunity to reframe and broaden approaches to study family farms by highlighting the critical need for understanding the ways in which institutional social supports may play a role in supporting them. •Article extend family farm literature by considering household level difficulties.•Propose a bridge between the family farm and social policy literatures.•Reframe the debate on farm families by highlighting the role institutional supports may play in farm persistence.•Develop a foundational framework of institutionalized social supports.•Outline a research agenda to study the interactions between social needs, social policy, and farm persistence.